Jump to content
pmm5557

Average Distances - How Far Do You Hit Each Club? (And Don't Lie!)

2,402 posts / 510799 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Now that I'm an advocate of Game Golf, seems like this thread is kind of redundant just like the "what did you shoot today" thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Lihu said:

Now that I'm an advocate of Game Golf, seems like this thread is kind of redundant just like the "what did you shoot today" thread.

Agreed. I'm going to pick up Game Golf Live, relatively soon, just waiting on the Dept. Of Treasury. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Where are you guys playing that you get roll out on your shots?? I have to get out of Seattle!! I crushed a drive today on a par 5 and was curious about distance. So I marked the tee box on my watch and walked up to my ball. It was laying in the fairway, 3 ft from its pitch mark. I guess I should be happy that it wasn't plugged. My watch said it was 271 yards. I'd like to go play in Denver one of these days. I hear the thin air makes for some long drives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dholmes said:

Where are you guys playing that you get roll out on your shots?? I have to get out of Seattle!! I crushed a drive today on a par 5 and was curious about distance. So I marked the tee box on my watch and walked up to my ball. It was laying in the fairway, 3 ft from its pitch mark. I guess I should be happy that it wasn't plugged. My watch said it was 271 yards. I'd like to go play in Denver one of these days. I hear the thin air makes for some long drives.

I'm in upstate NY, If I hit a drive right now, I won't be able to find the ball!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, Dholmes said:

Where are you guys playing that you get roll out on your shots?? I have to get out of Seattle!! I crushed a drive today on a par 5 and was curious about distance. So I marked the tee box on my watch and walked up to my ball. It was laying in the fairway, 3 ft from its pitch mark. I guess I should be happy that it wasn't plugged. My watch said it was 271 yards. I'd like to go play in Denver one of these days. I hear the thin air makes for some long drives.

Honolulu. No rain since nov. drier then Death Valley.  Just hit two 320+ drives.  Ground is like cement. 

Edited by GolfingInHawaiiSpoiledMe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That must be fun trying to stop the ball on the green. That the good part of rainy Seattle. My 5 iron does the one hop and stop on our greens. And bump and runs are worthless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dholmes said:

Where are you guys playing that you get roll out on your shots?? I have to get out of Seattle!! I crushed a drive today on a par 5 and was curious about distance. So I marked the tee box on my watch and walked up to my ball. It was laying in the fairway, 3 ft from its pitch mark. I guess I should be happy that it wasn't plugged. My watch said it was 271 yards. I'd like to go play in Denver one of these days. I hear the thin air makes for some long drives.

Why? Should you be driving that much farther than the rest of us? ;-)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It would just be nice to see one roll out a little as opposed to finding your ball right where it landed and caked with mud. Plus, then I could tell all my friends that I always drive the ball 300 yards. I actually hit the ball farther than 90% of the people I play with. I play twice a week at least, and I get paired with strangers all the time. I also play about 10 tournaments a year. With that said, I believe my average drive would be between 265 and 280. With all the people on these forums and everywhere else who always seem to hit 300 plus all the time, I would have to imagine that a lot of people don't measure very accurately, or.... balls don't fly as far in this part of the country ( no roll ). I was at Pro Golf Discount today and was testing out some hybrids. I ended up hitting a new ping i 4 iron and on the monitor, it said I had 3 shots over 230 yards. I have the i25's and I can barely hit my 5 iron 190 at the max. They are basically the same irons yet the monitor says that I'm hitting it 30 yards farther then it should be going. You take that 4 iron outside and I would bet it would go about 200 to 205. I know that there are guys that can hit the ball a mile, I've seen people do it. But from my experience, it's not commonplace in this area. I wonder if people who travel a lot could comment on differences in driver distance playing in different states. I.e. , does the ball seem to go farther in Arizona vs Minnesota ?? And for what it's worth, I don't really care how far I hit the ball off the tee. I just want to shoot in the 70's and low 80's. Because that makes me feel way better then having a few drives go 300+ and shooting in the 90's. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dholmes said:

