Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Apple watches vs Samsung Gear S


Note: This thread is 3886 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am hearing rumors that some seem to think an apple watch is better because it can not take phone calls when out of range of it's phone.

These ideas and viewpoints tend to totally baffle me, so hopefully someone here can explain to me why a watch that is not a separate phone is better than one that is.

For the record, I am no apple hater, nor am i a Samsung fan boy. I love my ipod 5 as much as I like my Samsung note Edge and Samsung Gear S.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am hearing rumors that some seem to think an apple watch is better because it can not take phone calls when out of range of it's phone.

These ideas and viewpoints tend to totally baffle me, so hopefully someone here can explain to me why a watch that is not a separate phone is better than one that is.

For the record, I am no apple hater, nor am i a Samsung fan boy. I love my ipod 5 as much as I like my Samsung note Edge and Samsung Gear S.

I have to admit I am not completely sure what you are asking. Are you saying that you want a watch to be a phone? Or you want your watch to take phone calls for you?

As I see it, the watch is an accessory to the phone. Our generation has become very addicted to the phone. I see people checking the phone hundreds to times a day, the watch can help you to see the messages or emails at a glance rather than pulling out your phone. It also tells time, and a few other things, but mainly it is a smaller simpler version of the phone on your wrist.

I don't think it will be a replacement for your phone, ever. The phone has a huge processor, GPS, a whole host of things the watch can't do for some time. Plus surfing the internet on your watch will not be a good experience. The phone will live on.

As for comparisons, I think that Apple will do a better job with user experience than Samsung did. I wore the Samsung watch for a year and I think from a functional perspective it is really similar. It did emails, texts, whatever the Apple Watch will likely do, but the user interface was really clunky. The Android Wear was better, but I didn't get to try that much, but it showed that there is hope for the user interface and likely Apple got it right. I think it will be seamless and fun...for a while anyways.

The problem that watches have is that these are not time pieces. They are electronics which wear out and start to suck after a while. A newer one comes along and you would rather have the new one. A Rolex (or insert whatever brand you prefer) never goes out of style. It is beautiful and can be worn for 15 years without worrying if the battery life has gotten so bad that the dang thing only works for 5 hours. The Apple watch is an electronic and they get replaced.

Considering the investment in something that will be out of style in such a short time the price tag for the watch is a bit more than I would like to spend at this point. If the first number was a 1 or even maybe a 2 I woud bite, but a 3 or a 4 makes it more than something I would like to spend. I don't fault the person who buys it. It will be a cool thing to have and will likely work really well for the purposes that I talked about, but at this point it isn't yet for me.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am hearing rumors that some seem to think an apple watch is better because it can not take phone calls when out of range of it's phone.  These ideas and viewpoints tend to totally baffle me, so hopefully someone here can explain to me why a watch that is not a separate phone is better than one that is. For the record, I am no apple hater, nor am i a Samsung fan boy. I love my ipod 5 as much as I like my Samsung note Edge and Samsung Gear S.

Sensitive much? Just buy what you like and enjoy. Why the hell would you care what someone else thinks about the gizmo you decided to buy?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sensitive much? Just buy what you like and enjoy. Why the hell would you care what someone else thinks about the gizmo you decided to buy?


What's wrong with trying to understand the pros and cons of each?

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Sensitive much? Just buy what you like and enjoy. Why the hell would you care what someone else thinks about the gizmo you decided to buy?

Not sensitive at all, just trying to understand others viewpoints . Shouldn't that be ok on a message board? [quote name="dsc123" url="/t/81306/apple-watches-vs-samsung-gear-s#post_1127158"] What's wrong with trying to understand the pros and cons of each? [/quote] Bingo!

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not sensitive at all, just trying to understand others viewpoints . Shouldn't that be ok on a message board?

It should be okay. Just as it should be okay to call out the obnoxious way in which you started the thread. Rumors? Please child. I wear a Rolex my dad gave me, I wear it every day, and that is not changing. I like my watch to be my watch and my phone to be my phone.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
It should be okay. Just as it should be okay to call out the obnoxious way in which you started the thread. Rumors? Please child. I wear a Rolex my dad gave me, I wear it every day, and that is not changing. I like my watch to be my watch and my phone to be my phone.

The only thing thats obnoxious here is your post, as usual. The guy is comparing two smart watches and asked why people see the absence of a feature as a strength of one vis a vis another. There's nothing obnoxious about that. You clearly have no interest in any smart watch, so your opinion is irrelevant.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The only thing thats obnoxious here is your post, as usual. The guy is comparing two smart watches and asked why people see the absence of a feature as a strength of one vis a vis another. There's nothing obnoxious about that. You clearly have no interest in any smart watch, so your opinion is irrelevant.

