Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is shaping the ball overrated


Note: This thread is 4983 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just following on from the "ball flight laws"thread. When I first started learning the game, i went through all stages of development like learning why I'm suddenly slicing, ooops there's a duck hook. ya know all that basic stuff about your swing and then my coach decided one day to try to teach me the value of shaping my shots into the green. And yep I believed him. It took me too many years to work out that shaping is a wank........unless your game is that complete and that polished that adding shaping is icing on the cake .....I'm talking competition winning pros.....anyone else don;'t bother. The problem I reckon is people see pro's doing it and they think it's another hurdle that must be jumped in order to to go to some next level of golf. Pros have got alot to answer to I reckon. Ordinary folks, you know like most golfers on this forum shouldn't be trying alot things that the pros use. Here's a couple to kick off. Driver lofts: how many punters like me are trying to hit 8,9,or 10.5 drivers. That's a joke, most peeps would hit a 14 or 16 degree driver the same length as their Pro style driver .....and improve their fairway position immensely......improve their score......enjoy their game more. OK another one....... 60 and 64 degree wedges. That's insane!!! just because Darren Clarke's got a 60 degree in his bag doe not mean hackers like us should even think about it. Golfers should be realistic, and use the equipment and techniques that will make our games better...

Taking the above advice may lead to destruction of your golf game. Laughing at it may reduce stress.


  • Moderator
Posted

I think knowing your typical ball flight shape is important.  And being able to hit fade or hook to get out of trouble is a good skill to learn.  I do  agree that it is the next level up to be strategizing your ball shape if you can not do it consistently.

However, we improve by trying and practicing things that are out of our comfort zone.  If you want to improve, you must keep working at it.  If you are happy at the level you are currently, then just go with what you have.

For me, I am never satisfied and always want to improve.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yes, I believe it is. For the average amateur, there is rarely a need to shape the ball from different angles to hit the right spot on the green. The main concern should be finding the green in the first place. Pros don't shape the ball as much as some think. You got some players that hit different shapes regularly, but most hit their stock ball flight shape 95% of the time. Why make things harder than needed? If you have a predictable draw, why not hit that shot all the time instead of trying something fancy? If the pin is on the right side of the green and right next to the water, just make sure you find the green. With a decent, high ball flight, the ball will pretty much stop dead with any shot shape. I use different shapes when I need to go under, over or around something in my way. If I have a clean lie and clear shot into the green, I won't try to hit a fade. I'll hit my stock push-draw. KISS. What's easier? Hitting a bunch of different shot shapes during a round or hitting the same shape over and over? Our swing is built by muscle memory. Why make it harder by trying something different all the time? If the shot demands a different shape, no problem. If it doesn't, stick with the most predictable shot you got.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yep, but just going back to the vid on the Ball flight thread(Luke Donald). So he's hitting a fade into a green with a 6 iron. So unless he's playing on rock hard Melbourne greens where nothing's going to stop or Scottish links in a down wind gale.....any 6 iron that Donald hits will stop within a couple of meters. So why not go straight at it! The thing is Donald can do it, and when it stuffs up he can recover and walk to the next hole. Golfers like me try(ed) to do it and all it does is set your game back. My point is Shaping is eye candy gobbled up by aspiring hackers......to their own detriment.

Taking the above advice may lead to destruction of your golf game. Laughing at it may reduce stress.


Posted
Having a stock fade or draw is something I would recommend. Makes it easier to take one side of the course out of play. If you hit a straight shot, you are more likely to miss both ways. With a stock draw, you'll be less likely to miss it right. Still, I'm working on a bit less in-out to make my stock draw curve less. Enough to make it a predictable right-to-left shot, but not so much that it's hurting me.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Agree with you on shaping. It would be great and speed up play if everyone learned the value of hitting a straight shot. A slight draw or fade for shaping can be done by setting the feet differently. That's good enough for most of us.

As to high lofted wedges, those with decent fundamentals can handle them.

As to drivers, agree on going to 11 degrees and up. It's easier to find the fairways.

But once again, if golfers stuck to fundamentals and a little practice and swing within themselves, the game would be more enjoyable and shorter. If some would just pick up a decent book ...

