Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Note: This thread is 2993 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
BR is very funky and plays longer IMO due to the layout. There are two par 4's there I hit 7i from the tee to avoid trouble (2 and 8). Par 3's play long too, 1 over the crud to blind green and 6 is uphill. I am going to talk to Pete about better bunker upkeep in 2015, footprint beach. I've shot -3 and +10 there, very odd course.

I was referring to Sunset in Longmont, but Bella Rosa is a curious course too. Interesting pond placement and that tree in the middle of the fifth fairway make you hit shorter clubs off the tee to increase its effective length. Some if the par fours are interesting because they almost appear drivable, but attempting to do so and missing is usually very bad for your score. Off topic, but I was actually the last person to play that course back when it was called The Missing Links right before they bulldozed it to build BR. I went on my fourth birthday the week before demolition and someone happened to be cleaning out the clubhouse and let me play.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why are we talking about courses and ratings again? Interesting, but :offtopic::beer:

At the risk of being called obsessed with TDP,  I've found on "goals" below in his blog over the past couple years. There were others, but they seemed even more haphazard than these below. Take a look, and I've got a few comments below after the last quote.

Quote: January 2013

(http://thedanplan.com/concerning-the-goals/)

Hours Stroke Average
3000 82
4000 77
5000 74
6000 ( 72
7000 70.5
8000 69
9000 68
10000 67

Quote: December 2013

(http://thedanplan.com/looking-back-at-2013-the-golfing-highs-and-lows/)

My goals are simple:  Don’t lose momentum, find new vigor and new energy and apply it daily.  Don’t allow frustration to set in.  Stay positive, learn, grow, improve, make every minute of the day quality time whether it’s on the course or at home.  Remind myself that there cannot be any regrets and live each day accordingly.  Break par, get to scratch, win an event.  Concrete that swing change, become more consistent, get faster and improve balance.  Understand my mind and body and how they are connected.  Sleep more soundly and wake with more energy.

That’s it.  Simple, straightforward goals that are mostly written out in order for me to remember to continue to push forward.

Quote: April 2014

(http://thedanplan.com/5000-of-10000-practice-hours-completed-half-way/)

To me that means my goal is to be playing in the Masters on the 10k finishing day which should be early April 2018.  Now that’s a target I can shoot for.

Quote: May 2014

(http://thedanplan.com/updated-stats-handicap-press-and-travel-plans/)

I spoke with Dr. K Anders Ericsson yesterday and he reminded me just how important keeping track of performance is.  In particular, he wanted me to find a new way to measure my current driver ability so that I can be certain that I am moving in the right direction.  He said that just noting how often I miss left, right or hit the fairway is not enough and that I need to figure out a system that measures my current level (base level as of today) and allows for regular updates as I progress.  Having the ability to measure progress is a huge part of deliberate practice.  I just need to figure out what that looks like when working with the driver in particular.....
.....
.....My current goal is to dramatically improve my tee shot game while getting my putting back.  Everything between the driver and the putter is also in for some major practice time.

Quote: January 2015

(http://thedanplan.com/a-fresh-start-to-2015/)

One outcome that I would like to hit this year is to place top 5 in a tournament.  Instead of focussing on that outcome, I will choose to work on improving my driving and putting as if I can transition from 30 percent of fairways hit to at least 50 percent by improving my driving accuracy that will translate to more fairways and more greens and if I work on getting the ball started on my line and improving my 7-15 foot putts it will lead to less putts per round and lower scores.  those are my main goals right now.

My take on all that above is that he's good at talking about goals in the abstract. He's good at talking about the importance of goals. He's good at wanting to track goals and says the right things. But in the end, it seems like the goals are just momentary flashes in his head, never to be followed up on, and never to be measured against.

He was even given specific advice by Dr Ericsson to come up with specific goals on the driver. He agreed. But nothing was ever posted that I could find.

To my knowledge, he has not ever once revisited the first quoted goal above, which was from his very own "goal guru," Stuart.  His stroke average when he gets to 4000 hours left (at the "6000" mark on the chart above) must be 72.

