• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dnaygs

Idea for a new type of tournament

17 posts in this topic

No holes on the green, no putting, and no score per hole.

You must hit every single fairway, and every single green in regulation, or you're out.  Last man standing wins.  How long do you think you could last?  How long do you think a pro could last?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

That would be interesting to see.

I suppose I would last about .5 holes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Kyle Anthony would be good because OB would be called a fairway hit just to make life easier for everyone to understand - and because he wasn't sure of the distinction betwen the two.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first reaction was that this seemed like a lame idea, but after thinking about it a bit more it might be pretty entertaining. If you had a group of 20 or so to start, it would be fun watching everyone hitting their pressure-packed second shots into the green with such a large "audience". Then the survivors all tee it up again at the next hole while the entourage of losers follows along.

I don't know that I'd call this a tournament, but it might be an entertaining novelty to do at the beginning or end of a season.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the odds of hitting a GIR (and only that) were 50% (they're much lower), it would be a relatively short tournament.

Start with 32.

After 1 hole, 16.

After 2 holes, 8.

After 3 holes, 4.

After 4 holes, 2.

Winner decided in five holes.


And again, that's without considering fairways hit, and giving these guys 50% GIR rates.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No holes on the green, no putting, and no score per hole.

You must hit every single fairway, and every single green in regulation, or you're out.  Last man standing wins.  How long do you think you could last?  How long do you think a pro could last?

Unless, the holes are shorter than 300 yards, this would be a game for scratch players. It's really hard to get this many GIR in a row.

Kyle Anthony would be good because OB would be called a fairway hit just to make life easier for everyone to understand - and because he wasn't sure of the distinction between the two.

It's the cat that made me laugh while reading your comment! :-$

My first reaction was that this seemed like a lame idea, but after thinking about it a bit more it might be pretty entertaining. If you had a group of 20 or so to start, it would be fun watching everyone hitting their pressure-packed second shots into the green with such a large "audience". Then the survivors all tee it up again at the next hole while the entourage of losers follows along.

I don't know that I'd call this a tournament, but it might be an entertaining novelty to do at the beginning or end of a season.

It would be too difficult for anyone to play. By the time you get the GIR it's only 2 or 3 putts at most also possibly 1.

EDIT: Erik already stated what I just wrote.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thinking back to every round I have played in my last 10 or so (my memory starts to fade beyond that), I have missed either a fairway or green on the first hole 7 of 10 times. So I guess my answer is that I likely wouldn't last past hole 1, but my upper boundary would probably be hole 3. For a professional who was having a world class ball striking day, I imagine he could make it through 6 or 7 holes, but even most pros would likely make an error well before that point.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not so sure about hitting fairways. If I can get GIRs from the first cut all day, I'll take it. If it's a short par 4 that's only bunkered (no water or OB), I'll take a green side bunker shot or pitch from the rough for eagle over laying up for a guaranteed FW hit leaving me 80 yards. To me, hitting GIRs is what really matters, not how you got there. I would rather get there from the fairway, but sometimes it can be easier to get there from the left rough if there is a tree blocking out shots from the right side of the FW.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As most have said, the concept is too difficult for most players.  If one seriously wanted to run something like this, each player would have to be given "X" number of missed fairways and greens before being eliminated.

One of the many beauties of golf is that a player does not have to be perfect off the tee or with their approach shots.  The game allows one to compensate for a weakness (driving or approaches) with a strength in another area (scrambling & putting).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played in a tournament, while visiting my parents out of town in the late fall. it went like this. You take your handicap 0-9 you allowed 80% of it, 10-15 you can take 85% 16-20 90%, 21 -30 = NO ADJUSTMENT.

lets say you are a 12 handicap, take 85%, your adjusted value is 10.2, add this to  the par for the entire round 72 + 10.2 = 83 (.2 was rounded up  as one stroke)

The purpose of the tourney is to play as FAR as you can with your strokes given to you ( 83) no gimmees, all rules are in effect. once you run out of strokes you put a tee down to mark it.

we did this one year and their were several players that ran out of strokes on the 17th hole, so who ever was closest to the pin eventually won. The guy who won it made a chip in on the par 4 16th hole,leaving him one more tee shot on 17, he crushed it and beat the next guy by15 yards. The guy who won it was a 9.

it really keeps an importance of playing steady, picking the right club, reducing errors and hitting to the center of the green.

another one I  played was a 2 man scramble, 2 teams per hole, except the opposing team picks the ball that your team will eventually play. rather than choosing your own ball to play as a team.