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The problem with a straight shot is its very hard to hit. It may go straight or just a bit left of just a bit right. If you are trying to take away the bunkers left of a left center pin then a nice cut at the pin with do that. I find it easier to purposely hit it one way or the other to take away trouble. Also not sure I agree with your assessment of driver lofts etc etc... Really depends on your speed and skill. I like my 60 for many things and yield it very well. Also I bought into the everyone needs more loft on their driver movement and went from a 9 to a 10.5 and my spin rates went up over 1000 rpms killing my distance. Its a very nice G15 10.5 with a aftermarket axivcore red (pureed) if you are interested. Basically new!

In the bag-

Driver- Ping Anser 9.5  Diamana Ahina
3 Wood-RBZ tour 15
Hybrid-RBZ tour 4 Irons-  Ping I20s 4-GW with soft stepped X100sWedges 58 and 54 SM4s with soft stepped X100s Putter- Ping TR Senita


Posted

problem is I hit a draw/semi-hook almost all the time ... can't fix it, so I'm learning to adjust for it.     So I typically aim right of where i want it to finish.    Problem is, the amount of hook varies from shot to shot & it's different with each club - for some reason, my 3W & hybrid  usually goes nice and straight, and my irons curve left ... last round I absolutely smoked a 3w off the tee & was aiming to the right to account for the anticipated hook (like I would for an iron shot) & just caught a tree on the edge of the fairway.   Mental lapse.    Just wish I could hit everything straight ... would simplify the game.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with both of your points. Shot shaping is nice if you can do it, but as stated above, finding the putting surface should be your first priority. It is important to know how to shape shots to get out of trouble with the most favorable outcome.

I really like what you said about the equipment tho. I hit a 9.5 pretty well, I guess. Not very far, but I don't hit a HL very far right now either. But I have a 60* and I wonder just wtf I'm doing with that thing in my bag sometimes. I pretty much strictly use it for chipping the most delicate of chips. Bubba talks about loving his 64* wedge, and that's just ridiculous for the average golfer. I hate feeling like a bad player because I can't hit a 6i 200 yards like the pros. Golfers need to know their own shapes and distances and play the game accordingly. If you reach a par 4 in 3, and one putt, I'm pretty sure that's par.


  • Administrator
Posted

Here's the deal: 95% of the shots a pro plays are their "stock" shot and shape. It might be different with the driver than the irons (some fade drivers and draw irons, or vice versa). But 95% of the time it's their stock shot, period.

Also, the stock shot of most pros, regardless of direction, curves about three yards. Almost nobody's out there really "working" the ball.

Good story about Kenny Perry playing with someone at Doral. An instructor I know wanted his student to hear these answers, so he asked Kenny Perry about how he plays golf. Kenny draws every golf ball. So he first asks "what do you do if the pin is on the right?" He says "I aim at it. If the ball doesn't curve much, I'm close. Otherwise, I'm center of the green." "What do you do if the pin is left?" Kenny says "I make birdie."

Working the ball is over-rated. When a modern pro "works" the ball it's often more about trajectory, not curve.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Zeph

Having a stock fade or draw is something I would recommend. Makes it easier to take one side of the course out of play. If you hit a straight shot, you are more likely to miss both ways. With a stock draw, you'll be less likely to miss it right.

Still, I'm working on a bit less in-out to make my stock draw curve less. Enough to make it a predictable right-to-left shot, but not so much that it's hurting me.



^ This.  You need to learn how to hit a stock fade or draw because you will always have to play the wind.  Even the pros dont hit it perfectly straight most of the time, so you need to be able to turn the ball back into the wind because trying to predict exactly how much the ball will drift in the wind is never going to make you consistent.

As Ben Hogan once said, "if you ever see me hit it straight it was an accident".

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted


Fantastic

Originally Posted by iacas

Here's the deal: 95% of the shots a pro plays are their "stock" shot and shape. It might be different with the driver than the irons (some fade drivers and draw irons, or vice versa). But 95% of the time it's their stock shot, period.

Also, the stock shot of most pros, regardless of direction, curves about three yards. Almost nobody's out there really "working" the ball.