You clearly did not see the other thread @meenman was referring to with his rumors bit.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

:offtopic: guys.

I said what I said in the other thread, @meenman (I agree that calling it a "rumor" is… I'll just go with "odd" given the ability to quote, copy/paste, tag others, etc. here at TST) because I'm a fan of specialization. I hate stuff that tries to do too much because it almost always fails to do any area particularly well.

Your watch is an actual phone now? What's next? Your remote control? Your socks? Your glasses? Your car keys? How about your shoe, Maxwell Smart? Let's just put a phone in everything!*

I prefer the Apple Watch approach. It's basically just a screen with limited processing power. That means that as the phones upgrade, the software can easily be upgraded on your watch to do more. There's less "hardware" to show its age over time. The Apple Watch does enough to run some basic stuff and the display. It's essentially a thin client. I don't have to worry about whether my SIM card in my watch is working. I don't have to worry about which phone will ring or whatnot. I don't have to worry about sucking battery power when I put my watch away in weak cell service areas. The Apple Watch does its jobs - a smaller list of jobs, yes - and does them well.

Specialization. I despise "jack of all trades, master of none" stuff.

Apple routinely goes for simplicity and focus. Other companies do not. To each their own. If you like having your watch be an actual phone, good for you. I do not. My opinion doesn't change the "betterness" of the watch phone for you, just as your opinion doesn't change the "betterness" of the Apple Watch for me.

People routinely also bash Apple for its simplicity, its focus, its specialization. "The iPod doesn't even do… x, y, z? That'll never work!" There are ten tons of claim chowder out there where people talk about Apple products as being failures because they don't have a huge bullet point list of features. Time and time again those things are proven wrong.

Enough people seem to like things that do a small list of tasks and do them well. For those who prefer a more "varied" task device, well, they can buy Samsung products. :-)

* As you may well know, two other facts remain relevant:

  • My computers and iPads allow me to take a phone call as well. My phone can be in my bedroom and I can be downstairs and I can answer my phone on my iPad or MacBook Pro.
  • My watch will work the same way - I can take a phone call so long as I'm on the same WiFi network. This extends out into my yard (and even into my neighbor's yards).

The second thing being said, too, I can't remember the last time I was without my phone for an extended period of time. Modern phones are great because they can do so much. When I'm doing yard work, I often have headphones plugged in snaked up under my shirt for listening to podcasts. I almost always have my phone with me. It's the best device for doing some tasks, like messaging, looking up something quickly on the Web, checking my calendar, etc. So having an actual phone IN my watch serves no purpose to me.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
None of that makes any sense to me. The entire premise of a smartphone/smart watch is that it's a jack of all trades. You don't need a point and shoot camera, ipod, a notebook, a scorecard, a GPS device, an alarm clock, etc. when you have a smartphone. I mean, you say that modern phones are great because they do so much. I get the sentiment of "I already have something that does all of that just fine," but only to an extent. That's what I felt about tablets for a while, I have a laptop which can do more, and a smartphone which is more convenient, and didn't see the need for a tablet. Now I only use my laptop to use analyzr and game golf. The tablet gets far more use. Sometimes you just have to try something to know how you will use it. There are certainly possible negative side effects to trying to do too much. I can totally see cramming a phone into that as being difficult to do well. But it comes down to execution.
  • Upvote 1

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Until Apple improves the battery life it's a useless piece of tech in my opinion.  I need a watch to last at least 18 hours with regular use and would prefer one that I didn't have to charge daily.  At the current 6-8 hours (under moderate use) I can't see why anyone would want it unless they want to look at a blank screen for 1/2 the day.  I love high tech and Apple products so this isn't Apple bashing.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Until Apple improves the battery life it's a useless piece of tech in my opinion.  I need a watch to last at least 18 hours with regular use and would prefer one that I didn't have to charge daily.  At the current 6-8 hours (under moderate use) I can't see why anyone would want it unless they want to look at a blank screen for 1/2 the day.  I love high tech and Apple products so this isn't Apple bashing.

What? 6-8 hours?? That's totally pointless, lol. What's the battery life on the Samsung?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernest Jones View Post


What? 6-8 hours?? That's totally pointless, lol.

What's the battery life on the Samsung?

