Jump to content
Bonvivant

Should Lines On Ball Be Illegal?

Ball alignment  

55 members have voted

  1. 1. Should extended lines drawn on to the ball and used for alignment be prohibited?

    • Yes. It's against the spirit of the rules.
      9
    • No. You should be able to draw what you want on your ball.
      46


121 posts / 4132 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, darthweasel said:

been a while since I have seen it but at one point there was a study shown that showed it actually HURT. People who did the line missed more putts. e the line of people "well it helps me", good for you, overall the stats, at least in that study, said for most golfers it doesn't, and yes I am sure you are the outlier.

Umm... did you read my post... I said, I didn't see any benefit from it. 

No idea why you are calling me an outlier. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Those lines do not give an advantage, if anything they hinder proper alignment. This is one of those things I hate, people are too damn concerned about what others are doing. If drawing a line "feels illegal" to you then don't do it. Hell, you can even get some satisfaction in knowing that the people that are doing it are probably hurting themselves. BUT, to try and get it made illegal because you don't like it makes you a busy body. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't add lines to my ball. I usually just mark with a couple colored dots to identify.

Voted no, but like others have said, I wouldn't mind if the lines were disallowed for pace of play. Personally, when I put my ball down before putting, I like to position it so that when I am over the ball ready to putt, all I see is the ball, no logos/markings. Any alignment aids on the ball seem to goof up my aim and stroke.

Sometimes for tee shots if I am having trouble aligning myself, maybe on a hole that has tricky perspective, I will use the line on the ball to help with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, CarlSpackler said:

Why do we have to keep trying to changing the game? If it doesn't really help much, why does there need to be a rule about it?

Did you read the article? The main argument I took away from it is that it is illegal to place anything on the course to aid in alignment and the author extends that to the ball. I happen to agree with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

Did you read the article? The main argument I took away from it is that it is illegal to place anything on the course to aid in alignment and the author extends that to the ball. I happen to agree with this.

I don't agree, you are allowed to mark your ball in any manner that you choose, and in replacing a ball, you may replace it in any orientation that you choose.  The Interpretation to 14.2 specifically allows the player to align marking on the ball (for example, a trademark).   The author of the article would like to redefine a marking on the golf ball as an "object", and then extrapolate that to the player setting down an object to assist in alignment.  I just don't accept that a bit of Sharpie ink qualifies as an "object".

The author also uses Tufts quote:

 "The purpose of the rules, at least according to former USGA president Richard Tufts, “is to make sure, as far as possible, that everybody plays the same game.”"

Well, every single player has the right to mark his ball in any way he chooses, and replace the ball in any orientation he chooses.  How does this contradict Tufts?  It doesn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Well, every single player has the right to mark his ball in any way he chooses, and replace the ball in any orientation he chooses.

What if I'm allergic to Sharpie ink? I jest. Another great reply. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I keep my ball pristine until I putt.  Then I pick it up and use a sharpie to draw a curved line to show me the break.  J/K

On a more serious issue there's a guy I will no longer play golf with.  Charming, conversational, intelligent.  But he's a 15 handicapper who aligns his golf ball line an average of 3 times before each putt.   So we're talking an extra 90 seconds per putt.  And he still misses the putt most of the time.   I'm a fast player so that just annoys the hell out of me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Double Mocha Man said:

On a more serious issue there's a guy I will no longer play golf with.  Charming, conversational, intelligent.  But he's a 15 handicapper who aligns his golf ball line an average of 3 times before each putt.   So we're talking an extra 90 seconds per putt.  And he still misses the putt most of the time.   I'm a fast player so that just annoys the hell out of me.

I think that most people can relate to this....if they can't, then they are probably the charming, conversational, intelligent one, lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

Did you read the article?

No, and I don't intend to.

26 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

The main argument I took away from it is that it is illegal to place anything on the course to aid in alignment and the author extends that to the ball. I happen to agree with this.

Then it should also be illegal to have a mark on the top of the putter? Is this not also an alignment aid? Where does it end?

image.png

It is illegal to put something on the course, not your equipment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

It is illegal to put something on the course, not your equipment.

Actually, its illegal to take your stance using a club which has been placed on the ground to indicate the line of play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, CarlSpackler said:

No, and I don't intend to.

Your input isn't as productive then. You are responding to a post about an article you haven't read.

 

3 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

Then it should also be illegal to have a mark on the top of the putter? Is this not also an alignment aid? Where does it end?

