Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger's Slam - A Grand Achievement?


iacas
Note: This thread is 3048 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Was Tiger's Slam (winning all four major championships in a row) a "grand slam"?

    • Yes
      60
    • No
      50


Recommended Posts

That's not really true... from what I've found, the International Tennis Federation says that winning four consecutive majors IS as Grand Slam regardless of if they are in the same calendar year or not.

According to the now-maligned Wiki, this is not quite the full story:

"The term Grand Slam also, and originally, refers to the achievement of winning all four major championships in a single calendar year within one of the five events: men's and women's singles; men's, women's, and mixed doubles. In doubles, one team may accomplish a Grand Slam playing together or one player may achieve it with different partners. The term "Grand Slam" without qualification refers to winning the four majors in a single calendar year.

Winning the four majors in consecutive tournaments but not in the same year is known as a Non-Calendar Year Grand Slam, while winning all four majors at any point during the course of a career is known as a Career Grand Slam.

In 1982 the International Tennis Federation (ITF) broadened the definition of the Grand Slam as meaning any four consecutive major victories, including the ones spanning two calendar years. As defined in the constitution of the ITF: "The Grand Slam titles are the championships of Australia, France, the United States of America and Wimbledon. Players who hold all four of these titles at the same time achieve the Grand Slam" . As this definition differs from the original definition of the Grand Slam as restricted to a single calendar year, there has been some controversy towards this redefinition in the tennis world. Subsequently, the ITF has distanced itself from the 1982 decision, reverting to the traditional calendar-year definition (when Martina Navratilova won the 1984 French Open to become the reigning champion of all four women's singles, the ITF awarded her $1 million Grand Slam bonus in recognition of her achievement. However subsequently, the ITF abandoned recognizing non-calendar year grand slams."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Slam_(tennis)#Non-calendar_year_Grand_Slam

There are lots of other sources showing tennis' ongoing ambivalence, such as:

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/nadal-this-will-be-my-only-shot-at-doing-the-grand-slam-2183008.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/tennis/serena-williams-i-dont-need-a-grand-slam-to-define-my-career/2015/06/24/0ec1f1b6-19c3-11e5-93b7-5eddc056ad8a_story.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/rafaelnadal/8248276/Rafael-Nadal-Grand-Slam-Australian-Open-is-just-the-beginning-says-Rod-Laver.html

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

...So, for you guys saying that it isn't a Grand Slam because that's what the definition says, answer this. If you were the ones writing the definition of "Grand Slam" what would it be? Would it include Tiger's achievement? If it has to be within the same season/calendar year, why?

If I was writing the definition, it would be exactly what the current definition is, as defined by the PGA - winning all four Majors in one season/calendar year.  It wouldn't include Woods' achievement because it's not (IMO) a Grand Slam.  It's a "Tiger Slam", for whatever that's worth.  My reasoning would be that it's the same as basically every other sport in the world - those types of titles are decided upon based upon one season of play, with clearly defined starting and ending points.  The FedEx Cup, tour cards, money winnings, etc. - those are all calculated based upon one "season" of golf, so why shouldn't the Grand Slam be the same?

Each of those accolades is a Tour endorsed seasonal achievement.  None of the majors is run by any Tour.  Applying seasonal attributes to them based on a Tour season is a purely arbitrary condition - and unnecessary and unwarranted.  As Erik said, if someone wants to offer a trophy or medal for the grand slam, then they can specify the conditions that apply.  I think any such trophy would collect a lot of dust before ever being awarded - a testimony to someones misplaced optimism. ;-)

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Each of those accolades is a Tour endorsed seasonal achievement.  None of the majors is run by any Tour.  Applying seasonal attributes to them based on a Tour season is a purely arbitrary condition - and unnecessary and unwarranted.  As Erik said, if someone wants to offer a trophy or medal for the grand slam, then they can specify the conditions that apply.  I think any such trophy would collect a lot of dust before ever being awarded - a testimony to someones misplaced optimism. ;-)

Well said ... I believe the opens are just that, opens ... you do not have to have a your card, be part of the of the Fed Ex cup, and anything tour related ... just survive the qualifying rounds prior to the event. Just don't see how can you tie the majors to an US tour season. Seems narrow minded to me.

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Each of those accolades is a Tour endorsed seasonal achievement.  None of the majors is run by any Tour.  Applying seasonal attributes to them based on a Tour season is a purely arbitrary condition - and unnecessary and unwarranted.  As Erik said, if someone wants to offer a trophy or medal for the grand slam, then they can specify the conditions that apply.  I think any such trophy would collect a lot of dust before ever being awarded - a testimony to someones misplaced optimism.

