Jump to content
IGNORED

2016 NFL Draft


phan52
Note: This thread is 2666 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

As an Eagles fan, I am not 100% on board with the move the Birds made to move up and get the second pick in the draft. It is obvious that they will take a QB, preferably Carson Wentz, but I don't think they completely thought through what this means for Sam Bradford. They just paid him a lot of money but this move says to him that he is never going to be a long term solution and that he is just holding the job temporarily until Wentz is ready. The guy has already had a different offensive coordinator every single year he has played and I am sure he re-signed with the Birds looking for some stability. Bradford has already said that he would prefer to be traded but that will wreck the Eagles salary cap for 2016. As I said, not thought through.

I am not sure that either one of the top two QB's (Goff and Wentz) are going to make it. I would have been OK with going with Bradford and drafting another QB later in the draft for development and use all the other picks in the next couple of years to build around the QB's.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, but we long suffering Browns fans thank you for it! It remains to be seen what our new front office will do with this bounty. If they can get even half the picks right it will be a bonanza! With the picks they gave up, you might think the Eagles were going to make a Super Bowl run this year. Yeah, like I should talk! We've never even been there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, phan52 said:

As an Eagles fan, I am not 100% on board with the move the Birds made to move up and get the second pick in the draft. It is obvious that they will take a QB, preferably Carson Wentz, but I don't think they completely thought through what this means for Sam Bradford. They just paid him a lot of money but this move says to him that he is never going to be a long term solution and that he is just holding the job temporarily until Wentz is ready. The guy has already had a different offensive coordinator every single year he has played and I am sure he re-signed with the Birds looking for some stability. Bradford has already said that he would prefer to be traded but that will wreck the Eagles salary cap for 2016. As I said, not thought through.

I am not sure that either one of the top two QB's (Goff and Wentz) are going to make it. I would have been OK with going with Bradford and drafting another QB later in the draft for development and use all the other picks in the next couple of years to build around the QB's.

Or they plan to trade Bradford if they get the QB they want.  The Jets and Broncos, as well as a few other teams who just don't realize it yet, need a starting QB.  

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As a Giants fan but also a fan of the game, I don't know why the Rams/Eagles would make these trades to take Goff or Wentz. Now I don't really watch either team in depth too much but I don't know why they would give up so much to get a QB that doesn't jump out to me as being elite. If I were either team, I would wait until a QB shows up in future drafts that people know is going to be good (Andrew Luck) and take him instead, but that's just me. As for my boys, I think they should take Treadwell. As we saw towards the end of last year when Jennings gets the majority of the carries, he produces, so we don't need a back like Elliot, as good as he is. While there are still some holes at linebacker, the defense improved over the offseason so while it is still a need, it is not a glaring need. Same with offensive line. D-line, I think they are fine. By taking Treadwell, that takes a ton of pressure off of force-feeding ODB every pass. Cruz is also a Giant (that's punny) question mark with his injury history, so you can't rely on him to be a #2. Those three together with Harris and Will Tye make up a very intimidating offense. Second round they should take Karl Joseph - he looked really good before he got hurt, and they clearly need a free safety to complement Collins.

Edited by bostonboy9416
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
On 4/23/2016 at 11:47 PM, newtogolf said:

Or they plan to trade Bradford if they get the QB they want.  The Jets and Broncos, as well as a few other teams who just don't realize it yet, need a starting QB.  

Broncos are in a tight cap issue. I'm not sure they could afford Bradford's cap hit. I do agree they need an upgrade from Sanchez.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Broncos are in a tight cap issue. I'm not sure they could afford Bradford's cap hit. I do agree they need an upgrade from Sanchez.

 

Connor Cook.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


44 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Broncos are in a tight cap issue. I'm not sure they could afford Bradford's cap hit. I do agree they need an upgrade from Sanchez.

The Eagles would have to take the brunt of the cap hit this season if they traded Bradford. I think he would fit well into Denver's cap situation.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2016/4/26/11512762/cardale-jones-espn-sports-science-episode-video

The guy can throw the ball upwards of 60+ mph. His measured throw in the sports science lab would have broken the combine throwing record. His arm strength is such that he can throw from his knees faster than the average QB throws on their hard throws. He also ranked better on accuracy on short passes than Blake Bortels who went overall #3 in 2014. 

I think this guy is going to be a steal for someone late in the draft. He'll go in the 4th or 5th round. Sit him for 3 years and see if he can learn and NFL playbook. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

56 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2016/4/26/11512762/cardale-jones-espn-sports-science-episode-video

The guy can throw the ball upwards of 60+ mph. His measured throw in the sports science lab would have broken the combine throwing record. His arm strength is such that he can throw from his knees faster than the average QB throws on their hard throws. He also ranked better on accuracy on short passes than Blake Bortels who went overall #3 in 2014. 

I think this guy is going to be a steal for someone late in the draft. He'll go in the 4th or 5th round. Sit him for 3 years and see if he can learn and NFL playbook. 

 

Sounds like JaMarcus Russell. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, Golfingdad said:

Sounds like JaMarcus Russell. :P

I think JaMarcus Russell would have been better served drafted in the 4-5th round. Yet Oakland took him #1 overall in the draft. 

Cardale isn't getting above the 3rd round in the draft. No one will take that much of a risk on him. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Damn Jerry Jones to hell.  A frickn RB with the 4th pick??  I know Garrett wanted Ramsey, a far more practical option.  Looks like year 21 without a Super Bowl.  

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Elliot is a great pick. He's not just the top RB in the draft. He's also an amazing pass blocker. That would be very helpful for Romo ;).  He also have WR level hands in catching the ball. He does all the little things. He gives you 100% on each play even without the ball. He's also a perfect fit for Dallas's zone blocking scheme, which is very similar to what OSU runs. He's an every down back that will give you much more than just running the ball. He'll be productive from day one. 

Ramsey didn't seem to be 100% on each down. His press coverage is lacking. He has a lot of work to do before he can be compared as one of the elite lock down corners. Also, he only has 3 INT over the last three seasons. For a CB you want a ball hawk. You want a game changer. He might someday turn into a top lock down guy, but I don't think he's worth a top 10 pick for hoping he'll become that top 10 CB 3 years from now. 

If Dallas thought he was overrated and went with the best player they thought was available and it fits a need for them then it's a good pick. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Elliot is a great pick. He's not just the top RB in the draft. He's also an amazing pass blocker. That would be very helpful for Romo ;).  He also have WR level hands in catching the ball. He does all the little things. He gives you 100% on each play even without the ball. He's also a perfect fit for Dallas's zone blocking scheme, which is very similar to what OSU runs. He's an every down back that will give you much more than just running the ball. He'll be productive from day one. 

Ramsey didn't seem to be 100% on each down. His press coverage is lacking. He has a lot of work to do before he can be compared as one of the elite lock down corners. Also, he only has 3 INT over the last three seasons. For a CB you want a ball hawk. You want a game changer. He might someday turn into a top lock down guy, but I don't think he's worth a top 10 pick for hoping he'll become that top 10 CB 3 years from now. 

If Dallas thought he was overrated and went with the best player they thought was available and it fits a need for them then it's a good pick. 

 

Well, that does make me feel a little better.  I'm just typically opposed to drafting a RB in the 1st round.  I'll withhold judgement til the season starts (although I did already damn the old man to hell).

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, Gunther said:

Well, that does make me feel a little better.  I'm just typically opposed to drafting a RB in the 1st round.  I'll withhold judgement til the season starts (although I did already damn the old man to hell).

They need DE, CB, QB, and RB. I could see they were waiting for Bosa to drop and if not then they go with Elliot. It might be they have a list of CB's they like that would fall to them later in the draft. I'm not sure CB's in the first round work out any better than RB's. 

If they think Elliot is a top 10 talent then go with it. If not then trade down. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://www.detroitlions.com/media-center/videos/Behind_the_scenes_Lions_call_Taylor_Decker/91bdf47a-a4ff-456c-90cc-d9f396d6a618

An inside look of what a draft room looks like for a team. This is the Detroit Lions giving Taylor Decker the call that he's going to be a Detroit Lion. 

There are lots of names on that white board ;) 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, Gunther said:

Damn Jerry Jones to hell.  A frickn RB with the 4th pick??  I know Garrett wanted Ramsey, a far more practical option.  Looks like year 21 without a Super Bowl.  

As an Eagles fan, that was my biggest fear. Elliot will really help the Cowboys, in multiple ways. The running behind that line is obvious, but he is an excellent pass catcher and his blocking ability will help Romo immensely. They are now my favorites to win the division. Yuk.

  • Upvote 1

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 8 months later...
On 29/04/2016 at 1:58 AM, Gunther said:

Damn Jerry Jones to hell.  A frickn RB with the 4th pick??  I know Garrett wanted Ramsey, a far more practical option.  Looks like year 21 without a Super Bowl.  

This was obviously a long time ago, but wonder whether you might be rethinking your original response? :-P

Great season for you guys though - must be excited about the playoffs!

Currently focusing on: Key 4 - shorter backswing.

What's in the bag: Callaway X2 Hot Driver, Titleist 915F 3 wood, X2 Hot 3 Hybrid, 3, 5-AW Apex Pro irons, 54*, 58* Cleveland RTX, Odyssey Versa 1 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2666 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 119: 4/24/24 Chipping and pitching followed by putting through 50 mm gates.
    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...