Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
saevel25

New Scramble Format

20 posts in this topic

This is an interesting new format that I will be playing in this year.

4x2 Scramble, and here is how it works.

You have a 4 man team, but you must also pick 2-two man teams with in the 4 man group.

Tee Off: So all four players of Team 1 tee off, pick the best ball (like a typical scramble)

2nd Shot: Now the two man teams play a scramble in from this spot. So each player plays an approach shot. Team 1A will take the best shot out of their two players, and Team 1B will take the best shot out of their two shots.

How is the score determined?

Well, you take the best sub team score. So, lets say Team 1A gets a par and Team 1B gets a bogey. You would put down a zero (Even Par).

Now as a twist the 2nd team can help on the score on birdies or better. So lets say you are on a par 5. Team 1A gets a birdie (-1), and Team 1B gets an eagle (-2), your team score for that hole would be a (-3).

So you can get a bonus on good play. If one team blows up, lets say double bogey (+2), and the other team gets a birdie (-1), then the team score would be a (-1) for that hole.

I think this is an interesting twist on a scramble. I think it will lower the number of birdies, just because you have only 2 people putting. Lets say one team is out of the hole, going to get double. The other team is putting for birdie from 20 feet. Lets assume they make 10% of these. That would mean they would miss 81% of the time. A team of 4 would only miss a 20 foot putt 66% of the time. So less putts will be made, and less greens will be hit. Should be interesting to see how low the scores get.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Sound interesting.  Let us know how it goes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If they're going to go through all that, why not just play real golf?  2 low balls of the 4 or some such thing.....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If they're going to go through all that, why not just play real golf?  2 low balls of the 4 or some such thing.....

No clue, but I think they wanted to keep the scramble part, but spice it up a bit. I'll let you guys know how it works out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I like it. I will propose it for our league ending scramble.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like half way between a scramble and a shamble.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sounds like half way between a scramble and a shamble.

Yea, that was my first thought as well. Should be interesting. My group is trying to decide how to split up the two man teams right now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this is an interesting twist on a scramble. I think it will lower the number of birdies, just because you have only 2 people putting. Lets say one team is out of the hole, going to get double. The other team is putting for birdie from 20 feet. Lets assume they make 10% of these. That would mean they would miss 81% of the time. A team of 4 would only miss a 20 foot putt 66% of the time. So less putts will be made, and less greens will be hit. Should be interesting to see how low the scores get.

Generally I agree with you, but for really good golfers scores would be lower if the answer to the question below is -2 as I think it is easier to make double birdie rather than eagle for good players on many holes.

Now as a twist the 2nd team can help on the score on birdies or better. So lets say you are on a par 5. Team 1A gets a birdie (-1), and Team 1B gets an eagle (-2), your team score for that hole would be a (-3).

What if both 1 A & 1 B make birdies?  -2 or -1?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally I agree with you, but for really good golfers scores would be lower if the answer to the question below is -2 as I think it is easier to make double birdie rather than eagle for good players on many holes.

What if both 1 A & 1 B make birdies?  -2 or -1?

-2, you get to keep the good scores, so anything that is birdie or better for the 2nd group. 2nd group being, not the lowest score on the hole.

Well, even taking 4 A players, lets say who hit 50% of their GIR. Normal scramble they would hit about 94% of the greens. If you keep it at 2 players, they only hit 75% of the greens. Same with putting. There is a big drop off in ability to hit greens and make putts with only two people compared to 4 people. So I think the odds of making two birdies are less. I do think better players will go double birdie on the par 5's, but par 4's and par 3's would be a lot of pars and maybe birdies.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I play in a league with about 20 guys of varying ability. We rotate players every week trying to have each group with an A B C and D player. We have always played scrambles. Lately some have wanted to just play "real golf" and see what score they would shoot. Does anyone know how we can do that and still bet on the outcome. We're all retired and nobody has an official USGA handicap. Thanks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-2, you get to keep the good scores, so anything that is birdie or better for the 2nd group. 2nd group being, not the lowest score on the hole.

Well, even taking 4 A players, lets say who hit 50% of their GIR. Normal scramble they would hit about 94% of the greens. If you keep it at 2 players, they only hit 75% of the greens. Same with putting. There is a big drop off in ability to hit greens and make putts with only two people compared to 4 people. So I think the odds of making two birdies are less. I do think better players will go double birdie on the par 5's, but par 4's and par 3's would be a lot of pars and maybe birdies.

I agree if you are talking about players who only hit 50% of their greens.  By "really good players" I was meaning scratch and better.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play in a league with about 20 guys of varying ability. We rotate players every week trying to have each group with an A B C and D player. We have always played scrambles. Lately some have wanted to just play "real golf" and see what score they would shoot. Does anyone know how we can do that and still bet on the outcome. We're all retired and nobody has an official USGA handicap. Thanks.