It would just be nice to see one roll out a little as opposed to finding your ball right where it landed and caked with mud. Plus, then I could tell all my friends that I always drive the ball 300 yards. I actually hit the ball farther than 90% of the people I play with. I play twice a week at least, and I get paired with strangers all the time. I also play about 10 tournaments a year. With that said, I believe my average drive would be between 265 and 280. With all the people on these forums and everywhere else who always seem to hit 300 plus all the time, I would have to imagine that a lot of people don't measure very accurately, or.... balls don't fly as far in this part of the country ( no roll ). I was at Pro Golf Discount today and was testing out some hybrids. I ended up hitting a new ping i 4 iron and on the monitor, it said I had 3 shots over 230 yards. I have the i25's and I can barely hit my 5 iron 190 at the max. They are basically the same irons yet the monitor says that I'm hitting it 30 yards farther then it should be going. You take that 4 iron outside and I would bet it would go about 200 to 205. I know that there are guys that can hit the ball a mile, I've seen people do it. But from my experience, it's not commonplace in this area. I wonder if people who travel a lot could comment on differences in driver distance playing in different states. I.e. , does the ball seem to go farther in Arizona vs Minnesota ?? And for what it's worth, I don't really care how far I hit the ball off the tee. I just want to shoot in the 70's and low 80's. Because that makes me feel way better then having a few drives go 300+ and shooting in the 90's. 

There are people who claim to hit 300 where there are those that do and those that don't. Some golfers are better at estimating their distances, and some not so. It really shouldn't make too much difference how they perceive themselves I guess. In a perfect golf world everyone would know exactly hot far they hit, but it's not a perfect world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

D- 275

3W- about 3 feet off the ground

5W- 235

4I: 215

5I: 205

6I: 190

7I: 180

8I: 170

9I: 160

PW: 150

GW: 130

SW: 115

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is more than 14 clubs but it's even club I own loft in parentheses:

Drivers:

EX9 (10° set at 10.5°): 255

SLDR Mini (14°):215 to 235

Fairway woods:

4-wood (16.5°): 225

7-wood (21°) 210

Hybrids:

3h (19°): 215

4h (22°): 202

5h (25°): 190

6h (28°): 177

Irons:

3 (19°): 205

4 (22°): 193

5 (25°): 181

6 (28°): 169

7 (31°): 157

8 (35°): 145

9 (40°): 133

Wedges:

PW (45°): 120

AW (50°): 105

54° SW:  90

58° SW: 75 ( when I remember to "cheat" my weight forward at address)

Putter: in the cup (I hope).:-D

I know that it's 20 total clubs. Right now I have D, MD, 3h, 4-PW, AW, 54°, 58°, Putter in the bag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Driver: 240-50 carry

Hybrid: 190, 200 (Teed)

6i: 180

7i: 160-165

8: 150

9: 140

PW: 130

UW: 120

SW: 110

GW: 100 (crushed), 90 (smooth full), 80 (3/4), 70 (1/2) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't cary typical clubs.  I also am recovering from a bad accident so I don't hit the distances I was.  

Driver (Cleveland HiBore XS 9°) 250-270 carry,  290-300 total

3 wood (Cleveland HiBore XS 15°). 230 carry, 250 total

5 wood ( Bang SF) 215 carry, 225 total

7 wood (Bang SF) 200 carry, 215 total

9 wood (Bang SF) 190 carry, 195 total

11 wood (Bang SF) 175 carry, 180 total

13 wood (Bang SF) 160 carry,  165 total

15 wood (Bang SF) 150 carry, 153 total

17 wood (Bang SF) 140 carry, 141 total

19 wood (Bang SF) 130 carry, 130 total

49° wedge (SMT Durometer) 125

53° wedge (SMT Durometer) 100

59° wedge (SMT Durometer) 80

Putter (Odyssey Two Ball) knocked one in from 50 ft before but I can hit it further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cobra Fly-Z+ Driver:  not sure; only used it for 1 round, so far, but I hit it a lot longer than the 3-iron off the tee.  :-D

 

Original King Cobra woods - kinda lost with these, right now.

  • 3W (14*): used to be ~220-230 off the turf; 230-250 off the tee.  Now, I can't touch it off the tee.  :~(
  • 5W (18*): used to be ~200-210; may be generous now.

