Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Aerated Greens: How Long to Return to "Normal" Play?


Note: This thread is 1222 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Depending on how they aerate and there are several ways after 3 weeks they should be good to go.If they vericut then 6-10 days as good as new.If you deep core aerate and use 90/10 top dress then 4 weeks.If they use the little hole punch and 80/20 1 week tops.There is a corse here on Long Island that Water aerates which is forcing high pressure water into the root system and you do not see a thing.Do not know all that much about it but it is the only course I have ever seen that uses it so I am thinking it might not be to good.If they use 80/20 to top dress {80 percent sand and 20 percent michagan pete}they usually grow back faster especially in the fall because Bent grass likes the cooler weather and higher nitrogen content of 80-20 mix.

In my new FT carry bag
FT-9 Tour nuetral 9.5
FT-15 degree 3 wood
Fussion Hybrids #2&4
Fussion irons with Grapholoy Pro launch Red shafts56&60 Cally X forged wedges with Red shaftsSG9 putterCally I ballBushnell Meadealist range finder


  • 9 years later...
Posted
On 9/8/2008 at 12:06 PM, Lefty731PM said:

Where I play after 1 week you can barely notice they've been done.

As for giving yourself 2 putts on the card inside 20 feet _ you certainly do not do that! Unless that's a temporary rule at your club. Everyone has the same conditions, so you putt out and too bad if you miss a few short ones. You don't make up rules to suit yourself.

I just don't keep score. I'm a pretty good putter, So not keeping score makes for a happy day. Aerated greens ,make this a practice round


Posted

I think it depends on the course and the superintendent. I've played courses where, 2 weeks after punching the greens, they had knit up and were putting beautifully. I've played other courses where greens that were punched the previous Fall still weren't healed mid-Spring the next year!

Also, I found out that some courses double punch their greens. Heck, last year Mill Creek punched "everything"! Tees, fairways, rough, and greens!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 minutes ago, Buckeyebowman said:

I think it depends on the course and the superintendent. I've played courses where, 2 weeks after punching the greens, they had knit up and were putting beautifully. I've played other courses where greens that were punched the previous Fall still weren't healed mid-Spring the next year!

Also, I found out that some courses double punch their greens. Heck, last year Mill Creek punched "everything"! Tees, fairways, rough, and greens!

Punching everything...sounds like what they did at my place.  Our course gets absolutely rotten reviews online some regarding conditions but mostly about the head pro that runs everything.  They rarely have outings here but they had one and  2 days before they punched everything.  This was last week, I bet they were pissed.  Those people won't be back.

Our greens were the best they had been in years and they punched them with huge holes....unplayable for the most part.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Round these parts...it’s usually 3 weeks before they are rolling really true again. Played Memorial Park back in April (one of my fav in Houston) and it was punched three weeks to the day I played. Greens were dang near perfect. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Depends on the greenskeeper and the weather. Around here two weeks with a good greenskeeper, a little sand and some rain.

Live from the doghouse.


Posted
On 9/8/2008 at 3:06 PM, Lefty731PM said:

Where I play after 1 week you can barely notice they've been done.

As for giving yourself 2 putts on the card inside 20 feet _ you certainly do not do that! Unless that's a temporary rule at your club. Everyone has the same conditions, so you putt out and too bad if you miss a few short ones. You don't make up rules to suit yourself.

What’s wrong with calling a 2 putt? If you’re not playing in a tournament or using the score for HC purposes, what’s the harm? My regular group will call 2 putts from certain distances if the greens are in rough shape. As long as everybody is on board, I don’t see the problem.

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 9/9/2008 at 3:50 AM, blue3715 said:

If you get a good heavy rain, the grass should grow in pretty fast. But they tend to seed the greens as well so you should kiss the next 6 weeks goodbye.

Generally once the ball is inside 20 feet, give yourself a 2 putt on the card.

??????? !!!!!!!! 

Aerated greens do not give you the right to "give yourself a 2 putt on the card".

Also - where I play, after about 10 days the greens are perfect. 6 weeks? Really?

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  • 1 year later...
Posted

As a greenkeeper I can say, or the message coming from the golfer, theirs no right time to core greens because hate to putt on cored greens.

So after many years of experience the  best time to core greens is when they will recover the fastest which will be in May or June when you have the most growth to recover

Anthony Keane

  • Upvote 1

Posted
On 5/28/2018 at 9:50 PM, Typhoon92 said:

Punching everything...sounds like what they did at my place.  Our course gets absolutely rotten reviews online some regarding conditions but mostly about the head pro that runs everything.  They rarely have outings here but they had one and  2 days before they punched everything.  This was last week, I bet they were pissed.  Those people won't be back.

Our greens were the best they had been in years and they punched them with huge holes....unplayable for the most part.

