Jump to content
IGNORED

Company announces green reading glasses: "Stereoscopic Optics Give Players Advantage by Revealing Hidden Subtleties in Putting Greens"


nevets88
Note: This thread is 3433 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

This is really funny for a couple of reasons:

A)  You were quoting yourself so it kind of looks like you are also berating yourself here.

And, that considered ... your PS becomes twice as funny!!

I was berating myself. Berating myself for be sloppy with my skins.

The PS is irony, 'cuz I don't have a job! LOL.

  • Upvote 1

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

Too bad, I could really use both technologies too!  The stereoscopic vision sounds a little too god to be true. . .

The glasses to find your lost ball could be hand if they worked, although I feel like we just need to incorporate homing devices into the balls and eliminate the need for looking at all.

As far as the green reading things ... no, you don't need those.  Take Aimpoint.  (If you haven't already).  Hell, with Aimpoint, you don't even need EYES.

According to another poster in another thread, you only need geometry. :-P

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Seems unnecessary, since I have feet. Not to mention illegal.

It might be illegal but it would still be good for practice to chart greens and write it down so next time you play course you have the right info instead of guesswork.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
It might be illegal but it would still be good for practice to chart greens and write it down so next time you play course you have the right info instead of guesswork.

Maybe. I wouldn't know, I use AimPoint. Green maps are kind of general, right? How do you get precise reads for specific putts?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Maybe. I wouldn't know, I use AimPoint.

Green maps are kind of general, right? How do you get precise reads for specific putts?

Generally players will putt from different areas of greens to get the breaks and lines where the breaks are subtle and chart them that way but from looks of those glasses it may cut down on all the putting work and time it would take to try the putts yourself all over the greens but that's onl;y if those glasses actually work and I don't exactly want to spend 199 dollars to find out haa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Generally players will putt from different areas of greens to get the breaks and lines where the breaks are subtle and chart them that way but from looks of those glasses it may cut down on all the putting work and time it would take to try the putts yourself all over the greens but that's onl;y if those glasses actually work and I don't exactly want to spend 199 dollars to find out haa.

Or you can spend that money on an AimPoint class, gain green reading skills that are actually legal to use in play, and save yourself a whole lot of work charting greens ;-)

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Or you can spend that money on an AimPoint class, gain green reading skills that are actually legal to use in play, and save yourself a whole lot of work charting greens

Well I know nothing about Aimpoint and unless it magically points out breaks I cant see anyways im not sure it would help me because unless a break is obvious I cannot read a green to savemy life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well I know nothing about Aimpoint and unless it magically points out breaks I cant see anyways im not sure it would help me because unless a break is obvious I cannot read a green to savemy life.

Ok, that literally makes no sense. "I'm really bad at reading greens so [something that teaches me to read greens better] won't help me." Say whaaaa???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ok, that literally makes no sense. "I'm really bad at reading greens so [something that teaches me to read greens better] won't help me."

Say whaaaa??

Lets just say id be surprised if Aimpoint class could make me see something invisible to my own eyes but like I said I don't know anything about what Aimpoint  teaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Ok, that literally makes no sense. "I'm really bad at reading greens so [something that teaches me to read greens better] won't help me."

Say whaaaa??

Lets just say id be surprised if Aimpoint class could make me see something invisible to my own eyes but like I said I don't know anything about what Aimpoint  teaches.

You don't just use your eyes with Aimpoint. And no it's not "the force", but pretty darn close to feeling like you have it when a ball drops from 20 feet or more. :banana:

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You don't just use your eyes with Aimpoint. And no it's not "the force", but pretty darn close to feeling like you have it when a ball drops from 20 feet or more.

I looked it up and there is a class next sat about 50 miles away but doesn't tell how much it cost.Im imagining it might be lil costly since it says 2 hour class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

You don't just use your eyes with Aimpoint. And no it's not "the force", but pretty darn close to feeling like you have it when a ball drops from 20 feet or more.

I looked it up and there is a class next sat about 50 miles away but doesn't tell how much it cost.Im imagining it might be lil costly since it says 2 hour class.

It's not cheap at all, but well worth it. I want to take more advanced ones now, but still have work to do on the chipping/pitch shots before starting another venture.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Lets just say id be surprised if Aimpoint class could make me see something invisible to my own eyes but like I said I don't know anything about what Aimpoint  teaches.

That's the whole point, your eyes suck at green reading. Everybody's eyes suck a green reading. So don't use them. B-)

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

To get back on topic, are we sure this would be illegal?  If it just uses optics (i.e., no electronic of any kind) then how is it really different than sunglasses?  Or even just regular glasses?  In all cases the glasses are using optics to enhance your ability to see, and hence to play, the shot.  It certainly FEELS like it should be illegal, but . . .

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3433 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • So here’s the thing, you’ve treated the bunker as if it were GUR, which would actually be the appropriate course of action except you and your playing partners are not authorized to determine that for yourselves. The Committee in this case would be the golf course and in an ideal world, they would have handled their responsibilities and told you at the beginning of the round that X bunkers are under water, treat them as GUR. I’m actually ok with how you handled the situation in a casual round TBH but this is the rules forum and you asked about a rules clarification so there’s a specific procedure for that. As for your proposed rule, I don’t agree with the logic at all for the reason I outlined in my previous post. You are trading a bunker lie for a lie in grass for no penalty. And also, there are already rules in place that address the exact situation you found yourself in, including relief options for if the bunker was appropriately marked as GUR or not.
    • Someone asked would pros accept someone else keeping score. It’s done in every other sport. That’s what scorekeepers are for. It’s an antiquated rule. It’s fine for non-professionals.  I feel like there is a lot of resistance to rule in golf, as if these rules were brought down on stone tablets by Moses.
    • Y'all can appoint a few good men from your own league that have proper understanding of the rules or at least access the USGA rules (book, online, etc.) when necessary. They don't have to have some kind of official certification or blessings from any outside org/entity to my knowledge.  Yes, y'all could have collectively declared it GUR under F-16 as @DaveP043 posted as the self appointed committee and you would have been fine to drop outside of this particular bunker. Remember to not declare all bunkers as GUR on a wholesale basis. It is case by case only.  Now you might say 'who's got time for all that' (going around which bunkers should be declared GUR) then I can somewhat understand  your pain but at the same time you cannot fault the tedium of rules  enforcement as a general reason to declare them 'lacking in common sense'.  
    • Its simple, YOU are responsible for reporting YOUR score correctly, at every level of golf.  Do you imagine a top pro would really trust anyone else with his score? Without getting too far from the original post, the Rules have been revised every 4 years for decades.  They're continually evaluated, and most changes are in response to changes within the game.  BTW, if wind blows your ball off the green before you've lifted and replaced it, you play from wherever it ends up.  The TV call ins weren't a rule of golf issue, they were a PGA Tour issue, all in an effort to get the call right.  
    • Someone asked what I propose. I think if the bunker is full of rainwater, you get to drop it with no penalty directly in back of the bunker, so you still have a tricky shot of chipping over the bunker. People are talking about local committees and such which we just don’t have at our level. My league and playing partners gave the free drop with no issue. My original purpose of this post was just to understand what the “real” rule is, and I now know. But now I also want to encourage people to see that many long time golf rules are outdated and illogical, and hopefully encourage people to push for change. They made some changes in the last few years, so I’m hopeful the game I love will improve if enough people speak out. A lot to hope for posting in a little forum I know, but you have to start somewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...