Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Worst bunkers that you have ever played in.


Note: This thread is 4605 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm not entirely certain, but I would think that my home course would be in the top 5 of "worst bunkers in the world."  Today I hit into a bunker and had my ball come to rest up next to a rock.  I also had a pile of rocks close by my ball.  After skulling out of the bunker because the dirt plays like concrete, I tried to rake the bunker. I had to take jabs at the dirt to even move the dirt.  Luckily there are only about 15 bunkers at my home course, and they are pretty easily avoidable.  Any one else have some "fantastic" bunkers that they play with.


Posted

Hard, dried dirt.  With farm tractor tracks dried in. No sand.

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Played a course this weekend with terrible bunkers. High lips (which typically I like), but the sand played like a shot off of the cart path... felt like each sand shot would cause damage to either a club or me physically.

Posted

The 9 hole course my father is a member, fortunately only has 2 bunkers, but I think they have the sand in them from when they switched from sand greens to grass greens in the 70's and have never added sand to them since!  I think the course as one time have several more bunkers but they didn't want to mess with them so they just threw grass seed in them and turned them into grass bunkers.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted

A picture's worth a thousand words.

This trap doesn't 'look' all that bad, but my buddy Mike decided to leave a message to Golf Group, the firm which manages the course, Casselberry Golf Club outside of Orlando. This trap was unraked & like concrete. C'mon guys...how hard is it to rake the traps each morning?


Posted
Originally Posted by zipazoid

A picture's worth a thousand words.

This trap doesn't 'look' all that bad, but my buddy Mike decided to leave a message to Golf Group, the firm which manages the course, Casselberry Golf Club outside of Orlando. This trap was unraked & like concrete. C'mon guys...how hard is it to rake the traps each morning?

While I understand the sentiment, your buddy probably just screwed the next poor schlub that ends up in that particular bunker.

I'd also offer, that playing Casselberry is pretty much a self-inflicted wound.......

  • Upvote 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by David in FL

I'd also offer, that playing Casselberry is pretty much a self-inflicted wound.......

True dat. We got what we paid for, which was like ten bucks.


Posted
Originally Posted by David in FL

While I understand the sentiment, your buddy probably just screwed the next poor schlub that ends up in that particular bunker.

My thoughts exactly.

I've never experienced a bunker THAT bad but if it truly is hard like concrete couldn't you just hit a regular pitch shot?

Question: If you declare an unplayable lie in a bunker you still have to drop in the bunker correct? ie: you can't go backwards as far as you want?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

Question: If you declare an unplayable lie in a bunker you still have to drop in the bunker correct? ie: you can't go backwards as far as you want?

Correct.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

local 'cheap' course the bunkers are pretty much 75% gravel, 25% bad sand.

If the lie is rocky, I don't hit out of them, they tear up the club head pretty bad.

Was in the bunkers twice this weekend at this very place - the lies were normal, so I actually got to practice sand shots.  (good 'thump' both times - one worked out great. the other.......let's just say that par 3 (220 yard) was my only double bogie that round)

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by David in FL

While I understand the sentiment, your buddy probably just screwed the next poor schlub that ends up in that particular bunker.

And while I understand that sentiment, did he really make that trap any worse for the next person than it already was?

Now before anyone replies with 'how dare you think that way, you defaced the course' posts, think it through. Look at that bunker. How does writing that message in the rock hard sand make play any more difficult for the next person? (I might also add we were playing in the evening, so it was unlikely there were too many players behind us. But given how GG maintains their courses, that message probably stayed there for a week)


Posted
Originally Posted by zipazoid

And while I understand that sentiment, did he really make that trap any worse for the next person than it already was?

Now before anyone replies with 'how dare you think that way, you defaced the course' posts, think it through. Look at that bunker. How does writing that message in the rock hard sand make play any more difficult for the next person? (I might also add we were playing in the evening, so it was unlikely there were too many players behind us. But given how GG maintains their courses, that message probably stayed there for a week)

Given that the average Casselberry player likely has no problem rolling the ball out of one of the gouges should he end up in one, probably not......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sometimes even well maintained bunkers can still be "bad".  This is typical of the bunkers at Fossil Trace in Golden Colorado.  They are nice soft fluffly sand, but the lies and stances you get there are crazy.  And it's often so hard to get in and out of them that players simply don't bother to rake, as you can see from a few footprints in this one.  They can be a lot worse than this, with craters so deep you would need a backhoe to get your ball out of them.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

... if it truly is hard like concrete couldn't you just hit a regular pitch shot?

Yeah, I think I might be in the minority here, but I actually like - don't think I'd go so far as to say 'prefer,' but definitely like - harder bunkers like that.  Especially if we're talking fairway bunkers, because those are easy to hit out of.  If it's rock hard and you need to hit a delicate, little soft shot, maybe that's a little more difficult, but regardless, they aren't that bad.  Plus, you never have to worry about fried eggs.

Second point:  We have gotten so good (as a whole, not everybody) at being able to play out of bunkers that we've decided to start complaining about the condition of them.  I think we are forgetting that when you hit it into a bunker you are supposed to be penalized.  Whether it be because of a lip, your stance, furrows, or the type or condition of the sand, if it's something people feel is worth complaining about, then they are probably doing their job. :)

Solution:  Don't hit it in the bunker!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
All about the quality of the sand. They actually run the Deere bunker rakes every morning during the peak season at the courses I play but some are full of pebbles and rocks. There are times I don't finish holes because I'm not willing to ruin a wedge to get out of a bunker. I couldn't care less about hard or soft conditions but I'm not going to scoop a club through rocks.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

White silica sand or brown builders sand, I dont care, just have some sand in them. Of course.....Im not supposed to go in them in the 1st place

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I joined a new course last year. I call the "sand traps" dirt traps as they are simply hard pan. Imagine having to carry a 3 foot lip that's just a foot in front of your ball. Boy, there is absolutely no margin for error in terms of how far behind the ball you hit (I think 1/8th of an inch behind is what you have to do. I compare it to hitting off of a baseball infield. The funny thing is, they're accepting donations to buy sand and redo the bunkers. I think they've redone 10 of the courses 30 bunkers so far. I love the new, soft sand. Long time members of this club HATE them. They just bury the club face deep into the sand and move the ball a few feet forward. They've been playing off of dirt for so long, they need to relearn (or learn for the first time, I guess) how to hit out of a true bunker...

Posted

I've been playing a course recently where they haven't added new sand to the bunkers in at least a year.  They are like concrete . .you couldn't even scratch a message in them as in the picture above.  When you walk on them you leave no footprints.  This same course also hasn't mowed or watered thier fairways in at least 7 or 8 months.  There are a lot of bare spots and other places where the seeded out fairway grass is 7-10 inches tall . .but really sparse.  $12 bucks with a cart . .you get what you pay for.

I recently played at a pretty nice course, though, where they had sloppily added new sand to the bunkers . .it was really soft and at least 12 inches deep where I landed.  When I got to my ball there was only about a quarter-sized piece of the top showing through the sand.  I whacked absolutely as hard as I could. .and did not get out of the bunker, lol.

Feast or famine in the bunkers of South Texas.

btw - I have no problem dropping behind the bunker if it's unplayable.  What else can you do?  No big deal . .I still manage to shoot really high scores.


Note: This thread is 4605 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.