To me, if you are AVERAGING 72 , your handicap is now a "plus" value, right?!?! Throw out your 10 worst, and your top 10 scores for the handicap calculation are likely going to be mostly better than 72 (taking into account the difference between average and median, of course).  Dan has shot par only once so far, I believe. If I were him, I suppose I'd not want to revisit that goal from his guru, because it would indicate how far off from his own goals he really is.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
  • Upvote 2

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I like this, but. . .

My issue with Dan is that he didn't really learn enough about golf prior for his stated goal be realistic. By declaring that he is going to play the PGA Tour in 10,000 hours of training he is scoffing at all the people who've spent years teaching and learning this sport. The scoffing is how I would interpret it if I were struggling with this sport for decades like many of the players on this site, and some person stated that he knows a way to progress from a rank beginner to a professional athlete without any prior knowledge or known talent for the sport.

Imagine if I went up to Dan and stated that, "Hey, I'm going to do the Lihu Plan to be able to qualify to play the PGA Tour. The difference is that I'll meet my goals and I don't need to learn anything from you to do it, because I'm way smarter than you and can figure everything out that you've been doing for the past 4 years."

So, without any realistic expectation for success, I don't even see how he can even have a map to the finish.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is just so good.. I'm going to use it at work with my CEOs plans ;) I think Randy nailed it, with the lack of mechanism or will to follow up it track stated objectives he is just being delusional about his progress!

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To me, if you are AVERAGING 72, your handicap is now a "plus" value, right?!?! Throw out your 10 worst, and your top 10 scores for the handicap calculation are likely going to be mostly better than 72 (taking into account the difference between average and median, of course).  Dan has shot par only once so far, I believe. If I were him, I suppose I'd not want to revisit that goal from his guru, because it would indicate how far off from his own goals he really is.

He's in pretty bad shape here. Considering his tournament scores from last year... most in the mid to upper 80's, he's no where close to his goal at the 3000 hour mark much less the 6000 mark. His current handicap consists of a mixture of mostly casual rounds which he performs much better in as well as those tournament rounds where he does much worse. I'm inclined to look at his tournament scores as a better indicator of how he's doing since his ultimate goal is to end up playing professional tournament golf. I was really cheering him on at first but its not looking good at all. :no:

IN MY BAG
Driver: Taylormade SLDR Mini Driver
3 Wood: Calloway RAZR Hawk
Hybrid: Ping 19*
Irons: Mizuno JPX 825
Wedges: 52, 56 Cleveland
Putter: Odyssey White Ice

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

One thing to realize is how gifted professional athletes really are at their game. Dan can put his 10,000 hours in. Any of us can put in 10,000 hours and not make it. We could have started at 9 years old and worked our butts off through our 20s and not made it. If you look at the field and how many teaching pros there are out of all the people who play golf the number is pretty small. When you go to the regional tours the number gets smaller. Then when you go to the major tour where the legends play the number is tiny.

Being a good amateur and being a good pro are two entirely different things. The legends are essentially freaks of nature. It's not just practice and dedication that got them where they are. They have  natural ability that none of us will ever have.

We have these in the music world. I know too many phenomenal classical performers who never made the big time because the requirements are so tight and pool of those who can meet those requirements is so tiny. They're still professionals, teaching in universities, and performing locally. Others ended up in day jobs because they didn't get PhDs.

Dan is trying to do this on practice and dedication, and while I applaud him on that, he doesn't stand a chance. He's showed his determination, but he's showing he doesn't have the gift. I hope he proves me wrong.

Another thought: Which tee is he using for his HC? White? Blue? Black? The blacks are a lot longer. Example: our local muni - whites: 6278; blacks: 7083. The course can play 7300 with back positions acc'd to the groundskeeper.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Dan is trying to do this on practice and dedication...

Not sure I agree with the dedication part.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My take on all that above is that he's good at talking about goals in the abstract. He's good at talking about the importance of goals. He's good at wanting to track goals and says the right things. But in the end, it seems like the goals are just momentary flashes in his head, never to be followed up on, and never to be measured against.

