Jump to content
IGNORED

Pelvis Motion in Elite Players


iacas
Note: This thread is 2254 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

A week or so ago, a known pot-stirrer who rarely (never?) offers anything of his own kicked up another storm on some instructor Facebook groups.

He had problems with the photo in this article: https://www.golfdigest.com/story/swing-by-numbers-new-study-unlocks-6-swing-secrets. Specifically with this image:

GolfTec-swing-study-illo-hip-sway-at-top

The pot-stirrer's issue is that the image looks a little too much like S&T.

The data from GolfTec shows that the average Pro's "pelvis"* moves 3.9" toward the target on the backswing, while the average amateur's moves "only" 2.55" (toward, also).

The paragraph accompanying the picture makes it clear that the "hips" or "pelvis" are measured at the tailbone, which even if it rotated 45° while the center of the hips remained in place, would move about 2.8" (assuming the tailbone is about 4" from the center of the pelvis). Measuring the hip sway at the tailbone is a pretty bad way to go about it, I agree, because again rotation alone will result in "sway" toward the target even if the center of the hips is actually swaying the other direction, away from the target.

But regardless, GolfTec's data said that the tailbone moved 3.9" toward the target in good players, and 2.55" in amateurs. It showed a strong correlation to ability, and ~1.4" is reasonably significant.

GolfTec-swing-study-illo-hip-sway-at-topBut pot-stirrer had a problem with the actual PHOTO.

Does the blue guy look a little left? Well, his torso is tilted away from the target. So I like that. But his right leg is close to "locked out straight" (then again, so is Red Guy's). That doesn't look like 1.35" difference, either.

Perhaps it would have been better had GolfTec simply shown the hips of the golfers and shown their starting position and a little dot on the tailbone where the thing is actually measured.

Better yet, GolfTec could put an additional sensor on the front of the golfer's hips, by his belt buckle, to measure the center of the pelvis a bit more so (this may require an adjustment for a very fat person).

Anyway, pot-stirrer's issue was with the picture. Not the actual data. Several commenters said the 3.9" was misleading, but it was made pretty clear in the article that the measurement is from the tailbone, so even if the sensor is 4" from the center of the hips, and the hips rotate 45°, that's 2.8" of movement right there.

But… let's look at what the hips actually do during the golf swing. Here's a tweet with some basic information.

A larger version of that image is here:

DRZFBSkUEAEOVoD.jpg:large

Not that it matters, but here are what the terms are.

01 BA = Breakaway (when the clubhead moves off the ball)
02 MB = Mid-Backswing
03 LB = Late Backswing
04 LBA = Late Backswing Arms
05 EPR = End of Pelvis Rotation
06 TB = Top of Backswing
07 EDA = End of Delivery (Arms, ~A5)
08 ED = Early Delivery (roughly A6)
09 MD = Mid-Delivery (roughly A6.5)
10 BI = Ball Impact
11 MF = Mid-Followthrough

Forward/Backward (thrust) is relative to the ball: closer to the ball or away from the ball.
Toward/Away (sway) is relative to the target: toward or away from the target.
Upward/Downward (lift) is vertically.

The middle line is the mean (average), and the lines on each side of the graph are one standard deviation away.

Some data points in mean (EPR) format for the green values, in centimeters (cm), are:

EPR: 1.2 (2.7)
TB: 3.0 (2.9)
EDA: 6.8 (2.9)

Between BA and MB (points 1 and 2), the pelvis can be seen swaying backward slightly. How slightly? If EPR (5) is 1.2 cm, then the max sway back away from the target is about 1.6cm. As 2.54cm = 1 inch, 1.6cm is about 0.6".

This very small sway back is used by some to "kick start" the forward motion: at EPR (5), it's 1.2cm forward, at TB (6, A4) it's 3.0 (or 1.2"). From 7 to 10 (impact), the mean is about 7.4cm @ 7/EDA, 8.4cm @ 8/ED, 10cm at 9/MD, and 10.95cm at 10/BI/A7 (impact).

So… the hips move back about half an inch in these elite players hitting driver, before they pivot and sway slightly forward during the backswing. During the downswing, BAM, the pelvis slides to about 11cm forward of their starting location: almost 4.5".

Again…

And…

BTW, these numbers are pretty darn close to what we wrote in the 5SK Instructor training manual back in 2012 or so. :-)

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Informative 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was a little surprised how the hips move forward toward the ball. Up/down made sense. To/from target, check.  But my gut on the Forward/backward measurement was that it would’ve been more constant than it is.  

I’m not trying to debate the info. Just wanted to ‘fess up on an inaccurate mental image of what was going on, in case others had a similar sense.

 

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
46 minutes ago, RandallT said:

I was a little surprised how the hips move forward toward the ball. Up/down made sense. To/from target, check.  But my gut on the Forward/backward measurement was that it would’ve been more constant than it is.  