Good story about Kenny Perry playing with someone at Doral. An instructor I know wanted his student to hear these answers, so he asked Kenny Perry about how he plays golf. Kenny draws every golf ball. So he first asks "what do you do if the pin is on the right?" He says "I aim at it. If the ball doesn't curve much, I'm close. Otherwise, I'm center of the green." "What do you do if the pin is left?" Kenny says "I make birdie."

Working the ball is over-rated. When a modern pro "works" the ball it's often more about trajectory, not curve.




Posted

I can curve the ball both ways, but I'm definitely not good enough with what I can do to go pin-hunting or put a tee ball on this side of the fairway or that. The only time I use those shots intentionally is to bend the ball around trees.


Posted


I like the profile pic, you live in Eugreen?

Originally Posted by The Recreational Golfer

I can curve the ball both ways, but I'm definitely not good enough with what I can do to go pin-hunting or put a tee ball on this side of the fairway or that. The only time I use those shots intentionally is to bend the ball around trees.




Posted

Shaping the ball is not overrated because most people learn to live with their natural ball flight and don't "shape" it.

TALKING about shaping the ball is overrated.

The only people who talk about "shaping" the ball are generally those who imagine they can do it on command. They're the ones on this forum who say "I like hitting a high draw!!!!" and stuff like that.

Bubba Watson shapes the ball like crazy, but he goes with his natural tendencies.

The Kenny Perry example was a good one.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by Shorty

Shaping the ball is not overrated because most people learn to live with their natural ball flight and don't "shape" it.

TALKING about shaping the ball is overrated.

The only people who talk about "shaping" the ball are generally those who imagine they can do it on command. They're the ones on this forum who say "I like hitting a high draw!!!!" and stuff like that.

Bubba Watson shapes the ball like crazy, but he goes with his natural tendencies.

The Kenny Perry example was a good one.



And when Bubba does shape it, sometimes he really over does it and gets himself into trouble.

I used to be able to shape the hell out of the ball... on Sega PGA Golf back in the early 1990s.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by bwdial

And when Bubba does shape it, sometimes he really over does it and gets himself into trouble.

I used to be able to shape the hell out of the ball... on Sega PGA Golf back in the early 1990s.



I LOVED the PGA Tour games on Sega. Had all of them.  Still play them sometimes because of the magic of genesis roms.  Good times.

In My Bag:
Driver: :cleveland:  Hi-Bore XLS
Irons: :cleveland:  CCi 3i-PW
Wedges: :nike:  VR V-Rev Cast Black-Satin
Putter: :ping:  IC 20-10A


Note: This thread is 4983 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 34 (14 Dec 25) - Got outside for a few moments to work on bump and runs with the 4h (again using the exaggerated weight shift reminder of the left (lead) heel). Finding that it helps keep the downswing arc extended.  
    • Wordle 1,639 4/6 🟩⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • You can try it with some lead tape first to see if it works for you.
    • Wordle 1,639 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I am currently playing a Cobra Ltdx LS 9 degree driver and Cobra Ltdx LS FW3. Both with Tensei White stock stiff shafts and original weights of 12g (heel) and 3g (toe). My miss is usually a pull fade or sometimes a slice, swing is out to in. Driver swing speed about 112 mph. Grips are stock regular. Intended change: Driver: Switching to Tensei White x-flex one inch shorter which I suppose would be 44,5? Changing heel weight to 18g. Changing grip to Golf Pride Z-grip cord midsize. Change hosel setting to standard draw. FW3: Changing heel weight to 16g (apparently not available in FW weights, but supposed to be something called "internal weight" a club builder can add which fits between the weight and the screw?). Change grip to Golf Pride Z-grip cord midsize. Changing hosel setting to standard +1. The goal is to 1) get better grip since I tend so lose grip in warm and moist conditions with the current grips and 2) mitigate the misses to start more straight with less side spin. Also considering adding the Cobra Ltdx LS FW5 instead of my old Taylormade R9 and getting 14g heel and 6g toe weights with the same grip as the others and hosel setting standard +1.   All of the above is based on conversations with ChatGPT and, as everyone knows, it can come up with pretty much whatever but I spent a few hours asking about different perspectives etc and this was the recommendation. So, my question is basically, does it make any sense?   Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.