I don't know, Everything I own (phone, tablets) is Apple based so I have zero interest in Samsung products.  Here is an article on the Apple Watch that details battery life;

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2015/03/16/beware-apple-watch-some-gotchas-to-look-out-for/

Quote:

It also bears pointing out that more active users will need more than just nightly charges. Apple's 18-hour day consists of 90 time checks, 90 notifications, 45 minutes of app use, and a 30-minute musical workout. It's hard to fathom anyone checking the time 90 times a day, but there will certainly be people going through a ton of notifications and spending more than 45 minutes on smartwatch apps.

The 18 hours assumes the screen is turned off unless in use, so you have to touch it to show the time as well.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The 18 hours assumes the screen is turned off unless in use, so you have to touch it to show the time as well.

You don't have to touch it. Raising on turning your wrist up to view is supposed to turn the screen on.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsc123 View Post

None of that makes any sense to me.

Bummer. I thought I had made myself pretty clear.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsc123 View Post

The entire premise of a smartphone/smart watch is that it's a jack of all trades.

I disagree that it's a jack of all trades. It does a number of things and does them well, but there are still a number of tasks that are better suited for a computer (or even an iPad). Heck, I have an iPad, an iPhone, and two computers (a desktop and a laptop). Each has different uses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsc123 View Post

Sometimes you just have to try something to know how you will use it.

And sometimes you don't.

I don't want my watch to be a full-fledged phone. It will already act like a phone when it's within about 200 feet of my phone already, and it'll do that without putting a SIM card in it or sucking battery like crazy or having hardware that gets outdated more quickly or whatever. That's a watch trying to do too much IMO.

The thin client approach makes more sense to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtogolf View Post

Until Apple improves the battery life it's a useless piece of tech in my opinion.  I need a watch to last at least 18 hours with regular use and would prefer one that I didn't have to charge daily.  At the current 6-8 hours (under moderate use) I can't see why anyone would want it unless they want to look at a blank screen for 1/2 the day.  I love high tech and Apple products so this isn't Apple bashing.

I think it gets 18 hours. Everything I've read says that. I've read a LOT of reviews, too.

Quote:
“All-day battery life is based on 18 hours with the following use: 90 time checks, 90 notifications, 45 minutes of app use, and a 30-minute workout with music playback from Apple Watch via Bluetooth, over the course of 18 hours.”

Every review I've read thus far says that the watch still has 20-50% of its battery life at the end of the day. One guy put it through heavy testing one day and had 5% left at the end of the day (Gruber, if you want to look that one up).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I don't have to worry about whether my SIM card in my watch is working. I don't have to worry about which phone will ring or whatnot. I don't have to worry about sucking battery power when I put my watch away in weak cell service areas. The Apple Watch does its jobs - a smaller list of jobs, yes - and does them well.

The second thing being said, too, I can't remember the last time I was without my phone for an extended period of time. Modern phones are great because they can do so much. When I'm doing yard work, I often have headphones plugged in snaked up under my shirt for listening to podcasts. I almost always have my phone with me. It's the best device for doing some tasks, like messaging, looking up something quickly on the Web, checking my calendar, etc. So having an actual phone IN my watch serves no purpose to me.

When was the last time you thought about a SIM card after putting it in a phone/tablet/watch?

You guys with tiny phones can keep them on you all day long, unless i am wearing deep pocketed khakis or shorts, my phone is just going to fall out - i go blind trying to use my ipod touch for any extended period of time.

Bottom line - a samsung watch is as useful to you as an apple is for me - since both are only compatible with their own kind. I am not anti-apple and may have even been on your side if apple had not stuck with one cell carrier for so long.

I will disagree with *not being it's own phone line is better* - but it isnt anything that any other apple owner wouldnt say.

What? 6-8 hours?? That's totally pointless, lol.

What's the battery life on the Samsung?

I beat the hell out of my watch and still have 20-30% left on it after it being off of the charger 15-18 hours.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I met some who was wearing a Pebble. Any thoughts?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I met some who was wearing a Pebble. Any thoughts?

From what I hear and the little research i have done  - it is compatible with more phones and sounds like a decent product. A little small for my taste, but I have always owned the largest phone screen and like my watch a bit obnoxious. I do think it will do well, especially with those that choose to use an androind phone that is not a samsung.

Just dont mention *pebble* if you are creating apple watch apps or the will kick you out of their app store.

The thing is with watches, when the apple one hits the streets, all *smartwatch* companies will benefit - it is better to be 10% of the market with millions sold than to be 75% with thousands sold.

I'll be honest - apple only irks me because I was one of the few with a smart watch and it was a great conversation piece with my customers - now everyone will have them and i will just be one of many.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3886 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.