Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?

[klineka]

8 hours ago, csh19792001 said:

Please let me know what to query.

Im new here and I’m learning.

You joined over 3 years ago and you've made 40+ comments. 

I think you can figure out how to use the search function. Or at the very least read the FAQ section.

[turtleback]

36 minutes ago, iacas said:

Oh, and look at that: he copied and pasted the post of someone else. At least a year ago he gave credit and linked to the original post. This time around he just posted it as if it was his own thoughts.

We don't do that here. I've replaced your original post in this topic with a link to that other post.

Seems like a little disingenuity going on with him  To what end I don't know.

[snapfade]

2 hours ago, Vinsk said:

Yeah. It’s because of the equipment:

Jack looks like he just came from a buffet. Plus, I think the hat has to have something to do with it. WTF is on Jacks head? Oh, BTW, that's @boogielicious two-tone Chrysler back there. 

[boogielicious]

9 hours ago, snapfade said:

Oh, BTW, that's @boogielicious two-tone Chrysler back there. 

And it matches my Sea Foam Green Stratocaster!

Players are better trained and educated on their game nowadays than in previous eras.

[jolter1]

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

[saevel25]

14 minutes ago, jolter1 said:

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

Go back to page 1 and read the thread. This has been debunked. Jack and Tiger do not get to decide this discussion. 

[klineka]

30 minutes ago, jolter1 said:

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

[boogielicious]

1 hour ago, jolter1 said:

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

TIGER! And its not even close.

[Vinsk]

3 hours ago, jolter1 said:

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

Jack originally stated that ‘most wins’ was the criteria for GOAT. Once he realized he wasn’t gonna be able to beat Sam Snead’s number, he moved the goal posts to better fit his portfolio. What may I ask are your thoughts on this statement by Jack?

[turtleback]

5 hours ago, jolter1 said:

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

Wow, if only someone had made that point at the start of this thread we wouldn't have had to have over 7,000 posts.

[iacas]

7 hours ago, jolter1 said:

Going ot use the words of Jack and Tiger, majors determine greatness and Jack has 18 major wins with 19 runnerups. Therefore Jack.

I'll pass.