Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2276 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Who is #3?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. If we accept the premise that Jack and Tiger occupy the first 2 places on the all-time list, who is third on the list?

    • Ben Hogan
      25
    • Gary Player
      2
    • Phil Mickelson
      24
    • Tom Watson
      7
    • Arnold Palmer
      9
    • Sam Snead
      7
    • Byron Nelson
      1
    • Bobby Jones
      3
    • Other (please specify)
      3


Recommended Posts

Posted

I here you.  It isn't who is the greatest.  How could that possibly be?  Someone is the shit...from one week, month, year, or era to the next.  Henry Cotton was the man...for a while.  Who remembers him?  Was he better than John Ball?  Who the f*** can say?

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I voted for Byron Nelson. And immediately decided I was wrong. If I could re-do my vote I'd go with Hogan. But, I don't think there is a clearcut #3.

  • Like 1

My old but trusty bag is filled with clubs I built...Integra SoooLong 450 10.5°, Jackaroo II 13* 16* 23*  hybrids, Dynacraft irons and wedges...plus a sweet Tad Moore Peach putter.

Please check out my sports card/memorabilia blog: The Five Tool Collector


  • Administrator
Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:43 AM, commishbob said:

I voted for Byron Nelson. And immediately decided I was wrong. If I could re-do my vote I'd go with Hogan. But, I don't think there is a clearcut #3.

Expand  

You can redo your vote.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Went with Hogan. One criteria I used was had to be a grand slam winner. If you are behind just Jack and Tiger you have to have all 4 majors. He sits at 4 in all time wins. 

  • Like 2

Ping G400 9 degree driver, 3 Wood and 3 Hybrid, Ping 2016 G 4-UW,  Ping Glide Forged Pro 52 degree, Ping Glide 2.0 WS 56 degree, Ping Craz-E Putter, Titleist Tour Soft balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Another vote for Ben Hogan here. The dude had a stretch were he played in 5 US Opens and won 4 finishing 3rd in the other! I think the numbers actually favor Sam over Ben 64 and 9 vs 81 and 7, but that US Open record has clinched it for me. I think Arnold Palmer doesn't get enough recognition nowadays as well, 62 wins 7 majors in an arguably tougher era in golf - vs the WWII era.

  • Like 1

Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 3:56 PM, Golfnutgalen said:

Another vote for Ben Hogan here. The dude had a stretch were he played in 5 US Opens and won 4 finishing 3rd in the other! I think the numbers actually favor Sam over Ben 64 and 9 vs 81 and 7, but that US Open record has clinched it for me. I think Arnold Palmer doesn't get enough recognition nowadays as well, 62 wins 7 majors in an arguably tougher era in golf - vs the WWII era.

Expand  

 

No career Grand Slam is a crack in the armor for Palmer/Snead/Mickelson/Watson compared to Hogan.

Plus Hogan had the bus accident and played prime Tiger level golf after it. This should not be ignored. 


Posted

A pretty good case can be made for Walter Hagen.  He won 11 majors despite there being no Open Championship in 1915 thru 1919, no US Open in 1917 or 1918, and no Masters until 1934.  

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:08 PM, Dr. Manhattan said:

 

No career Grand Slam is a crack in the armor for Palmer/Snead/Mickelson/Watson compared to Hogan.

Plus Hogan had the bus accident and played prime Tiger level golf after it. This should not be ignored. 

Expand  

Indeed. I've tried in the past to make a case for both Byron and Snead over Hogan, but I don't think it's a strong enough argument. Correct me if I'm wrong, the US Open was huge back in the day by far the most important tournament in US golf up until maybe 1960 When the Masters gained a ton of traction.

Even ignoring the accident, Ben Hogan won 25% of his events up until age 40 which is something nobody has done since outside of Tiger Woods.

Best win percentages up to age 43 post-Bobby Jones

1.      Ben Hogan (43) 1932-1957 - 63 wins in 262 events (24.05%)

2.      Tiger Woods (43) 1996-2019 - 81 wins in 338 events (23.96%)

3.      Sam Snead (43) 1931-1956 - 75 wins in 341 events (21.99%)

4.      Byron Nelson (43) 1933-1955 - 52 wins in 261 events (19.92%)

5.      Jack Nicklaus (43) 1961-1983 - 71 wins in 429 events (16.55%)

6.      Arnold Palmer (43) 1954-1972 - 61 wins in 465 events (13.02%)

7.      Billy Casper (43) 1954-1975 - 51 wins in 464 events (10.99%)

8.      Phil Mickelson (43) 1991-2013 - 42 wins in 477 events (8.81%)

9.      Vijay Singh (43) 1992-2006 - 29 wins in 360 events (8.06%)

10.      Tom Watson (43) 1971-1993 - 37 wins in 497 events (7.44%)

  On 4/20/2019 at 4:31 PM, Piz said:

A pretty good case can be made for Walter Hagen.  He won 11 majors despite there being no Open Championship in 1915 thru 1919, no US Open in 1917 or 1918, and no Masters until 1934.  

Expand  

The only problem is Jones trounced Hagen in actual tournament play. And nobody is willing to give Jones credit anymore. In a stretch of 9 US Opens Jones finished won 4 and finished 2nd 4 more times! Jones winning percentage in the majors up to 1930 actually goes up if you exclude his amateur wins to a ludicrous 7/15 wins.

Edited by Golfnutgalen

Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:37 PM, Golfnutgalen said:

Indeed. I've tried in the past to make a case for both Byron and Snead over Hogan, but I don't think it's a strong enough argument. Correct me if I'm wrong, the US Open was huge back in the day by far the most important tournament in US golf up until maybe 1960 When the Masters gained a ton of traction.

Even ignoring the accident, Ben Hogan won 25% of his events up until age 40 which is something nobody has done since outside of Tiger Woods.

Best win percentages up to age 43 post-Bobby Jones

1.      Ben Hogan (43) 1932-1957 - 63 wins in 262 events (24.05%)

 

 

2.      Tiger Woods (43) 1996-2019 - 81 wins in 338 events (23.96%)

3.      Sam Snead (43) 1931-1956 - 75 wins in 341 events (21.99%)

4.      Byron Nelson (43) 1933-1955 - 52 wins in 261 events (19.92%)

5.      Jack Nicklaus (43) 1961-1983 - 71 wins in 429 events (16.55%)

6.      Arnold Palmer (43) 1954-1972 - 61 wins in 465 events (13.02%)

7.      Billy Casper (43) 1954-1975 - 51 wins in 464 events (10.99%)

8.      Phil Mickelson (43) 1991-2013 - 42 wins in 477 events (8.81%)

 

 

9.      Vijay Singh (43) 1992-2006 - 29 wins in 360 events (8.06%)

10.      Tom Watson (43) 1971-1993 - 37 wins in 497 events (7.44%)

 

 

Expand  

 

U.S. Open was definitely more important during the days of Hogan/Snead/Nelson. 

After the bus accident, Hogan won 6 of his 8 major starts from 1950 U.S. Open to 1953 British. The only person remotely close to this 75% win rate in the last 80 years is Tiger getting 7 of 11. 


  • Administrator
Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:31 PM, Piz said:

A pretty good case can be made for Walter Hagen.  He won 11 majors despite there being no Open Championship in 1915 thru 1919, no US Open in 1917 or 1918, and no Masters until 1934.  

Expand  

I disagree that the case is "pretty good" once you consider strength/depth of field.

Few consider Peter Thomson in the top 20 golfers who ever lived, and he has five major titles to his name. They're all the same one, and they were against incredibly weak fields.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:31 PM, Piz said:

A pretty good case can be made for Walter Hagen.  He won 11 majors despite there being no Open Championship in 1915 thru 1919, no US Open in 1917 or 1918, and no Masters until 1934.  

Expand  

Not to mention 5 Western Opens which were regarded as majors back then.

  • Like 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:37 PM, Golfnutgalen said:

The only problem is Jones trounced Hagen in actual tournament play. And nobody is willing to give Jones credit anymore. In a stretch of 9 US Opens Jones finished won 4 and finished 2nd 4 more times! Jones winning percentage in the majors up to 1930 actually goes up if you exclude his amateur wins to a ludicrous 7/15 wins.

Expand  

No, he didn't.  Sometimes Jones won, sometimes Hagen did.  They were each supreme, in their world, in matchplay, but since Hagen was a pro he couldn't play in the match play events Jones played in (the Amateurs) and since Jones was an Am he couldn't play in the match play events Hagen played in (the PGA).  Which was better at match play?

Hagen beat Jones in their famous Match of the Century, 12 & 11 in the nominally 72 hole match.

  • Like 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
  On 4/20/2019 at 8:04 PM, turtleback said:

No, he didn't.  Sometimes Jones won, sometimes Hagen did.  They were each supreme, in their world, in matchplay, but since Hagen was a pro he couldn't play in the match play events Jones played in (the Amateurs) and since Jones was an Am he couldn't play in the match play events Hagen played in (the PGA).  Which was better at match play?

Hagen beat Jones in their famous Match of the Century, 12 & 11 in the nominally 72 hole match.

Expand  

The match of the Century is mostly meaningless though, not much more than a silly season event. As for the rest I disagree, both players played great golf in basically the same time frame and Jones was superior in the events they both attended. In the 13 majors they both played Jones got the better of Hagen 10 times and won 5 while Hagen never won an Open with Jones in the field. That's fairly dominant in my eyes. Also going back to the US Open importance, Jones won 4 vs Hagen's 2. I can see justifying ranking Hagen over Jones on the strength of his 45 total tour wins, but that seems a bit unfair because Jones only played a handful of events.

Still, Hagen was incredible. He won 24% of his events (45/190) by the time of his last win age 43. Definitely comparable to Hogan if we assume that they competed in a similar level of competition.

 

Edited by Golfnutgalen

Posted

I voted for Hogan on this question, but that is just based on my opinion of him being the 3rd best player ever (arguably the GOAT if not for his injuries and WW2).

If we switch the question to Mount Rushmore, it becomes far more difficult because Mount Rushmore includes other stuff besides performance on the course. Tiger, Arnold, and Jack are all on Mount Rushmore. The #4 spot then becomes a question of Jones or Hogan. I would have to give this spot to Jones because The Masters would not exist without him.

Everything that Arnold/Jack/Tiger have done would not be as special without The Masters. Likewise for Hogan's performance at Augusta for that matter. That is a little trickier because Hogan is the one who came up with the Champions Dinner idea in the first place. But the golf course and tournament simply would not exist without Jones. 

Best Ever

  1. Tiger
  2. Jack
  3. Hogan
  4. Jones/Hagen (tie)
     

Mount Rushmore

  1. Jones
  2. Arnold
  3. Jack
  4. Tiger

Posted

Gotta go with FIGJAM, aka Lefty, aka Phil. He fell victim to having his best years coincide with the an era where Tiger was essentially unbeatable. 

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  On 4/20/2019 at 4:31 PM, Piz said:

A pretty good case can be made for Walter Hagen.  He won 11 majors despite there being no Open Championship in 1915 thru 1919, no US Open in 1917 or 1918, and no Masters until 1934.  

Expand  

Hagen won lots of PGA titles that Jones didn't enter (nor the other top amateurs of the day), and never beat his illustrious rival at an Open championship (US or British). No question which of those two ranks higher. I'd also put Hogan above Snead, as although Sam won more in quantity, Hogan's almost total dominance in, again, the majors that mattered after coming back from his terrible injuries in 1949 eclipsed anything Snead did. Not maybe a candidate for number 3 but a definite top 5 shout for me would be Seve - not just for his 5 majors but the fact that he was the player who showed European golfers could win majors in the States against the very best like Nicklaus and Watson and opened the floodgates for Langer, Lyle, Faldo etc. 

  • Like 2

Posted (edited)
  On 4/20/2019 at 6:19 PM, iacas said:

I disagree that the case is "pretty good" once you consider strength/depth of field.

