Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3765 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've hit that shot with a GW, PW, and 8I, and all with reasonable success - in fact I almost holed out the 8I for an eagle, just left a tap in for birdie.  I like trying different things based on how the conditions feel on a given day.  In each case I tried to make a basic explosion shot, hitting the sand about an inch behind the ball, with open stance and open clubface, swinging from about 3/4 to full swing speed.

It's a difficult shot at any time, so anything that helps a player increase his confidence when he sets up to it can't hurt.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hardest shot, almost always is the long near green bunker shot.  Most common error I see, short and fat. 

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Yeah not my most favorite shot, it's just a tough one to gauge. The 8 or 9-iron with an open face like @iacas suggested is typically a good way to go. Gives you a good chance to get the ball on the green and takes the "big miss" out of play.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I personally play the 50 yard bunker shot with a 52* gap wedge. I open up the face slightly, but not as much as in a regular bunker shot, and I take a mighty swing towards the ball aiming to take only a little bit of sand. Really it feels like I'm trying to hit almost a flop shot, since it's nearly pure contact but I'm attempting to feel like I slide the club under it. It works pretty well for me.

The shot I personally hate more is the 3/4 wedge shot from a bunker (around 80 yards or so) since it seems I always blade it clear over the green.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would either use a 9I and open the face, or take my 50 degree gap wedge and take a half to 2/3 swing and concentrate on hitting like a normal shot and taking a big sand divot after the ball.   I usually do the latter since that's what I've done for a long time.   I'm trying to work the PW and 9I type shot into it.

8 hours ago, Pretzel said:

The shot I personally hate more is the 3/4 wedge shot from a bunker (around 80 yards or so) since it seems I always blade it clear over the green.

I do the same thing.   I think it's because I get quick and really try to hit it crisply instead of trying to take a "normal" swing.  

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have had success playing with a PW. I open the face and hit behind it like a regular sand shot.  Keep in mind the lip needs to be fairly low to pull this off.  Otherwise you'd have to take a huge swing with your SW and blast it up there.  Hope this helps.


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

For 50 yard bunker shot out of fluffy sand, I would hit a 60 degree as if I were hitting it 75 yards and take a little sand before the ball, about 1/2 inch.

Out of hard wet sand it's like a cart path shot, ball first and a touch of sand after, hit it true to the number.

the key to this shot is a slightly early release, so the hit is shallow and not too descending. Smoother and slightly longer swing helps, and a little steeper plane. You have to have good swing plane to start with for these shots or the sand will grab the club or bounce it, that's why it is hard.

Please read this thread when considering swing advice from me.


Note: This thread is 3765 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.