Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1591 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I cut a Prov1, a refurbished Prov1, and a refinished Prov1.  It seems that the refurbished one isn’t actually a Prov1 as it doesn’t have the extra core layer.  Thoughts?

I found these balls and thought it would be neat to see. I may cut open all refinished/refurbished Prov1s that I find and track them. 
B103AE17-8A76-4F97-B2B2-8505702B5868.thumb.jpeg.fa035f05f6e40dd7ee648ffb67abf986.jpeg

  • Like 1

Posted

Ok, so what are you trying to accomplish? From your picture, the middle ball is a Pro V1x  ('x') which is 4 layers.  The ball on the left has a red number, so it's probably also a Prov1x, again, 4 layers.  And the ball on the right has a black number, so probably a Pro V1 (no 'x') which is a 3 layer ball.  So?

  • Informative 1

Mike

Driver: TM Sim2 9* Ventus Black, M5 9* Kuro Kage
Fwy: TM SLDR 3W, 5W;    Hybrid: TM M1 4 Hybrid
Irons: TM Tour Preferred MC 2014
Wedges: TM Tour Preferred, 52 @ 51*, 56
Putter: Ping Scottsdale TR Anser 2 or Odyssey Rossie

It isn't the hours that you put in at practice that count. It's the way you spend those minutes. -- tony lema

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 minutes ago, mohearn said:

Ok, so what are you trying to accomplish? From your picture, the middle ball is a Pro V1x  ('x') which is 4 layers.  The ball on the left has a red number, so it's probably also a Prov1x, again, 4 layers.  And the ball on the right has a black number, so probably a Pro V1 (no 'x') which is a 3 layer ball.  So?

Easy there bud. I was just interested in finding out if the refurbished or refinished balls are actually Prov1s.  No need to be defensive


Posted
12 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Easy there bud. I was just interested in finding out if the refurbished or refinished balls are actually Prov1s.  No need to be defensive

I do not think he was being defensive, you may have read a little "Tone" into his email that I did not sense.  He is providing specifications of different versions of Pro-V balls which appears to explain the different visuals you are seeing when you cut them in half.

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, StuM said:

I do not think he was being defensive, you may have read a little "Tone" into his email that I did not sense.  He is providing specifications of different versions of Pro-V balls which appears to explain the different visuals you are seeing when you cut them in half.

Yeah it seemed defensive or condescending with the “so what are you trying to accomplish?” And “so?” Comments. I find quite a bit of these and typically don’t play them being they’re refurbished or refinished.  So that’s why I posted. Interested in finding out if any of these balls are ever not Prov1s 


  • Administrator
Posted
7 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Yeah it seemed defensive or condescending with the “so what are you trying to accomplish?” And “so?” Comments. I find quite a bit of these and typically don’t play them being they’re refurbished or refinished.  So that’s why I posted. Interested in finding out if any of these balls are ever not Prov1s 

I think you're still missing his original point.

  • The current Pro V1x is a four-piece ball.
  • The Pro V1 is a three-piece ball.

The "Pro V1" and "Pro V1x" are different models of golf ball. They have different compositions and different performance characteristics. They're both premium balls, but they're fundamentally different golf balls.


For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, the Titleist Pro V1 golf ball provides total performance from tee to green. Shop directly from Titleist today.

For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, look no further than the Titleist Pro V1x golf ball. Shop directly from Titleist and make the Pro V1x your own.

Look, @checkerfred, just read the words as they're written. The only "tone" in reading a written word is the tone you add to it. I can say "f*** off" to a buddy when he's told me he just made another hole in one and it can be completely nice and friendly and astonished and happy for him, and I can say "f*** off" to someone who just stole something from me and ran away and it can be none of those things. Just reading those words you have no idea the "tone" of the words because you can't hear them in the author's voice as he would have said them at the time.

So, benefit of the doubt, man.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
39 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think you're still missing his original point.

  • The current Pro V1x is a four-piece ball.
  • The Pro V1 is a three-piece ball.

The "Pro V1" and "Pro V1x" are different models of golf ball. They have different compositions and different performance characteristics. They're both premium balls, but they're fundamentally different golf balls.


For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, the Titleist Pro V1 golf ball provides...

For golfers looking to shoot their best scores, look no further than the Titleist Pro...

Look, @checkerfred, just read the words as they're written. The only "tone" in reading a written word is the tone you add to it. I can say "f*** off" to a buddy when he's told me he just made another hole in one and it can be completely nice and friendly and astonished and happy for him, and I can say "f*** off" to someone who just stole something from me and ran away and it can be none of those things. Just reading those words you have no idea the "tone" of the words because you can't hear them in the author's voice as he would have said them at the time.

So, benefit of the doubt, man.

Definitely didn’t miss the original point. Obviously had I known the prov came in a 3 piece I wouldn’t have posted.  Just trying to be a little more active on the forum but no worries. 


  • Administrator
Posted
5 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Just trying to be a little more active on the forum but no worries. 

