• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
saevel25

Hockey - Orange Warning Strip?

0  

  1. 1. Orange Stripe Good or Bad!

    • Yes?
      3
    • No?
      5


Recommended Posts

saevel25    1,071

https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/does-hockey-need--warning-track--to-prevent-devastating-injuries-130606231.html

I know Hockey has been one of the few sports not to be defanged by constant rule regulations on safety.

So, to all those who watch more hockey than I do, and know more about the game. What do you think about this idea?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Golfingdad    1,850

https://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/does-hockey-need--warning-track--to-prevent-devastating-injuries-130606231.html

I know Hockey has been one of the few sports not to be defanged by constant rule regulations on safety.

So, to all those who watch more hockey than I do, and know more about the game. What do you think about this idea?

I voted "good" because I don't see how it could be bad ... however, I don't think it is necessary.  When outfielders are running to catch fly balls at the wall, they are usually looking the complete opposite direction than they are running.  Unless they have eyes in the back of their head, the warning track is all they have to let them know they are about to get smoked.

In hockey, players are never skating fast towards the wall while looking the opposite direction.  It's always in your peripheral, so you always know where it is.

Again, I don't see how it could hurt, so why not give it a shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ernest Jones    993
As someone who watches a fair bit of hockey I say it's not needed, these guys have excellent situational awareness. What needs to happen is the God damn NHL has got to fix their officiating. Pluggers play under different rules than stars and post season has different rules than regular season. If the NHL starts being consistent in their call and starts handing out serious suspensions things will change immediately. Ya know what, make a team play short handed for the remainder of a game when there is a game misconduct. Fixed immediately, I guarantee it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

David in FL    1,519

As someone who watches a fair bit of hockey I say it's not needed, these guys have excellent situational awareness. What needs to happen is the God damn NHL has got to fix their officiating. Pluggers play under different rules than stars and post season has different rules than regular season. If the NHL starts being consistent in their call and starts handing out serious suspensions things will change immediately. Ya know what, make a team play short handed for the remainder of a game when there is a game misconduct. Fixed immediately, I guarantee it.

Agree.

Hockey players know when they're within 40 inches of the boards.  Good grief......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

billchao    474
Wait a minute, the poll question asks "Good or Bad" but the answers are "Yes? No?" :-P Not necessary. Baseball players need a warning track because they are following a play in the opposite direction of the wall. Hockey players don't because the play is at the boards. They're facing the boards when dangerous hits happen, so it wouldn't help there, and people will still get tripped and crash into the boards, so the strip won't help there, either. I agree that there is a player safety issue, but I don't think this will do much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ernest Jones    993

Not sure it would help.  I agree with @Ernest Jones for the NHL level.  It may help for lower levels to train youth players on being aware of the boards location.

I don't think it'll do squat for the players but if it helps the incompetent buffoons that officiate, I guess that could be a good thing. Clearly they need some help. It's embarrassing how bad it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

boogielicious    1,159

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogielicious

Not sure it would help.  I agree with @Ernest Jones for the NHL level.  It may help for lower levels to train youth players on being aware of the boards location.

I don't think it'll do squat for the players but if it helps the incompetent buffoons that officiate, I guess that could be a good thing. Clearly they need some help. It's embarrassing how bad it is.

:dance:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18rounds    13
Avid hockey fan. This seems like an answer to a question nobody asked. NHL players know where they are on the ice. As others have said, if you want the boarding out of the game call it consistanly wheather it's on the 4th line enforcer or the top line center.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

iacas    4,160

As someone who watches a fair bit of hockey I say it's not needed, these guys have excellent situational awareness. What needs to happen is the God damn NHL has got to fix their officiating. Pluggers play under different rules than stars and post season has different rules than regular season. If the NHL starts being consistent in their call and starts handing out serious suspensions things will change immediately. Ya know what, make a team play short handed for the remainder of a game when there is a game misconduct. Fixed immediately, I guarantee it.

QFT.

