Jump to content
IGNORED

Fitzpatrick Cracked Driver Denied Replacement


Vinsk

Recommended Posts

Taking a quick look at the video, it wasn't enough damaged (on camera) to affect ball flight in my opinion. I think he just took his chances with a referee in hopes he will be allowed to change it. 

A couple months ago I cracked my Driver on the warm up of a mid am. It sounded different and of course the ball wasn't going as far, but the flight was somewhat predictable and the lost in carry wasn't that huge to drop down to 3 wood so I played the 36 holes with that club and proceeded to replace it (under warranty) for the next tournament. 

I drove it pretty well that tournament, stats told me I loose 10 yards but it was accurate enough to be a better selection than 3 wood. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

Taking a quick look at the video, it wasn't enough damaged (on camera) to affect ball flight in my opinion. I think he just took his chances with a referee in hopes he will be allowed to change it. 

A couple months ago I cracked my Driver on the warm up of a mid am. It sounded different and of course the ball wasn't going as far, but the flight was somewhat predictable and the lost in carry wasn't that huge to drop down to 3 wood so I played the 36 holes with that club and proceeded to replace it (under warranty) for the next tournament. 

I drove it pretty well that tournament, stats told me I loose 10 yards but it was accurate enough to be a better selection than 3 wood. 

Even a tiny crack is enough to change ball flight at the PGA Tour level. Plus the next swing might completely collapse it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

25 minutes ago, iacas said:

Even a tiny crack is enough to change ball flight at the PGA Tour level. Plus the next swing might completely collapse it.

And unless one believes he tanked his next drive, the cracked face appears to have affected the ball flight.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

54 minutes ago, turtleback said:

And unless one believes he tanked his next drive, the cracked face appears to have affected the ball flight.

Are you suggesting there was significant other damage?

Given that a club is “broken or significantly damaged” when: The clubhead is visibly and significantly deformed (but not when the clubhead is only cracked)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


13 hours ago, Rulesman said:

but not when the clubhead is only cracked)

It wasn’t the clubhead. It was the club face. Either way,  sounds like the rule suggests that just a crack won’t affect ball flight thus the club isn’t damaged? A little disingenuous that a paper thin sticker anywhere on the club face deems a club non-conforming because it could affect the ball flight but a crack …won’t?

  • Thumbs Up 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Vinsk said:

It wasn’t the clubhead. It was the club face. Either way,  sounds like the rule suggests that just a crack won’t affect ball flight thus the club isn’t damaged? A little disingenuous that a paper thin sticker anywhere on the club face deems a club non-conforming because it could affect the ball flight but a crack …won’t?

So my understanding is that not that a crack on the clubface is inconsequential but that it is hard to determine the difference from something like a scratch. The rule is to protect players from requesting club replacements under the disguise of 'damage'. And yes, I think there are non-damage related reasons (illegal) someone would want to change a driver mid-round. 

I could be totally off-base here but that's what I concluded from everything I didn't read 😂.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
2 hours ago, Vinsk said:

It wasn’t the clubhead. It was the club face. Either way,  sounds like the rule suggests that just a crack won’t affect ball flight thus the club isn’t damaged? A little disingenuous that a paper thin sticker anywhere on the club face deems a club non-conforming because it could affect the ball flight but a crack …won’t?

just so we all understand what the rule actually says, I'll quote it, you can replace a club if:

" The club face impact area is visibly deformed (but not when the club face is only scratched or cracked)"

I can't say for certain why the MLR was written this way, or why the Tour has chosen to use it, but I suspect that @GolfLug is on the right track.  The officials interpreted the rule correctly,  from everything I've read.  If anyone must be "blamed", look to tour management, including the players advisory group.

  • Informative 2

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 hours ago, Vinsk said:

It wasn’t the clubhead. It was the club face. Either way,  sounds like the rule suggests that just a crack won’t affect ball flight thus the club isn’t damaged? A little disingenuous that a paper thin sticker anywhere on the club face deems a club non-conforming because it could affect the ball flight but a crack …won’t?

Kevin, man, c'mon. It's been addressed.

  • The sticker comparison is bogus. The rule is simple: don't add anything to the clubface. It's sacred territory. Simple rule, easily enforced, with valid reasons.
  • The regular rule of golf would have allowed replacement for a crack.
  • The PGA Tour has the MLR in place, G-9, so more than a small crack is required. That's all. Reasons may be as I've said and as @Vinsk recently said.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
58 minutes ago, colin007 said:

"Not when the club face is only cracked" = stupid rule

Oy. It's a Local Rule the PGA Tour puts into place. It wouldn't affect you even if you ever did play an event, as they'd just use 4.1a(2) without G-9.

@colin007 did you read the topic before replying with the same off-the-cuff reaction that has already been replied to a few times?

I realize I'm "stanning" a bit for the Rules of Golf, but this is a PGA Tour issue, and those saying "stupid rule" should direct their ire there, not at the "rule."

(I get that a Local Rule is also part of the "rules" of golf, but this feels like an MLR that the PGA Tour asked to have included. I'm not even sure I'd been aware of this MLR until recently and it's never been talked about in any of my rules seminars or come up in any tournaments.)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
32 minutes ago, iacas said:

I'm not even sure I'd been aware of this MLR until recently and it's never been talked about in any of my rules seminars or come up in any tournaments

I have some vague memory of this rule, but like you I don't remember it ever being discussed in a rules Workshop.

I ran across this article, which quotes a retired tour caddie explainng why he thinks the rules is being used.


One tour insider has given the "real reason" why Matt Fitzpatrick wasn't allowed to change his driver at the BMW Championship.

“If pros were allowed to replace a driver with any sort of a crack, manufacturers would build the faces as thin as legally possible. It is a roundabout way of controlling distance.

“Written this way, manufacturers have to build their drivers with a bit of a “buffer zone” so they don’t crack more often. The thinner the face, the faster the ball comes off, the more often they would crack and be replaced with another one also pushed right up against the limit.”

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

I realize I'm "stanning" a bit for the Rules of Golf, but this is a PGA Tour issue, and those saying "stupid rule" should direct their ire there, not at the "rule."

I'm confused by this.

IMO it doesn't matter on what tour(s) the rule applies or who asked for it, the fact that the rule exists at all is stupid. 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
15 minutes ago, klineka said:

IMO it doesn't matter on what tour(s) the rule applies or who asked for it, the fact that the rule exists at all is stupid. 

The point is your issue is with the PGA Tour.

I think it's stupid to say "the rule is stupid" before you even know what the reasons for the rule are.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
26 minutes ago, klineka said:

I'm confused by this.

IMO it doesn't matter on what tour(s) the rule applies or who asked for it, the fact that the rule exists at all is stupid. 

Did you read what @GolfLug suggested, or the thoughts from a retired caddie at the link I posted?   You might compare this with the basic Rule, 4.1a(2), which says "“Damaged during a round ” means when any part, feature, or property of a club is changed because of any act during the round ".   A chip in the paint, I want to replace this.  A scratch on the face, I want to replace this.  And I want to replace this 6* driver with a 12* driver for this next (downwind) hole.   Or I don't need this 3-iron for the rest of the round, its scratched, I'll replace it with a wedge.  And at the top levels, a player CAN have a brand new club in his bag within a few minutes, unlike the rest of us.  The MLR limits replacement of clubs, I believe to minimize just these kinds of club changes.  

  • Informative 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
24 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Did you read what @GolfLug suggested, or the thoughts from a retired caddie at the link I posted?   You might compare this with the basic Rule, 4.1a(2), which says "“Damaged during a round ” means when any part, feature, or property of a club is changed because of any act during the round ".   A chip in the paint, I want to replace this.  A scratch on the face, I want to replace this.  And I want to replace this 6* driver with a 12* driver for this next (downwind) hole.   Or I don't need this 3-iron for the rest of the round, its scratched, I'll replace it with a wedge.  And at the top levels, a player CAN have a brand new club in his bag within a few minutes, unlike the rest of us.  The MLR limits replacement of clubs, I believe to minimize just these kinds of club changes.  

Exactly.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

29 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Did you read what @GolfLug suggested, or the thoughts from a retired caddie at the link I posted?   You might compare this with the basic Rule, 4.1a(2), which says "“Damaged during a round ” means when any part, feature, or property of a club is changed because of any act during the round ".   A chip in the paint, I want to replace this.  A scratch on the face, I want to replace this.  And I want to replace this 6* driver with a 12* driver for this next (downwind) hole.   Or I don't need this 3-iron for the rest of the round, its scratched, I'll replace it with a wedge.  And at the top levels, a player CAN have a brand new club in his bag within a few minutes, unlike the rest of us.  The MLR limits replacement of clubs, I believe to minimize just these kinds of club changes.  