I’m not trying to debate the info. Just wanted to ‘fess up on an inaccurate mental image of what was going on, in case others had a similar sense.

 

The average is less than an inch by impact. I'd call that "steady" ;-)

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This picture IS misleading.  I remember reading the article, seeing the picture and wondering Wtf...

If u look at the graph background and draw a line up from the lead foot on the blue you see that he's in the right position.  Blue guy stays over the ball.  The difference between the 2 is so great I think that's where it throws people.

Maybe putting an address position in there would have helped.

Edited by Typhoon92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, billchao said:

The average is less than an inch by impact. I'd call that "steady" ;-)

Glad to know the pros aren’t goat humping then :-D

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

imageproxy-01.thumb.jpg.e908bc54959a689fd4cdab0868e259cf.jpgMaybe I'm misunderstanding the OP, but the illustration does make it look like his lead leg is stiff. It's likely traced from a photo and as such accurate, but it fails do a good job of indicating the lead leg/knee is bent forward.

Again, sorry if I'm misunderstanding the post.

 

Edited by JonMA1

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

imageproxy-01.thumb.jpg.e908bc54959a689fd4cdab0868e259cf.jpgMaybe I'm misunderstanding the OP, but the illustration does make it look like his lead leg is stiff. It's likely traced from a photo and as such accurate, but it fails do a good job of indicating the lead leg/knee is bent forward.

I don't think it does that at all. It's an illustration. They can't add a crap ton of lines and stuff.

Screen%20Shot%202018-01-07%20at%2012.11.

And I don't think the lead knee is what anyone had an issue with. It's not what the sensor is measuring, or what the discussion was about.

The focus was on the pelvis and hips.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

31 minutes ago, iacas said:

And I don't think the lead knee is what anyone had an issue with. It's not what the sensor is measuring, or what the discussion was about.

The focus was on the pelvis and hips.

So the "pot stirrer" thought the position of the pelvis and hips in the illustration looked like "Stack & Tilt"? Because almost every PGA image I could find shows those closer to the target at the top. Same with the angles of the back and trail leg.

I guess I'm confused as to why anyone would think that was different or wrong. Doesn't really matter I suppose.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

So the "pot stirrer" thought the position of the pelvis and hips in the illustration looked like "Stack & Tilt"?

Basically.

2 hours ago, JonMA1 said:

I guess I'm confused as to why anyone would think that was different or wrong. Doesn't really matter I suppose.

It doesn't really matter, right. It's an illustration. The OP was operating under the guise that Nick Clearwater is turning GolfTec into a fully S&T type swing. Which the OP hates.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...

The image is misleading.  The sensor is on the tailbone so unseen in the graphic.  I saw Clearwater demonstrating  the data on Golf Channel this morning and went to the practice range with it. Transformed my impact in minutes after years of struggling with divot after ball for years.  I'm not complaining.

Edited by Xerex
Link to comment
Share on other sites


anyways, regardless of what the picture looks like...   

Since reading this post a few days ago, this thought has really helped out.   I've working hard to make a full shoulder turn to help get my hands deep.  Focusing on making a good turn of the hips has really made it easier and even more natural to get my shoulders turned. 

note: I think that trying to open up my hips right away has forced me to pull the club back on an inside path, but I can fix that by focusing on keeping my lead shoulder down, i think.   

:hmm: lots of swing thoughts going on right now...    That's what winter is for, i guess. 

 

:tmade:  - SIM2 - Kuro Kage silver 60 shaft
:cobra:  - F9 3W, 15 degree - Fukijara Atmos white tour spec stiff flex shaft

:tmade: - M2 hybrid, 19 degree
:tmade: - GAPR 3 iron - 18degree
:mizuno: MP-H5 4-5 iron, MP-25 6-8 iron, MP-5 9-PW

Miura - 1957 series k-grind - 56 degree
:bettinardi: - 52 degree
:titleist: - Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Putter

check out my swing here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 12/19/2017 at 6:43 PM, iacas said:

The paragraph accompanying the picture makes it clear that the "hips" or "pelvis" are measured at the tailbone, which even if it rotated 45° while the center of the hips remained in place, would move about 2.8" (assuming the tailbone is about 4" from the center of the pelvis). Measuring the hip sway at the tailbone is a pretty bad way to go about it, I agree, because again rotation alone will result in "sway" toward the target even if the center of the hips is actually swaying the other direction, away from the target.

I can only draw one conclusion from this diagram, better golfers have bigger butts. The "pot stirrer" objected to that, obviously. :-D

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Went to youtube and looked at Nick Clearwater from August 2016 .. go to the :54 second mark

 

 

 

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Anyone who plays golf is looking for a silver bullet solution. For me at least this is one of those. It corrects a number of different positions in the back swing which in turn give consistency of ball impact on release. Elegant, simple and most of all repeatable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2254 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...