 

Wilson MS-600 irons (mid-90s)

  • 3 (22*): 190
  • 4 (25*): 180
  • 5 (28*): 170
  • 6 (32*): 160
  • 7 (36*): 150
  • 8 (40*): 135
  • 9 (44*): 120
  • PW (48*): 105

 

Cobra Trusty Rusty wedges - I've had the SW for a while, but just added the GW and LW in the last month.  The SW and LW are both from the original run (non-conforming now, I think, whatever that means).  The GW is from the newer run (early 2010s, with orange paint fill).  I haven't played since getting the GW and LW, due to my elbow, so I have no idea how I hit these on full shots.  I've hit the LW around the practice green from a variety of lies and like it a lot, so far.

  • GW (51*): ???
  • SW (55*): 70
  • LW (59*): ???
  • Wilson Staff LW (59*):  varies wildly; hated this club just about every time I hit it, so I found a replacement (I hope) in the Trusty Rusty.

My distances drop off faster after the 7-iron, which has always bugged me.

 

Putters:

  • Cobra TPA V-i
  • Ping Anser (late-60s model)

 

I never paid attention to iron specs when I was in school, but I've been looking at current irons lately and am shocked at what I've found.  Cobra's F6 and Fly-Z sets have a 5-iron (23*) that is close to what I have in a 3-iron (22*).  I don't like the resulting 5* gap between clubs at the low end that that requires.

Edited by Duffer Waldorf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I dont think distance is so much important. Just play the yardage the distance you do have allows for. 

I don't know my distances to the yard like pros do, but I'm pretty confident these are my carry numbers within 5 yards. 

