Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3913 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The majority of people on TST know, understand and believe the 'new' (read: correct) ball flight laws where the club face is responsible for ~85% of the starting line of the flight, however there are many people who have played for years with the 'old' ball flight laws and continue to do so because to them the old way is correct.

OLD = Initial direction of the ball is dictated by the club head path . The curvature of the ball is dictated by the club face angle.

NEW = Initial direction of the ball is 85% dictated by the club face angle . The curvature is dictated by the club head path.

Today I watched another Masterclass video with Mizuno and Luke Donald (number 1 again. Go Llluuuuukkkkeeeee!) which was filled with misinformation:



Luke says in the video, "Get that ball position a little bit more forward for a cut. Aim my club face at the pin. Aim my body a little bit left. And then swing across that line."

If you look at the video however that's not the case:

Adobe Flash Player_2012-03-19_11-20-11.png

Luke's body and club head path is aimed way left toward the far left of the green and the ball starts out just left of the pin, curving back toward it.

Just another example of feel not being real in my opinion.

NOTE: I'm a big Luke fan and I love seeing ALL types of golfer play. The above is solely an opinion I'm sharing because I hate us amateurs being fed misinformation. If the old laws work for Luke that's great. If they work for you that's great. I just feel that incorrect information should not be taught to people as being the truth.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

He also contradicts himself. Before he takes the shot he says aim the clubface left of the pin and then over the ball says aim it at the pin.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Administrator
Posted

Luke has a Trackman, has worked extensively with it, etc. It just goes to show that even if you know the right information, applying it to your mental circuitry is difficult. Clearly his muscular circuitry has had the "right information" for a long, long time.

At the end of the day you don't need to know the right information here to play some incredible golf. But it helps, and since it only takes a few minutes to understand, I don't see the point in bumbling along with the wrong information.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm also surprised someone at Mizuno didn't know better. Unfortunately, I think they were more concerned with having their brand associated with Luke than giving out the right information.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

Thats the way I hit a fade and its the only way I can.  I"ve never been able to start the ball left of my stance line and fade it back.  I open way up in my stance play the ball far foward and open the face towards the target and hit a push fade.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Pro golfers try to instantly forget bad strokes/holes/courses and only remember their very best shots/holes etc because positive mental attitude is incredibly important to success. If I was World #1 and I believed that the Golf Fairy carried the ball to the hole whenever I said "Fluffy Slippers" in my mind at address it's a thought that I would cling onto for dear life as clearly it works for me, else I wouldn't be World #1.

I sincerely think it's fine for any golfer to believe whatever they want in their game; more power to them. Where I draw the line is when they then start perpetuating misinformation to people who know no better, effectively holding them back from their best potential.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by poser

Thats the way I hit a fade and its the only way I can.  I"ve never been able to start the ball left of my stance line and fade it back.  I open way up in my stance play the ball far foward and open the face towards the target and hit a push fade.


A push fade is a perfectly fine shot to play. I use that myself. However, as you know, your clubface is not pointed at the target at impact.

For the numbers below, the target is at 0 degrees and negative numbers are left of the target.

Pull-fade: Stance 0°, Path -4°, Clubface -2°.   (Clubface is 2° closed relative to stance, hence, pull-fade).

Push-fade: Stance -6°, Path -4°, Clubface -2°. (Clubface is 4° open relative to stance, hence, push-fade).

Push-fade: Stance -4°, Path -4°, Clubface -2°. (Same as one above with smaller difference in stance/path).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I played with a pro Saturday who played the push fade. He hit some incredible golf shots. He aimed his body open about 15 degrees and it looked like his face was aimed at the pin. I know that is how he set-up to hit the shot, but that is not what happened at impact as the club face had to be closed as as compared to the initial address position but open to the path. It was not by much because it was more of a baby fade with so much control. I don't know if he knows the ball flight laws, but he knows how to play competitive golf on the local tournament level.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

I sincerely think it's fine for any golfer to believe whatever they want in their game; more power to them. Where I draw the line is when they then start perpetuating misinformation to people who know no better, effectively holding them back from their best potential.



I completely agree that it is misinformation because the "new" laws are, no doubt, correct.  However, I think we might be putting too much stock in them, and I don't necessarily agree that it is holding people back.  There were good and bad golfers prior to the "new" laws and there are good and bad golfers now.  And I am sure many of the bad golfers now know the new laws.  To me, the part of the ball flight laws that really matter haven't changed; club face closed relative to path, ball curves left, and club face open relative to path, ball curves right.  That is what I would take away from the video.  I've seen other videos posted here (and there are probably hundreds of them out there) like this one, or the Brandel Chamblee/Aaron Rodgers video, or the Nick Faldo/Sony Open video that all say the same thing.  And they are all wrong in the exact literal sense, i.e. in the case of the Nick Faldo video (how to curve one around a tree) if you followed his directions to the letter, you would, in fact, hit the tree every time.  But you would see that the first time you practiced it, and you would keep tinkering until you figured out how to hit the target.

