Jump to content
IGNORED

Recommend Me A Rangefinder


Note: This thread is 1393 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I know we have a lot of avid golfers here so let me hear all of your thoughts? I would prefer to get something that is going to last a LONG time and is built very well. 

:titleist:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have really liked my Leupold Rangefinder. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I bought the Bushnell Tour V4 last month to replace my very old and basically dead Leupold and have had no complaints so far.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, billchao said:

I bought the Bushnell Tour V4 last month to replace my very old and basically dead Leupold and have had no complaints so far.

This one has been on my radar. I like the price point of this one. Back in my hunting days Leupold were known for their superior clarity, notice any difference with the Bushnell vs your old Leupold?

:titleist:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I just bought the Bushnell Tour V5 Shift/slope, and the optics are fantastic. I use it for all approach shots. 2 yr warranty, great reviews. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
11 minutes ago, ShawnSum said:

This one has been on my radar. I like the price point of this one. Back in my hunting days Leupold were known for their superior clarity, notice any difference with the Bushnell vs your old Leupold?

Well the Leupold was from 2009 or something, so it didn’t have as many features as rangefinders typically come with now. It wouldn’t be fair to compare the two. I chose Leupold at the time because Bushnell units were much bigger back then IIRC. I liked it a lot until the display started fading. It was out of warranty and I never bothered to contact Leupold to get it fixed.

  • Informative 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
59 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I have really liked my Leupold Rangefinder. 

Me as well and they replaced mine four years ago because the viewer had issues even though it was past warranty.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Still have my Leupold I (10+ years). Accuracy still there but optics are fading so I might get the new Bushnell. Heard nothing but good.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have a Leupold GX-i2, have had it since '13 or '14 (I lost my GPS unit in August of one of those years, bought this shortly thereafter, changed the battery last year for the first and so far only time).  I'm very happy with it, it's a great asset to my short game, both directly and indirectly. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I love my Leupold, but I'm also liking the heck out of my…

green-nx7-pro-shadow.jpg

The Award-Winner of the Best Value Golf Rangefinder. Precision Pro Golf offers the best combination of price and performance for golfers. Learn more.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, iacas said:

I love my Leupold, but I'm also liking the heck out of my…

green-nx7-pro-shadow.jpg

The Award-Winner of the Best Value Golf Rangefinder. Precision Pro Golf offers the best combination of price and performance for golfers. Learn more.

 

I have an Precision Pro NX7-Pro as well. It's the first rangefinder I've had so I don't have a reference for comparison, but it works well enough for me and I haven't found any glaring issues with it. I've tested it against my friend's Bushnell (not sure which model) and the accuracy is comparable (limited sample size).

I've used the slope feature a lot recently playing practice rounds for an upcoming tournament on a course with plenty of uphill and downhill shots. Not sure how accurate the calculations are, but it at least gives an idea.

  • Thumbs Up 1

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest smd

I can't tell you which one to pick but I might be able to offer some advice.  I've been using range finders since they became a thing for golf (maybe 15ish years ago).  I've had quite a few starting with the first Bushnell (the 400 I think).  I progressed through the 800, and 1600 before settling on one I purchased 6 or 7 years ago.  My advice is to buy the strongest power that is available. I think mine is good to 1500 yards (maybe more, not sure).  Not that I need to measure 1500 yards but measuring 240 yards is no problem and it happens very quickly.  My friends all purchased the cheaper (lower power) one handed models and they spend an inordinate amount of time trying to make a measurement.  The stronger models cost the most, spend the money up front and you won't be disappointed.  Also, get over the idea of slope measurements.  Slope just adds cost, is not legal in tournaments (not the ones I play) and is something any somewhat accomplished player should be able to figure out.  Also- Mine has the jolt feature. I turned it off.  It will only reduce the battery life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1393 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 554, May 9, 2024 Practiced a bit downtown at Golf Evolution. Would have loved to get more work in, but oh well.
    • I think if I could hit a 2nd shot when I did not like the result from the 1st I am sure I would get some lower scores.  I guess the idea is to mentally put yourself in a position where you need to make a really great shot, not just a good shot.  For example, hitting from the lie next to the creek his 1st chip was, in my view, pretty good but it was not "Great" in his opinion so he tried to do better on the mulligan, but he failed and was farther from the hole. I see myself doing this more on the range.  For example, after a period of practice I will mentally say I need to hit 4 good shots in a row.  I start with a Driver and if that is good then I do a 3 Hybrid followed by a pitch with a wedge and finally by a short chip.  If any shot is "Bad" I have to start over.      
    • That’s how I interpreted it. You’re giving yourself two mulligans on every shot. Yea it’s just a variation of getting used to scoring low. I’m curious how valuable that practice is. I guess for some people they feel mounting pressure from playing a string of holes well? I’m kind of the complete opposite TBH. Once I start putting together good holes, I get a little swagger and if anything I get overconfident. I start thinking I can hit the green from anywhere, I can hit my driver to the smallest of targets, and everything inside of 10’ is going in. None of that is true, of course, and I inevitably will hit a miss that brings me back down to earth.
    • Wordle 1,055 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I saw this video yesterday, couldn't figure out what he meant, then saw this thread and thought "oh maybe someone knows what he was talking about" and you guys are in the same place as me.  I *think* what he's suggesting is that you play a game such that going low is expected. He said there are different variations of it. I think his variation is you get three goes at a shot. You hit your first shot and it's good enough, then you just take it. If it's not good enough then you can abandon that shot and play another. If you still don't like it, you can hit it a third time, but then you're stuck with it. He's good enough that three goes at a shot ought to give him one that's good enough to move on. He did mention his parameters for what counts as "good enough", although I do note that he should have hit a third go on that pitch from the hazard based on that. He holed the putt though so it worked out in the end. I think if you're not as good as he is (which let's face it is everyone here and virtually everyone on the planet), then you'd adjust those rules to make it such that you might manage to make 5 birdies in a row. So maybe you play a two ball scramble with yourself and if you don't like either one then you can abandon those and hit a third or you play a three ball scramble or whatever it is that you need to make your standard work.  At its base though, it's just like going out and playing from the front tees or playing a scramble with yourself. The goal is to gain comfort with making lots of birdies and going way under par, so that when you find yourself in that situation in a real game, you don't panic. It's an interesting variation and if I ever got to play "for fun" at my home course, then I'd definitely try it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...