Well said ... I believe the opens are just that, opens ... you do not have to have a your card, be part of the of the Fed Ex cup, and anything tour related ... just survive the qualifying rounds prior to the event.

Just don't see how can you tie the majors to an US tour season. Seems narrow minded to me.

Especially considering that there are several Tours to be considered, even if the PGA and European Tours may have more standing from our point of view.  That point of view isn't necessarily shared worldwide.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger woods?

No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not.

Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this.  Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.  His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit).

Champions shouldn't need and don't deserve "affirmative action" because of somebody's white guilt.  Golf doesn't "need" a black champion anymore than the NFL "needs" an MVP Samoan quarterback, or NASCAR "needs" an Asian champion.  A champion is the person who performs best at his/her sport, and that is what it is. The NBA hasn't had a white MVP since 2006, yet I don't see anybody bleating that the NBA "needs a white champion".  As far as I can see, there's never been a Hispanic NBA MVP - where's the outcry over that?

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A discussion emerged as to whether or not Tiger completed a "Grand Slam." Although the title of the thread may have insinuated that with its use of the word "Grand" the actual question asks if it's a grand achievement. I'm not sure how anyone could possibly argue that winning 4 majors in a row isn't a grand achievement. Really? It's an amazing accomplishment just to win any tournament on the PGA tour. Personally I agree with Iacas regarding the Grand Slam topic. What Tiger did was fantastic and I bet it will be a long time before it's repeated.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A discussion emerged as to whether or not Tiger completed a "Grand Slam." Although the title of the thread may have insinuated that with its use of the word "Grand" the actual question asks if it's a grand achievement. I'm not sure how anyone could possibly argue that winning 4 majors in a row isn't a grand achievement. Really? It's an amazing accomplishment just to win any tournament on the PGA tour. Personally I agree with Iacas regarding the Grand Slam topic. What Tiger did was fantastic and I bet it will be a long time before it's repeated.

That's the title, but did you actually read the OP?  Iacas' contention is that Woods completed the Grand Slam and that the calendar year is irrelevant and arbitrary.  That's where the entire discussion stems from.

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes and I addressed that as well.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?


Yes

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?

Yes

If Jack had done what Tiger did, there would be people making the same argument on Jacks behalf.  The name of the golfer shouldn't even be brought into the discussion, it's either a Grand Slam or it's not.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?

Hack? You obviously mean GOAT. If Nicklaus had done this, the conversation would be the same.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not.

As I've already said, it doesn't "add a jewel." The dude won four majors in a row whether you call it a "Grand Slam" or a "Tiger Slam" or a freaking "Kerbooble Janooey". Whatever you call it, he won four majors in a row (and 3 U.S. Ams in a row, and 14 or 17 majors…).

Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this. Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.

Uhhhhh… no.

His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit).

They're false accolades to you given your definition .

Champions shouldn't need and don't deserve "affirmative action" because of somebody's white guilt.  Golf doesn't "need" a black champion anymore than the NFL "needs" an MVP Samoan quarterback, or NASCAR "needs" an Asian champion.  A champion is the person who performs best at his/her sport, and that is what it is. The NBA hasn't had a white MVP since 2006, yet I don't see anybody bleating that the NBA "needs a white champion".  As far as I can see, there's never been a Hispanic NBA MVP - where's the outcry over that?

Race is not playing a role in this discussion (until you brought it up… and you've previously mentioned you don't like Tiger, so…???).

And now race ends its short time playing a role in this discussion, please.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As I've already said, it doesn't "add a jewel." The dude won four majors in a row whether you call it a "Grand Slam" or a "Tiger Slam" or a freaking "Kerbooble Janooey". Whatever you call it, he won four majors in a row (and 3 U.S. Ams in a row, and 14 or 17 majors…). Uhhhhh… no.   They're false accolades to you given your definition .   Race is not playing a role in this discussion (until you brought it up… and you've previously mentioned you don't like Tiger, so…???). And now race ends its short time playing a role in this discussion, please.

Criminey....thank you Erik..

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not. Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this.  Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.  His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit).  Champions shouldn't need and don't deserve "affirmative action" because of somebody's white guilt.  Golf doesn't "need" a black champion anymore than the NFL "needs" an MVP Samoan quarterback, or NASCAR "needs" an Asian champion.  A champion is the person who performs best at his/her sport, and that is what it is. The NBA hasn't had a white MVP since 2006, yet I don't see anybody bleating that the NBA "needs a white champion".  As far as I can see, there's never been a Hispanic NBA MVP - where's the outcry over that?