The difference is that you are placing the ball. Now that we mark on greens, we are no longer playing it as it lies, though we are replacing it in the same place some people choose to purposefully replace it in a different orientation to give an advantage. I think that the playing as it lies rule is good and should be upheld as tightly as possible, and the line-up technique doesn't really fit in with that. Obviously the rules allow for it now, but it is something that you could easily make an argument to do away with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Actually, its illegal to take your stance using a club which has been placed on the ground to indicate the line of play.

I didn't word that very well. I meant that you can mark your equipment however you like, not that you can use your equipment as an alignment aid. I used to park my push cart parallel to my line of play, but stopped doing so because that could be considered an alignment aid.

5 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

Your input isn't as productive then. You are responding to a post about an article you haven't read.

That's fine. I will gracefully bow out of the conversation here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

I used to park my push cart parallel to my line of play, but stopped doing so because that could be considered an alignment aid.

I've seen this move with both trolleys and buggies. I've never called anyone on it but I sure have thought about it.

4 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

That's fine. I will gracefully bow out of the conversation here.

I'm not trying to push you out or be overly confrontational. The article is a decent read, even if it's just to see the other side (my side) of the (non-existent in the greater scheme of things) debate. I posted the article because that is what I saw, and agreed. Easier than me typing out all of my thoughts on it or repeating more of what was said in the article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Actually, its illegal to take your stance using a club which has been placed on the ground to indicate the line of play.

Thought about this very thing this past weekend. 

Missed another green and had to chip. I dropped the putter disgustedly down near my ball. Looked at it for a moment before I realized what that looked like and got the putter away before I took my stance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

24 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

The difference is that you are placing the ball. Now that we mark on greens, we are no longer playing it as it lies, though we are replacing it in the same place some people choose to purposefully replace it in a different orientation to give an advantage. I think that the playing as it lies rule is good and should be upheld as tightly as possible, and the line-up technique doesn't really fit in with that. Obviously the rules allow for it now, but it is something that you could easily make an argument to do away with.

I think its always a good idea when suggesting a change in the rules to ask, exactly how would you want the wording changed?  Is there a limit to any straight-line marking on the ball, including both the manufacturer's imprints and anything added by the player?  Or would you have the player replace the ball in its original orientation, even if it does have a line?  Write a rule, and let us see what you think should be done.

And understand, I don't think the rule change is warranted, I don't believe that a 1.5 inch line drawn on a curved surface can be very effective in accurately aligning a 5 or 10 or 30-foot putt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

And understand, I don't think the rule change is warranted, I don't believe that a 1.5 inch line drawn on a curved surface can be very effective in accurately aligning a 5 or 10 or 30-foot putt.

This is fair, and is borne out in results I think, maybe just anecdotes. I know I've been scolded in the past for talking about how something feels scummy to me, so I have been trying not to go down that road. Preferred lies (or lift clean and place) has always rubbed me the wrong way. Last week I watch Hovland get to line up a putt....from the fringe, which really hit me hard so when I saw this article, I had to post and get opinions.

8 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I think its always a good idea when suggesting a change in the rules to ask, exactly how would you want the wording changed?  Is there a limit to any straight-line marking on the ball, including both the manufacturer's imprints and anything added by the player?  Or would you have the player replace the ball in its original orientation, even if it does have a line?  Write a rule, and let us see what you think should be done.

I think you've told me this in the past on something (probably slow play/amount of time per shot), and I really couldn't come up with anything. The same might be the case here.

My initial thought is to have someone else in your group, not your caddie, place the ball for you, but that brings in the problem of them intentionally lining it up incorrectly as opposed to placing it randomly.