You can play 2 or 4 man best ball. Another thing to look at with groups that don't have handicaps is to play a Callaway tournament. Do a Google search for the rules. It's kind of weird, but anybody regardless of their handicap could win.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can play 2 or 4 man best ball. Another thing to look at with groups that don't have handicaps is to play a Callaway tournament. Do a Google search for the rules. It's kind of weird, but anybody regardless of their handicap could win.

Thanks for the reply. We're trying to keep everyone in the group happy so we may have to get creative.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now all the cheats can claim two eagles on the par 5's. Prepare for some -25s


I think cheating is part of the rules in scrambles, I think alternate shot would be a cool twist after the tee shot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think cheating is part of the rules in scrambles, I think alternate shot would be a cool twist after the tee shot.

I saw one team once win a scramble by shooting in the 40's. It's because that team bought a lot of "string" that let you basically call your shot good if it got close enough. They bought enough that all they had to do was get within 10 feet on each hole to say that they holed out on the scorecard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I saw one team once win a scramble by shooting in the 40's. It's because that team bought a lot of "string" that let you basically call your shot good if it got close enough. They bought enough that all they had to do was get within 10 feet on each hole to say that they holed out on the scorecard.


One of my playing partners kept on, and on, and on leaving putts about 2 inches short last week. :doh:

I told him it was too bad he wasn't playing in one of those deals where you get a piece of string. Even with a foot of string he would have shot 5 or 6 strokes better. ;-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Played a tournament with a 3 foot "Magic String". Winning team shot 46. A friend played a scramble like the OP described. Four scratch golfers. Shot -31. That's a 41.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I haven't felt that way about golf yet.  However, I can relate as I had that same issue with tennis. I was a scholarship tennis player and tennis instructor.  I got so competitive that winning wasn't that much fun due to pressure and when I did lose a match it was awful.  It always felt like a high pressure job after I graduated high school. Then I discovered golf playing Tiger Woods video game.   This wonderful sport is only as competitive as you want to make it.  You can play higher pressure stroke play events and betting games with other players, or choose the low stress route of "playing against the course" and playing in scrambles only. No matter how low my handicap gets I will never play another stroke play event.  The last one I played in I shot 3 rounds in the low 80's and lost to a guy that couldn't break 90 due to his "handicap."  I said to hell with that...and I've stuck to scrambles and playing the course ever since.
    • The 3h seems like a waste of a slot (distance-wise).  If it was me, I'd ditch that one in favor of something that I could hit 205 to better fill the gap between the 3i and the driver, and get another wedge for around the green as well.
    • There are times where I feel like a bit of an oddity within the TST community, because I'm not actively working on making swing changes.  I do try to spend one short range session reinforcing basics like alignment and tempo and proper sequencing, but my course time is all about just playing.  For me, I enjoy the competition and the company of my friends, even when I play poorly.  Sure, I have more fun when I play well, but I never have a bad time at the golf course.  The biggest part of my enjoyment comes from time with my friends, good golf is just a sideshow.  Think of the time invested.  If you take 100 shots, and concentrate an entire 30 seconds on each one, that's still less than an hour.  3/4 of your time on the golf course, maybe more, is spent NOT hitting shots, enjoy that part of it. OK, I accept that you're going to continue playing as deep into the fall as you can, but you want to somehow improve your enjoyment.  What else can you change?  Can you play with different people?  Should you temporarily curtail your swing practice, and just play?  Can you somehow change your mental approach to take pressure to perform off?   It seems like you feel its your duty to continue playing, because the season will end before long, rather than playing because you look forward to it.  I have a duty to go to work, to earn my paycheck, but I play golf because I enjoy it.  To continue doing the same thing, and continue to not enjoy the time, seems pretty counterproductive to me.  So what if you take a couple of weeks off in the middle of golf season, that seems like a better choice to me than going out there and having a bad time.
    • Understood; bag makeup is all about personal preference, if something doesn't work for you there's no sense giving it a slot. I would still recommend trying out a third wedge, like a 54. Yes it's close, but that allows for a difference in bounce which is important for different lies, and also in sole grind which allows other options. You might, for instance, pick a 54 with a grind that allows you to open the clubface, allowing lob and flop shots similar to what you could do with a 60* or higher. Voila, 4 wedges (including PW) just effectively became 5, adding two more weapons to your greenside game. If you don't think playing the open flop shot is in the cards for you, consider a low- to mid-bounce 60*, again giving you additional approach options you don't have now. In this case it would be the ability to hit your normal full swing as close as 40-60 yards, and to pitch instead of chip from rough with a tight pin position. Remember that your wedges and your putter account for 2/3 of your strokes, so making the right shot up close is the best way to drop your score. The more options you have inside 80 yards that you are confident in, the better the outcome.
    • Agreed! I was just looking at the MP-4s, MP-5s and Titleist 716 MBs last night. Looking to make the transition into one of those sets after I get the chance to hit them all.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Jason141
      Jason141
      (27 years old)
    2. ngreed86
      ngreed86
      (30 years old)
  • Blog Entries