Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dnaygs

Idea for a new type of tournament

17 posts in this topic

No holes on the green, no putting, and no score per hole.

You must hit every single fairway, and every single green in regulation, or you're out.  Last man standing wins.  How long do you think you could last?  How long do you think a pro could last?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

That would be interesting to see.

I suppose I would last about .5 holes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Kyle Anthony would be good because OB would be called a fairway hit just to make life easier for everyone to understand - and because he wasn't sure of the distinction betwen the two.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first reaction was that this seemed like a lame idea, but after thinking about it a bit more it might be pretty entertaining. If you had a group of 20 or so to start, it would be fun watching everyone hitting their pressure-packed second shots into the green with such a large "audience". Then the survivors all tee it up again at the next hole while the entourage of losers follows along.

I don't know that I'd call this a tournament, but it might be an entertaining novelty to do at the beginning or end of a season.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the odds of hitting a GIR (and only that) were 50% (they're much lower), it would be a relatively short tournament.

Start with 32.

After 1 hole, 16.

After 2 holes, 8.

After 3 holes, 4.

After 4 holes, 2.

Winner decided in five holes.


And again, that's without considering fairways hit, and giving these guys 50% GIR rates.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No holes on the green, no putting, and no score per hole.

You must hit every single fairway, and every single green in regulation, or you're out.  Last man standing wins.  How long do you think you could last?  How long do you think a pro could last?

Unless, the holes are shorter than 300 yards, this would be a game for scratch players. It's really hard to get this many GIR in a row.

Kyle Anthony would be good because OB would be called a fairway hit just to make life easier for everyone to understand - and because he wasn't sure of the distinction between the two.

It's the cat that made me laugh while reading your comment! :-$

My first reaction was that this seemed like a lame idea, but after thinking about it a bit more it might be pretty entertaining. If you had a group of 20 or so to start, it would be fun watching everyone hitting their pressure-packed second shots into the green with such a large "audience". Then the survivors all tee it up again at the next hole while the entourage of losers follows along.

I don't know that I'd call this a tournament, but it might be an entertaining novelty to do at the beginning or end of a season.

It would be too difficult for anyone to play. By the time you get the GIR it's only 2 or 3 putts at most also possibly 1.

EDIT: Erik already stated what I just wrote.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thinking back to every round I have played in my last 10 or so (my memory starts to fade beyond that), I have missed either a fairway or green on the first hole 7 of 10 times. So I guess my answer is that I likely wouldn't last past hole 1, but my upper boundary would probably be hole 3. For a professional who was having a world class ball striking day, I imagine he could make it through 6 or 7 holes, but even most pros would likely make an error well before that point.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not so sure about hitting fairways. If I can get GIRs from the first cut all day, I'll take it. If it's a short par 4 that's only bunkered (no water or OB), I'll take a green side bunker shot or pitch from the rough for eagle over laying up for a guaranteed FW hit leaving me 80 yards. To me, hitting GIRs is what really matters, not how you got there. I would rather get there from the fairway, but sometimes it can be easier to get there from the left rough if there is a tree blocking out shots from the right side of the FW.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As most have said, the concept is too difficult for most players.  If one seriously wanted to run something like this, each player would have to be given "X" number of missed fairways and greens before being eliminated.

One of the many beauties of golf is that a player does not have to be perfect off the tee or with their approach shots.  The game allows one to compensate for a weakness (driving or approaches) with a strength in another area (scrambling & putting).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played in a tournament, while visiting my parents out of town in the late fall. it went like this. You take your handicap 0-9 you allowed 80% of it, 10-15 you can take 85% 16-20 90%, 21 -30 = NO ADJUSTMENT.

lets say you are a 12 handicap, take 85%, your adjusted value is 10.2, add this to  the par for the entire round 72 + 10.2 = 83 (.2 was rounded up  as one stroke)

The purpose of the tourney is to play as FAR as you can with your strokes given to you ( 83) no gimmees, all rules are in effect. once you run out of strokes you put a tee down to mark it.

we did this one year and their were several players that ran out of strokes on the 17th hole, so who ever was closest to the pin eventually won. The guy who won it made a chip in on the par 4 16th hole,leaving him one more tee shot on 17, he crushed it and beat the next guy by15 yards. The guy who won it was a 9.

it really keeps an importance of playing steady, picking the right club, reducing errors and hitting to the center of the green.

another one I  played was a 2 man scramble, 2 teams per hole, except the opposing team picks the ball that your team will eventually play. rather than choosing your own ball to play as a team.

I like the fairway and GIR concept.There might be some holes that you hit hybrid and then 7iron.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

another one I  played was a 2 man scramble, 2 teams per hole, except the opposing team picks the ball that your team will eventually play. rather than choosing your own ball to play as a team.

That type of game (worst ball scramble) is ridiculously hard. I've done a it by myself when the course was empty and you would be amazed how difficult it is to hit two good shots back to back for an entire hole. Bogey is a very solid score in such a format.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On a fairly short course with fairly wide fairways and fairly large greens, in a field of the top 200 players in the world, how many do you think would be left after 9 holes?  after 18? 27? 36?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

On a fairly short course with fairly wide fairways and fairly large greens, in a field of the top 200 players in the world, how many do you think would be left after 9 holes?  after 18? 27? 36?

Fairly short/wide/large are still relative terms. Relative to what? Typical profession setups? Typical muni courses?

Assuming you are talking about relatively easy set ups for professional courses, I would estimate the following

After 9 holes - 5 players left

After 18/27/36 holes - 0 left.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Fairly short/wide/large are still relative terms. Relative to what? Typical profession setups? Typical muni courses?

Assuming you are talking about relatively easy set ups for professional courses, I would estimate the following

After 9 holes - 5 players left

After 18/27/36 holes - 0 left.


On the other hand, the hosting course only needs to manicure the first 9 holes, and golf would be a shorter game to match America's short attention span :roll:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

First reaction was the same as Buttonda's until I recalled a pro/ am nearest the pin skins game from the late 80's/ early 90's featuring then world ranked number 1, Ian Woosnam

Woosnam won the first three holes with a degree of comfort as a player was eliminated each hole and never looked in any danger until he suddenly found himself with a pitch and run about 20 yards off the green and needing to get inside about 10ft

Suddenly a terrible situation had developed for him from seemingly nowhere and with no hint. Woosnam shanked it and got knocked out. Within a minute they were all laughing about it, but Woosnam freely admitted that of all the shots he'd ever faced in golf, he was more nervous about this one than anything that had a title or money riding on it. The reason he said was because of the opposition who he was expected to beat, and because something much more important to him was on the line - his pride. He confessed with a sense of surprise and embarrassment (as no pro likes to admit it) that he simply lost his nerve and couldn't hold it together for pressure. What he also found bewildering is how such an innocuous occasion had suddenly got to him and he hadn't been able to cope with it. He basically never saw it coming until he was required to execute the shot and the terror of the occssion suddenly dawned on him. H elooked slightly stunned not so much by his failure, or even the way he failed, but that it had generated such pressure on him

In today's age of course the competition would have to involve celebrities, dancing on ice skates, with an interlude for a cookery spot at the turn

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No holes on the green, no putting, and no score per hole.

You must hit every single fairway, and every single green in regulation, or you're out.  Last man standing wins.  How long do you think you could last?  How long do you think a pro could last?

This sounds kinda fun but yeah for a group of weekend hackers it would be over in about 10 minutes.  Playing it on an executive course would probably help some.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon