Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

How to "Flight" Your Wedges and Short Irons


Note: This thread is 1938 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Of course it was.

Not sure I would defer to @saevel25 when it comes to typos. :-$

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Of course it was.

Ooops, my mind read, "feel ain't real". You see it enough times, and you just assume that it was typed that way. :whistle:

Not sure I would defer to @saevel25 when it comes to typos.

There is no way I can defend myself on this. :-D

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ooops, my mind read, "feel ain't real". You see it enough times, and you just assume that it was typed that way. :whistle: There is no way I can defend myself on this. :-D

To be fair ... My first thought was EXACTLY the same as yours ... But then I caught it before I posted anything, Ist kndia lkie toshe wreid stnences wehre as lnog as smoe of teh ltertes are sitll in teh rhgit pacle tehn you can slitl raed it jsut fnie.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So if one were to try these "flighted" shots do you have to relearn your distances or is it fairly easy to guess? Do you just figure one club more? Or do you really just have to practice this shot with all your irons and wedges and see where they come out?


Posted
I tried this a couple of times today ... work well ... for some reason there is a macho thing, to say I hit a PW (or other clubs) xx yards, ... but I like it, because I get in trouble when I try to "hit it hard"

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Played around with these today on the range. Tiny sample, but I literally hit the 150 and 100 yard sign posts I was aiming at. So it at least seems to help with accuracy, haha.

Curious: I'd been playing some knockdown shots in the past. Is flighting synonymous with that? I'd used slightly different technique, but I'm curious if they're different ideas or different names for the same thing.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Of course it was.

Fixed.

So if one were to try these "flighted" shots do you have to relearn your distances or is it fairly easy to guess? Do you just figure one club more? Or do you really just have to practice this shot with all your irons and wedges and see where they come out?

Kind of all the above. Certainly practice it a bit on the range, figure on playing a half to a full club more. Sometimes it can even be two clubs more, Erik mentioned he might sometimes hit an 8 iron from 130 yards. Just depends on how far you take it back, if you're hitting into a lot of wind, etc.

Curious: I'd been playing some knockdown shots in the past. Is flighting synonymous with that? I'd used slightly different technique, but I'm curious if they're different ideas or different names for the same thing.

Others may have a different definition but I think of the knockdown as basically the same thing as a punch or stinger shot. Similar kind of swing as I'm talking about in this thread, just with the ball further back, close to the right foot and the followthrough is even shorter. To me the knockdown/punch/stinger shots are more specialty shots that you might only use when you have to hit it into a strong wind or under some tree limbs. I make flighted type swings every time I play, not the case with the knockdown shot.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Others may have a different definition but I think of the knockdown as basically the same thing as a punch or stinger shot. Similar kind of swing as I'm talking about in this thread, just with the ball further back, close to the right foot and the followthrough is even shorter. To me the knockdown/punch/stinger shots are more specialty shots that you might only use when you have to hit it into a strong wind or under some tree limbs. I make flighted type swings every time I play, not the case with the knockdown shot.

Ok, fair enough. I'd heard in various course vlogs people saying things like "I'm going to hit a knockdown 8 iron into this green." As I've been using the term based on that as hitting an iron in lower than normal versus a punch shot which I think of a low long iron shot. Good to know.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Others may have a different definition but I think of the knockdown as basically the same thing as a punch or stinger shot. Similar kind of swing as I'm talking about in this thread, just with the ball further back, close to the right foot and the followthrough is even shorter. To me the knockdown/punch/stinger shots are more specialty shots that you might only use when you have to hit it into a strong wind or under some tree limbs. I make flighted type swings every time I play, not the case with the knockdown shot.

Ok, fair enough. I'd heard in various course vlogs people saying things like "I'm going to hit a knockdown 8 iron into this green." As I've been using the term based on that as hitting an iron in lower than normal versus a punch shot which I think of a low long iron shot. Good to know.

Terminology does seem to shift. I've seen some descriptions call that a 'knockdown', with the 'punch' / 'stinger' having a similar 'held off', but very short & low follow-through with hands very ahead at impact, But some 'knockdown' versions emphasize less wrist hinge on backswing to intentionally take spin off for a low running shot into strong wind to limit ballooning.

Whatever you call it, good shot to have. Well explained.

Kevin


Posted

Great thread.

Between everything in mvmac's OP and iacas's post...lots of good stuff.

I have been noticing a lot of people that I play with hitting 1 or 2 irons lower than what I have been playing lately...lots of wind from the north lately in SW Michigan.  They try to nut their 9 iron 140 into a strong wind and I take a 7 iron, choke down on it and feel much more comfortable.

