Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2794 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, adampaul said:

I think Uruguay will definitely defeat top teams in top 16 because Uruguay is the only team who win all 3 matches of group matches.

Croatia also won all three of their matches against, arguably, much better teams than Uruguay.  Also, England or Belgium could come away with 9 points tomorrow as well.  If they don't then that group is going to be decided on yellow/red cards.


Interesting (to me) little bits of trivia I learned recently:

  • There have been 20 past World Cups and only 12 different Champions.
  • Piggybacking off of that, 3 of those 12 have only one WC to their name (England, France, Spain), and the remaining 9 have won a combined 17 Cups.
  • In addition to those 12 champions, only 4 other countries have ever made a final.
  • Brazil, Germany, Italy and Argentina have combined for 15 WC titles and 11 WC runner-ups.
  • EVERY country to ever play in a WC final has been from UEFA (Europe) or CONMEBOL (South America).

Based on this info, there are only 7 teams remaining that have a chance to make the final :-P ... Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, France, England, Spain, and Sweden.

Edited by Golfingdad
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
23 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

Based on this info, there are only 7 teams remaining that have a chance to make the final :-P ... Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, France, England, Spain, and Sweden.

That's what makes sports so interesting.    Anything can happen, and does.  The way that Argentina, France and Spain are playing right now, they are less likely to make it to the final.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On June 8, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Groucho Valentine said:

If you're not Germany or France, you're probably just playing for fun.  One of those two teams are going to win.

:-$

1 hour ago, dennyjones said:

It was exciting to see the ending of the Germany / South Korea game.   It's not unusual for the defending champion to exit the tournament early. 

They don't have the same knights of death prowling the midfield they used to, but you're talking about the machine, here. They're too talented to not at least make it to the knockout. Shocking. 


Posted

Happy to see Germany out. They haven't played well and with winning the last EC and WC, I didn't want them to get far. 

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

IIRC, Alexi Lalas picked Germany to win the WC in the very first pre game show.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Golfingdad said:

Croatia also won all three of their matches against, arguably, much better teams than Uruguay.  Also, England or Belgium could come away with 9 points tomorrow as well.  If they don't then that group is going to be decided on yellow/red cards.


Interesting (to me) little bits of trivia I learned recently:

  • There have been 20 past World Cups and only 12 8 different Champions.
  • Piggybacking off of that, 3 of those 12 8 have only one WC to their name (England, France, Spain), and the remaining 9 5 have won a combined 17 Cups.
  • In addition to those 12 8 champions, only 4 other countries have ever made a final.
  • Brazil, Germany, Italy and Argentina have combined for 15 WC titles and 11 WC runner-ups.
  • EVERY country to ever play in a WC final has been from UEFA (Europe) or CONMEBOL (South America).

Based on this info, there are only 7 teams remaining that have a chance to make the final :-P ... Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, France, England, Spain, and Sweden.

Guys, I totally blew this.  There have been only EIGHT different champions, not 12.  12 total countries ever in the final.  Sorry for the confusion.

National team Wins Runners-up Total finals Years won Years runners-up
22px-Flag_of_Brazil.svg.png Brazil 5 2 7 1958, 1962, 1970, 1994, 2002 1950, 1998
23px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Germany 4 4 8 1954, 1974, 1990, 2014 1966, 1982, 1986, 2002
23px-Flag_of_Italy.svg.png Italy 4 2 6 1934, 1938, 1982, 2006 1970, 1994
23px-Flag_of_Argentina.svg.png Argentina 2 3 5 1978, 1986 1930, 1990, 2014
23px-Flag_of_Uruguay.svg.png Uruguay 2 0 2 1930, 1950
23px-Flag_of_France.svg.png France 1 1 2 1998 2006
23px-Flag_of_England.svg.png England 1 0 1 1966
23px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Spain 1 0 1 2010
23px-Flag_of_the_Netherlands.svg.png Netherlands 0 3 3 1974, 1978, 2010
23px-Flag_of_the_Czech_Republic.svg.png Czechoslovakia 0 2 2 1934, 1962
23px-Flag_of_Hungary.svg.png Hungary 0 2 2 1938, 1954
23px-Flag_of_Sweden.svg.png Sweden 0 1 1 1958
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The entire complexion of international football (soccer) is changing pretty rapidly. Most of us ought to live long enough to see 12 nations with World Cups.

Who knows? Maybe North America gets one in the not-too-distant future.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
32 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

The entire complexion of international football (soccer) is changing pretty rapidly. Most of us ought to live long enough to see 12 nations with World Cups.