I like the fairway and GIR concept.There might be some holes that you hit hybrid and then 7iron.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another one I  played was a 2 man scramble, 2 teams per hole, except the opposing team picks the ball that your team will eventually play. rather than choosing your own ball to play as a team.

That type of game (worst ball scramble) is ridiculously hard. I've done a it by myself when the course was empty and you would be amazed how difficult it is to hit two good shots back to back for an entire hole. Bogey is a very solid score in such a format.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On a fairly short course with fairly wide fairways and fairly large greens, in a field of the top 200 players in the world, how many do you think would be left after 9 holes?  after 18? 27? 36?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

On a fairly short course with fairly wide fairways and fairly large greens, in a field of the top 200 players in the world, how many do you think would be left after 9 holes?  after 18? 27? 36?

Fairly short/wide/large are still relative terms. Relative to what? Typical profession setups? Typical muni courses?

Assuming you are talking about relatively easy set ups for professional courses, I would estimate the following

After 9 holes - 5 players left

After 18/27/36 holes - 0 left.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Fairly short/wide/large are still relative terms. Relative to what? Typical profession setups? Typical muni courses?

Assuming you are talking about relatively easy set ups for professional courses, I would estimate the following

After 9 holes - 5 players left

After 18/27/36 holes - 0 left.


On the other hand, the hosting course only needs to manicure the first 9 holes, and golf would be a shorter game to match America's short attention span :roll:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

First reaction was the same as Buttonda's until I recalled a pro/ am nearest the pin skins game from the late 80's/ early 90's featuring then world ranked number 1, Ian Woosnam

Woosnam won the first three holes with a degree of comfort as a player was eliminated each hole and never looked in any danger until he suddenly found himself with a pitch and run about 20 yards off the green and needing to get inside about 10ft

Suddenly a terrible situation had developed for him from seemingly nowhere and with no hint. Woosnam shanked it and got knocked out. Within a minute they were all laughing about it, but Woosnam freely admitted that of all the shots he'd ever faced in golf, he was more nervous about this one than anything that had a title or money riding on it. The reason he said was because of the opposition who he was expected to beat, and because something much more important to him was on the line - his pride. He confessed with a sense of surprise and embarrassment (as no pro likes to admit it) that he simply lost his nerve and couldn't hold it together for pressure. What he also found bewildering is how such an innocuous occasion had suddenly got to him and he hadn't been able to cope with it. He basically never saw it coming until he was required to execute the shot and the terror of the occssion suddenly dawned on him. H elooked slightly stunned not so much by his failure, or even the way he failed, but that it had generated such pressure on him

In today's age of course the competition would have to involve celebrities, dancing on ice skates, with an interlude for a cookery spot at the turn

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No holes on the green, no putting, and no score per hole.

You must hit every single fairway, and every single green in regulation, or you're out.  Last man standing wins.  How long do you think you could last?  How long do you think a pro could last?

This sounds kinda fun but yeah for a group of weekend hackers it would be over in about 10 minutes.  Playing it on an executive course would probably help some.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
    • My irons are from 1978, driver and woods from 2004 (same G5 as you)....at my current playing level, I don't feel like my clubs are holding my scores back. I will be updating my wedges to something designed this century in the near future but I'll probably regrip and keep playing my grandfather's old Eye irons a couple more years. There's something to be said about being familiar with your equipment too. The control you talk about with your driver comes from hitting a lot of balls with it and getting to know how it responds to different things. That's tough to give up considering that it could take weeks to develop that relationship with a new driver...at least that helps me cure the new toy bug and keep the wallet closed. :)
    • Hah, I was thinking the same thing when I saw that pic go up on the landing page.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries