Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2578 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/7/2013 at 6:53 PM, Lihu said:

I have had my eyes on the MP53s. :-)

I just picked up a set of used MP-53's from 2ndswing for around $300.  Great condition, very new looking grips.  Highly recommend picking up a used set vs a Wally-world set (for those considering that). 

The cheaper manufactured clubs have the same issues that all cheaply manufactured goods have - quality control and materials.  These companies basically take (steal, in some cases) standard designs and then make them as cheaply as they can.  You might find that the lies are inconsistent in the set or that the materials and hardening is not as good and the lies and lofts get out of whack with use.  Stuff like that. 

With the availability of used golf clubs - I'd say there's not even a reason to buy super cheap new clubs. 

This is mostly about "major brand" clubs vs "super cheap" clubs.  I'm not talking about "2nd tier" brands that make good equipment but focus on value . .like Tour Edge (maybe - I'm not super up on brands), etc.  I think most or all of those are fine clubs. 

 


Posted
On August 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, golfingnooob said:

I know they have machines that can swing a golf club in the exact same place at the same speed using a robotic arm.

 

Has anyone ever done this with a cheap club against an expensive one? Do you think the expensive driver would go much further, or the expensive irons would be more accurate or whatever?

 

My thinking is that these companies like Ping and Callaway invest loads of money in R&D; but then the year after, other companies can just copy their clubs, and I imagine most are made the same way with the same materials. Plus these companies have to spend money on marketing, sponsorship, etc.

 

What are your thoughts?

I think it depends on why they are expensive.

Just expensive for the sake of a brand name, then of course there are no differences.

However, if they are expensive because of the materials used, or they were custom fitted to you swing style, then there will be a difference.


Posted
6 minutes ago, Rainmaker said:

I just picked up a set of used MP-53's from 2ndswing for around $300.  Great condition, very new looking grips.  Highly recommend picking up a used set vs a Wally-world set (for those considering that). 

The cheaper manufactured clubs have the same issues that all cheaply manufactured goods have - quality control and materials.  These companies basically take (steal, in some cases) standard designs and then make them as cheaply as they can.  You might find that the lies are inconsistent in the set or that the materials and hardening is not as good and the lies and lofts get out of whack with use.  Stuff like that. 

With the availability of used golf clubs - I'd say there's not even a reason to buy super cheap new clubs. 

This is mostly about "major brand" clubs vs "super cheap" clubs.  I'm not talking about "2nd tier" brands that make good equipment but focus on value . .like Tour Edge (maybe - I'm not super up on brands), etc.  I think most or all of those are fine clubs. 

I'm still thinking of getting an MP-53 or MP-54 or even an MP-25. I am totally sold on my MP-52, and would continue to use them for quite some time if I can't get a deal on the other ones. Someday, I will even be willing to pay full price on Mizuno clubs, but that needs to wait a few years yet. My kids' college is going to be pretty expensive. . .

One thing I would recommend is to change the grips. Find one that is perfect for you. It's only $40 to get them replaced by a professional, or about $25 yourself getting them in bulk.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
36 minutes ago, Lihu said:

I'm still thinking of getting an MP-53 or MP-54 or even an MP-25. I am totally sold on my MP-52, and would continue to use them for quite some time if I can't get a deal on the other ones. Someday, I will even be willing to pay full price on Mizuno clubs, but that needs to wait a few years yet. My kids' college is going to be pretty expensive. . .

One thing I would recommend is to change the grips. Find one that is perfect for you. It's only $40 to get them replaced by a professional, or about $25 yourself getting them in bulk.

I was prepared to change the grips but I like these.  They are the blue golf pride that I'm pretty sure are or where standard on some Mizuno irons . . but they've hardly been played and feel great to me . .so - bonus!


Posted
4 minutes ago, Rainmaker said:

I was prepared to change the grips but I like these.  They are the blue golf pride that I'm pretty sure are or where standard on some Mizuno irons . . but they've hardly been played and feel great to me . .so - bonus!