Driver - 265

3Wood - 245

2 hybrid - 225

3 hybrid - 210

4 iron 195

5iron 185

6 iron 175

7iron - 165

8iron -155

9iron 140

PW - 125

GW - 110

58 degree - 80

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • I like nice things. I'll admit to paying a bit more for things that are well built or feel or look better than competing products that do the same exact thing. This is particularly true in golf and tech, and when those two meet, well, let's just say I could have afforded to play a little bit more golf if I had been more logical in some of the decisions I've made. <grin> We all knew what a "good" rangefinder costs. Sure, you could go to Dick's and get a rangefinder from a brand you'd never heard of for as little as $150. The thing might work for a few months before the display would start to fade, or it wouldn't work with a hint of fog, or the laser would get mis-aligned after dropping it a foot into the rough a few times before playing your shot. Get used to that shade of green - it's Precision Pro's shade. We all knew what the "good" brands were, and a lot of golfers either had to shell out as much as a brand-new big-name driver (or more!) to get one, or try to mess around with GPS apps or devices. (I've always been a big proponent of laser rangefinders over GPS, for various reasons, but this isn't the place to re-open that discussion.) I say "knew" because Precision Pro aims to change the game with their NX9 Slope, NX9, and NX2 range finders. They claim to deliver a quality product at a fraction of the price of the other companies. How'd they do? Let's find out… Design and Technology Precision Pro rangefinders come with everything you'd expect from a modern rangefinder. According to Precision Pro, the NX9 comes with: Crystal Clear Optics with an enhanced LCD display and 6x magnification Magnetic Grip for attaching to the vertical beam in most golf carts (or clubs, or steel shafts) Adaptive Slope (NX9 Slope only, of course) will adjust for the slope and give you a calculated effective playing yardage. Pulse Vibration lets you know when you've locked on to the flag. Target Acquisition Technology makes it easy to lock on to the target even with shaky hands. Precision Pro also says that both models offer a "shock-proof" and "water resistant" design. Both models are accurate to one yard and have a 400-yard range. Both are tournament legal (though you will have to disable the slope feature if your model supports it). The NX9 Battery is a standard CR2, and Precision Pro will replace it for free when it dies. The NX9 Slope is a two-lens, two-button rangefinder, with the top buttons being the power/distance "getter" button and a "mode" button that will switch between both slope or no-slope with a short press and meters/yards with a long press. The viewfinder, as noted above, offers 6x magnification with an LCD display in standard black/dark grey. My NX9 Slope displays only integers, while the NX7 (which also did slope) will display down to the tenths of a yard. Either is fine - I chuckle whenever a rangefinder tells me I have 223.7 yards to the flag. The battery is a standard rangefinder battery - the CR2 - and Precision Pro will send you a new battery every time yours dies, for as long as you own your rangefinder. Finally, though it's not really technology related, Precision Pro offers what they call the Precision Care Package free with every rangefinder. This includes: 90 day money-back guarantee Free lifetime battery replacement Two-year warranty Guaranteed trade-in allowance (30%) Fast turnaround, no cost replacement Fast response time Performance and Esthetics We reviewed two models: the NX9 Slope edition and what was the NX7 but which has now been re-classified (and slightly remodeled to add the magnetic strip) as the NX9 Non-Slope version. Testing occurred over a few months in a variety of weather conditions, including fog and rain. The NX9 Slope is simple, refined, and tasteful… with a bright green lens area. Esthetically, all of Precision Pro rangefinders are oriented vertically as is now standard (can you believe we once had "horizontal" rangefinders?). They fit great in one hand, though if you're shaky, you can use your second hand to steady the rangefinder. The Precision Pro bright green color is used around the lenses and sparingly elsewhere, while the NX9 Slope version features a metallic silver plastic side panel. The power button on both is green and sits beneath your index finger, with the mode button sitting often two fingers further down toward the lenses, under your ring finger. The NX9 Slope has a battery door that pretty firmly locks into place, while the old NX7 had a round screw-on door. If I'm being honest, the screw-on door feels more secure to me - a little knock feels like it might pop the battery door off the NX9. Though, of course, it never did in testing, so take that for what it's worth. The NX9 lenses and surrounding green "Precision Pro Green" plastic. The hexagonal gripping surfaces on both models provide a little extra grip and feel good, though both rangefinders are made of a moderately firm plastic. The hexagonal pattern is a bit softer. Both models are made of plastic, primarily, so they're going to feel significantly lighter than higher-priced rangefinders. This is one of the ways that Precision Pro is able to charge less, and since the material really doesn't affect performance, it's a worthwhile tradeoff for a few hundred dollars, in my opinion. The adjustable focus eyepiece is relatively wide and the glass is not sunk too far, which is great for those of us who wear glasses as it allows for a relatively wide viewing angle that avoids the "barrel look" of some other rangefinders. The range of focal adjustments worked for everyone who tested them, and the focal range was fairly large (objects from 50 to 350 yards appeared to be quite crisp if you adjusted for focus at about 200 yards). The adjustable eyepiece - I'm not sure what the markings mean, but twisting this adjusts the focus. The first and most obvious test of any rangefinder: check it against itself as well as other rangefinders. You can check a rangefinder against itself by repeatedly measuring the same object, particularly