I need to think about it more. I'm glad I posted this and have loved the feedback and other opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I suspect you can turn farther than you are. Do as Matt said… post a Member Swing topic with some good video.
    • Day 276 - Sept 29, 2020 Power was out yesterday, so I'm giving myself that day. I played 13 holes. Today I played 18, albeit from the white tees as the course was soft and Richard plays the whites. I hit two drivers. 😛
    • Many of my issues with the “design” are related to pace of play and/or safety issues. Trees that needlessly block your view of an area, for example… stuff like that. Obviously, based on only one playing, and I’m only really highlighting the things I think could be better or that are negatives. I’m not including the positive aspects of the thing here (I’d rate the course as a 5.5/10 or 6/10 - it’s not worth two hours for me to drive, but it’s still a slightly better than average course). So, mostly just the negatives…: Why have rough there? There’s also a dense bunch of pines right that serve no real purpose. Thin them out and allow recovery shots as well as easier tracking of a ball hit into them. Mostly fine. Short right fwy bunker kinda useless. The fairway is 17 yards wide at 250 yards. Left is dead. Right is trees. Difficult holes are fine, but nobody is going to want to be in the valley left, so there are going to be a lot of people looking in the trees right. None of us hit the green from 210 yards, and we spent about six or seven minutes progressively looking for everyone’s balls. Total balls found: 13. Number that were ours? All four, eventually. Did we still wait on the next tee after playing out? Yes. Balls were embedded everywhere on this hole. No real issues here. The left fairway is again 17-18 yards wide, the right fairway is 22 and runs out after 260 yards. We were hit into on this hole even though we kept a cart in the left fairway plainly visible from the tee by someone who hit through the middle in the trees where three of our tee shots went (all but one ended up downhill to the right with a relatively clean angle to the green. I reached with a 6I). Pace of play nightmare type hole. Mostly fine. You can’t see that the water extends around the back as much as it does, and it’s almost the same yardage from every set of tees, which doesn’t make sense to me. I wonder how the front tee players play this hole. Great example here of some bad stuff, IMO. First, trees just off the tee block your sight line to the left rough, nearly hiding all of two bunkers that are left as well as the cart path (behind more trees) on a cart-path-only hole. Then up the right, there’s an elevated bunker that hides the pond behind it, with thick, soft rough that’s 50+ yards from the cart path. Flatten the hill where the bunker right is so you can see the pond. If you want a bunker there, put it down by the water to stop balls from rolling in, though honestly it’s just not necessary as players hitting bunker shots over a pond are going to chunk or blade them 90% of the time, leading to slower play. Thin the trees out so you can see up the left side of the hole, both for safety and pace of play reasons. The fairway is again 21 yards wide just before you get to the hazard, which is about 230 yards off the back of the long strip tee, and 260 off the black tees. Good hole, though the possibly blind second shot is a mild pace of play/safety issue. I say possibly because I was in the left rough, and hit a 7I over trees to 40 yards shy of the green. It appeared that it may be blind going up and over the hill, but maybe it’s not tall enough to actually be blind. If not, the hole is fine/good. Decent hole. Fine. Green has a good amount of slope for a 210-yard tee shot, not a big size. Good hole. Trees right by the tee block your view up the right-hand side if you hit a ball to the right edge of the fairway, let alone just into the rough. The cart path is up the right-hand side, too, making it a pace of play and a safety issue, especially as most players slice. Otherwise, a good hole. Generally I’m not a fan of massive features on a green when it’s a blind shot. The green has an odd shape, a big tier, and is completely blind (you can see the flagstick). “It’s only blind once” they say, but for a busy almost “destination” type course (I’m using the term loosely, for just folks within an hour or two), this is another place where a few minutes of pace could be saved. Decent hole otherwise. Another 19-yard wide fairway at 250 yards off the tee. We could barely see the top of the flagstick from where we were teeing off (fortunately it was toward the back). I love a good downhill island par three, but it’s generally good to be able to see where the ball lands. Otherwise much of the drama is gone, unless you want to run forward so you can see the green. A good hole with a poor choice of hole locations yesterday. And a minor safety issue, as three of us drove well over the hilltop. We waited long enough so we knew they’d moved on, but people could be hit into here. I think the course could be pretty darn good with a few changes, starting with firming up the conditions. Plugged balls in areas that are clearly too wet to mow very often (long rough) are a pace of play nightmare, and also just not fun golf. Firmer conditions would let better players hit 3W on some tees and still feed the ball into better areas instead of trying to hit driver into 20-yard-wide areas with a giant slope right and trees left (or vice versa). I played pretty well. Got boned once or twice, but that’s fine, and they weren’t even on the obvious holes (once I think was a bad yardage - I think he got the slope behind the green and not the flagstick). The greens, because of how soft they were, were beat to heck. So many ball marks, footprints, etc. Billy Horschel would have done his Chambers Bay wiggly snake hand motion a few times on putts.
    • If you find yourself losing focus on the range, change up what you're doing. I can get more out of a 15-minute range session than many people can get out of an hour or 70 balls.
    • I was thinking it could be a good option. But since that is the starting shaft that had bad results, scrap that idea. The blue is counterbalanced though, so that might be an issue. If you want to do a cheap experiment, get some lead tape and put 2-3 inches of it somewhere on the back of the head and see if that does anything to your ball flight.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 3puttmaster
      3puttmaster
      (36 years old)
    2. Ed
      Ed
      (55 years old)
    3. Elisa Marton
      Elisa Marton
      (28 years old)
    4. Jorge L
      Jorge L
      (42 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...