• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
boil3rmak3r

You Should Watch Your Partner's Putts Roll to a Stop

64 posts in this topic

I had 5 holes today where watching other people's putts helped me hole my own putt....

While the majority of someone else's putt will give you a general idea of the slope of the green, the last few inches of their putt will tell you exactly how the green slopes.  Therefore, if their putt ends up very near the hole, the last inch of their ball's roll will tell you where the fall line is.

I see many folks ignoring the roll of their playing partners putts and just study the line they have.  I think this is a huge mistake.  If I still have a putt left, I watch everyone's putts closely.  If it stops near the hole, I watch the last inch of the roll specifically.  I haven't taken Aimpoint yet (I hope to at some point), but think watching other people putt can give you the fall line many times.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Yea if your PP are good putters. I played with others whose putt are so badly off line with terrible pace that if gives me bad vibes watching their putts
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea if your PP are good putters. I played with others whose putt are so badly off line with terrible pace that if gives me bad vibes watching their putts

I agree.  If the putt is grossly offline with terrible pace, it doesn't tell you much.  I anyone, though, can get their ball to roll close to the hole, it tells you a lot.  Even if the putter puts sidespin on his putt for the first few feet (i.e. Billy Mayfair), if their speed is somewhat decent, the end roll of their ball should give you a great read.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had 5 holes today where watching other people's putts helped me hole my own putt....

While the majority of someone else's putt will give you a general idea of the slope of the green, the last few inches of their putt will tell you exactly how the green slopes.  Therefore, if their putt ends up very near the hole, the last inch of their ball's roll will tell you where the fall line is.

I see many folks ignoring the roll of their playing partners putts and just study the line they have.  I think this is a huge mistake.  If I still have a putt left, I watch everyone's putts closely.  If it stops near the hole, I watch the last inch of the roll specifically.  I haven't taken Aimpoint yet (I hope to at some point), but think watching other people putt can give you the fall line many times.

I think this is definitely smart, however, don't forget that most greens aren't one plane, and therefore, will have multiple fall lines.

Also, when you do take Aimpoint, you'll learn to feel the fall line/slope for your own exact putt, so there really is no reason to confuse your mind with information on somebody else's, unless it's right on your line.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this is definitely smart, however, don't forget that most greens aren't one plane, and therefore, will have multiple fall lines.

Also, when you do take Aimpoint, you'll learn to feel the fall line/slope for your own exact putt, so there really is no reason to confuse your mind with information on somebody else's, unless it's right on your line.

I didn't realize there were different fall lines.  I thought that a fall line was the line where a putt would be straight up hill or straight down hill.  I guess I'm wrong.  What is a fall line?

Edit:  I see that you are saying that a green isn't uniformly sloped throughout and one must account for the different slopes.  I agree.  My point is that, around the hole, you can tell a heck of a lot from closely watching others putt.  Plus, from what I've read about Aimpoint, what happens around the hole is ubber important.  If you have a putt with multiple fall lines, there is no perfect calculation for that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the majority of someone else's putt will give you a general idea of the slope of the green, the last few inches of their putt will tell you exactly how the green slopes.  Therefore, if their putt ends up very near the hole, the last inch of their ball's roll will tell you where the fall line is.

I see many folks ignoring the roll of their playing partners putts and just study the line they have.  I think this is a huge mistake.  If I still have a putt left, I watch everyone's putts closely.  If it stops near the hole, I watch the last inch of the roll specifically.  I haven't taken Aimpoint yet (I hope to at some point), but think watching other people putt can give you the fall line many times.

The last inch of the putt is the worst part to look at. Heck, the last six inches. The ball is rolling so slowly that any imperfection can cause a large amount of "wobble." Balls can easily move "uphill" during the last six inches or so of the putt, because the "micro-slopes" of the green aren't overpowered by the ball's momentum. It's easily diverted.

If you had said the last six FEET of a putt, you'd be more correct, but judging anything by the last foot of a putt is likely not all that beneficial.

Plus, from what I've read about Aimpoint, what happens around the hole is ubber important.

Not particularly, no.

Let's consider a certain 20-foot putt that breaks 32 inches. Of that 32 inches, 6 inches of break occur in the last 5 feet. In other words, five feet out from the hole, the ball is traveling at a spot six inches from the center of the cup.

So the last 25% of the putt's distance accounts for less than 19% of the putt's break.