A tip: don't talk about shit you don't understand, like racial and sociological politics. It makes you look like a jerk. Also, I find it hilarious that you are so convinced this is a ploy to bolster Tiger's resumé; not to spoil it for you, but he doesn't need help in that department.

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hack? You obviously mean GOAT. If Nicklaus had done this, the conversation would be the same.

[quote name="Mac62" url="/t/83344/tigers-slam-a-grand-achievement/390#post_1174773"]No, I don't.  I feel it's nothing more than an effort by his admirers to add another jewel to his crown, deserved or not. Gary Player recently said "Golf needs a black champion", and that (discriminatory, IMO) line of thought is what leads to things like this.  Because of his race, many people feel the need to prop him up to the maximum extent possible.  His accomplishments speak for themselves whether you're a fan of his or not - he doesn't need false accolades piled on top of them (although I'm sure his ego doesn't mind it one bit). [/quote]Well hes a hack now and GOHE but not GOAT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Probably not. The Tiger lovers need some "Great Tiger" stuff to talk about, and there just hasn't been any of that for quite some time. Tiger missed another cut, played horrible again, and wasn't even hardly discussed. He's playing so bad they don't even talk about that( his poor play) much anymore. It's got to be disheartening for his following, so they delve back into history for some Tiger love.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aflighter View Post

Does anyone even think this whole discussion would even exist if it was someone else other than tiger (hack) woods?

Probably not. The Tiger lovers need some "Great Tiger" stuff to talk about, and there just hasn't been any of that for quite some time. Tiger missed another cut, played horrible again, and wasn't even hardly discussed. He's playing so bad they don't even talk about that( his poor play) much anymore. It's got to be disheartening for his following, so they delve back into history for some Tiger love.

