Jump to content
IGNORED

Can you hear the hiss of your own ball?


Note: This thread is 5364 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

my brothers and i had this discussion on the range one day when we heard one of us hiss a ball by... we discovered that the uglier the ball was the louder the hiss... and i could only produce it by hitting my hybrids, longer irons, and my 4w whereas my long hitting brother could do it from his mid irons to his shorter woods... the "cleaner" balls even if struck purely hardly made a sound... the ugly balls with lots of scuffs made mean hissing sounds... but the ballstriker never heard it... i couldnt hear it when i hit it... etc etc etc
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I've got an update. Every shot I hit well, I can hear. This means that the trajectory is somewhat boring, the speed is very high, and I probably have some ball rash on the sweet spot of my club. I think the lowness matters a lot because the sound bounces off the ground like when you open your car window at highway speeds and pass by a barrier. You hear road noise much louder. I noticed that I can hear it about 3/4 of the way to the apex of the flight, or around 100 yards out or so. It did matter whether the ball had gouges or not, but it was definitely noticeable with clean/new balls. The quality of the hiss is somewhat dependent on how much I shredded the ball. I hit a 7-iron into a green where the ball had some serious strings left on it (Dunlop loco - firm cover). That was by far the most noticeable hiss I've ever hit in my life. I think the strings just made a weird weed-eater sound going through the air.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There may be times when you'll here it a bit but not often. Variables such as moisture in the air and wind direction can influence it.

Think of it the same way as a baseball. When you throw it you can't here the whizzing sound the seams make very well if at all. However, the person batting or the catcher here them quite well.

If you go to a PGA event and stand behind a player you won't here it. But if you stand to their side you will.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


its such a cool feeling when i strike the ball and it hisses! mostly its on my irons.
In my Warbird Hot Stand Bag:

Driver: R9 420cc 9.5° stiff
3 Wood: Burner 07 Fairway #3 Stiff
5 Wood: Burner 07 Fairway #5 Stiff3 Hybrid: Burner 08 Rescue #3 StiffIrons: MX-25 4-G Project X 5.5SW: CG12 STD bounce 56° Black PearlLW: CG12 STD bounce 60° Black PearlPutter: California...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I had a lesson earlier this week and after a couple of tweaks to my swing he had me striking the ball much better and with more club head speed. For the first time, I was hearing the hiss of my own shots. I only heard it for a split second before the ball gets more than 50-60 yards out, but it was very noticeable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I heard that if go out and buy the new Cobra irons and driver you get a lot more hisssssssssss out of your balls

Haha that's a good one

-Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There is no doubt you can hear them, read the answers in this thread and you'll see it.

As I think iacas said, it's more spin related than pure speed. There'll be a component to do with the speed though.

ahh... i was really hoping to see an answer to my longtime question on this thread, but havent. is a hissing ball good or bad?! or neither?

Precisely.

First, sound does travel in 360 degrees,

Sound waves can be very directional; with the right equipment you can project a sound very specifically so someone it's aimed at will hear it and someone 180° in the other direction won't hear a thing. If you hear something that's ostensibly directional and not pointing your way, you're often hearing a reflection.

I've never heard my own ball no matter how well it's hit and I can't say I've heard a ball coming straight at me until the last fraction of a second. For some reason, it always seems clearest when I'm stood at ~90° to the flight of a ball going past.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I usually can't hear mine over all the profanity
"The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote, 'A flute with no holes is not a flute. And a doughnut with no hole is a danish."

909 D3 Diamana Blueboard 63g
909 F2 3 Wood
MP-57's 4-pwIdea Pro 2 and 3 iron hybridsTour-W 52 deg wedge Tour-W 56 deg wedge2 Ball center shaft putterProV1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I only hear mine when my wife tells me that she has a headake.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee

Link to comment
Share on other sites


When I was in the Army, I was Artillery, and had the same experiences with the cannons. Because you are directly behind your gun, it's not loud, the sound waves go forward and out to the sides. But when the gun beside you shoot, it was horrible.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


There may be times when you'll here it a bit but not often. Variables such as moisture in the air and wind direction can influence it.