AimPoint doesn't consider what happens around the hole über-important. AimPoint considers the entire putt über-important, and if there was a "most important" region, it's the middle of the putt (it acts as an averaging agent to help you "average" the entire putt or one "chunk" of a putt).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The last inch of the putt is the worst part to look at. Heck, the last six inches. The ball is rolling so slowly that any imperfection can cause a large amount of "wobble." Balls can easily move "uphill" during the last six inches or so of the putt, because the "micro-slopes" of the green aren't overpowered by the ball's momentum. It's easily diverted.

Absolutely. Even a billiard ball on a dead straight table can turn perceptibly as it comes to a stop......

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If I take a read off someone else's putt, it's to get a general break tendency when the slope is quite subtle.  Most of the time I'm confident in my own ability to read a green fairly well.  It's most difficult when the break is extreme so that even a good read is going to be half luck if you execute the speed well enough to hole it, or when it's so slight that it can be hard to tell if the putt is straight or has just enough break to miss the hole when aimed at the center.  The extreme break I don't normally need any help to see and read - it's right there in your face.  A two inch break in a 12 foot putt can be hard to read on an unfamiliar green no matter what method you use, so I may watch with the hope for a slight read.

Most of the time I'm watching my companions putts until they stop just because that's what I do, not for any particular reason.  Most greens don't have a constant break anyway.  It will usually vary along the course of the putt, so taking a read from the last 6 - 12 inches can give one a false read.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The guys I usually play with are such bad putters, I close my eyes when they putt. One will almost NEVER get it within 6 feet on a 20 footer coming up short. And the other will usually leave a 6-8 foot come backer on a flat 10 footer. So no help there. If I'm out as a single I will observe the others and pick out the better putter, then watch his ball- NOT HIS TECHNIQUE- as it approaches the hole or rolls past. Just as I watch MY putts going past the hole if I'm a bit bold. Makes it easier for the comebacker.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watch other people's putts and try to get what information I can from them but I only use that information as sort of a tie breaker if I'm unsure. If the person can really roll the ball I put more stock in what I'm seeing than if they have a poor roll (especially on Bermuda).

I use the information from a putt from the opposite direction from mine and on the opposite side of the hole but I put much less stock in that than I do a putt on the same line and the same direction as mine.

It's crazy for me to not use that information if I am completely unsure but there are several areas of the greens at our course where I know enough from playing them to ignore what I saw from the other side.

I'm probably much more of a "homer" than most when it comes to putting because I'm a good mechanic on rolling the ball but a fairly poor green reader until I play a course enough times to really learn the greens. In other words I wouldn't be much of a travelling player.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is definitely smart, however, don't forget that most greens aren't one plane, and therefore, will have multiple fall lines. Also, when you do take Aimpoint, you'll learn to feel the fall line/slope for your own exact putt, so there really is no reason to confuse your mind with information on somebody else's, unless it's right on your line.

I assume you have taken the Aimpoint class? If you had a 10' putt, do you think you'd be more likely to make it solely based on your Aimpoint calculations, or solely based on seeing someone else putt from a different angle to the hole (let's say your putt is from 11:00 and the other putt is from 1:00)? I'm not trying to be snarky. I am sincerely wondering which you would prefer. To me, it seems like a no brainer that I'd want to see an actual ball roll towards the hole versus using my estimated calculations.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you have taken the Aimpoint class? If you had a 10' putt, do you think you'd be more likely to make it solely based on your Aimpoint calculations, or solely based on seeing someone else putt from a different angle to the hole (let's say your putt is from 11:00 and the other putt is from 1:00)?

I'm not trying to be snarky. I am sincerely wondering which you would prefer. To me, it seems like a no brainer that I'd want to see an actual ball roll towards the hole versus using my estimated calculations.

I use both.  I'm still not that good on estimating the flatter putts, because my tendency is to try and find SOME break, and sometimes there just isn't any.  So if I already know that my putt is pretty flat and I'm going to have trouble getting a read with my feet, then I will absolutely watch somebody else's similar putt for help.

But if it's a little more "obvious" - for example, a 2 or 3% slope - then I will go with my Aimpoint read only.  My read gives me an exact spot to aim at, and all I'm going to get from watching somebody else's putt is that it curves some amount.  I won't be allowed to stand directly behind him so I can't possibly know the line he started it on, and therefore, can't figure out how much it breaks.

But, yeah, on anything that tends towards the flat, I will pay attention to other putts.  I'll have an idea that mine is pretty straight, and if I can just get a hint of break from somewhere else, then I can give myself more hole aim at by going inside right edge or something like that

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not trying to be snarky. I am sincerely wondering which you would prefer. To me, it seems like a no brainer that I'd want to see an actual ball roll towards the hole versus using my estimated calculations.