Some of the better courses around here have gone to aerators that punch smaller diameter holes. It really does make a difference if you have to putt on them. Especially if they don't skimp on the sand, which I've never understood! I've putted on some punched greens with tons of empty holes. Why? Is sand really that expensive? Or, how lazy is your grounds crew? 

On 1/11/2020 at 3:27 PM, Anthony Keane said:

As a greenkeeper I can say, or the message coming from the golfer, theirs no right time to core greens because hate to putt on cored greens.

So after many years of experience the  best time to core greens is when they will recover the fastest which will be in May or June when you have the most growth to recover

Anthony Keane

Oh! I can just imagine the outrage around here if a course decided to punch greens at that time of year! 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The end of last year I was out by myself and the Super was out there walking up one of the fairways.  The course really ended up looking great and I took the time to thank him.  I imagine all he ever gets is complaints so I thought it would be nice for him to be thanked.

 

i also asked him about the aerating and why sometimes the holes are huge and other times they do smaller holes that you barely notice and no sand.  He told me it has to do with the depth.  The small holes go deep so it’s a different type of aerification .

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 years later...
Posted

I know this an old post but I found it doing research about hollow tining and the poor state of our course last YEAR! I'm in UK, I believe clay based soil and our golf course is flat. Last year the greens were so bad for the whole year I bought it up at AGM. Our greens took literally months to recover from hollow tining. Incredibly bumpy for weeks and weeks and still look like a cross stitch base. Just as the holes had begun to disappear/grow over (months) and they were JUST beginning to role something close to flat ish, they were hollow tined again and/or spiked. Not one week last year did we have greens that I would class as acceptable/flat/good little alone excellent condition and were very slow. They used to be lovely true, fast, flat greens!! ☹️ I am challenging the club on this matter.

The course is now getting wetter and of course pesticides etc have been banned. Any comments asap would be appreciated.

Thank you


  • 6 months later...
Posted

Reviving an old thread. I player today on aerated greens and also extremely damaged greens. I can’t begin to explain how much it takes me out of a round from the first green on. Especially when it is not made public or clear by pro shop they aerated. Worst round of the year. Just had no enjoyment in the round from the 1st green through 18th. I watched my first putt bounce and changed direction due to large aeration marks. I just don’t have the mental makeup to want to play like that. Which is 100% on me. 

  :sunmountain: eco lite stand Bag
:tmade: Sim 2 Max driver
 :callaway: Mavrick 20 * hybrid
:tmade: M2 3HL                               :mizuno: JPX 923 5-gw                           

 Lazrus 52, 56 wedges

:scotty_cameron:
:true_linkswear:-Lux Hybrid, Lux Sport, Original 1.2

:clicgear:


Posted
1 hour ago, jmanbooyaa said:

Reviving an old thread. I player today on aerated greens and also extremely damaged greens. I can’t begin to explain how much it takes me out of a round from the first green on. Especially when it is not made public or clear by pro shop they aerated. Worst round of the year. Just had no enjoyment in the round from the 1st green through 18th. I watched my first putt bounce and changed direction due to large aeration marks. I just don’t have the mental makeup to want to play like that. Which is 100% on me. 

When the aeration season is upon us I'll always check the website before making a tee time.  If I don't trust that I'll make a phone call.


Posted
2 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

When the aeration season is upon us I'll always check the website before making a tee time.  If I don't trust that I'll make a phone call.

My course posts it on the monthly calendar in the clubhouse (where they list schedule of scrambles, club tournaments, etc.). 

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 9/8/2008 at 5:55 PM, ks8829 said:

approximately 4-5 weeks.

Don't think much to your green keepers. Within a week our greens are back to normal

On 9/18/2008 at 4:59 AM, flap said:

Depending on how they aerate and there are several ways after 3 weeks they should be good to go.If they vericut then 6-10 days as good as new.If you deep core aerate and use 90/10 top dress then 4 weeks.If they use the little hole punch and 80/20 1 week tops.There is a corse here on Long Island that Water aerates which is forcing high pressure water into the root system and you do not see a thing.Do not know all that much about it but it is the only course I have ever seen that uses it so I am thinking it might not be to good.If they use 80/20 to top dress {80 percent sand and 20 percent michagan pete}they usually grow back faster especially in the fall because Bent grass likes the cooler weather and higher nitrogen content of 80-20 mix.

If the green keepers know what they are doing, everything should be OK within a week 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Took about ten days at the local course (mid-August) before the greens were pretty much back to normal. And that was with the pretty big plugs/holes taken out, not the really small tines.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I always heard courses say about 1-2 weeks. I remember one course had something go wrong, and it was still bumpy for like 3-4 months afterwards. Like, they didn't fill in the holes well enough to get the grass to level out. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1222 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.