Bonus! That's the thing about quality clubs, they continue to look quality even when all banged up. My Mizuno clubs still look pretty nice even when I put them through my daily game.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/20/2016 at 9:04 AM, newtogolf said:

In the instances I was referring to, it wasn't the heads, but the shafts that broke.  If you're selling an entire set for $150 it's not likely being built with the best components so overall quality is going to suffer.  

I agree, but I never broke a shaft either.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Cheap or expensive sort of depends on where you purchase your club. For example, my Cobra Flyz + driver is currently selling at Dick's Sporting goods for $200 plus tax, whereas I bought it on ebay for $139 with free shipping. My Cobra Bio Cell hybrid is currently selling at Dick's for $90 plus tax, but I got it on ebay for $59 with free shipping. Basically, I saved approximately $125 by buying from ebay as opposed to Dick's. That $125 I saved will be used to buy other equipment.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, I have. The expensive ones cost more. 

  • Upvote 2

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted
On 8/6/2013 at 1:30 AM, joekelly said:

Some years ago someone took middle range cast irons, and middle range forged irons and painted them all black. No one could see any difference. Then some touring pros were asked to hit some balls. No touring pro could find any difference in performance. Nuff said?

Doesn't surprise me.

In my bag Driver: Cleveland CG tour black Fairway Woods: Diablo Octane 3 wood; Diablo 5 wood Irons: Mizuno MP53 5-9 Hybrid: Cobra 3, 4 T-Rail Wedge: 46* Cleveland, 50* Cleveland, 54* Titleist, 60* Titleist Putter: Odyssey protype #6 Ball: Maxfli U4/U6... But I'm not really picky about the ball I use.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)
On 8/7/2013 at 6:10 PM, Lihu said:

I have Cleveland CG Tour for my main "learning" club. I also have ping i10, burner 1.0 and really cheap Zevo clubs. To be honest, they all hit about the same now. I would say the the Clevelands are the easiest to hit a consistent distance with the I10 coming in a close second. The burners and the Zevo clubs could hit much farther, but I just don't like the look of the clubs. They are much easier to hit, but they look kind of big. My hybrids have the same size head as the SW on both the burner and the Zevo clubs. My two favorite clubs sets are the Clevelands and the pings. I wouldn't mind finding a second hand set of taylormade MB or CB clubs. The ultimate clubs I would like are titleist or mizuno, but they are expensive even for used clubs. It would take quite a bit for me to get a brand new set of $1000 plus clubs, perhaps I am too cheap?

I hate to bring up an old topic, but I am actually looking into getting a new set, and am by no means looking to break the bank. I just want good, quality clubs that will last a while, considering I only golf maybe 6 or 7 times a year, if lucky enough to do so, and can't justify $500+ clubs at this point. 

I have seen a Zevo z450 complete club set for under $200 on sale, and was curious if anyone has used them before and what their overall impressions on the clubs themselves were, and if they thought they were indeed a good buy for the cost. Granted, I'm not trying to come across as cheap, but if I can find good quality for under $300 that will last, then by all means, I'll look into it. I can just be leery of either non-big named brand clubs, for fear of being cheap quality and/or breaking easily. 

I've also checked out the Callaway Strata sets for around $220, but those have gotten very mixed reviews, with some claiming club heads break off and/or just aren't good enough quality to last, which is alarming from a brand like Callaway, in my opinion, of course, they aren't top of the line, but still. 

Cheers! 

Edited by pmack18

Posted
29 minutes ago, pmack18 said:

I hate to bring up an old topic, but I am actually looking into getting a new set, and am by no means looking to break the bank. I just want good, quality clubs that will last a while, considering I only golf maybe 6 or 7 times a year, if lucky enough to do so, and can't justify $500+ clubs at this point. 