Seems like that could easily be solved by saying that the replacement club has to be of the same make, model, loft, shaft, length, etc, right?

  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 hours ago, Rulesman said:

Are you suggesting there was significant other damage?

Given that a club is “broken or significantly damaged” when: The clubhead is visibly and significantly deformed (but not when the clubhead is only cracked)

 

No, I'm suggesting it is a stupid Local Rule that is at odds with reality.

  • Funny 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, klineka said:

Seems like that could easily be solved by saying that the replacement club has to be of the same make, model, loft, shaft, length, etc, right?

Determined by the stickers/stampings on the clubs/shafts?? 😊

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 248 - Wide backswing, good impact position, repeat 5x before hitting a ball. 
    • Day 62: did a stack session. 
    • Smart2Move https://www.smart2move.com/devices/3d-dual-force-plates I now have a set of the Smart2Move 3D Dual Force Plates. These measure forces and torques in all three dimensions, and are portable (somewhat — each plate weighs about 12 pounds) and run wirelessly to an iPad. I've already used them for a session or two, and often I would just AirPlay my screen to the TV in my hitting station. It worked really well in early testing, and I'm excited to continue to work with Smart2Move and these plates. @david_wedzik were among the first people in the world to own a SwingCatalyst. We have a BodiTrak as well. I'm on record as saying a few things regarding these things: You can "see" what golfers are doing with your eyes, even if it's not really measured. They were kind of a pain to set up and use. Students are bad at understanding forces and torques. Everyone has semi-decent nGRF; what you can gain from using them is somewhat limited, and instructors make too much out of GRF these days. ROI? In order… 1. You can see what golfers are doing with your eyes, even if it's not truly measured. They say "force precedes motion" and that's true. And I can see what golfers are doing - where they're applying forces, torques, etc. I don't know exactly how much, but my estimates would be pretty close. I don't necessarily need force plates to help golfers, or to see what they're doing, but… they do. Like I've found with GEARS, and my GCQuadMAX… golfers are more willing to make changes when they do something and I say "no, you didn't do it" when as I say that, I'm pointing to proof that they didn't do it. It carries more weight than just me saying "you didn't do it" based on what I saw. 😄  2. They were kind of a pain to set up and use. They were; that's still true. These S2M plates are not. They connect to an iPad, not an entire PC with a dedicated, wired camera that has a hard time getting a good frame rate. The iPad gives 240 FPS video. 3. Students are bad at understanding forces and torques. They still are. You tell someone to add pressure to their left foot, and they'll push with their right foot to shift their weight left… thus adding force to their right foot. But, that's where I come in — I can explain what we're trying to do, and narrow their focus to one graph or one number. 4. Everyone has semi-decent GRF; what you can gain from using them is somewhat limited, and instructors make too much out of GRF these days. To be honest, I still think this is mostly true, but… I'm seeing enough people these days who shift their weight into their trail side toes instead of back toward the heel a bit, or who are super late getting forward, or who don't do some other things pretty easily seen on a graph, that I think I can narrow their focus to just the one thing, explain that thing, and make good progress. Plus, for better players, sometimes this timing — or the amount that they do it — can lead to a noticeable change, even if it takes them from a +1 to a +1.4, or a 110 MPH driver swing to 114. 5. No, at $14k, there would be no good ROI argument to be made. 😛 Erie is a "thrifty" town, after all. I'm excited to have these again. Like I said, the old systems were a pain to use, and these are much easier, and need only an iPad. I'll be using them in "regular" lessons as well as in GEARS lessons. Any questions?
    • Day 269: 9/17/24 Indoor chipping followed by slow motion swings working on weight shift. Each day begins with a Par4Success workout.
    • Oh my, no. It's a wedge second shot. Your angle into the green doesn't matter. You should not be aiming for the "side" of a 30-yard wide fairway to give yourself a better angle to hit your wedge shot. Or almost any shot after that. If the mounds on the left were a pond, or horrible bunkers, sure aim left. But they're not. If teeing off from the right side gives you confidence, cool, but the angle changes like 0.5°.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...