I don't think that anyone would argue that it's not helpful for an experienced golfer to watch someone else putt, especially along a line close to their own.  I think the issue lies in your suggestion that "last inch" of the putt provides a significant help.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I rely exclusively on my aimpoint read unless I am undecided on some aspect of my read.  So if I am unsure if I'm exactly at 2 or 3% and someone else's ball breaks more than I expect, I may err towards 3%.  If I see an opponent's ball diverge significantly from my read, that might give me reason to take another look at my aimpoint read, but if my aimpoint read comes back the same, I just go with it and try to block the prior putt from my memory.

I do always pay attention though--it usually just confirms my aimpoint read and gives me more confidence.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I won't be allowed to stand directly behind him so I can't possibly know the line he started it on, and therefore, can't figure out how much it breaks.

Technically you can (though it's considered against the rules of etiquette, it's only an actual rules violation if it's a partner).

I don't think that anyone would argue that it's not helpful for an experienced golfer to watch someone else putt, especially along a line close to their own.  I think the issue lies in your suggestion that "last inch" of the putt provides a significant help.

Yup.

Did my point about how the last 25% of a 20-foot putt accounted for less than 19% of the break not get any responses? Did you read it, @boil3rmak3r ? The last inch tells you nothing. The last six inches barely tell you anything at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think that anyone would argue that it's not helpful for an experienced golfer to watch someone else putt, especially along a line close to their own.  I think the issue lies in your suggestion that "last inch" of the putt provides a significant help.

Yeah, the "last inch" was probably a bit extreme. I know that imperfections in the green can cause a ball to wobble at slow speeds, but I also know that gravity affects a ball much more at slow speeds. So, maybe the better thing to say is the last foot... [quote name="dsc123" url="/t/75644/you-should-watch-your-partners-putts-roll-to-a-stop#post_1016354"]I rely exclusively on my aimpoint read unless I am undecided on some aspect of my read.  So if I am unsure if I'm exactly at 2 or 3% and someone else's ball breaks more than I expect, I may err towards 3%.  If I see an opponent's ball diverge significantly from my read, that might give me reason to take another look at my aimpoint read, but if my aimpoint read comes back the same, I just go with it and try to block the prior putt from my memory.   I do always pay attention though--it usually just confirms my aimpoint read and gives me more confidence.   [/quote] While I bet you are really good at reading greens, this mentality confuses me (along with @iacas's previous response). Most people's reviews about Aimpoint basically say that longer putts with multiple slopes is an educated guess. Most pins are located in a spot where the slope is pretty much the same within a certain radius of the hole (that radius is often 5' or more). If you have a putt within that radius, seeing another ball roll in it tells you everything you need to know. If you have a putt outside that radius, at least you know what the latter part of your putt will do. If I had a putting contest with an Aimpoint student from 5' with the stipulation that I could watch one putt roll toward the hole and they couldn't, I think I'd win most of the time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, the "last inch" was probably a bit extreme. I know that imperfections in the green can cause a ball to wobble at slow speeds, but I also know that gravity affects a ball much more at slow speeds. So, maybe the better thing to say is the last foot...

The last foot is still not super-important.

While I bet you are really good at reading greens, this mentality confuses me (along with @iacas's previous response). Most people's reviews about Aimpoint basically say that longer putts with multiple slopes is an educated guess.

So… what's the relevance of that statement (it's a highly educated guess - I can pretty much peg them to a fairly accurate spot - you just "chunk" the putt into several planar sections). AImPoint is far and away the most accurate system I've found for reading ANY putt (that's legal to use - obviously the lasers they use to map greens are even more accurate… which they used to draw the AimPoint line on Golf Channel for a few years).

If I had a putting contest with an Aimpoint student from 5' with the stipulation that I could watch one putt roll toward the hole and they couldn't, I think I'd win most of the time.

I could probably beat you. :-) Even if you got to watch my AimPoint putts (which I'd make a lot of) as your "one putt to watch."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

... but I also know that gravity affects a ball much more at slow speeds. So, maybe the better thing to say is the last foot...

Be careful here.  The golfer in me says "I know what he means" but the engineer in me says "that is dead wrong."  Gravity doesn't vary with speed.  Unless you hit the ball so hard that it comes off the ground, it's going to be affected by gravity at the exact same rate for the entirety of the putt.

I think what you mean to say is that at slower speeds, the break appears more pronounced (because it occurs over a shorter distance) and is thus a bit easier to see.

