Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3631 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

Had a recent change of irons, my last set stopped at a 44degree PW so I had a 52 and 58 degree pair of Cleveland 588's in the bag. My new set has a 43 degree PW and also a 55 degree SW. Do my current additional wedges work or would I be better to change the gaps maybe a 50 degree. The set does have a GW option which is 47 degrees. 

Thanks


Posted
27 minutes ago, Hazza said:

Hello all,

Had a recent change of irons, my last set stopped at a 44degree PW so I had a 52 and 58 degree pair of Cleveland 588's in the bag. My new set has a 43 degree PW and also a 55 degree SW. Do my current additional wedges work or would I be better to change the gaps maybe a 50 degree. The set does have a GW option which is 47 degrees. 

Thanks

You have a pretty big gap so I would imagine you would need something in there. Whether it's a 50° wedge or something else, maybe even 2 wedges, is a different question.  You need to figure out your yardages on each end of the go and try out some wedges to see how they fit into that gap. A 50° might work, but what type of wedge you get will impact that. A bladier wedge might give you different distances than a chunkier cavity back due to different CGs even with the same loft. You really just need to get your yardages and try some wedges. Consider also how it hits tweener distances on pitching. A gap wedge is very typically used on pitching for a lot of folks so see how comfortable you are doing that with the wedge. 

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with dkolo in that you need something in there to take care of the gap between your pw and 55. The distance in between those clubs would have to be made up with different swing speeds which is more difficult than with having a different loft on an added club. The only reason not to have a gap wedge is if you feel you can gain strokes by carrying a club instead of your gap wedge. This may be a lofted hybrid or a club to chip and run with that is used primarily around the green. You have to weigh your options, are you gonna play better with the gap wedge in your bag or whatever club you replace the gap wedge with. It is a personal question that can only be answered by reviewing your weaknesses and choosing the club that best helps out weakness.


  • Moderator
Posted

In my world, I don't really care a lot about the loft numbers,  my normal distance with each club is much more important.  If there's a big gap in yardage, it would make a lot of sense to explore finding a club to fit in that gap.  Of course, you also need to weigh which club you'd take out of your bag to keep within the 14-club limit.  For me, if I have to have a big gap somewhere, I'd rather it be at the longer end of the spectrum than at the shorter (wedge) end, but that's all personal preference.

  • Upvote 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Could you open up that 43 wedge when you need 50 degrees? I use to carry 4 wedges. I have now culled that down to two by manipulating the club faces at addres. I only carry 12 clubs now.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's really weird that a lot of game improvement sets are bundled with 4 - PW, SW rather than 4 - PW, GW or 5 - PW, GW, SW.  In these sets the PW is very strong so that omitting the GW leaves a big gap in a similar fashion that omitting the 7-iron would.

In the case of the OP's set it sounds like the 47* GW that goes with the set would have worked great with the 52* and 58* that you already have.  The SW that came with it very likely does not fill in as important a gap between your two current wedges.  If you can I would think you should trade the SW back in for the GW and play your 2 current wedges.

Of course the best thing is to see how far you hit them all and if you have yardage gaps, but I think just about everyone would benefit from that GW.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You need a wedge according to your distance gaps.  If the gaps are too big, get another wedge that fills the gap.  Otherwise get another club elsewhere to plug another gap or a specialty club to help get out of trouble, like a chipper or a hybrid

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks a lot for the feedback folks. I hit the 52 around 95yds and the 58 around 75yds. The PW is going to be around 120yds for me. 

I can see how with the GW it would be fairly balanced at least on lofts with my current 52 and 58. 

I'm definitely going to need something in there though.  As it stands I'm carrying 13 clubs. 

I guess one option is to get the 47 and work with what I have opening up the face etc.  Obviously yardage gaps are key rather than the lofts themselves. 


Posted

My situation was quite similar to yours in terms of gaps, I had a 45 degree PW and a 54 degree SM5, for me the distance gap between those was definitely to big. In this gap, where I ended up more than I would like to admit, I always had to fabricate something and think about it, which ended not very well in general. I bought a 50 degree and I absolutely love it. I would recommend buying a gap wedge, but in your case I would look at a 48 degree, because the loft gaps are 5 and 4 degrees with the other wedges, instead of 7 and 2.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, you NEED that wedge.  And some other toys too.  and a nice watch.  and cargo shorts.

(I like yardage gapping, too, as a way to pick them.  But 75-95-120 isn't too bad.  I have 4 wedges and full swings about:  60d (70 yds); 56d (95 yds); 50d (110yds);  PW46 (120 yds).  works for me)

 

That 100 - 110 distance is really a sweet spot for me - I use my GW (the 50 degree) probably the most of any of my wedges.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 minutes ago, Hazza said:

Thanks a lot for the feedback folks. I hit the 52 around 95yds and the 58 around 75yds. The PW is going to be around 120yds for me. 

I can see how with the GW it would be fairly balanced at least on lofts with my current 52 and 58. 

I'm definitely going to need something in there though.  As it stands I'm carrying 13 clubs. 

I guess one option is to get the 47 and work with what I have opening up the face etc.  Obviously yardage gaps are key rather than the lofts themselves. 

Yeah, I think you have it right.  Get that gap wedge because a 25 yard gap is really big, especially at those distances, and especially considering you only have 13 clubs.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Is 43 to 50 still a too big gap really? The 47 is sounding like the better option. Then keep the 52 55 58. 

The alternative I guess is 43 50 55 60. 

I know I need to check yardages but just looking for opinions on those options. 

 

Cheers


Posted
3 hours ago, Hazza said:

Is 43 to 50 still a too big gap really? The 47 is sounding like the better option. Then keep the 52 55 58. 

The alternative I guess is 43 50 55 60. 

I know I need to check yardages but just looking for opinions on those options. 

 

Cheers

43, 48, 54, 60.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3631 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.