Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1889 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I turn 50 next year and I am thinking of going to graphite shafts in my irons. I have the typical aches and pains in my fingers, wrists, and arms that comes with playing A LOT of golf for the last 20+ years. Not to mention, while I still hit the ball a long way, I am certainly on the downhill side of distance. I have done quite a bit of reading about graphite iron shaft offerings and have whittled it down to a couple of options: Project X Catalyst 100 or Aerotech Steelfiber 110. I will be ordering them in the new Callaway Apex MB irons that came out last week.

Has anyone out there made the switch to graphite? Was it easier on the joints? How did you like the slightly lighter shaft? Any experiences are appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I know graphite shafts used to (and supposedly) dampen vibrations some, but is that still true? Has it been tested? That feels like one of those things that was maybe once true, and people just believe it, but as graphite shafts and steel shafts have gotten better, maybe they've converged a bit?

Be wary of going too light. It's not like you're short.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

61 yrs old here. Just got back into the game after a couple decades off. Used to be a scratch golfer playing really, really nice forged Yonex ADX Tours with a stiff Boron/graphite shaft. ( Not to be confused with the Super ADX). Shafts were too stiff for me upon my reentry into the game. Went to Golf Galaxy and a local well known pro shop. Hit a lot of clubs. Felt no love for any of them. I am currently playing a 20 yr old set of Mizuno MX 20's with DG R300s. in them. Any set of R flex graphite I tried on new clubs flew too high, and I lost most feel of where on the club face I hit it. Never was a cast club player, they always felt harsh to me. I'll sick with a soft forging and soft steel shaft, even with arthritis it's not bad at all. And the enhanced feel for what' s going on down there can only help keep you consistent. 


Posted
49 minutes ago, iacas said:

I know graphite shafts used to (and supposedly) dampen vibrations some, but is that still true? Has it been tested? That feels like one of those things that was maybe once true, and people just believe it, but as graphite shafts and steel shafts have gotten better, maybe they've converged a bit?

From everything that I have read it appears to be true to a certain extent. I personally don't feel a big difference when I hit irons with graphite shafts, but I do like the feel of graphite.

50 minutes ago, iacas said:

Be wary of going too light. It's not like you're short.

Thats what I am worried about. Mind you a 100 gram shaft is not a light shaft, but I would still be dropping 20-30 grams. True temper says any change over 20 grams you run the risk of having issues.

Another reason I have for looking to switch is I am not nearly as aggressive through the ball as I used to be. I find myself flighting a lot of my short irons most of the time. That hard 8 is now a smooth three-quarter 7. Plus as I said I am not getting any younger. 

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, NM Golf said:

I turn 50 next year and I am thinking of going to graphite shafts in my irons. I have the typical aches and pains in my fingers, wrists, and arms that comes with playing A LOT of golf for the last 20+ years. Not to mention, while I still hit the ball a long way, I am certainly on the downhill side of distance. I have done quite a bit of reading about graphite iron shaft offerings and have whittled it down to a couple of options: Project X Catalyst 100 or Aerotech Steelfiber 110. I will be ordering them in the new Callaway Apex MB irons that came out last week.

Has anyone out there made the switch to graphite? Was it easier on the joints? How did you like the slightly lighter shaft? Any experiences are appreciated. Thanks in advance!

I don't know enough about it to help with shaft selection but just wondered if you'd considered a larger grip size. The larger grips helped my aging, slightly arthritic hands and seemed to absorb the contact shock better than the standard grip size.

  • Like 1

Posted

A few years ago I decided to try graphite. I bought a set of Titleist AP 2 irons with the Kuro Kage regular flex shafts. These were a great club, and to this day I am still playing them. But I did change the shafts in them. I found that if was more difficult for me to work the ball. I have tried numerous graphite irons, and basically with the same results. My feeling was this. When I struck the ball, and was trying to turn the ball over to creat a slight draw, it seemed like the ball was allready gone off the club head. I do feel that the time that the ball remains on the face of the graphite iron is much less than a steel shaft. I replaced the Kuro Kage shafts with just a cheap True Temper TT Lite Shaft. These shafts are around 12 bucks a piece. They hit very nice, and I find them to be very soft, and easy on the arms and elbows. Also I find steel to be much more constant than the graphite. I am 66 years old and my driver, 5 wood, and a hybrid are the only graphites I have in my bag. There is a lot of steel out there that will match, or in my book will feel better than hitting graphite.

 I also just put together a set of Maltby TE forged irons. I used the True Temper Score shafts which probably runs around 10 bucks a shaft. I tipped them to be a soft regular flex, and found them to be very easy on your arms, and wrists...


  • Moderator
Posted
12 hours ago, iacas said:

I know graphite shafts used to (and supposedly) dampen vibrations some, but is that still true? Has it been tested? That feels like one of those things that was maybe once true, and people just believe it, but as graphite shafts and steel shafts have gotten better, maybe they've converged a bit?

Be wary of going too light. It's not like you're short.