And I think 1' is still pushing the envelope a bit.  Aimpoint teaches us to hit putts 9" past the hole so as to eliminate the "wobble effect."  At a bare minimum, I think you need to be looking more at the last 2 or 3 feet, or like Erik suggested, the last 6 feet.

If I had a putting contest with an Aimpoint student from 5' with the stipulation that I could watch one putt roll toward the hole and they couldn't, I think I'd win most of the time.

LOL ... I certainly wouldn't put any money on it because you are probably right, but it would be a fun little experiment! :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Mass and Force If equal force is applied to two objects, the object with the lesser mass will have the greater resulting acceleration. Correspondingly, the object with a lesser mass will travel a greater distance over an allotted time interval. In order for two objects to travel the same distance, a greater force must be applied to the object with a greater mass. (From the Internet) This does not really speak to my interest. But when you research on a quick Internet search about greater mass striking an object, this is all you find. Maybe this is why it's hard to understand “mass” and ball striking. R.L. Welsh Should You Be Using A Heavier Golf Club?  (Again, this is from the Internet) Golfers vary. If you give Davis Love III or Brad Faxon a club which is slightly heavier than what they are used to it will noticeably throw them off. Hulk Hogan or Arnold Schwarznegger will never notice the difference. The ball will just go farther. The nature of their muscle mass is what limits their top-end swing speed. Long, loose muscles generate the most speed. Large, bulky muscles generate the most torque. Fast ball pitchers and quarterbacks are never built like tight ends and linebackers. Wayne Gretsky is surprisingly scrawny and puny looking without his shirt on, yet he was able to shoot the hockey puck with great velocity. It’s a case of John Deere versus Kawasaki. The fastest motorcycle does a terrible job hauling a lot of weight and the strongest tractor is blown away by even a dinky, little motorcycle in the quarter-mile. If you add a second, two hundred pound rider to the back of the motorcycle you will drastically reduce its zero-to-sixty speed time. Adding the same weight to the tractor will have little or no impact on its rate of acceleration. A tall, scrawny runner might easily beat a stocky, muscular decathlete in a footrace until both men are given thirty-pound backpacks to wear during the race. How do we determine the optimum weight of a golf club? Well, we know that a hummingbird smashing into a golf ball at 100 miles per hour would, just before it died, cause the ball to fly only a very short distance. We also know that a massive locomotive smashing into a golf ball at 20 miles an hour would not cause the ball to go very far either. The optimum weight/speed combination rests somewhere in between. Anyone who has hit range balls with a weighted training club has experienced the same results: that ball just does not go very far regardless of how hard the golfer tries. Golf clubs can easily be made very light. That enables them to be swung at great speed, but to little avail if the weight falls below a certain amount. A lightweight, plastic, juvenile club does even more poorly than does the weighted, training club. Finding the optimum weight combination would be simple if all humans were the same size and weight and possessed the same strength and suppleness. An Iron Byron test machine or a physics professor could decide the issue in an hour or two. Unfortunately, we all vary a great deal and manufacturers are forced to go with a general average weighting pattern. There is no one precise formula. Don’t ever let anyone tell you differently. (I think this answers my question! RLW) Many, many women and seniors labor under the misassumption that ultra-light clubs will enable them to hit the ball farther. Generally, the opposite is true. They can get the club up more easily, but when it comes down to the ball it does not have enough oomph to send the ball flying. (this is my thought when I strike the ball with my Callaway X18R long irons; However, the PW is so heavy, greater mass, I notice how easy the swing and how far the ball travels with little effort. RLW) Some companies construct their ladies’ club heads so that they are actually heavier than the male counterparts. It is the golfer who can generate high club head speeds who generally benefits most from lower head weights. Golfers with slow swing speeds are the ones who benefit most from the added authority given by extra weight both overall weight and swing weight. Unfortunately, weak and elderly golfers often do not have the strength endurance to use the heavier clubs for a complete round. Strong, muscular golfers do have ample strength endurance, however. They are the ones who should experiment with added weight. They are the ones who should try heavier shafts, heavier heads and heavier grips. There are an infinite number of combinations. Adding a few extra grams to both head and grip might be the answer. (But we have to know how to do this properly; Hence go to the Fitter RLW) The Basics of MOI Matching Your Golf Clubs By Jeff Sheets With MOI matching we are attempting to place the ideal amount of resistance into the golfer’s hands that they can control the most consistently. (ie: Heavy head weight too! I have yet to have a fitter even mention this approach. RLW ) Too much resistance and he or she will struggle to accelerate the club through impact and/or have difficulty controlling it. With too little resistance the golfer