if it's something flat and still like the side of a building or the trunk of a tree. The NX9 performed great at this task. Yardages were consistently within one yard of each other as well as other rangefinders. The most fluctuation occurred with flags that were flapping in the breeze, and that was still within about 1.5 yards every time. Another look at the CR2 battery. As I said, I played with the Precision Pro NX9 Slope in rain, fog, and bright sunlight. One time, when the sun was directly over the flag (I had to shield the rangefinder lens from the sun to look through it safely), I had a little trouble getting a yardage. It took a few attempts. In rain, the NX9 continued to work. Small water spots on the lenses didn't seem to affect the ability to get a yardage, and I learned to just leave the NX9 on the cart via the magnetic mount. The NX9 had some trouble with fog, however. In moderate to heavy fog, the rangefinder would almost always say "6.2 yards" or something else nonsensical. Most of the time, other rangefinders had trouble as well, but there were times when a morning mist perplexed the NX9. These situations weren't common at all in the summer, but as the weather cooled in the fall, we got them occasionally. The magnetic gripping area is adequate and will grip the post on a cart. While I can't say I tested the "shock-proof design" as thoroughly as possible (I'm picturing an off-shoot of those "will it blend?" videos right now wherein people chuck things at brick walls or something), I did drop my range finder onto fairways or into the rough, toss it into the back of my car, throw it to a friend, and scoop it up using the magnet onto a club or shaft. At no point did I worry that the rangefinder would break or crack, and the alignment continued to be spot on. I've had rangefinders in the past where you had to mis-aim them because something got mis-aligned, but that didn't happen in a few months of, quite honestly, kinda beating on these rangefinders. My daughter cares a bit less for her things than I do and also plays a LOT more golf than I do, and her rangefinder is still perfectly accurate. The slope feature worked well. While some competing rangefinders will feature a "setup" process that asks you how far you hit a few clubs, or what your trajectory is, that's only ever resulted in a one-yard adjustment or so in my experience. The Precision Pro NX9 just gives you an adjusted yardage that's average for most golfers. Sure, if you hit your 7I 175 and another player hits his 4I that far, the effective yardage will vary slightly, but again, most of us aren't controlling our yardages to within a half yard, and if you are, the wind, the lie, etc. are going to have a larger effect than a range finder that's off 1% on a calculated adjustment. That's a long way of saying the adjustments uphill or downhill are very good, and can be relied upon for almost all golfers to provide an accurate playing yardage on even the steepest up- or down-hill shots. Whether you face a 75-yard shot that plays 88 or a 140-yard shot that plays 129, the NX9 will help you dial in your shot. Then, it's up to you to hit it. The NX9 asks you to tap the power button, not hold it. It takes one measurement, not multiple via a "scanning" mode. Functionally, the NX9 performs well. The mode button will toggle between "M1" (non-slope mode) and M2 (slope mode), which is more obvious with the second yardage at the top of the display. Long pressing the mode button toggles between yards and meters. The NX9 works a bit differently than other rangefinders and it takes a few holes to get used to it, or at least it did for me: I'm used to pressing and holding a button on other rangefinders to "scan" the target. They'll lock on and vibrate or indicate that they've picked up the flag, but I can also scan a target line to see the distance to a bunker, the trees behind it, etc. The NX9 asks you to tap the button and hold the rangefinder over the single object you wish to scan. The NX9 fits really well in your hand. It's perfectly sized. The NX9's mode actually feels a bit faster and less prone to errors, but for the first few holes I kept holding down the power button and expecting to get a yardage, only to then remember to tap it. So, while there's no scan mode or anything, you'll probably save battery life by just tapping instead of constantly shooting lasers off into the distance. <grin> All told, a rangefinder has one main job: to get the yardage right, and the NX9 does a great job. Target acquisition is quick, the display is easy to read, and the vibration lets you know that you've locked on to the target. If I have any small complaints, they're just that: small. I noted the "heft" above, and the second is the size or strength of the magnet. I'm reviewing another rangefinder with a certain "mouth-based" word for their magnet feature, and the NX9 magnet is noticeably weaker. Some of that is undoubtedly due to the size of the magnet - the NX9's magnetic area is about 2" x 7/8". The material over the magnetized area is also a smooth, firmer-touch plastic, while on the "other" rangefinder is a softer, much tackier rubber that seems to increase the grip. The NX9 never fell off the cart - or even really budged - despite going over typical bumps and potholes on a golf course. I'll temper that minor complaint by saying that the rangefinder never fell off the cart's windshield post, where I'd often stick it. Even when I put the rangefinder horizontally, for the least magnet surface contact, it remained in place. The NX9 still gripped club shafts, clubfaces, and other metal surfaces well enough. Still, the NX9 lacks that satisfying "pull" when I'd get the other rangefinder within about an inch of a metal surface. My final small complaint is that my NX9's "mode" button is fairly easily clicked with my ring finger as I grip the rangefinder. On my NX7, the buttons have a firmer click, so I didn't accidentally press the mode button. Why does this matter? Because as currently configured, tapping the mode button once toggles the Slope mode on and off. If you accidentally tap it and enable Slope, then get a yardage, you've breached the Rules. I did this a few times in casual play. A long press