Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3786 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
  Pretzel said:

Yeah, the ProV1x well still spin notably more than an NXT or NXT Tour, the same as a B330-RX spinning more than an e6, or a Nike RZN Black spinning more than a RZN Red.

Notably more on wedge and half-wedge shots. Not notably more on driver shots. Just to clarify a bit.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  saevel25 said:
Notably more on wedge and half-wedge shots. Not notably more on driver shots. Just to clarify a bit.

At least for me, the ProV1x spins much more than Titleist's low spin distance balls with a full swing, both irons and woods. Less that the ProV1, for sure, but significantly more than the others.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  David in FL said:

At least for me, the ProV1x spins much more than Titleist's low spin distance balls with a full swing, both irons and woods. Less that the ProV1, for sure, but significantly more than the others.

Yea that makes sense. Pro-V1x is suppose to spin slightly less than the Pro-V1. They both have Urethane covers, so you are not going to see much difference in half-wedge shots.

As for driver spin, you'd probably see a few hundred rpm less between the Pro-V line and the NXT line. As for half-wedge spin you should see nearly 1000+ rpm difference.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Too expensive!

I had some top flight XL long a while back... Didn't like them one bit

OK, I was thrown a bit about the not cheap, but I see now what you meant  You don;t want to go down to those $8 a dozen balls (I agree with you on that).

I didn't like the Top Flite XL either.  Or any Top-flite ball.  Until the gamer.  That is why I made the point that this is not your father's top flite.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Too expensive!

I had some top flight XL long a while back... Didn't like them one bit

dude, the TopFlite Gamers are NOTHING like the XL.  if you dont try them out then youre missing out on a great ball.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Regarding the Gamer...

Looking at the TF site, it appears that only the Gamer Tour has a urethane cover.

Has anyone played the regular, Tour, and Soft versions? Any significant difference in long game spin? How about the drop & stop factor?

Gambling is illegal at Bushwood sir, and I never slice.   

           

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I consider both the regular and the tour versions to be better than the Titleist NXT

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Tat14 said:

Regarding the Gamer...

Looking at the TF site, it appears that only the Gamer Tour has a urethane cover.

Has anyone played the regular, Tour, and Soft versions? Any significant difference in long game spin? How about the drop & stop factor?

I've played the regular, but not the Soft or Tour.  I plan on trying out the Tour and Soft versions when summer comes.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In case anyone is interested, my delivery of 24 Chrome Soft did arrive yesterday, the 16th, coinciding with shelf availability.

Well done Callaway.

Gambling is illegal at Bushwood sir, and I never slice.   

           

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have played all 3 of the Gamer offerings and can offer the following general comparisons based on my swing:

The Gamer is similar to the e6 or NXT Tour and a bit longer than both for my 90 mph driver SS.

The Gamer Soft is a 3 piece version of balls like the Supersoft but with a somewhat more solid feel than the 2014 Supersoft,  It is one of the best balls that no one is talking about and it did receive the Golf Digest gold award.

The Gamer Tour is a 3 piece Urethene ball that I would compare to the Chrome +.  Holds the green well with a good amount of spin, but did not stop like velcro for my swing which I prefer.  I played it a full season and for my swing I was a bit shorter than the Gamer,  Some have complained about the durability of the Gamer Tour urethene cover but I never had a problem (but I do not have pro level speed or spin with my wedges).  I also rarely make it through an 18 hole round with the same ball so I cannot comment on durability beyond 15-16 holes.

A real sleeper was the 2014 Maxfli U/3, a 3 piece urethene covered ball also.  I gave it a try and it became my regular ball last season due to the increase in distance I received - not sure why but I gained 10-15 yards off the tee and was a club longer for the rest of my clubs.  Trees and cart paths also did little to degrade the cover,

There are a lot of great choices to try and as golfers the ball OEMs are constantly fighting for market share - the introduction of the Chrome Soft was a clear response to the Chrome branding and the popularity of soft feeling golf balls.

Have fun and good luck finding the right ball for you!

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

NJ is spot on.  I have played the soft.  It felt great off irons and wedges.  Had decent stopping power.  Flew true and decent distance.  I'm also going to give the U3 a whirl this spring as well.  The whole Gamer series is the proverbial "Diamond in the rough".  Not trying them would be a great disservice to yourself.