He was even given specific advice by Dr Ericsson to come up with specific goals on the driver. He agreed. But nothing was ever posted that I could find.

To my knowledge, he has not ever once revisited the first quoted goal above, which was from his very own "goal guru," Stuart.  His stroke average when he gets to 4000 hours left (at the "6000" mark on the chart above) must be 72.

To me, if you are AVERAGING 72, your handicap is now a "plus" value, right?!?! Throw out your 10 worst, and your top 10 scores for the handicap calculation are likely going to be mostly better than 72 (taking into account the difference between average and median, of course).  Dan has shot par only once so far, I believe. If I were him, I suppose I'd not want to revisit that goal from his guru, because it would indicate how far off from his own goals he really is.

This is interesting, this is exactly how I think Dan views his swing. He's said a few times that he's "making swing changes" but yet his swing doesn't look much different.


Posted

Not sure I agree with the dedication part.


Nor do I.

He is dedicated to being flown around the world, playing with good players who obviously don't know much about him, being interviewed and living in a fantasy world.

He loves looking the part and talking then talk, but the more I see him with his hideous swagger and manner of speech, the more I think that he is certifiable.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

Nor do I.

He is dedicated to being flown around the world, playing with good players who obviously don't know much about him, being interviewed and living in a fantasy world.

He loves looking the part and talking then talk, but the more I see him with his hideous swagger and manner of speech, the more I think that he is certifiable.

Seriously.

It seems like he'd be the type of person who would enjoy being a reality TV performer or a top tier athlete.

His best bet at this point for what it seems he wants is to parlay this into something dealing with reality tv because he's never going to be a top tier athlete.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by RFKFREAK

Not sure I agree with the dedication part.

Nor do I.

He is dedicated to being flown around the world, playing with good players who obviously don't know much about him, being interviewed and living in a fantasy world.

He loves looking the part and talking then talk, but the more I see him with his hideous swagger and manner of speech, the more I think that he is certifiable.

This isn't around the world, but getting about:

:offtopic:

OK, the word gamer. Gamer clubs. From some of those I've talked to here, it's not used much. But I do see it used among Twitter in the golf industry accounts. What's the Urban Dictionary aspect of this term. Is it tacky? Is it "cool"? I don't hear the term a lot among golfers in my area.

Yo, I game these gamers. Peace out! I dunno, I guess I would say the clubs/woods/putter I put/use in play/tournaments. My primary set?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by RFKFREAK

Not sure I agree with the dedication part.

Nor do I.

He is dedicated to being flown around the world, playing with good players who obviously don't know much about him, being interviewed and living in a fantasy world.

He loves looking the part and talking then talk, but the more I see him with his hideous swagger and manner of speech, the more I think that he is certifiable.

Needed to rummage through the video again, and I see where you get this now. His comment that Kota is " a step above where I am now". I can picture you saying with an Australian accent in Paul Hogan's voice "Pompous a$$" :-D

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This is not how I pictued the Dan Plan to play out at all. I thought that Dan would struggle for quite a while at first and then progress quite quickly to about a 4 handicap. The main difference though is that I thought his swing would look very good on video and he would hit a wall of sorts trying to figure out how to get down to scratch and have lots of people comment something like "well your swing is pretty good, you should be able to shoot lowered then that"

Posted

This is not how I pictued the Dan Plan to play out at all. I thought that Dan would struggle for quite a while at first and then progress quite quickly to about a 4 handicap. The main difference though is that I thought his swing would look very good on video and he would hit a wall of sorts trying to figure out how to get down to scratch and have lots of people comment something like "well your swing is pretty good, you should be able to shoot lowered then that"

I think it's just that "twitchy" thing he does at the end of his swing that makes it look pretty stupid. If he just swung then stopped twitching around after his swing, it doesn't really look all that bad to me.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm not an instructor but it doesn't look good at all. I think iacas said above that he doesn't turn but also he has no power and his sequencing is all weid. I'd bet he hits it no where and I can see how he has so many problems with his driver with that flat whips action.

Note: This thread is 2993 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.