# The "Ball Under a Foot of Water" Challenge

Note: This thread is 1817 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

## Recommended Posts

Pretty sure everyone here would gladly send you \$10 each if you can demonstrate this. No tricks - we want to see a ball under 1 foot of water a few feet from the shore.

I'm in. @MS256 , do you take Canadian? As many attempts as you care to take, but we get to watch them all.

FWIW, I don't think you are lying, I think you vastly overestimated the depth and won't admit to that possibility.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

Some back-of-the-envelope math tells me that a golf ball has a maximum density of ~1129 kg/m3. Water, by contrast, is 1000 kg/m3. So golf balls do sink, but just barely, and pretty slowly. That is, the buoyant force very nearly balances out gravity.

Knowing this, we can devise a simple, quick, rough experiment to find out how far a golf ball, moving at a certain speed, can move through water. All you need to do is throw a golf ball downward into water and measure how deep it goes.

Easiest way would be to fill a clear plastic bin to different heights with water. If you hear a thud, you've hit the bottom. Keep filling and throwing until you find the point where there's no thud. Or when you need Tommy John surgery.

Obviously, there are some other simplifications. We're overlooking things like surface tension, lift, that density difference, etc.

I'm not sure how this experiment is supposed to work, because gravity will always pull the ball down to the bottom, eventually.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

LOL. But I was there.

And I understand basic physics.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamo

Some back-of-the-envelope math tells me that a golf ball has a maximum density of ~1129 kg/m3. Water, by contrast, is 1000 kg/m3. So golf balls do sink, but just barely, and pretty slowly. That is, the buoyant force very nearly balances out gravity.

Knowing this, we can devise a simple, quick, rough experiment to find out how far a golf ball, moving at a certain speed, can move through water. All you need to do is throw a golf ball downward into water and measure how deep it goes.

Easiest way would be to fill a clear plastic bin to different heights with water. If you hear a thud, you've hit the bottom. Keep filling and throwing until you find the point where there's no thud. Or when you need Tommy John surgery.

Obviously, there are some other simplifications. We're overlooking things like surface tension, lift, that density difference, etc.

I'm not sure how this experiment is supposed to work, because gravity will always pull the ball down, eventually.

Dude, really?

The ball won't make a thud from floating down...

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Dude, really?

If you are throwing the ball straight down into a bucket, it seems like the ball will eventually hit bottom. The balls density is still greater than water. Water is virtually incompressible, therefore the ball will always hit bottom.

So, really, I'm not sure how it's supposed to work. Can you explain the details to me?

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not sure how this experiment is supposed to work, because gravity will always pull the ball down to the bottom, eventually.

Eventually, of course. But you'd notice a big difference in the speed at which the ball would hit the bottom of the bucket. Hence the changing "thud noises." If there's only an inch or two of water, you'll get a loud noise. If there's a foot and a half, you won't hear much at all. Look, it's not perfect, by clearly people have no clue how far golf ball move through water. It's just a rough estimate.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

Dude, really?

If you are throwing the ball straight down into a bucket, it seems like the ball will eventually hit bottom. The balls density is still greater than water. Water is virtually incompressible, therefore the ball will always hit bottom.

So, really, I'm not sure how it's supposed to work. Can you explain the details to me?

I think you'd be able to distinguish between a ball that impacted the bottom of the bucket from the velocity created by the throw and a ball that "eventually hit bottom."

Now pony up your \$10 everyone!

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Eventually, of course. But you'd notice a big difference in the speed at which the ball would hit the bottom of the bucket. Hence the changing "thud noises."

If there's only an inch or two of water, you'll get a loud noise. If there's a foot and a half, you won't hear much at all.

Look, it's not perfect, by clearly people have no clue how far golf ball move through water. It's just a rough estimate.

For the record (and calculations) it didn't feel like I hit the ball at all. Maybe I did and maybe I didn't but it just felt like I threw a whole lot of water on the green and the ball was in with it (to my surprise).

##### Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamo

Eventually, of course. But you'd notice a big difference in the speed at which the ball would hit the bottom of the bucket. Hence the changing "thud noises."

If there's only an inch or two of water, you'll get a loud noise. If there's a foot and a half, you won't hear much at all.

Look, it's not perfect, by clearly people have no clue how far golf ball move through water. It's just a rough estimate.

For the record (and calculations) it didn't feel like I hit the ball at all. Maybe I did and maybe I didn't but it just felt like I threw a whole lot of water on the green and the ball was in with it (to my surprise).

Well yeah, I assume the only way to even think of attempting this type of shot is to treat it like an explosion shot out of a bunker or heavy wet rough, but I got \$10 sez it wasn't any where near a foot.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Eventually, of course. But you'd notice a big difference in the speed at which the ball would hit the bottom of the bucket. Hence the changing "thud noises."

If there's only an inch or two of water, you'll get a loud noise. If there's a foot and a half, you won't hear much at all.

Look, it's not perfect, by clearly people have no clue how far golf ball move through water. It's just a rough estimate.

Sure, I get it.

I have a strike plate (a load cell plate with a 1msec response time) and a swimming pool. Presume an air cannon made out of a PVC pipe and compressor would work. I have some proximity detectors that can measure the velocity of the ball before going into the pool, but need to setup a scope to measure the time between pulses.

Not sure if this test is worthwhile or not, because it will take me the better part of a free day to do it. If I can interest my son into doing it this Saturday or Sunday afternoon, then I'll do it.

Let me know if you have any other inputs for this experiment, and I agree that the path of the ball is not known but hoping that the strike plate is big enough for the deeper tests.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not sure if this test is worthwhile or not, because it will take me the better part of a free day to do it. If I can interest my son into doing it this Saturday or Sunday afternoon, then I'll do it.

It's not.

So, @MS256 , are you going to do it? Because as politely as possible, I'm calling complete and utter BS.

Pretty sure you can make \$100+ if you're able to do it. If you fail, we get to assign your avatar and user title for one week for each person who is willing to put up \$10 (nothing generally offensive to a typical person).

Who's in?

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's not.

So, @MS256, are you going to do it? Because as politely as possible, I'm calling complete and utter BS.

Pretty sure you can make \$100+ if you're able to do it. If you fail, we get to assign your avatar and user title for one week for each person who is willing to put up \$10 (nothing generally offensive to a typical person).

Who's in?

@iacas

@Lihu

@jamo

@Shorty

@Ernest Jones

@boogielicious

@cipher

Okay, I'm in. How will we wire the money to MS256 if he should be able to do it?

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Okay, I'm in. How will we wire the money to MS256 if he should be able to do it?

PayPal.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

[QUOTE name="iacas" url="/t/78113/ms256-vs-physics-10-wagers/18#post_1074632"]   It's not. So, @MS256 , are you going to do it? Because as politely as possible, I'm calling complete and utter BS. Pretty sure you can make \$100+ if you're able to do it. If you fail, we get to assign your avatar and user title for one week for each person who is willing to put up \$10 (nothing generally offensive to a typical person). Who's in? [LIST] [*] @iacas [*] @Lihu [*] @jamo [*] @Golfingdad [*] @Shorty [*] @Ernest Jones [*] @boogielicious [*] @cipher [/LIST] [/QUOTE] Okay, I'm in. How will we wire the money to MS256 if he should be able to do it?

Easiest way is e-mail money transfer. One of us can act as an escrow or we can just leave to good faith all around. Any non-payers will be tared and feathered. Anyway, I don't see any \$\$ being paid out.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm in.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm in.

I'm in too.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what's the over under if he ends up hurting himself swinging hard or falling and ending up completely under water. :)

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what's the over under if he ends up hurting himself swinging hard or falling and ending up completely under water. :)

I don't know. Add your name to the list if you're in.

##### Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1817 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

• ### Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ## 2020 TST Partners

• ### Posts

• I do rest my driver on the ground. In fact, I tap my driver to make sure the head is sitting on solid ground.  I have an odd setup for my driver. If anyone were to watch me from behind, they’d think I am setting up for a practice swing because the ball and my club head are nowhere near each other!
• I have golf trips to Hawaii every year and I fly with Alaska Air. I pack EVERYTHING  into the golf bag so I don’t have to check another bag in. So far no issues. I lock my bag with a TSA approved lock and they always open and rearrange my things. And I always pack to the limit of 50lbs!
• I believe the issue with distance is small and easily addressed.  Here are my thoughts: Let's say in the not too distant future the PGA tour is made up of guys that look more like long drive competitors.  Big tall muscular athletes that instead of going to the MLB or NFL see a more viable future in golf with distance being at the forefront.   There will still be your sharp shooters that can hit a 7 iron with the same accuracy as some of the bombers hit a wedge but they will be much more rare. When this is the case, they might have to build new longer golf courses that suit these super athletes or expand the existing ones in length.  Why is this a problem?  You only need enough courses to provide a year's worth of weekend tournament play.  These courses can have a much larger gap in the tee blocks so amateur short hitters can still play the courses if they want to see what a golf course played by the big boys feels like.  All the other golf courses in existence can remain the same because as previously mentioned they will still suit >99% of the golfing population.  If you are in the <1% of the golfing population who can hit 340+ yard drives while keeping the ball in play most of the time, then yeah, you are going to over power a lot of old golf courses, congratulations.  If you get really good maybe you can make the PGA Tour and play the big boy courses. A lot of the old history rich courses are going to become obsolete to these new super athletes.  So the tour can do one of two things.  Stop playing there because times have changed and it is what it is.  Or they are treated as separate events with a different set of rules (equipment restrictions).
• No they wouldn't..lol. But that was entertaining.
• Haven't been keeping up with posting in this thread so here are my scores the past month. Been in a slump since about mid Jan, starting to come out of it. Part of it is also how hard the course is playing this time of year, not much grass on the fairways, greens are firm and fast and really tough to get it up and down off the dormant bermuda. Good news is my handicap is going up 👍

• ### Today's Birthdays

1. Jay G
(44 years old)
2. JRan
(40 years old)
3. Rkrider99
(70 years old)

×
×
• Create New...

## Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...