may over-swing, cast the club, or simply lack the mass in the club head necessary to maximize distance. (Eureka!!!) The objective is to identify the optimum mass distribution for the golfer (head weight, length, shaft balance, etc.) and then replicate it into every club in the set. The Auditor MOI scale for complete clubs will assign a higher value to a club that has a greater resistance to swinging. In layman's terms, the lower the complete club’s MOI, the easier it will be to swing, and vice versa. Some club-fitters may realize that the same factors that influence a complete club's MOI are identical to the factors that influence swing weight. If you have made this determination, then you are correct. Making a club longer in length makes it more difficult to swing (increased MOI), but it also increases its swing weight. Making the head lighter in weight makes it easier to swing, while at the same time it reduces its MOI. The same exact factors that influence swing weight allow us to fine-tune the precise MOI target we seek in a completed club.   My original question to Tom Wishon and suggested Local Fitter was: Is it so hard to make a 6iron 280grams club-head weight? Gentlemen, I have no criticism here for anyone. I am just trying to understand. I added the bold and underline for my emphasis to “mass” or “heavy club head.” This all seems very logical to me, even if engineers do not agree. My experience tells me my 60degree Sand Wedge takes a lot more swing than my PW with a heavy club head, to make the ball travel the same distance. This alone tells me to increase the club head weight in my longer irons to calm down my swing and send the ball a greater distance with a smooth easy swing, and a consistent strike in the 'sweet.' Maybe I should put a longer shaft on my 60 SW to see if I can go the same distance with the same easy swing as my heavy PW? I thought to ask you Makers & Builders these questions thinking perhaps it has already been tried; Or perhaps some scientific principle may prove it does or does not work. But no one has yet presented any information as to the outcome of my so-called the “theory.” In a fitting I am just pointed back towards modern conventional “theory” that the Top Ball Strikers on tour have supposedly proven: “Light is better, and longer for more speed.” (Tour players mean nothing to me and my game.) Again, desiring answers to these questions are why I would go to a Custom Club maker for help. But I am finding most makers are use to doing things a certain way; Mainly the way they have been brought up in the business, the way the current business model tells them, using the current technology which is focused on “lighter is better.” Hey, what the heck, you sell a great deal of clubs the way it is. Unfortunately this is only slightly different from “mass produced” clubs. You are still in the same camp as you can not add weight to the Club Head, nor do you think it is necessary. Food for thought: The person with no preconceived notions on how “things should be” will step out and experiment to see if there is a better way. If you would say “no” that will not work, and point to the “Pro's” and what is being mass produced does work; the truth is the public does not even know what the “Pro's” are truly playing; The public knows nothing about their clubs. So I guess I will head out to the shed and start melting lead and filling in the open cavity on the back side of my cavity backed irons. Can't hurt much. The real funny thing about all of this is that my 73 year old Aunt was telling me how she saw my Grandfather out in his work shed 40 some years ago, drilling on his irons in an attempt to add weight. I never knew this before. I guess the apple does not fall too far from the tree. He was not an avid golfer but I guess he had an idea of what might work better. Sincerely, R.L. Welsh
    • So I just played my round best yesterday and only lost 2 golf balls! Which is really good for me because the course I live on has so much water and narrow fairways. The first time I went I lost a 24 pack of laddies.... so this made me happy in the wallet to say the least haha. anyhow I'm not sure where I should spend more time practicing so I wrote down my score into 3 different sections  shots to get to pitching or chipping distance. pitching and chipping. putts.   my score was a 100 with a 45 on the front and a 55 on the back... (I smoked on the back and I blame the 10 extra strokes because of this.)  shots to chipping and pitching: 18 F 22B pitching and chipping: 9F 8B putts: 18 F 22 B Penalties: 0F 2B so in my opinion I think my distance with my long game is there I just need to work on my accuracy to lower my chips and pitches. my pitching chipping and putting all go together because I've already used my GiR so my first chip or pitch is actually counting as my first putt (if I'm going for scratch golf. my putting is horrendous because of the amount of pitching and chipping I had there should be no reason for any 3 putts at all. The only time I should 3 putt is if I hit an iron to the green. tell me what u guys think
    • Mitt Romney was slow in releasing his tax returns in 2012; when he did release them, it revealed nothing of interest, and the rumors about what he was hiding quickly fell by the wayside. In reality, the worst thing that could happen to Donald Trump in releasing his tax returns now is that they would confirm what people already assume, based on the extensive investigative reporting on his financials, his foundation, and his business connections. He doesn't have anything to lose; he's just too vain to capitulate.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries