Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

How Much Difference Does the Ball Make for Average Player?


Note: This thread is 1732 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, Moniker said:

For short irons, back spin is increased, so the ball flies straighter.

:doh: What makes you think that same logic doesn't apply to a driver with a high spin ball as well?

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Moniker said:

I think the ball doesn't know back spin from side spin. If spin is increased, then all kinds of spin are increased. For short irons, back spin is increased, so the ball flies straighter. For longer clubs, especially the driver, side spin will be increased more.

Kevin…

6 minutes ago, klineka said:

:doh: What makes you think that same logic doesn't apply to a driver with a high spin ball as well?

He's just saying this:

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, iacas said:

Kevin…

He's just saying this:

 

That makes sense. This part is what didn't make sense to me:

3 hours ago, Mr Puddle said:

For example, PRO V1's are designed to spin. Good players who can control spin find this an asset, for people like me, who just want the thing to go straight, it is a disadvantage.

Wouldn't a higher spin ball likely go straighter with a driver compared to a lower spin ball, all else equal? Or is it just a myth that increased backspin decreases side spin?

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, klineka said:

That makes sense. This part is what didn't make sense to me:

Wouldn't a higher spin ball likely go straighter with a driver compared to a lower spin ball, all else equal? Or is it just a myth that increased backspin decreases side spin?

Using this logic, shouldn’t balata balls go straighter than modern balls?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, klineka said:

That makes sense. This part is what didn't make sense to me:

Wouldn't a higher spin ball likely go straighter with a driver compared to a lower spin ball, all else equal? Or is it just a myth that increased backspin decreases side spin?

You can think of spin in term of axis and rpm. For a wedge, because the face is near horizontal, it can impart massive back spin on the ball, whereas the side spin component is negligible. The "spinning top" effect then keeps the ball fly straight.

For the driver, because the face is near vertical, it is hard to impart a lot of back spin on the ball with it. As it happens, unless you hit the ball relatively straight, the side component of spin usually takes over and makes the ball turn to the side more.


Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, klineka said:

That makes sense. This part is what didn't make sense to me:

Wouldn't a higher spin ball likely go straighter with a driver compared to a lower spin ball, all else equal? Or is it just a myth that increased backspin decreases side spin?

A higher spin ball is more sensitive to any type of spin.  Thus, a mishit shot (face open/closed) will have a more pronounced effect, thus making the higher spin ball fly more off line.  A lower spin ball reacts less in the same scenario.  Thus the lower spin ball goes straighter.

Backspin being spin on a horizontal axis, the close the spin is to 90* then less it is to 0* or 180* and thus the less sidespin.  The definition of backspin in this instance means there must be less sidespin.  For any degree of one you have less of the other.

It's the lack of sidespin that makes it go straighter. The more backspin you have, the less sidespin you have.  Their relationship is inverse.  Actually you could have no spin and it'd go straight with the exception that you'd get a knuckeball effect.  You needs some spin.. I did a science fair project on this and hit smooth balls, balls with a vaseline-coated clubface, etc.  It was interesting. Corkscrews, diving quail, all kinds of interesting flights.

Edited by 3jacker
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Posted (edited)

Interesting discussion and thanks to everyone who gave an opinion.   

A couple of years ago, I bought a whole bunch of those Kirkland 4-piece balls with the Urethane cover.  I played them one whole summer.  Lately I've been using a different cheap ball, the Callaway Tour Soft, and it seems to me that I used to hit that Kirkland ball a lot farther, especially with my driver.  So I was wondering about the difference between a premium ball and a cheap ball for an average hacker like me. 

It seems like nowadays when I take a good hard swing with my driver and hit the ball flush, it takes the same trajectory as it used to, but when I get to where it wound up, it's just not as far as it used to be when I was using the Kirkland ball. 

But based on what I have learned since the original post, if I did hit the Kirklands farther, I'm now thinking it was probably because of warmer weather, or dryer and harder fairways, or some reason that doesn't have to do with what ball I was using.  Maybe it's because I'm getting older.  

I've still got a couple of dozen of those 4-piece Kirklands, so I might pull them back out and see if I can detect any difference.  

 

 

Edited by Marty2019
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have to say every time I hear a 15 - 20 handicap talk about the dynamics of different golf balls and how they affect their game I am forced to shake my head. Perhaps I was different, but when I was first starting out I could have played any ball and it wouldn't have mattered.

People of that skill level do not make consistent enough contact to worry about what ball they are playing. When I was a 15 handicap I was just trying to get the stupid thing off the ground and in the general direction I wanted. Hell, even now I bet playing a distance ball wouldn't affect my scores all that much. 

Look, if someone wants to play a premium ball, go for it. Premium balls do work better, for everyone. But, IMHO the difference for anyone other than the very good player is not worth the cost. 

 

  • Like 2

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, klineka said:

Wouldn't a higher spin ball likely go straighter with a driver compared to a lower spin ball, all else equal?

No. The golf ball doesn't know what direction "backspin" is.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 2/27/2020 at 11:18 AM, NM Golf said:

I have to say every time I hear a 15 - 20 handicap talk about the dynamics of different golf balls and how they affect their game I am forced to shake my head. Perhaps I was different, but when I was first starting out I could have played any ball and it wouldn't have mattered.

People of that skill level do not make consistent enough contact to worry about what ball they are playing. When I was a 15 handicap I was just trying to get the stupid thing off the ground and in the general direction I wanted. Hell, even now I bet playing a distance ball wouldn't affect my scores all that much. 

Look, if someone wants to play a premium ball, go for it. Premium balls do work better, for everyone. But, IMHO the difference for anyone other than the very good player is not worth the cost. 

