Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2450 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’ve been playing golf for about a year and a half, and I guess I was always under the impression that your 6 iron went in the middle of your stance, and as the club loft went up, the ball moved a little farther back in your stance. On the other hand, and the loft went down, the ball moved toward the front of your stance. Right now, my sand wedge is in between the middle of my stance and my back foot, but I was told that unless I’m chipping, no club should be behind the middle of your stance?   

 

Is there a proper way or is it by feel?

 

Thank you


Posted (edited)

That's the general idea, but don't get carried away with it. The bottom of your swing is wherever it is. Find that out, and you'll be much further ahead.

Edited by Buckeyebowman
  • Like 2
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
45 minutes ago, Nygolfer12 said:

I was always under the impression that your 6 iron went in the middle of your stance, and as the club loft went up, the ball moved a little farther back in your stance.

Wedge shots are in the middle of your stance. Six iron should be placed way further forward. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 minutes ago, Buckeyebowman said:

That's the general idea, but don't get carried away with it. The bottom of your swing is wherever it is. Find that out, and you'll be much further ahead.

Agree 100%.  Every lie is different.  It is better to find the bottom than it is to set up the same every time.  Take a couple practice swings and note the effect.  

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

When you see Pro's making practice swings, many times they are checking where the bottom of their arc is and that is where they place the ball.


Posted

Thanks, my coach has instructed me to put the ball back. Because of that, I tend to skull it some of the time and can hit it beautifully at other times. On the other hand, when I put it mid or slightly forward I can sometimes have more consistency. I'm going to approach with the open mind you've recommended, as every lie is different.


  • Moderator
Posted
On 4/6/2019 at 11:01 PM, arturo28mx said:

When you see Pro's making practice swings, many times they are checking where the bottom of their arc is and that is where they place the ball.

I doubt it. They know where the bottom of their arc is.

Pros make practice swings to keep loose, practice a feel, or it's built into their pre-shot routines. Once in a while, they do it to practice trick shots:

 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/6/2019 at 11:01 PM, arturo28mx said:

When you see Pro's making practice swings, many times they are checking where the bottom of their arc is and that is where they place the ball.

I watched John Daly, some years ago, explaining that very thing.  He was talking about uneven lies, in the fairway and rough, rather than tee shots.  It wasn't about where he placed the ball...but rather where he placed himself relative to it.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/6/2019 at 11:01 PM, arturo28mx said:

When you see Pro's making practice swings, many times they are checking where the bottom of their arc is and that is where they place the ball.

Any facts to support your claim? 

Also, many pro's don't even touch the ground with a practice swing, so how do they know? 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

From an interview with Tom Watson, Golf Digest, October 18, 2012

"On the course, you determine the bottom of your arc with practice swings".


Posted

wedges to mid-irons I place in the middle of my stance, for me this is one club head length off my left heel, for 6 iron and up I then just move my right foot further back, takes any guesswork out of the equation.


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 4/13/2019 at 6:57 PM, Piz said:

I watched John Daly, some years ago, explaining that very thing.  He was talking about uneven lies, in the fairway and rough, rather than tee shots.  It wasn't about where he placed the ball...but rather where he placed himself relative to it.

That interesting.  I was about to say simply I position the ball off my right hip.  But now reading that explanation,  On most easy lies  and off the tee , I position my right hip to the ball

and for more difficult lies (downhill and ball below my feet) I position my mid pelvis to the ball


Posted

http://www.golfinstruction.com/golf-instruction/proper-practice-swings-14079.htm

Since this thread gravitated a little to practice swings, here is one man's theory on practice swings. 

Myself, I take practice swings as part of my preshot routine. Mostly to get use to the club I am going to be swinging. That, and practice how far back I want to swing the club. 

As for ball position, on shorter clubs up to my 7i, the ball is even with my sternum. The only thing that changes is width of my stance. On some swings,  I might also open my stance a little, after locating the ball off my sternum in a square stance.

The longer clubs are a little more left of my sternum, with my driver being the farthest left, near my arm pit. 

I sometimes practice ball positions with various clubs, using a metal yard stick. The numbers offer up great reference points. 

Also, way back when, on chips, and pitches, by playing the ball further back than my sternum, I was putting various amounts of back spin on the ball. Since I was not good enough to control how much back spin I might put on the ball, my distances to the hole were not consistent. By placing the ball even with my sternum, I generated less back spin, and a more consistent roll out.  

 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I really appreciate all of the replies. I’ll try to take all of your advice and see what works for me. I’m just ready to be more consistent and to stop hitting behind the ball and chunking my shots 


Posted
On 4/6/2019 at 9:57 PM, Buckeyebowman said:

That's the general idea, but don't get carried away with it. The bottom of your swing is wherever it is. Find that out, and you'll be much further ahead.

This. 


  • Administrator
Posted

Wedges barely forward of middle, driver front big toe, everything else based on that.

No normal shots back of center.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2450 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.