I need to start doing this more with my wedges though....with or without wind.  I think I'm getting too comfortable with taking full swings with my SW and GW and am not hitting to ball close enough to where I am aiming.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by SavvySwede

1. Slightly reduces clubhead speed

2. You need to stand closer to the ball which equates to a steeper swing and more downward AoA

Steeper swing and more down AoA will also bring an increase in spin.  Agreed?

I can certainly see this in chipping as centered or forward ball brings higher ball flight and very little spin, more of drop and roll.  When ball back, more spin and check-up.  I find the soft dropping ball better on greens sloping away from me towards the hole.


  • Moderator
Posted

Ok, fair enough. I'd heard in various course vlogs people saying things like "I'm going to hit a knockdown 8 iron into this green." As I've been using the term based on that as hitting an iron in lower than normal versus a punch shot which I think of a low long iron shot. Good to know.

Terminology does seem to shift. I've seen some descriptions call that a 'knockdown', with the 'punch' / 'stinger' having a similar 'held off', but very short & low follow-through with hands very ahead at impact, But some 'knockdown' versions emphasize less wrist hinge on backswing to intentionally take spin off for a low running shot into strong wind to limit ballooning.

Whatever you call it, good shot to have. Well explained.

Yeah like I said I put the term knockdown in with the punch and stinger shots. If others don't it's not a big deal.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah like I said I put the term knockdown in with the punch and stinger shots. If others don't it's not a big deal.

I was just distinguishing, because they are all useful shots.

My guess is the Texas / American 'knockdown' is typically equivalent to a 'groove thin & quail high' punch / stinger, while I've seen the 'no wrist hinge' wide-arm swing (while clubbing up) for low spin & lots of run more from European players / instructors.

It's possible that beyond just style the spin is more of an issue for links players who play on courses that traditionally have very low if any brush so there is very little protection from ballooning even on a low-hit ball, where I expect Texas courses on average have a modest brush and tree buffer so they can get away with a bit more spin just on a lower trajectory.

Kevin


Posted

I was just distinguishing, because they are all useful shots. (while all meaning low)

My guess is the Texas / American 'knockdown' is typically equivalent to a 'groove thin & quail high' punch / stinger, while I've seen the 'no wrist hinge' wide-arm swing (while clubbing up) for low spin & lots of run more from European players / instructors.

It's possible that beyond just style the spin is more of an issue for links players who play on courses that traditionally have very low if any brush so there is very little protection from ballooning even on a low-hit ball, where I expect Texas courses on average have a modest brush and tree buffer so they can get away with a bit more spin just on a lower trajectory.

Got timed out by the time I found these. Some blend of the first video's knockdown description at 1:29 and the second video (talk about shifting terms - I don't think it's really a stinger if you take wrists out) is about what I was trying to describe as a 'links knockdown'. May only be useful with wedges and short irons on very high wind days or on 7th at Pebble Beach.

OT: Not sure I understand Tischler's distinction between the hand action for punch vs covering.

Kevin


Posted

So I played 18 today and tried this technique out. Zero practice ahead of time, just figured I would try it out. The result was a consistent 15-20 yard pull. I'm going to practice it into my net tomorrow and hopefully it's just something I need some time with. Definitely didn't see this technique being less accurate but with zero practice I'm not discouraged yet. If it continues to be a problem I might take some video and put it in my swing thread. Any obvious reasons why this would cause pulls? When I try to overcook one I usually get about the same pull and every now and then on full shots so it's not like a totally new problem for me. I was just a little surprised to see it so consistently on these shots.


  • Moderator
Posted

So I played 18 today and tried this technique out. Zero practice ahead of time, just figured I would try it out. The result was a consistent 15-20 yard pull. I'm going to practice it into my net tomorrow and hopefully it's just something I need some time with. Definitely didn't see this technique being less accurate but with zero practice I'm not discouraged yet. If it continues to be a problem I might take some video and put it in my swing thread. Any obvious reasons why this would cause pulls?

Not sure, if anything the 3/4 followthrough should help you start the ball more online. Maybe your head was moving too far forward in an effort to "cover it"?

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not sure, if anything the 3/4 followthrough should help you start the ball more online. Maybe your head was moving too far forward in an effort to "cover it"?

I sometimes have a problem with pulls as well. I thought it was because rushed my transition. This makes me think I could be moving my head forward. I'll have to get some video and check.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

question for @iacas or @mvmac k about pros hitting their short irons lower than youd expect, but theyre taking a full swing/full follow thru and not "flighting" the ball as per this thread, how are they doing that?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1938 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.