 

Agreed. Outside of TopFlights, we call the TopRocks, I don’t think it makes any real difference for me. I usually play either Pinnacle or Calloway, simply because they are a decent price. 

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted

The average player, Mid handicap, has no business playing the expensive pro balls.  That's my opinion and my experience . If you are a really good scratch golfer you will get some benefit from the balls like ProV.   Every fall I go with a buddy and hunt lost balls in the rough and woods at our local course we play.  Believe me those high $$$ ball go into the wood and the rough. We find lots of them.  We have both been buying and using the mid range softer balls and can't tell any difference.  I like the Kirkland Signature balls and the Callaway soft.   


Posted
28 minutes ago, Larrh7 said:

The average player, Mid handicap, has no business playing the expensive pro balls.  That's my opinion and my experience . If you are a really good scratch golfer you will get some benefit from the balls like ProV.   Every fall I go with a buddy and hunt lost balls in the rough and woods at our local course we play.  Believe me those high $$$ ball go into the wood and the rough. We find lots of them.  We have both been buying and using the mid range softer balls and can't tell any difference.  I like the Kirkland Signature balls and the Callaway soft.   

I The technology in the premium balls keeps them as straight off the tee as the low priced two piece ionomer balls. Yet they offer better greenside spin. Now for a high capper, it probably doesn't make a whole lot of difference what ball they play, but for a mid capper I think they can take advantage of the urethane characteristics. Example: I am a 12.6 cap and had 108 yds into a green, par 5, the other day. I punched a gap wedge that hit 1 yd in front of the pin and stopped 4 ft behind the pin, something a low priced ball really isn't capable of. I made the putt for birdie. Many think just because a ball is high priced, it has a lot more side spin off the tee, and I don't think that is the case. I don't spin the ball that much on the green, so all the help I can get is good for me.

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
17 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

The technology in the premium balls keeps them as straight off the tee as the low priced two piece ionomer balls. Yet they offer better greenside spin.

Bingo.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
27 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

I The technology in the premium balls keeps them as straight off the tee as the low priced two piece ionomer balls. Yet they offer better greenside spin. Now for a high capper, it probably doesn't make a whole lot of difference what ball they play, but for a mid capper I think they can take advantage of the urethane characteristics. Example: I am a 12.6 cap and had 108 yds into a green, par 5, the other day. I punched a gap wedge that hit 1 yd in front of the pin and stopped 4 ft behind the pin, something a low priced ball really isn't capable of. I made the putt for birdie. Many think just because a ball is high priced, it has a lot more side spin off the tee, and I don't think that is the case. I don't spin the ball that much on the green, so all the help I can get is good for me.

I will quote Harvey Penick. He was the coach for many but two notable were Curtis Strange and Tom Kite  When asked by some guys he was giving lessons to on how to put back spin on the ball.  He said, how often do you hit the ball long and want to bring it back?  Not many could say they did.  He told them why do you want backspin on the ball then.  I got a kick out of that.   He was a proponent of hitting a lower trajectory ball though.  I'm sure they high $$$ balls are better in some respect.  I did say average golfer though.  I've played a lot of golf with average golfers over the years and not many can zip it back like the pros do. 


  • Administrator
Posted
8 minutes ago, Larrh7 said:

I will quote Harvey Penick. He was the coach for many but two notable were Curtis Strange and Tom Kite  When asked by some guys he was giving lessons to on how to put back spin on the ball.  He said, how often do you hit the ball long and want to bring it back?  Not many could say they did.  He told them why do you want backspin on the ball then.  I got a kick out of that.   He was a proponent of hitting a lower trajectory ball though.  I'm sure they high $$$ balls are better in some respect.  I did say average golfer though.  I've played a lot of golf with average golfers over the years and not many can zip it back like the pros do. 

Harvey Penick died in 1995. The Pro V1 and other similar balls came out in ~2000.

It's not about "zipping it back."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Harvey Penick died in 1995. The Pro V1 and other similar balls came out in ~2000.

It's not about "zipping it back."

Yes I remember when he died.  I know what you are saying.  It's more than zipping it back it's stopping the ball and having control.  His question was The Average Golfer. The average golfer has a handicap of around 15.   The average golfer can use a cheaper ball.  Not a junk ball. There is a difference.  Some of the Topflite balls are like hitting a rock.  There are a lot of very good much cheaper balls that you can stop the ball on the green.  I was just saying the average golfer doesn't need a ProV1.  


  • Administrator
Posted
24 minutes ago, Larrh7 said:

Yes I remember when he died.  I know what you are saying.  It's more than zipping it back it's stopping the ball and having control.  His question was The Average Golfer. The average golfer has a handicap of around 15.   The average golfer can use a cheaper ball.  Not a junk ball. There is a difference.  Some of the Topflite balls are like hitting a rock.  There are a lot of very good much cheaper balls that you can stop the ball on the green.  I was just saying the average golfer doesn't need a ProV1.  

They’re still giving up performance if they do.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
33 minutes ago, Larrh7 said:

Yes I remember when he died.  I know what you are saying.  It's more than zipping it back it's stopping the ball and having control.  His question was The Average Golfer. The average golfer has a handicap of around 15.   The average golfer can use a cheaper ball.  Not a junk ball. There is a difference.  Some of the Topflite balls are like hitting a rock.  There are a lot of very good much cheaper balls that you can stop the ball on the green.  I was just saying the average golfer doesn't need a ProV1.  

Snell balls are equivalent to Pro V1 and V1X and are a heck of a lot cheaper. What I like about them is if I launch a wedge too low at the green, they spin enough to hold. That’s what I want. Same with chips and pitches.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1732 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.