I have seen a Zevo z450 complete club set for under $200 on sale, and was curious if anyone has used them before and what their overall impressions on the clubs themselves were, and if they thought they were indeed a good buy for the cost. Granted, I'm not trying to come across as cheap, but if I can find good quality for under $300 that will last, then by all means, I'll look into it. I can just be leery of either non-big named brand clubs, for fear of being cheap quality and/or breaking easily. 

I've also checked out the Callaway Strata sets for around $220, but those have gotten very mixed reviews, with some claiming club heads break off and/or just aren't good enough quality to last, which is alarming from a brand like Callaway, in my opinion, of course, they aren't top of the line, but still. 

Cheers! 

The Zevo are solid clubs, but kind of chunky. If you don't mind that they could be a good fit. I'd definitely replace the driver and woods in the set eventually.

  • Like 1

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Lihu said:

The Zevo are solid clubs, but kind of chunky. If you don't mind that they could be a good fit. I'd definitely replace the driver and woods in the set eventually.

That's good to know. I've been debating between getting this Zevo complete set, or trying to find a decent quality iron set $150 to $250, that I can use with the current driver I have. Only problem is trying to find one new that isn't poor quality, or one used that doesn't look like it's been beaten to hell and back. Gotta love it! :-)


Posted
Just now, pmack18 said:

That's good to know. I've been debating between getting this Zevo complete set, or trying to find a decent quality iron set $150 to $250, that I can use with the current driver I have. Only problem is trying to find one new that isn't poor quality, or one used that doesn't look like it's been beaten to hell and back. Gotta love it! :-)

Yeah, beginners clubs go through a lot of abuse. Try getting a used set of good clubs. There are quite a few places that have those as well.

The thing about the Zevo clubs was their lifetime warranty. I don't know if they still have it, but as a Golfsmith product they were warranted for life. I got shafts replaces and head glued on many times for free. The name brand products like TM or Callaway required shipping back to the manufacturers and could take a couple weeks.

Shop around a bit.

  • Like 1

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hands down, if you want to play your best you're better off going with a competent builder and a component brand. Reason being that the money gets to the equipment and the fitting more than it gets back to tour pros. Buying off the rack clubs doesn't help anyone except retailers because you'll keep buying and buying and buying whenever the newest comes out. 

  • Like 2

Posted

At the moment, I found and am leaning towards a Mizuno MP52, used in Very Good Condition, 4-PW Iron set, which will total roughly $170, so not too shabby at all. 

Of course it is a stiff flex, but that can always be adjusted to, and might even help my game out a little bit, can't make it any worse, that's for sure! Ha 


Posted
7 hours ago, The Club Nut said:

Hands down, if you want to play your best you're better off going with a competent builder and a component brand. Reason being that the money gets to the equipment and the fitting more than it gets back to tour pros. Buying off the rack clubs doesn't help anyone except retailers because you'll keep buying and buying and buying whenever the newest comes out. 

I like this comment!

5 hours ago, pmack18 said:

At the moment, I found and am leaning towards a Mizuno MP52, used in Very Good Condition, 4-PW Iron set, which will total roughly $170, so not too shabby at all. 

Of course it is a stiff flex, but that can always be adjusted to, and might even help my game out a little bit, can't make it any worse, that's for sure! Ha 

Actually, yes it could!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 hours ago, pmack18 said:

At the moment, I found and am leaning towards a Mizuno MP52, used in Very Good Condition, 4-PW Iron set, which will total roughly $170, so not too shabby at all. 

Of course it is a stiff flex, but that can always be adjusted to, and might even help my game out a little bit, can't make it any worse, that's for sure! Ha 

Great clubs. $170 is cheap. I love mine.

Just don't get frustrated with lower trajectories at first. This club with an S300 shaft has a notoriously low trajectory until you get your swing speed up. That said, they're really good clubs, and I think you'll enjoy them as well.

  • Like 1

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2578 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.