I think they are just using the material properties as their guide. Carbon fiber in a resin doesn’t propagate vibration as well as steel. Bike frame companies spent a lot of time on this. The stiffness and strength can be tailored, but vibration will dampen just because of the base material. The example they use often is a bell or tuning fork. 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm 66, and switched to graphite about 1.5 years ago. I had Ping G30 irons with the stock steel stiff shaft. I think they were about 105 grams. I switched to Mizuno 919 Hot Metals with stiff Recoil 95s. I made the move due to some arthritis in both thumbs. I play a lot, and usually hit balls on the days I don't play, so there is a fair bit of stress on my hands. I have to say that the graphite shafts have helped a lot. I have also picked up a bit of distance, too. They do take a bit of time to get used to, so be patient. Now, if I can just find a putter, I'll be set!


Posted
10 hours ago, golfer2b2000 said:

A few years ago I decided to try graphite. I bought a set of Titleist AP 2 irons with the Kuro Kage regular flex shafts. These were a great club, and to this day I am still playing them. But I did change the shafts in them. I found that if was more difficult for me to work the ball. I have tried numerous graphite irons, and basically with the same results. My feeling was this. When I struck the ball, and was trying to turn the ball over to creat a slight draw, it seemed like the ball was allready gone off the club head. I do feel that the time that the ball remains on the face of the graphite iron is much less than a steel shaft. I replaced the Kuro Kage shafts with just a cheap True Temper TT Lite Shaft. These shafts are around 12 bucks a piece. They hit very nice, and I find them to be very soft, and easy on the arms and elbows. Also I find steel to be much more constant than the graphite. I am 66 years old and my driver, 5 wood, and a hybrid are the only graphites I have in my bag. There is a lot of steel out there that will match, or in my book will feel better than hitting graphite.

 I also just put together a set of Maltby TE forged irons. I used the True Temper Score shafts which probably runs around 10 bucks a shaft. I tipped them to be a soft regular flex, and found them to be very easy on your arms, and wrists...

I don't want soft shafts, my swing speed is too high. I question your "feel" that the ball doesn't stay on the club face as long for two reasons. One, the time the ball stays in the club face is measured in milliseconds so I don't believe you can "feel" that. And two, I read a story one time that said that shaft stiffness and material made little difference in the amount of time the ball stays in contact with the face. I would imagine it was more difficult to turn the ball over because they were poorly fitted as far as shaft flex.

2 hours ago, Sandy Divot said:

I'm 66, and switched to graphite about 1.5 years ago. I had Ping G30 irons with the stock steel stiff shaft. I think they were about 105 grams. I switched to Mizuno 919 Hot Metals with stiff Recoil 95s. I made the move due to some arthritis in both thumbs. I play a lot, and usually hit balls on the days I don't play, so there is a fair bit of stress on my hands. I have to say that the graphite shafts have helped a lot. I have also picked up a bit of distance, too. They do take a bit of time to get used to, so be patient. Now, if I can just find a putter, I'll be set!

Everything I read says the same thing, that they help with dampening vibration. I am probably going to order them. Worst comes to worst I can stick with my current irons if they don't work out.

  • Like 1

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
10 hours ago, golfer2b2000 said:

My feeling was this. When I struck the ball, and was trying to turn the ball over to creat a slight draw, it seemed like the ball was allready gone off the club head. I do feel that the time that the ball remains on the face of the graphite iron is much less than a steel shaft.

Yeah, as @NM Golf wrote, that's completely bogus.

The ball is off the face in about 400 microseconds. That's 0.4 milliseconds. An eye blink is about 200 milliseconds, so… 500 eye blinks.

You're not doing anything in that time span, particularly when only the first half of that really matters.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, golfer2b2000 said:

I do feel that the time that the ball remains on the face of the graphite iron is much less than a steel shaft.

Damn...that’s getting a little too DeChambeau-ish yeah? 😃

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Yeah, as @NM Golf wrote, that's completely bogus.

The ball is off the face in about 400 microseconds. That's 0.4 milliseconds. An eye blink is about 200 milliseconds, so… 500 eye blinks.

You're not doing anything in that time span, particularly when only the first half of that really matters.

Yeah...that’s the stuff I say is really just for entertainment. It’s fun to think that stuff matters. It doesn’t.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, iacas said:

so… 500 eye blinks

1/500 th of an eyeblink?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I find that graphite doesn't hurt (vibrate) like steel on a 'peripheral' hit but also not as 'sweet' on center contact. You will give up a something for sure. of course it's relative. For my money I would try soft stepping the same frequency shafts before going all out on graphite.   

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 hours ago, NM Golf said:

I don't want soft shafts, my swing speed is too high. I question your "feel" that the ball doesn't stay on the club face as long for two reasons. One, the time the ball stays in the club face is measured in milliseconds so I don't believe you can "feel" that. And two, I read a story one time that said that shaft stiffness and material made little difference in the amount of time the ball stays in contact with the face. I would imagine it was more difficult to turn the ball over because they were poorly fitted as far as shaft flex.

Everything I read says the same thing, that they help with dampening vibration. I am probably going to order them. Worst comes to worst I can stick with my current irons if they don't work out.

Be patient. I actually ordered the G30s in graphite, played with them 4-5 months, and sent them back to Ping to get steel put in. I chose the Recoil 95s because they were the heaviest stock graphite shafts I could find. That fact was also why I switched from Ping to Mizuno. It took awhile but I wanted to find graphite shafts that played as close to steel as possible. For me, the biggest adjustment was in "feel" shots. It takes a bit of time to get the feel for half shots, punches, ect.


Note: This thread is 1889 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.