Anyways, that is my two cents.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I'm also surprised someone at Mizuno didn't know better. Unfortunately, I think they were more concerned with having their brand associated with Luke than giving out the right information.

The equipment companies do know but are in a tough spot. They're interested in selling clubs, not informing the masses and don't want to be the ones to deal with the backlash of telling golfers they have been taught the wrong info.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon View Post

I sincerely think it's fine for any golfer to believe whatever they want in their game; more power to them. Where I draw the line is when they then start perpetuating misinformation to people who know no better, effectively holding them back from their best potential.



Well said

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by mvmac

The equipment companies do know but are in a tough spot. They're interested in selling clubs, not informing the masses and don't want to be the ones to deal with the backlash of telling golfers they have been taught the wrong info.

You think that Mizuno is worried that golfers will not buy their clubs because a short Luke Donald video may differ from their ball flight philosophy?


Posted

Sorry I didn't watch the video, but and maybe I've missed something in the video summary, but does Luke actually refer to ball flight laws or is he simply desribing how he sets up to hit a shot? To hit a draw, I align my feet and club face to the target, then shift slightly to the right, which naturally shifts the face to right of the target as well. Then I either close the clubface a little or swing out to the right depending on the day. At impact the club face is right of the final target in order to have the ball draw back to it, but it was aimed squarely at the target when I started the process.

Originally Posted by Harmonious

Quote:

Originally Posted by mvmac

The equipment companies do know but are in a tough spot. They're interested in selling clubs, not informing the masses and don't want to be the ones to deal with the backlash of telling golfers they have been taught the wrong info.

You think that Mizuno is worried that golfers will not buy their clubs because a short Luke Donald video may differ from their ball flight philosophy?



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

As others have stated and many pro golfers have proved knowledge of the ball flight laws is by no means a necessity in playing amazing golf.  For the majority of the gifted golfers out there their body just figures it out even if their brain can't.  I really think that where knowledge of the ball flight laws really matters is for golfers like me who don't really have that natural ability and need to understand what is actually happening so we can attempt to make the correct fix.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I guess I fall in the minority, what are the new ball flight laws? I got a handout in my golf class I took thru my school that said the clubface controls spin direction (fade or draw, or in my case, slice or hook) and the path controls starting line.


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Harmonious

You think that Mizuno is worried that golfers will not buy their clubs because a short Luke Donald video may differ from their ball flight philosophy?


Typically not a fan of speaking for others, but no, H, that's not what he thinks.

He's simply saying that Mizuno is marketing with these videos, not looking to necessarily put out the absolute 100% perfect information and in doing so contradict what their (only?) star player has to say.

His description is muddy at best, but he definitely says "point the clubface at the target," which is misleading.

And look, we've done our jobs. People know the correct information, and when someone gives bad information, other people here share the links to the correct information. Job done. We don't need to keep bringing this same old topic up, or talking about it. (I've already had conversations about this video on various Facebook groups, for example.)

Case in point:


Originally Posted by Jwat381

I guess I fall in the minority, what are the new ball flight laws? I got a handout in my golf class I took thru my school that said the clubface controls spin direction (fade or draw, or in my case, slice or hook) and the path controls starting line.


Read about them here: Ball Flight Laws .

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Jwat381

I guess I fall in the minority, what are the new ball flight laws? I got a handout in my golf class I took thru my school that said the clubface controls spin direction (fade or draw, or in my case, slice or hook) and the path controls starting line.


First post.

Originally Posted by iacas

We don't need to keep bringing this same old topic up, or talking about it.


Yeah sorry about that; I just saw what seemed to be a nice clear example of feel versus real regarding the laws so I shared it and explained why. I know there are other examples out there; I just felt this one was especially useful. Won't happen again.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted


Thanks, I found that right after I asked the question haha. It gets confusing going back and forth between the old and new, but I think I've got. I  usually hit a straight fade, sometimes a push fade, or more like a push slice, but that's rare anymore. So my clubface is actually getting pretty square or closed, but my biggest problem is too much out to in swing? Good to know, I've been working really hard on that. I'll get the driver out and swing as in to out as I think I can and hit a few duck hooks just to get the feel. When I amp up the swing speed I still get a tiny bit of fade still. This is good to know tho.



Read about them here: Ball Flight Laws .




  • Moderator
Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

Typically not a fan of speaking for others, but no, H, that's not what he thinks.

He's simply saying that Mizuno is marketing with these videos, not looking to necessarily put out the absolute 100% perfect information and in doing so contradict what their (only?) star player has to say.



Correct, thanks Erik.

Originally Posted by Jwat381

Thanks, I found that right after I asked the question haha. It gets confusing going back and forth between the old and new, but I think I've got. I  usually hit a straight fade, sometimes a push fade, or more like a push slice, but that's rare anymore. So my clubface is actually getting pretty square or closed, but my biggest problem is too much out to in swing? Good to know, I've been working really hard on that. I'll get the driver out and swing as in to out as I think I can and hit a few duck hooks just to get the feel. When I amp up the swing speed I still get a tiny bit of fade still. This is good to know tho.


Yes the straight fade would be club face aimed at the target, path was left so the ball curved to the right.  To hit a draw with the driver, start off by aiming the face a little right of target, let's say right center of the fairway and aiming the body further right.  There are also swing faults that can lead to the path not being far enough right but it's easier to start with the set-up alignments

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3913 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am going to try to try to have more intent with my shot routines. I saw this process in a YouTube video I watched last night.  Decide what you want to happen - Yardage, shot shape, start line Visualize what you want to happen - Straight forward, but one tip he suggested was while focusing the shot take in a slow deep breath (like 4 seconds in duration), hold for 1 second, then exhale slowly (like 4 seconds again). There is some evidence to show that this rhythmic style of breathing can help in calming heart rate and improving focus.  Feel what you want to happen. - Your 1-2 practice swings. Like if you need to hit your PW at 90%, feeling that.  Commit to what you want to happen on the ball.  Post-shot routine, where you either gain confidence from a good shot or learn from a mistake to foster a growth mentality. - If it was a good shot then give yourself some good vibes/feedback. If the shot didn't turn out, then access why to learn from it. I am going to add, don't get negative. 
    • I mean, if you like GZ, and would drink it more often during a round than water, then keep drinking that. If you walk 18 holes, on a hot summer day, and drink 2 20-oz waters or 4 20-oz GZ. You will benefit more from the 4 20-oz GZ because it's like 99.99% water, lol. Yea, if flavored water makes you drink more water, then that works better.  I would just monitor the salt intake relative to your own health. I am sure some people might have to be careful. GZ is 280 mg salt. So, 4 of those is over 1000 mg. It is over 4 hours. That is like half the daily recommended intake of salt. You are probably losing some of your salt reserves playing golf. Long winded way of saying, it depends on the person.   
    • My first few years playing golf, I'd take a 32 oz Gatorade (probably pre-zero;  almost certainly Gatorade Tiger when that was a thing) with me in my bag, but I'd otherwise take water (in about the volumes I take now).  From your post, it seems like going back to something like that might be a better idea for me -- primarily water (maybe with some fruit or mint leaves thrown in for flavor) and one bottle of sports drink, rather than a diluted sports drink across all I'm drinking?
    • Yesterday evening, I watched The Gentlemen, a Guy Ritchie film from 2019 that I evidently missed on first pass.  It's a par, but it's a par on one of those long par-4s where the par feels like a birdie. It's in a similar vein to some other movies like Lock Stock, Snatch, or Layer Cake (which was Vaughn, not Ritchie).  If you liked those, I think you'll like this.   A friend suggested it a few months ago, and I started it one night and couldn't finish because I was having trouble following.  In retrospect, that was an artifact of trying to watch the movie too late in the day.  I started the movie at the beginning earlier yesterday and got to enjoy the full thing very much, but unlike some other movies, I encourage anyone to watch this when they're awake enough to catch which characters are which.  In my case, watching with subtitles helped me understand what some characters were saying. 
    • Sweat contains about 800 to 1500 mg per liter. For me, about 45 minutes of moderately intense workout had me lose about 3-lbs of water weight. That is about 1-liter. Now, a thing you need consider how much salt you are getting from food. Humans have been perfectly fine eating food with extra salt added. Typically, people would get 500 to 1000 mg of salt just from eating whole foods. Most people eat processed foods, which have more salt. So, we probably are not salt deprived. We are constantly digesting food we eat and taking in that salt. Unless you are fasting, and working out, you probably are slowly getting salt back into your body.  I will say electrolyte powder is probably beneficial for people for intense training or long endurance activities in the perspective of improving fluid retention (helps in recovery) and preventing cramping. I would say, just drinking water is way more important in general. For something like running marathons, absolutely beneficial. For golf, this is a marginal benefit.  In terms of ideal electrolyte ratios, you want to be in the 2:1 to 4:1 sodium to potassium ratio. Though, I have also seen ratios closer to 20:1. This mechanism is vital for nerve impulses, cell volume control, and kidney functions. Potassium is essential for muscle contractions. Magnesium is good for muscles function as well.  Ultima Replenisher: 55mg salt, 250mg potassium, 100mg magnesium.  *Probably good for people who don't eat a lot of whole foods, or foods with a lot salt. Probably one in the same, lol.  LiquidIV: 500mg salt, 370mg potassium, no magnesium.  LMNT: 1000mg salt, 200mg potassium, 60mg magnesium. Skratch: 400mg salt, 50mg potassium, 50mg magnesium.  Transparent Labs: 500mg salt, 250mg potassium, 50mg magnesium. If I had to choose one, I would probably go with Skratch. My diet isn't 100% whole foods, so I get plenty of salt.  Note, if you have kidney issues, I would be wary of adding excessive salt. Salt can be very hard on the kidneys, and you might be negating the benefits of drinking that water. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.