Then stop reading "tone" into plain text.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, checkerfred said:

Interested in finding out if any of these balls are ever not Prov1s

Ok, so back on topic, how would you know simply from cutting them open? I’m pretty sure Titleist tweaks their ball formula periodically, so even if two Pro V1s don’t match, you could just be looking at balls from different years or something.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, billchao said:

Ok, so back on topic, how would you know simply from cutting them open? I’m pretty sure Titleist tweaks their ball formula periodically, so even if two Pro V1s don’t match, you could just be looking at balls from different years or something.

Good point, on the other side of that though, how would you know it’s not some other 3 piece ball? I’ve found some of these that are definitely harder feeling that others especially compared to the original ones


  • Moderator
Posted
5 minutes ago, checkerfred said:

Good point, on the other side of that though, how would you know it’s not some other 3 piece ball? I’ve found some of these that are definitely harder feeling that others especially compared to the original ones

You found them though, right? They’ve been exposed to the elements for who knows how long?

I’m sure a business that refurbishes random balls and sells them as Pro V1s would get into trouble if they were caught, but this isn’t exactly a definitive way to prove anything. If there aren’t any markings indicating so, you don’t even know which company did the job, do you?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

If we believe the marketing, these golf balls are tweaked every two years or so.  The thickness of the various layers may change a little, and the coloring of the materials may also change.  For the "original" ProV1, you can probably look at the markings and determine which version you have.  But the refurbished/refinished balls won't have their original markings, they'll have new paint, so you'll have no idea what to try to compare them to.   I wonder if the color of the compounds might change for different ball plants, I just don't know. And as others have said, there's the difficulty of comparing a 3-piece ball against a 4-piece ball, if the refurbishing is done right the color of the number should differentiate those for you.  Its an interesting exercise to cut the balls open, but I'm not sure you'd ever be able to prove anything.

  • Like 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

If we believe the marketing, these golf balls are tweaked every two years or so.  The thickness of the various layers may change a little, and the coloring of the materials may also change.  For the "original" ProV1, you can probably look at the markings and determine which version you have.  But the refurbished/refinished balls won't have their original markings, they'll have new paint, so you'll have no idea what to try to compare them to.   I wonder if the color of the compounds might change for different ball plants, I just don't know. And as others have said, there's the difficulty of comparing a 3-piece ball against a 4-piece ball, if the refurbishing is done right the color of the number should differentiate those for you.  Its an interesting exercise to cut the balls open, but I'm not sure you'd ever be able to prove anything.

Interestingly enough, they were all marked Prov1 x. So I guess it must have been a sorting error.  I’ve never cut them open before. The original Prov1 has lumps on the cover so I wasn’t going to play it. You can see them on the outside of where I cut it. The other two I had on my shag bag 

6 hours ago, billchao said:

You found them though, right? They’ve been exposed to the elements for who knows how long?

I’m sure a business that refurbishes random balls and sells them as Pro V1s would get into trouble if they were caught, but this isn’t exactly a definitive way to prove anything. If there aren’t any markings indicating so, you don’t even know which company did the job, do you?

I did but they weren’t out that long when I had found them. I just watched a video that Rick Shiels had done comparing them to an original. He noticed they were harder feeling too. He actually picked them out on a blind test. I’ve found a few where I’d try to make a fingernail mark and they wouldn’t mark as easily as ab original prov1.  But I’ve also noticed the yellow Prov1s seem to do that too. So idk 


  • Moderator
Posted
5 hours ago, checkerfred said:

Interestingly enough, they were all marked Prov1 x. So I guess it must have been a sorting error.  I’ve never cut them open before. The original Prov1 has lumps on the cover so I wasn’t going to play it. You can see them on the outside of where I cut it. The other two I had on my shag bag 

I did but they weren’t out that long when I had found them. I just watched a video that Rick Shiels had done comparing them to an original. He noticed they were harder feeling too. He actually picked them out on a blind test. I’ve found a few where I’d try to make a fingernail mark and they wouldn’t mark as easily as ab original prov1.  But I’ve also noticed the yellow Prov1s seem to do that too. So idk 

Titleist tweaks the coating formula to adjust for spin when they make modifications to the interior layers. Some revisions may scratch easier than others. The top mantle layer does provide some of the feel of hardness too.  It’s a balancing act to optimize ball flight. Other OEM do the same. There have been many revisions of the ProV1 and ProV1X balls.

You can find videos and other details on the OEM sites.

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Titleist tweaks the coating formula to adjust for spin when they make modifications to the interior layers. Some revisions may scratch easier than others. The top mantle layer does provide some of the feel of hardness too.  It’s a balancing act to optimize ball flight. Other OEM do the same. There have been many revisions of the ProV1 and ProV1X balls.

You can find videos and other details on the OEM sites.

 

I like those videos. BTW - Often the color of the layers is just an adder. They add the colors so that they can do internal quality checks. If all the rubber was the same color it would make it more difficult on their own QA team's inspections. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1591 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.