Few consider Peter Thomson in the top 20 golfers who ever lived, and he has five major titles to his name. They're all the same one, and they were against incredibly weak fields.

Expand  

Cant disagree with the Peter Thompson argument. I've heard his swing was wonderful (FWIW). But depth of field keeps coming up; It doesn't make Hagen any less great if he played against inferior competition. Tiger Woods is still great whether he plays against Koepka or me.

Was the depth of field that great from 1997-2002? Tiger said only he and Vijay worked on their physical health! Even so, with the strokes gained data from now into the future, It should be able to show how good Tiger was 100 years from now.

Edited by Slim_Pivot
added (FWIW) to avoid confusion, i agreed with Iacas assessment of peter thompson.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2276 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 296 - 2025-07-23 Got a good hour+ of work in after a few lessons on my off day today. 😉 Recorded some, had mirrors in both places FO/DL. Same stuff, but made sure the right knee was fine.
    • Skill work/clubface control. And…
    • That's not always true. I can apply a force perpendicular to the club… through the center of mass. No rotation. 😉 You don't "apply" a torque. A torque is a result of the force away from the COM. And, per the above, it's not exclusive of the translational motion. Nit-picky, yes. But if we're gonna talk about physics, let's actually talk about physics, and not the ninth grade version of it. I know what you mean, but again, getting terminology right is a big part of this. It's not "behind" the hands exactly as it's already kicked out a little (mostly at that point because  the hands have already slowed a little). They don't really pull up much. They just continue around their arc. The upward pulling here is small. You've seen resultant forces, but may be confusing "holding onto the grip" with how much the hands actually pull upward. To say it another way, you may be confusing the force and the counter force that stops the club from slipping out of your hands. No, because that would be a silly way to look at it given that the golfer is not only holding onto the club  but continuing to push the handle forward, too. Poorly, yes. See above.
    • I just hate when I make half swings I can’t f***** control face or path. F****** half swing back, arms down feeling and block it 30 f****** yards right with a fade.  I can’t even join my game out here at least I have nice views
    • Okay - I'm going to try this again from the top. While that may not be what I said, it is what I meant, although it appears I didn't express it very clearly. The hands apply forces and torques to the club throughout the swing. Any force applied to something like a club can be broken down into the portion of the force that is perpendicular to the shaft and the portion that is parallel to the shaft. The part that is perpendicular to it is applying a torque to the club, which will cause its rotation to change. In a similar fashion, we can look at the club as the sum of two different sets of motion. One of those is how the COM of the club is moving through space. That is affected by all the forces applied to the club, be they from the hands or gravity or the ground or the ball or the air - I think that's about it. The hands in a full swing are going to be the vast majority of those forces. Then the change in location of the COM (translational motion I think it's called) is caused by the net of all the forces applying to it. The perpendicular portion of the force is the only one that matters for rotational motion. That can be considered exclusive of the translational motion. Rotational motion will change with torques applied and can be contemplated on its own. From P6 to P7, you start with the club lagging behind the hands. The hands then pull up (among other things), which is a force applied to the club, not directly through the COM of the club. That means that a torque is being applied to the club by the hands. One which will cause the club to rotate around its COM if we are exclusively looking at the rotational motion. And so, in that sense, the club is rotating around it's COM. That's the part of the motion that I was trying to describe originally. That upward force from the hands is also going to be accelerating the COM around the swing arc due to the net effect of the forces applied to it.  Then, the combined effect of the forces and torques may be to cause the club to rotate around something else in a different reference frame. You can draw a line up the shaft of the club in each frame of video around impact and the point where those lines meet is roughly the center of rotation of the club in the static frame. That center of rotation is also moving through time as you'll see the point where the lines meet is rarely going to remain in the same spot. In any case, this is a different rotation from what I was trying to talk about previously. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

Join us here in The Sand Trap!

Registration is free and takes almost no time. You'll see one fewer ad per page and be ready to jump in and contribute your thoughts to any subject!

Click here to register (registration will open in a new page so you can continue to read what you came to read).

The popup will be closed in 9 seconds...