of the button switches between meters and yards, and in my opinion, this problem would be resolved by switching that functionality. Or, more likely, I might have simply gotten an NX9 with a softer button than most, and this isn't a problem at all (like on the NX7). The Precision Pro case is rock solid. I haven't talked about the case, so I guess I'll shoehorn this in here. It's a fairly standard rangefinder case, made of a woven fabric over a plastic body, with an elastic strap plus a zipper, and a clip on the back side for attaching to your bag. Many will clip the case to their bag, and either let the case sit unzipped or will throw the elastic strap over the case to keep it closed, but still provide ready access to the rangefinder. With the magnet mount, though, I never did this: I'd use the magnetic mount on the NX9 to attach it to the cart windshield post and put my wallet and keys in the case, mostly to remind me to get the NX9 before dropping the cart off at the end of the round! The case is simple, attractive, and functional. Everything you could want. Again, I didn't chuck it against a brick wall, but I did toss it in the back of my car, push carts rolled over it, bags sat on it, etc. and it showed no signs of wear or damage. It did its job. Conclusion Like I said, I'm testing a competing rangefinder with slope and a magnet on it. This other rangefinder is made by one of the "big names" in rangefinders, and they sponsor a number of PGA Tour players. Their equivalent model - with a magnet and the Slope feature - costs $400. The Precision Pro offers virtually the same actual performance, plus lifetime battery replacements and great customer service (I've had a few friends use their customer service, including one who accidentally but completely drowned his rangefinder), and costs $269 for the NX9 Slope model and $219 for the NX9 Non-Slope (and, if you look even a little, you'll find coupons to save an extra $20+ from time to time - during Amazon Prime Day, for example, the NX9 Slope cost $215.99). The tradeoffs are small, and the performance is right there with the best in the game. You won't be paying for a metal body, or a bigger magnet, but you're also not paying for multi-million dollar marketing campaigns. Instead, you're supporting a business based in Cincinnati, OH, and getting a great performing rangefinder with all the features while saving enough to play more than a few more rounds of golf. NX7 Photos The NX7 Pro (a model with Slope) was replaced in the Precision Pro lineup in late summer, 2020, and we reviewed the NX7 Pro as well as the NX9 Slope model. Here are photos of that NX7 model. The NX9 Slope model is featured above within the review.
    • Nice, after I upgrade my irons to the New Titleist irons, the driver will be next.
    • I went through the fitting process a couple days ago and below are my initial thoughts.  Disclaimer is that I already have a TS2 driver with the Smoke shaft and a Callaway Epic Sub Zero with a Tour AD DI-6 shaft.  I'm currently spinning the TS2 too much but strike it more consistently.  The Sub Zero has better numbers but don't hit it quite as solid as I'd like. TSi2 - Same shape and feel as the TS2.  A bit of an elongated back that makes it look like it sits up at a good attack angle to the ball.  Sound is very similar to the TS2...not as pleasing as the TSi3.  For whatever reason, it feels a little lighter in my hands than the 3 during my swing. TSi3 - Shape is better looking.  Very similar to my Sub Zero.  Sound is more solid, maybe less "hollow", compared to the 3.  I think that most people will go for this version.  A couple of my friends that went through fittings were both fit into the 3. As for shafts, I tried the new Smoke (60g) and the Tensei blue (55g).  I didn't even get to the Tour ADs...will explain why.  I tried both shafts in both drivers and hit probably 10+ balls on each after going back and forth multiple times to see where the numbers ended up.  As much as I liked the head and sound of the TSi3, the TSi2 felt better for me and, again, more consistent of a strike.  My two longest drives were with the TSi2 and Tensei blue.  I think I only hit 1-2 sligthly off-center drives with that combination.  The TSi3, I hit some good drives as well but was 3-5 yards short of the TSi2. I didn't try the Tour ADs since 1) the up-charge is $200 and 2) I have a buddy who can pull the connector off my other one and put the Titleist one on for me if i want to try it and 3) I'm not sure if it would have improved much since my smash factor was already well above 1.5.  The fitter said that I could hit it if I wanted but he didn't think I'd get much more out of any other shaft. It's a bit steep of a price ($550) but I went with the TSi2 and Tensei Blue shaft.  Should ship in a couple weeks supposedly and hope to have it in my hands in mid-November.  Will post back here with some updates if the weather permits.    
    • If the beginner set is aluminum zinc heads yes, it’s inferior. If they’re stainless steel they’re the same as the more expensive stuff. A 5 iron head will weigh around 255 grams, give or take a couple grams, on any 5 iron, new or old, cheap expensive. Steel shafts tend to also be pretty similar, a cheaper club may have a kind of standard weight( 125 gram) shaft where a higher price might get you a lighter (  100 gram) steel shaft. Your right about loft. Modern manufacturers lower the loft to make it look like their clubs go longer when people hit them on monitors. I don’t buy it. Loft on irons is your friend. If the shot is short, move up a club, that’s why you have 14 clubs in your bag. As you learn to play you will find it’s not so hard to deloft a shot but it’s impossible to add. Modern fittings will have you trying 7 irons, what a joke, I can hit any 7 iron on the planet. Fitting with something like a 5 iron will tell you better how you handle a particular set. 
    • Lean away from the target a few degrees at address. If you are not already doing this, it may be that simple.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Axel Gebwut
      Axel Gebwut
      (62 years old)
    2. chspeed
      chspeed
      (53 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...