Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm a little brand-biased based on the amazingly good experiences I've had with Taylormade customer service. But at the same time, it may be partially a bad thing that I've had to work with customer service that often. But they always, always treat you right. Other than that, I like the rest of the brands about the same. I have had nothing but bad luck with Nike's stuff though.

What's in my Sun Mountain C-130 bag:

Driver - Taylormade Superfast 2.0 TP 10.5
3 Wood - Taylormade Burner 15* REAX
Hybrid - Adams Idea Pro 18* GD YSQ-HL

Irons - Callaway X-18 4-PW

GW - Cleveland 588 51*

SW - Cleveland CG 12 56*

LW - Cleveland CG15 60*

Putter - Cameron Studio Style Newport 2

Bushnell Medalist rangefinder


  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I'm definitely open to putting anything in the bag if it works (just take a look at my signature). So it's a no for me on being brand biased for the most part. Although I am starting to get locked into just Cleveland for my wedges. Since I originally got 3 cleveland wedge lofts at different times, I have also been replacing them at different times. I would only feel comfortable switching wedges if I "clean house" and replace all 3 with the new brand. Like ShanksAMillion, I too used to be skeptical of Nike since to me they seemed like some imposter apparel company trying to make clubs with the best, but now they look to have their act together.

"I'm not going left or right of those trees, okay. I'm going over those trees...with a little draw." ~ Tin Cup


Posted
I wouldn't call that brand biased, I would call that cash biased. If I had a TMAG card, or any other serious discount like that, I would probably find a set that I liked, just based on price alone. The only thing better than golf is cheap golf......lol

The discount isn't THAT big.

:callaway: BB Alpha 815 DBD 10.5* Rogue Silver 60 :callaway: x2hot 3deep 14.5* (TBD) :tmade: RSI UDI 20* RIP Tour 90 :bridgestone: J40CB 4-PW Steelfiber i95 :vokey: SM4 50* KBS Tour V :vokey: SM5 54* KBS 610 :vokey: SM5 58* KBS HI-REV 2.0 MannKrafted Handmade Custom


Posted

I suppose I am to a point. But it's not due to love for a certain company. I just really like the looks of the clubs that I've purchased. My bag used to have a large variety in it (Ping, TaylorMade, Cleveland, Mizuno, Callaway, Titleist & Maxfli all at the same time). I decided that I wanted consistancy in what I was looking at at address and really liked the look, feel and performance of my TaylorMade so that is the direction that I went.


Posted
I'm not brand biased at all... I have a Titleist driver and 3 wood, an Adams Pro Black hybrid, Mizuno irons, Vokey wedges and a Yes putter. Oh and I play a TM ball now. A little different than my signature but still, if I'm loyal to any one product it would be my Mizuno irons.

Driver: Titleist GT3 Ventus Blue 6X
Hybrid: Ping G440
Irons: Ping Blueprint S X100
Wedges: Ping S159 (50/54/58)
Putter: LAB 2.1


Posted
I personally am not brand biased. I like the top brands because of the quality. I also like getting good deals so that influences my decisions on what I buy. I am a deal hawk for all my golf spending. I can't remember the last time I paid retail on anything.

Brian


Posted
I have a combination of brands in my bag. This is because I believe one company does not produce the best clubs in every category. For woods I like Taylormade and Callaway, Irons- Taylormade, Wedges- Titleist and Cleveland, Putter- Odyssey and Scotty Cameron. This is because each manufacturer is the best in certain aspects, for instance Titleist and Cleveland have ruled the wedge domain for years because of the quality clubs they produce. I am a person that likes to play the best and I feel that these companies know what they are doing when it comes to specific clubs.

My arsenal

Bag- SQ Tour Stand Bag
Driver- Tour Burner 10.5* Stiff
3 Wood- SQ Dymo 15* Stiff5 Wood- SQ Dymo 19* StiffIrons (3-PW)- Tour Preferred StiffWedges- 56.11* and 60.07*Putter- Method 003 34 Inches


Posted
I am not brand biased, although my signature contradicts me. At the beginning everything was Callaway, but then when I was looking for a hybrid I tried the Callaway and the Titleist and liked the Titleist. Then the same happened when I bought the 3 wood... When I changed my irons, I wanted the Mizuno MP-57 but I thought that maybe those will not forgive me as the AP2 so I get the AP2. And finally my wedges were Callway, I liked them because they were forged, but since they were 54 and 58 and I was planning to add a 52, I decided to try the Titleist because of all the comments I read about them. But if I try one club and like it, I will buy it, whichever brand it is.

Cheers!

Driver: 905R 9.5° (UST Proforce V2 Stiff) | Fairway: 906F2 15° (UST Proforce V2 Stiff) | Hybrid: 585.H 21° (S300) | Irons: AP2 4-PW (Project X 6.0) | Wedges: Vokey Design 52.08, 56.11 & 60.11  | Putter: Studio Select Newport 2 

www.flickr.com/avm_photo


Posted

Definately! Ever since I was a kid. I'm not sure why. In baseball, my catcher's equipment had to match - everything All-Star. I had my All-Star set which included glove, Wilson, Rawlings, Mizuno, Louisville Slugger, and now Under Armour. For golf I have a complete Titleist set, 3 complete PING sets, a complete Taylormade set, and I want a complete Cleveland set. I'm not sure why. I think i have some ocd or something. But either way, I play great with whatever is in my hands. I think i do have ocd

In My Under Armour Links Stand Bag or PING Hoofer Vantage Team Bag :
i15 9.5°, Project X Graphite -7A3 | i15 15.5°, Project X Graphite -8A4 | S57 2 - PW, Project X 6.5 | Tour-W 56.10/60.8 Project X 6.5 | Redwood Black Satin Anser | Titleist Black | Golf Pride Tour Velvet Round Grips With Logo...


Posted
Definately! Ever since I was a kid. I'm not sure why. In baseball, my catcher's equipment had to match - everything All-Star. I had my All-Star set which included glove, Wilson, Rawlings, Mizuno, Louisville Slugger, and now Under Armour. For golf I have a complete Titleist set, 3 complete PING sets, a complete Taylormade set, and I want a complete Cleveland set. I'm not sure why. I think i have some ocd or something. But either way, I play great with whatever is in my hands. I think i do have ocd

I'm set up for MacGregors and Spaldings. I "need" wedges for my Cleveland set, a driver for my Titleists, a putter and driver for my Mizunos, and a putter for my Hogans. I only need irons, wedges, and a putter to go with my PING G10 driver. Do you think my wife will see my logic?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
In a lot of areas yes, but it doesn't look like I am when it comes to golf equipment.

in the bag...

Driver: MX560
3W/5W: Tight Lies
3i-pw: Pi-7gw/sw: Tom Watsonputter: Bulls Eye bag: Ozoneball: / home: Lake of the Woods @ www.golfthelake.com


Posted
I am brand biased with irons, I love Mizuno b/c of the "buttery" feel when struck correctly. After that its whatever works and feels best.

My bag goes Stultz driver, MacGregor NVG 2 3 metal, Bridgestone hybrid 2 iron, Mizuno MP 60 & 32 (3-pw), Niki VR wedges (54 & 60*) and Taylor Made Rossa lambaugh putter.

Posted
Sorta, I needed to relearn the game, swing and all after to many years away from being a hacker at best. I bought all the same brand to simply provide a reliable baseline. I bought decent GI clubs so I could be sure that my improvement will not be complicated by different offests, swing weights, etc. I am improving. I think any future purchases will be based on hitting the clubs and brand will not matter.

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka


Posted
Thank god I have not fell into the 'Bias' category...I currently play with TM Burner 10.5, Adams A2 3 hybrid, chepo 3 wood and starter set irons (both getting replaced soon) and Odyssey white hot xg rossie putter in Ogio Ozone bag... Talk about all over the board... lol...

ogio.gif Black/White Ozone Stand bag, Caddytek 13.5 Black/Red Push Cart

taylormade.gif RBZ Tour 9* Stiff / ping.gifRapture 3 'metal' Titanium 14* Stiff Aldila Proto VS 'By You'
adams.gif Hybrid A2 20*3 hybrid Stiff Aldila VS / ping.gifRapture Black Dot 4-PW Stiff / cleveland.gifWedges CG11 54* SW / taylormade.gif RAC 52*, 58*Wedge / odyssey.gif  33" White Hot XG


Posted
Absolutely, if it isnt Callaway, I will refuse to buy it. I dont want my bag filled with a bunch of orphan clubs! lol

FT-iQ 10* driver
FT-i Squareway 3 Wood
X-22's Irons
X Series JAWS Chrome 56*, 60*
Zinc Dual Sided Blade Putter HX Hot Bite X-22 Stand Bag


Note: This thread is 5919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.