Mark Shuman

Mark Shuman


Posted
I found a TM Rocketballz with a urethane cover. Haven't hit it yet but I bet it plays well. Not sure of the price either. I don't plan on switching.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted

I really like the Titleist Velocity, as requested it flies off the driver with low spin.

 ping.gif G30 Driver

 ping.gif K15 3 Wood

 ping.gif G25 Hybrid

 ping.gif i20 Irons 4-S

 ping.gifTour S Rustique 58 degree Wedge

 ping.gif Anser 2 TR Putter


Posted

This might help:

http://www.golfdigest.com/images/equipment/2014-05/eqsl32-hot-list-ball-spin-rate-chart.jpg

Driver:       Cobra AMP Cell - Blue

Fairway:    TM Rocketballz Stage 2  *17
Hybrids:    Callaway X2 Hot 19* and 22*
Irons:        Mizuno MX-23 5-PW
Wedges:   Cleveland 588  51*, 56*, 60*

Putter:      Scotty Cameron GoLo Customized

Ball:          Srixon Z Star (2013)


Posted
  Derek02 said:

This might help:

http://www.golfdigest.com/images/equipment/2014-05/eqsl32-hot-list-ball-spin-rate-chart.jpg

For what it's worth: I'm kind of a golf ball aficionado, and I like to try different balls (particularly inside 100 yards).  Historically, I have found that the wedge spin rates, relatively speaking, have not always matched up to Golf Digest's charts.  For example, the 2011 Z Star was located high up in the chart in terms of half wedge spin, but I found that it didn't spin all that much (everything else about it was great).  I think it had to do with the fact that the Z Stars have the thinnest covers in the premium market.  As a result, the wedge didn't grip the ball that well to impart a lot of spin.  I'm inclined to think that others (including pros) agreed with me since they subsequently put the new "spin skin" on the next generation of balls.  I really like the newest version of the Z Star (2013), but you might prefer the Z Star XV between the two.

Driver:       Cobra AMP Cell - Blue

Fairway:    TM Rocketballz Stage 2  *17
Hybrids:    Callaway X2 Hot 19* and 22*
Irons:        Mizuno MX-23 5-PW
Wedges:   Cleveland 588  51*, 56*, 60*

Putter:      Scotty Cameron GoLo Customized

Ball:          Srixon Z Star (2013)


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  Derek02 said:
For what it's worth: I'm kind of a golf ball aficionado , and I like to try different balls (particularly inside 100 yards).  Historically, I have found that the wedge spin rates, relatively speaking, have not always matched up to Golf Digest's charts.  For example, the 2011 Z Star was located high up in the chart in terms of half wedge spin, but I found that it didn't spin all that much (everything else about it was great).  I think it had to do with the fact that the Z Stars have the thinnest covers in the premium market.  As a result, the wedge didn't grip the ball that well to impart a lot of spin.  I'm inclined to think that others (including pros) agreed with me since they subsequently put the new "spin skin" on the next generation of balls.  I really like the newest version of the Z Star (2013), but you might prefer the Z Star XV between the two.

Interesting. Rank the top 5 golf ball products, in your opinion.


Note: This thread is 3786 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • It's really hard to argue against the Tiger Woods 2000 swing.  I like Rory's swing. And, I've always liked Joaquin Niemann's swing. Although, if I tried to mimic Niemann's swing I'd probably end up in traction for 2 months. I was kinda bummed when he went to LIV cuz I almost never see it anymore.  At the other extreme, I can't look at Bryson when he plays. Even if it's very effective, it's coyote-ugly to watch.  I'd rather watch Charles Barkley than Bryson. ....  
    • Thank you for that information,I would have loved to see him in person
    • I think he was always kind of like that - he hit it off the planet relatively frequently throughout his career. I saw him play a couple of times. One time at Walton Heath in the European Open. He was playing the 13th on the Old (dogleg right par 5) and his drive had gone through the fairway and found a patch of grass in the woods there to the left (the woods have now gone). He had an opening to play back to the fairway. Maybe 25 yards to reach the fairway and 65 yards to run through the other side. He was maybe 230 yards away from the green, but the trees made sure that was not a viable option (at least that's what I thought at the time). He pulled out a pretty long iron - probably a 3 and gave it a full blooded thrash. I watched this ball come out straight for about 40 yards and then it just turned hard left, but stayed in the air (still not sure how he did that). He started the ball at a point that must have been 100 yards right of the green and hooked it basically that whole 100 yards and the ball wound up on the front of the green.  Shotmaking he was pretty much peerless. Not sure his swing was ever technically solid. Flowing and fun to watch yes, but not one you'd want to copy.  As to the question, I have heard a few people suggest that Mickey Wright had the best swing ever. Frank Nobilo had a pretty sweet looking one. Bruce Lietzke's was pretty cool - he managed to maintain PGA Tour playing rights with basically little to no work on his game - got to be a lot said for that.
    • A lot of us on this forum are hyper competitive, we just know not to break things that don't belong to us! that is why I stated "a person with a poor attitude grows up with no consequences" it is not all entitlement.
    • Yea, it is a cult following. Especially with the YouTube golf personalities using them. They did great marketing in a space that not many other golf clubs are getting into yet. Especially for putters.  I tried them out at Golf Galaxy before; I can't stand them look of them. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...