Who knows? Maybe North America gets one in the not-too-distant future.

Only a casual fan. Rapidly changing. By this do you mean fewer countries and teams dominating? 

4 hours ago, nevets88 said:

I'm torn on rooting for Mexico as they eliminated the USMNT, I wonder how the US would have done in Mexico's group though, they would be hard pressed to do what Mexico did. I did enjoy Mexico beating the Germans though.

Oi, my mistake. Forgot how US got knocked out. 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I guess gone are the days when you could pick Brazil, Italy or Germany as your horse and you would have better than 70% odds of collecting a payout. 

I am not a die hard futbol fan and usually enjoy watching late stages regardless of who is playing but won't mind if Argentina wins cause I want Messi to win one.  

Interesting that people hate on Germany similar to how people hate on Yankees and Patriots.  

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, nevets88 said:

Only a casual fan. Rapidly changing. By this do you mean fewer countries and teams dominating? 

Yep.

It's getting globalized just like everything else. Just look at the top-flight club level. EPL and Bundesliga are full of non-native players. Even La Liga has some 43% of its players from outside Spain and that's on the lower end of it.. 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

By this do you mean fewer countries and teams dominating? 

That's a confusing sentence, lol.  Fewer teams dominating kind of sounds like the opposite of what I believe you are trying to say.  But I think that, yes, that's what he is saying.  More and more good teams all over, not just the same few powers.  Definitely becoming more worldwide - Africa has some good teams, Asia, North America hopefully too.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There is some potential for "tanking" shenanigans in tomorrow's England-Belgium match, I believe.  It's already known that the winner of that group are faced with Brazil (or Mexico) in the quarters, and second gets Sweden or Switzerland.  Factor in that they'll also know their first round opponent by the start of the match as well.

So if you're either of those teams and you know going in a win gets you Colombia then Brazil, whereas a loss gets you Japan and then SWE/SUI winner, how badly do you really want to win that game?  Top it off with this consideration as well; a draw leaves them tied in every tiebreaker category except the last, which is fair play points.  Currently England leads in that one with one fewer yellow card.

(Mainly, this is just me trying to manufacture some drama for that last round of games, since otherwise there is none. :))

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Golfingdad said:

That's a confusing sentence, lol.  Fewer teams dominating kind of sounds like the opposite of what I believe you are trying to say.  But I think that, yes, that's what he is saying.  More and more good teams all over, not just the same few powers.  Definitely becoming more worldwide - Africa has some good teams, Asia, North America hopefully too.

Sorry, I don't multitask well, yes you're right. More towards parity.

  • Like 1

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Curious, anyone watching via Sling, YouTube Live, Hulu Live, Playstation, DirectTV? How is the picture quality? Anyone from UK streaming in 4K? Hulu Live, the matches can be a touch pixelly, like 720ish or below, sometimes hitting 1080.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
57 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

There is some potential for "tanking" shenanigans in tomorrow's England-Belgium match, I believe.  It's already known that the winner of that group are faced with Brazil (or Mexico) in the quarters, and second gets Sweden or Switzerland.  Factor in that they'll also know their first round opponent by the start of the match as well.

So if you're either of those teams and you know going in a win gets you Colombia then Brazil, whereas a loss gets you Japan and then SWE/SUI winner, how badly do you really want to win that game?  Top it off with this consideration as well; a draw leaves them tied in every tiebreaker category except the last, which is fair play points.  Currently England leads in that one with one fewer yellow card.

(Mainly, this is just me trying to manufacture some drama for that last round of games, since otherwise there is none. :))

 

Definitely a factor, I'd prefer us to be tactical and finish 2nd, because avoiding Brazil early is huge. At the least , we should treat the game like a friendly.


Posted
3 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Curious, anyone watching via Sling, YouTube Live, Hulu Live, Playstation, DirectTV? How is the picture quality? Anyone from UK streaming in 4K? Hulu Live, the matches can be a touch pixelly, like 720ish or below, sometimes hitting 1080.

I watch via Roku via the Fox Sports app.  Very good picture with multiple options for viewing.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, Moxley said:

Definitely a factor, I'd prefer us to be tactical and finish 2nd, because avoiding Brazil early is huge. At the least , we should treat the game like a friendly.

Then again, is it better to play Brazil later?  Or are they only jelling and getting better as the tournament goes on.  Maybe earlier is better, lol.

Supposedly the English manager said today that they want to win the game. Good for him.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2794 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.