Or… the Jordan Spieth stuff brought up the topic of what a "Grand Slam" is to people. As the thread starter, I can tell you it was that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3048 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I had to think about this topic for a while. I don't tend to remember specific details about my putts, but a few do stand out in my mind so I guess they're worth noting. I don't know that I'd call them my favorite but it's close enough. #18 at Spooky Brook Might be the hardest 4' putt I've ever had. Pin was back right and I hit my third shot just to the right of it. The green slopes fairly severely back to front. I read the green but I knew the putt anyway as I've seen it before. I told the guys I was playing with that the putt was it was going to break almost 3' and if it doesn't go in I'd have a longer coming back up for par than I was looking at. It went in. #12 at Quail Brook I'm not even sure how to describe this green properly. It's not quite a two-tiered green, but the back and front are separated by a ridge that goes across the middle of it, with the green sloping harder off the front than the back. You can generally putt from the front to a back hole location but good luck keeping the ball on the green if you putt from back to front. On this particular day, I was looking at the latter. I had to putt up into the apron due to how the ball was going to break and that helped slow the ball down enough to hit the hole at the perfect speed. One of the rare birdies I've seen on that hole. #2 at Hyatt Hills Short par 5. This makes the list because it's the first eagle putt I've ever made, which funny enough happened the day after the first eagle I've ever made. I've made two eagles in all my life and they came on back to back days. I wasn't even planning on playing golf - it was a Monday - but I was doing some work at the place I used to work at when I was younger and catching up with some of the guys I've known for years. They were going out to play in the afternoon and had a spot available. I used to see these guys every day for years but we've never played together, so I said I'm in. I hit a really good approach shot into slope that separated the two tiers on the green and spun the ball closer to the hole. Had roughly 8' left to the hole, a downhill right to left breaker. One of the guys said, "You've got to make this, I've never seen an eagle before," and I said, "I've never made an eagle putt before." And then I made it. #17 at Stoneleigh @GolfLug's post reminded me of my own heroics on #17 a couple of years ago. The hole was back left, in the bottom tier. I hit my approach short of the green and flubbed my chip so it stayed on the top tier. I read how the putt was going to break after the ramp (is that what you call it?), then read my putt up to that point. It needed to basically die at that point because if it hit the slope with any kind of speed, it would long past the hole and possibly off the green. I hit the putt perfectly and holed the 40-footer center cup. #6 at Meadow at Neshanic Valley, #15 in the Round This was during the stroke play qualifier of my tournament. It might be a little bit of recency bias and I hit some really good long putts in the four rounds I played, but this 7-footer was my favorite putt of the entire tournament. The hole was cut on the top of a ridge. I hit my tee shot short right but hit a pretty good chip just long and below the hole. Play had backed up at this point, with the ladies waiting on the tee while we were finishing up. I hit the putt just a hair on the high side and it curled around the hole, fell back a couple of inches and stopped on lip. We all looked at it incredulously, "How does that not fall in?" Before I took my first step towards the hole, the ball must have thought the same thing and decided to drop.
    • I don't remember a ton of putts, but I've thought about this a bit and came up with 2 good ones. #5 at Mid-South: 2017 Newport Cup I remember the putt pretty well, but the surrounding details are a little hazy. I believe this was in my singles match against @cipher, and it was a hole he was stroking on. I had hit a mediocre approach to the front of the green and had what must have been a 50 foot putt to a back pin. If I remember correctly, @cipher was pretty close for an easy par at worst. I had @mvmac help me out with a read, which ended up being a great read by him. Hit the putt and jarred it for birdie. It was perfect speed, too, would have been an easy 2 putt if it hadn't gone in. I think we ended up tying for the hole. But I rarely make putts that long, and doing it to steal half a hole was really nice. #3 Fox Hollow (Links): 2023 Match Play This was on the third extra hole of a scratch match against a legitimate 0 handicapper. We had tied after 18 holes and traded pars on the first two extra holes. On the third extra hole, he had about 30 feet for birdie; I had about 25. We were on pretty much the exact same line. He missed his putt just on the low side, and I conceded the par. I felt good over this putt - I knew the break well and just needed good speed. I hit a great (not perfect) putt, and BAM, back of the cup for the victory on the 21st hole. I will say that the speed wasn't great, as it would have been a few feet past if it didn't hit the cup. But I wanted to give the ball a chance and take a bit of break out of it. I went on to win the match play tournament, which is my only tournament victory in a scratch event.
    • there will be lots of changes.  i mean, look at newey past, each team fell off a cliff when he moved on i think max is the magic bullet   if red bull loses him then whee are they going for drivers?   lots of young talent but he is a proven winner and i’m sure top engineers love to work with him  
    • I too, like @GolfLug, remember great wedge, iron shots, or my missed putts, more than my made putts. My most memorable recently, would be: #17 Old Course St. Andrews (last year) I had been putting awful all day (I started 3 putt, 4 putt, 3 putt, 3 putt), but found a putting stroke on the back 9 and was 1 under on the back going into 16 and of course I 3-putted it for a bogey. Got to 17 and my playing partner just hit it into the hotel, so I went a little more left and decided to not try and hit it over the hotel.  And as soon as my ball was in the air, I heard one of the other caddies do the chicken noise.  LOL My shot was a little more left than I wanted, about 185 yards, I hit a 6-iron and it was drawing right at the flag.  The pin was just to the right of he bunker and towards the front of the green. My ball hit short (and just missed going into said bunker) and stopped about 15 feet left of the hole. Had a little left to right break and as soon as I hit it, I knew it was in.  Birdie on the road hole, looked at the caddie and said not bad for a Chicken.  Parred 18 (missed 10 foot birdie putt) for a 35 on the back 9 at the Old Course. #18 Springfield G&CC Last year while playing in our season long match play event, my partner and I get the 18th hole needing to win the match to move on into the knockout round.  We are tied going into 18.  A tie and we lose on overall points by .5.  Our teaching pro is on the other team (very good golfer), so we were pretty sure we needed a birdie to have a chance to win the match, I hit on of the best drives I hit all day and had about 135 yards to the pin, but it was in a place where you didn't really want to be long.  So I hit a PW and it landed just short of the flag but released about 12 feet past the hole, so have a devilish putt coming back down the hill.  Our competitors were away and the pro missed his birdie putt by inches, I thought it was in when he hit it.  So after reading the putt, which probably had a 2 cup left to right break, I made the putt to win the match.   #15 Springfield G&CC A few years back, was playing in the first round of the Club Championship (against the previous years runner-up) and my putter was balky all day.  Got to the 15 hole, 2nd Par 5 on back, and was 3-down with 4 to play.  We both hit good drives, both hit good second shots and we both hit decent 3rd shots.  I was about 15 feet and he was just a hair longer.  He missed his putt, I had another slider putt down the hill, with about a foot of right to left break and made the putt.  I birded the next hole, to go 1 down, but not a memorable putt as I only needed a bogey to beat him on that hole, he had all kinds of issues going on.  Lost on 17, as he birdied it, right after I missed mine to lose 2&1.
    • Wordle 1,049 3/6* ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟨 ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...