I had a similar experience as above. You hear better when standing in front of the player along the side. My guess is that it takes some time for ball to gather enough speed to generate the hiss. The ball doesn't go from 0-150mph at the impact. Exactly when it reaches the point where it's fast enough to makes noise will depend on a lot of things but the maximum speed is not at impact but some where down the line.

As an acoustical engineer, I can clarify the issue of whether the sound travels in all direction or not. That depends on the wave length of the sound and the size of the source. If the wave length is bigger than the object, it will diffract(bend around) and travel in all direction. But if the wave length is smaller than the object, it can't diffract and just travel straight a head. Of course there is a grey area where it's somewhat directional but not entirely. For example, even a 12" big woofer will emit bass in all direction since the wave length at that low frequency is much larger than 12". On the other hand a 4" high frequency driver will beam sound to the front since high frequency has very small wave length. For a golf ball in the air case, a 10kHz sound wave has about 1.5" wave length so any sound lower than that will travel in all direction. I'm pretty sure that the hissing sound that you hear has most of energy at below 10khz so in that sense it's mostly 'omni' directional.

"During our weekly Lamaze class, the instructor emphasized the importance of exercise, hinting strongly that husbands need to get out and start walking with their wives. From the back of the room one expectant father inquired, "Would it be okay if she carries a bag of golf clubs while she walks?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I had a similar experience as above. You hear better when standing in front of the player along the side. My guess is that it takes some time for ball to gather enough speed to generate the hiss. The ball doesn't go from 0-150mph at the impact. Exactly when it reaches the point where it's fast enough to makes noise will depend on a lot of things but the maximum speed is not at impact but some where down the line.

Approximately how long after the ball leaves the clubface will it reach maximum velocity?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Approximately how long after the ball leaves the clubface will it reach maximum velocity?

Its translational (tangential?) velocity peak will be as it is struck. The ball will never get faster as it flies to its target.

I'm not sure about the rotational velocity of the ball though. I'm assuming it can rotate at different speeds in its flight as its center of gravity is found and it stops "wobbling". And the spinning creates much if the hissing sound.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5364 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • New 3W is pretty good  I hit a good drive actually but straight into a headwind so it left me far enough back from the trees to attempt something stupid. So naturally, with a new 3W in the bag, I wanted to see what it could do. Hit a high draw directly over the trees and couldn't see where it ended up from the fairway, but I knew I hit it well. I doubt that's the optimal play for scoring well in the long run but it felt good to do.
    • I'm sure you've read this, but I just have to post it, here, again, for everyone who hasn't. It changed my thinking forever and irrevocably on this exact topic:  "We don't say "the golfers are more talented" today. We say "there are more talented golfers today." "More" meaning they are far more numerous, not more talented. Talent is random. Only a small percentage of people win the talent lottery --- for world class golf, way less than 1%. And there's no telling whether the most talented player of any period, including this one, was more talented than Jack, or Jones, or Vardon. It's absolutely unknowable. What IS knowable, though, is that the base population is larger, so whatever percentage of people are born with golf talent, there are a lot more of them today than there were 50 years ago. What is knowable is that training and coaching is vastly improved. Hogan had to, in his words, "dig his swing out of the dirt" by hitting millions of golf balls. Today, they have radar and laser and the Minolta super duper high speed swing cam, and they know exactly how every little swing tweak affects their spin rate and launch angle and apex height -- stuff nobody had any clue about in Jack's day. So 50 years ago, if you had 100 guys born with golf talent take up golf, maybe 30 of them would find their optimal swing. Today, it's probably over 90. What is knowable is that the huge purses, and the fact that Tiger was the world's richest and most famous athlete, and not just the world #1 golfer, is making golf the first choice of more young athletes, rather than just the guys who couldn't make the "real" sports teams in school. So if you had 100 guys born with multi-sport talent 50 years ago, most of them played golf for fun, if at all. Today, a lot more of them concentrate on golf as their main sport. And what is knowable is that travel is much faster and cheaper now, so almost every world class player shows up for almost every major and WGC, and for many of the regular PGA events. 50 years ago, the second or third best player in, say, Australia, often didn't even play in the British Open, let alone a PGA event. So all the PGA events, and three of the four majors, had only a handful of international players, and the fourth major had only a handful of Americans. None of that is speculation. It is a verifiable fact that there are over twice as many people in the world today than there were 50 years ago. It's a verifiable fact that the purses today are hundreds of times as high as they were 50 years ago --- Tony Lema got about $4200 for winning the 1964 Open; today, it's about $3.5 million. It's a verifiable fact that virtually all the world top 100 play every major they are eligible for, instead of only a handful playing any events that require overseas travel. It's not knowable exactly how all of that combines, but a good indication is the number of entries in the US Open. To enter the US Open requires both top 1% talent for the game, and a serious commitment to it. There were about 2400 entrants per year 50 years ago. This century, it's consistently over 9000, well over three times as many. It's true that, mostly because of the time and expense, the number of duffers recreational players has declined, but they never had any influence on field strength, anyway. High school kids on the golf team still play all they want, for free. What do you have to counter that? Nothing but your belief that there were half a dozen golf phenoms all at the same time in the 60's, and none today, now that Tiger's past his prime. You're entitled to that opinion, but what facts do you have to back it up? Only the number of majors they won. But how many majors would Phil have won if the fields were like they were 50 years ago? Mickelson finished second in the US Open to Goosen in 2004, to Ogilvy in 2006, and to Rose last year. 50 years ago, odds are that none of those guys would have even tried to qualify for the US Open, since it required shutting down their schedule for a minimum of three weeks to travel to the US for sectional qualifying, with no guarantee that they would make it into the actual tournament. Michael Campbell, who beat Tiger with some amazing putting down the stretch in 2005, said that he would not have entered that year if the USGA hadn't established overseas qualifying sites, so he didn't have to travel to enter. How would Phil look next to Arnie with those three US Opens? Eight majors, and a career Grand Slam. And how would Tiger look if Michael Campbell, Trevor Immelman, Angel Cabrera, and YE Yang had stayed home, like most international players did in the Jack era? I'll make it even simpler for you, since you follow women's golf. How much better would the US women look today, if there were no Asians on tour? Or even just no Koreans? Well, it looks like you're going to crow about the lack of current talent every time a guy backs into a win for the foreseeable future, but come on. The Valero was a 40-point tournament, which makes it one of the weakest regular PGA events, barely above the John Deere Classic. And the tournament committee knows that most top players don't like to play right before a major, so they try to attract the few who do by making it as close to major conditions as possible, to help them fine tune their games. A weak field facing a tough setup is not a recipe for low scores, but you still insist on taking one bad week and comparing it to the majors of your hazy memory, even though you seem to have forgotten epic collapses by the likes of Arnie, who managed to lose a seven shot lead over the last 9 holes of the 1966 US Open. And who knows how often something like that happened in a low-rent event? I don't know if Tiger was more talented than Jack, or even Trevino. All I know is that there are many solid reasons to believe that in order to win a tournament, he had to beat around three times as many talented golfers, even in most of the regular tour events he's won, as Jack did in a major --- especially the Open, where Jack only had to beat as few as 8 other Americans, at a time when probably 60-70 of the world top 100 were Americans.  I don't say it's true by definition, as you claimed, but I say it's the way to bet, based on facts and logic."  
    • Shot 50/41 today. I didn't hit the ball particularly well but not as poorly as the score would indicate. I just happened to hit it in some really punishing places that wound up taking one or two strokes just to hit back into play. The undergrowth and the fescue are really growing in at the course. Lipped out and burned a few edges on putts, too. I always say when I miss putts by that small a margin that they're eventually going to drop as long as I don't deviate from the process and that's exactly what started happening on the back 9. I ended up making a couple of mid-length putts. Five over on the back included a triple bogey on 17.
    • Birdied the par 5 #14 at Quail Brook GC. Hit a high draw 3W just short of the green on my second shot, chipped just right of the back right flag to about 12' and made the putt. It's starting to look like I'm going to get at least 20 rounds at Quail Brook for it to qualify as my home course but I've been adding the birdies there to my away composite for so long that I don't feel like separating it all now. So the away composite will simply be an aggregate of all my birdie holes for the year.
    • Wordle 1,065 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...