Totally unnecessary. The officiating is crap. Particularly the difference between the regular season and the playoffs: skill teams in the playoffs get hosed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Layton    0

I voted yes, but I don't think this needs to be put in place for the NHL. I watch a ton of hockey. Seriously, I love it. For the professionals, it's unnecessary.

That being said, I think it is a great idea for the other levels of the game (I'd say high school and down). Young players that are not nearly as experienced or talented at controlling themselves on the ice could definitely benefit from it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Grndslmhttr3    40

I don't think this is necessary at all. For starters, there's already the kickplate at the bottom of the boards that has a similar effect (that's not what it is intended for but it's a nice bonus). Secondly, this is not like baseball where players may not be looking in the direction they are headed (i.e. tracking a fly ball while going full speed toward the wall). If you do that in hockey then you are asking to get blindsided. Lastly, it's ugly and looks stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

TimATC    3
QFT. Totally unnecessary. The officiating is crap. Particularly the difference between the regular season and the playoffs: skill teams in the playoffs get hosed.

Ok, I'll bite. Could you define or give an example of a "skill team"? ;-) As for the warning track, are we talking NHL or amateur ice hockey? It would be a good thing in amateur hockey, both for players and officials. In the NHL it is totally unnecessary. The players at the NHL level have an unreal sense of positional awareness, and do not need a "warning track". In a majority of hits along the boards, players will use the boards to their advantage, to absorb the force of a hit. In the NHL, predatory open ice hits where the head is the principle point of contact are the most dangerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Grndslmhttr3    40
Pierre is and always will be an assclown. Oh yeah the options on this poll are a bit ambiguous, so I'm gonna ho ahead and vote no

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I responded initially to David's comment about hitting an approach shot with what I thought would require a fairway wood to a difficult green and being confident in the outcome. What you've quoted was a response and disagreement to Kevin's comment suggesting that hole would not be difficult for higher handicappers. I'll resist replying to @Vinsk's post directly below yours. My apologies for taking this thread off-topic.
    • I've been looking at my swing in caddie view, especially P8/A8 (the shaft is parallel to the ground in the follow-through) and I noticed that my neck and eyes are still pointing in the direction of where the ball was at address until after P9/A9. I think this is a really bad move for me as I am left handed and left eye dominant, meaning that my dominant eye isn't really seeing the ball after impact, and I am not extending or raising my head from P7/A7 to P9/A9. Annika Sorenstam (who is right handed and right eye dominant) does the opposite move, at P8/A8 her eyes and neck are in the direction of the clubhead from a head swivel move in the downswing. Jim Furyk and David Duval do the same thing that she does and all 3 players shot sub 60 rounds... Could this be a magic move?
    • Uhh, these guys you are destroying, what scores do they usually shoot? they had low handicaps, they were on the golf team with me or for another high school.   You have a 28 HDCP, yet you hit the sweet spot consistently on your irons? for the most part, yes.    thank you for the suggestion, but I hate the feel and look of game improvement irons. which ones do you suggest?
    • Funny guy this Groucho, think he is trolling you Erik.  My story as someone who scores in the seventies when playing a good round (low eighties are more common). I really need my long game to be on. Hitting it 220-230y from the tee, playing a course at 6700y. Next I mostly have a wood or a hybrid to the green. Because of that I became a really good woods/hybrid player (practice it a lot during my rounds). There are two 440y par4's that I can't reach in two, stopped trying to make gir there (no more 3 woods out of my shoes to the green). Not that I hit every green, I even miss greens from 100y in, allways very happy to be on the green in regulation. Ngir is king for me. If not on the green, but almost, I try my Texas wedge (putter) to make up and down. I am not an elite player at all, but am really into scoring. Thinking about buying a chipper, because my chipping is below average. I take my driver out on every hole except par3's. I learned to hit a short gripped driver with an easy 70% swing 180-190y, when there is danger at 200+y, it works for me all the time.
    • Particularly one that is wrong
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bryan Kasper
      Bryan Kasper
      (25 years old)
    2. Greg Pickett Golf
      Greg Pickett Golf
      (62 years old)
    3. hobecorning
      hobecorning
      (75 years old)
    4. Lfm
      Lfm
      (73 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon