Jump to content
IGNORED

Did Golf Clubs Used to Have Flatter Lie Angles?


Recommended Posts

To all you club builders out there that probably had to put whipping on wood clubs…. Did the clubs made say pre Ping Eye 2 era have flatter lie angles? (The PINGs were pretty upright for their time) … I will include a chart from my old 1988 book. Sports Illustrated: Golf Play Like A Pro. 

B573E5D5-8040-4D92-96B9-452D7322617A.thumb.jpeg.d7156591ab34e4fe70b60b31290101ef.jpeg

The Titleist 841 when I looked them were about 1° more upright than the lie angles listed on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Here are the specs from my irons. My 6 iron is equivalent to their 5 in loft. My lie is steeper and length different. It may have to do with the shafts. If their shafts were heavier/thicker, they may have flexed less at impact and needed a flatter lie.

A88550B3-1D3C-4551-A8AC-846E7F954591.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

38 minutes ago, Adam C said:

Those are pretty standard for the time.

I figured that much. 
 

The Ping Eye 2 irons were around when the book was published and looking up the specs for them, I found that they (Black dot Eye 2’s) were substantially more upright than the numbers above.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was those Pings that probably forced the change to more upright lies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Adam C said:

It was those Pings that probably forced the change to more upright lies.

This chart really doesn’t say, but was standard swingweight a little different in the old days?

You would think shorter clubs would play a little flatter anyway… am I reading too much into this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

This chart really doesn’t say, but was standard swingweight a little different in the old days?

You would think shorter clubs would play a little flatter anyway… am I reading too much into this?

I think the old lie angles were all based on basic geometry which would give you lower needed lies. I think they now understand how the club act during the swing and the lies have moved accordingly. 

I don't recall the SW on the old stuff. The clubs were heavy overall but they were shorter so the swing weights were probably in the high C range. Ping for years, was always lighter in SW than the other major brands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Shaft droop effectively flattens the lie angle of the club into delivery, too.

Shafts have always drooped, I'm not saying that's new.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
(edited)
On 6/20/2021 at 1:18 AM, onthehunt526 said:

To all you club builders out there that probably had to put whipping on wood clubs…. Did the clubs made say pre Ping Eye 2 era have flatter lie angles? (The PINGs were pretty upright for their time) … I will include a chart from my old 1988 book. Sports Illustrated: Golf Play Like A Pro. 

B573E5D5-8040-4D92-96B9-452D7322617A.thumb.jpeg.d7156591ab34e4fe70b60b31290101ef.jpeg

The Titleist 841 when I looked them were about 1° more upright than the lie angles listed on here.

Below are my new Ping Eye 2 iron specs:

3i   18 deg.

4i   22deg.

5i   26deg

6i   30deg

7i   34deg

8i   38deg

9i   42deg

PW  46deg

SW  54deg

Below are my new Ping Eye 2 specs:

All steel shafts have been replaced and made 3/4" longer over stock.

3i   18 deg.

4i   22deg.

5i   26deg

6i   30deg

7i   34deg

8i   38deg

9i   42deg

PW  46deg

SW  54deg

Edited by NHpro
additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NHpro said:

Below are my new Ping Eye 2 iron specs:

3i   18 deg.

4i   22deg.

5i   26deg

6i   30deg

7i   34deg

8i   38deg

9i   42deg

PW  46deg

SW  54deg

Below are my new Ping Eye 2 specs:

All steel shafts have been replaced and made 3/4" longer over stock.

3i   18 deg.

4i   22deg.

5i   26deg

6i   30deg

7i   34deg

8i   38deg

9i   42deg

PW  46deg

SW  54deg

Lie angle, not loft.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

I think some manufacturers at some times made their super game improvement clubs with more upright lies, as (all other things being equal) this will tend to make shots start more left and mitigate the effects of slicing to some degree. Whether it's still done or not in irons, I don't know. I think at one time the way "draw bias" was induced in adjustable hosel metal woods was to basically make them more upright.  Anyway those are reasons I think you may find that current specs in _some_ modern clubs are more upright than traditional specs. 

 

Edited by Big Lex
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • I'm watching this video and he mentions "he got himself a little more out onto the front of his feet" and "he's got himself more centred in to back of his feet" in the other comparison https://youtu.be/S8dkDx8YVkI?t=242  Does that mean he puts more weight on the front of his feet than the back?   One more question: how do you create more space for the right arm during impact as mentioned here? He's more tipped over which allows this , I think http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8dkDx8YVkI?t=280 Would reducing how much your right forearm can rotate clockwise help with this, duringthe end of your backswing?
    • Sounds like he may have originated from my neck of the woods,   ‘Awayanbileyerheid’ is a fairly humorous response to someone ,  sort of like ,get lost your talking drivel (nonsense) If you want to get an insight of the meaning , Google ‘ Parliamo Glasgow’ -;))
    • I don’t think there is anything wrong with watching YouTube golf instruction videos, if and only if you stick to one or two instructors. I personally like Matt Fisher and Danny Maude myself.    Funny story: I played golf with three guys I haven’t seen in person since about 2003 today. Anyway one of the guys I played with, reminded me of a video I watched on posture recently, with Danny Maude. Me as a low single figure handicap my arms look like / at address down the line. You want them like | or \ slightly on the latter. My posture sucks… and I shot 1 under on the back today.
    • Can you share some information about your computer, such as OS?
    • There used to be a joke about the instructional articles in Golf Digest.  It might still be there, I haven't subscribed in years.  Anyway, every odd-numbered month, the lesson would be "fix your slice," but what they wouldn't tell you is that it'd cost you 10 yards.  In even numbered months, they'd tell you how to gain 10 yards on your tee shot, but not tell you that it'd cause you to slice. YouTube instruction is a bit like that.  You'll get conflicting information that may or may not cancel out.  Find someone reputable and get lessons for you not for some generic you. If you need someone online to give you something to work on, and don't feel like spending the money for something quality like Evolvr (hey, money was tight when I took up golf, I understand), at least make a "My Swing" thread and try what ends up being suggested for you.  The first time I did this, I was shocked at how someone could watch a few swings on video and give me good advice of what to practice that resulted in some improvement.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...