Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5415 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. What ball flight do you play?

    • Draw
      15
    • Fade
      13
    • Both
      8
    • Straight
      6


Recommended Posts

Posted

While this survey only coverd 210 players, it counters most of the views given here that the pros tend to play a fade.

I am surprised a little bit at how few players work the ball - particularly on the champions tour - I would have thought there were more old school 'shot makers' out there.

In general, do you play a:
PGA
Draw................ 59%
Fade................ 28%
Both................... 7%
Straight ball... 6%
Loose lips: "I wish I knew."

LPGA
Draw................ 74%
Fade................ 25%
Straight ball..... 1%
Loose lips: "I play both—that's why I missed the cut this week."

CHAMPIONS
Draw................ 56%
Fade................ 30%
Both................... 9%
Straight ball....5%
Loose lips: "My body decided to make a fade."



Read more: http://www.golf.com/golf/tours_news/article/0,28136,2057288,00.html#ixzz1FltX1OB2

Driver: Nakashima 10.5 degree
3 Wood: 15 degree F2
Hybrids: 19 and 21 degree
Irons: MP-58, 4-9 iron
Wedges: Vokey sm 47.06, 53.08, 58.08Putter: studio select 2.5Ball: Pro Vx : Warren Golf Club 73.6 : 146


Posted


Originally Posted by Sing Golfer

While this survey only coverd 210 players, it counters most of the views given here that the pros tend to play a fade.


Who has said that?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Interesting.

If you truly swing on plane, the clubhead is still moving outward prior to low point, so in a way I'm not surprised more play a draw. Backs up what I've seen on the range on the PGA Tour as well.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Originally Posted by jamo

Who has said that?


It's been said on this forum more often than not.

Driver: Nakashima 10.5 degree
3 Wood: 15 degree F2
Hybrids: 19 and 21 degree
Irons: MP-58, 4-9 iron
Wedges: Vokey sm 47.06, 53.08, 58.08Putter: studio select 2.5Ball: Pro Vx : Warren Golf Club 73.6 : 146


Posted

Just because the pros state they play a certain shot shape in general, doesn't mean they don't work the ball when necessary.  But, like iacas said, check out any practice range during a PGA tour stop (before the round, not after, where they might be working on something) and you'll see the percentage stated: 7 out of 10 hit it straight or right to left.  Maybe because there are well known faders, like Trevino, Nicklaus, Couples, Calcavecchia it seems that there are more on tour.

One other note - The pros draw or fade is not the same as ours.  For them, it looks like a perfectly straight ball off the club, then falls gently to the left or right.  Not a big curving ball, which I'm sure they would consider a slice or hook.


Posted

I can believe it.  When watching pros playing on tv, the majority of the time the commentators will remark that player xyz plays a draw as his natural shot shape.  The shot tracker thing as well usually shows a right to left (assuming right handed golfer) ball flight as well for a lot the shots being highlighted.  I hardly ever hear fade mentioned as their natural shot shape.  Additionally, as Erik mentioned, swinging from the inside prior to impact would promote that draw.

 

In my Mizuno Aerolite IV Stand Bag:

Driver: Titleist 910D2 (9.5°, RIP Alpha 70S)
Wood: Titleist 910F (15°, RIP Alpha 70S)

Irons: Mizuno MP-68 Irons (3 - PW, C-Taper S+), Mizuno MP-33 2 Iron (C-Taper S+)

Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled (56.11 - Bent to 54°, 60.07 Tour Chrome, C-Taper S+ DSS)

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 (34")

Ball: Titleist Pro-V1x

GPS: Garmin Approach g5

Most useful training aids (for me) that I use: Tour Striker Pro 7 Iron, Swingyde, Tour Sticks alignment sticks, Dave Pelz Putting Tutor


Posted

occasionally i'll come up to the ball and think "okay, need to draw this one," but if i have my druthers, i'll fade it.


Posted

I wonder if this perception is because a number of the best players are long and are willing to give up some distance for a little extra safety, especially when they start targeting majors?

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted

The percentages are more draw favoring than I would have thought but I have watched tournaments where the commentators have said that Vijay, Dustin Johnson, and Tiger all prefer to hit high fades. The pros have good imagination when it comes to shaping shots to hold into the wind or riding the wind to get to a tucked pin. Very cool


Posted

Originally Posted by cory

The percentages are more draw favoring than I would have thought but I have watched tournaments where the commentators have said that Vijay, Dustin Johnson, and Tiger all prefer to hit high fades. The pros have good imagination when it comes to shaping shots to hold into the wind or riding the wind to get to a tucked pin. Very cool


And I've heard Tiger say that his stock shot is and always has been a draw. I tell people it makes sense too - the club is still moving to the right when it strikes the ball before a divot.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Very interesting statistics.

As others have mentioned, there are some pros who play fades.  Kaymer is one who does and I heard during the broadcast this weekend that Mahan is only now starting to work the ball right to left.

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


Posted


I swear Dustin Johnson hits a draw, used to hit big hooks apparently but got some advice from AP and MB to get the handle exiting lower and left

Originally Posted by cory

The percentages are more draw favoring than I would have thought but I have watched tournaments where the commentators have said that Vijay, Dustin Johnson, and Tiger all prefer to hit high fades. The pros have good imagination when it comes to shaping shots to hold into the wind or riding the wind to get to a tucked pin. Very cool



Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
FTA: [quote]TECHNOLOGY What's the longest iron in your bag? CHAMPIONS One............................. 3% Two............................ 3% Three....................... 49% Four.......................... 32% Five............................. 9% Six................................ 1% Seven........................ 3% [/quote] 3% of the Champions tour doesn't have an iron longer than a 7? I know that some of the polls (eg, "which club would you throw out?") beg for some silly answers (eg, "putter"), but this is a question of fact. Does anyone think this is legitimate? I don't watch the Champions tour. [quote]Will Tiger win a major in 2011? PGA Yes...... 39% No........ 54% Maybe.. 7% Loose lips: "It's a long shot."[/quote] Very interesting. The field doesn't have strong confidence in him this year.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted

I guess i need to hit a draw!  Good to be able to hit both i guess.... I'd say most hackers hit slices.


Posted

I get a kick out of the fact that a very high percentage of golfers slice the ball but when you listen to almost any golf announcer almost every pro has a "natural draw". I understand what they are saying, that the pro has a favored ball flight, it's just the phrase "natural draw" that gets me. Wish I had a natural draw (in case you haven't guessed I voted fade in the poll).

BO THE GOLFER

In my Top Flite stand bag:

Driver-Ping G400+ 10.5 degrees regular flex Hybrids-Ping I25 17 & 20 degrees stiff flex Irons-Ping I3 O-size 4 through lob wedge regular flex Putter-Nike Oz 6


Posted

Fade and slice is not the same thing.

Also, the poll says nothing about what kind of draw or fade it is. You can fade the ball with an in-to-out swing. Regardless, a pull-fade works if you play it consistently.

Natural draw? I doubt most tour pros were swinging in-to-out the first time they picked up a club. Most of them have worked enough on the swing that it is far from natural anymore.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I hear ya Zeph as I am well schooled (thanks to this site) on the ball flight laws. I play a fade as it is the best way for me to play golf.

BO THE GOLFER

In my Top Flite stand bag:

Driver-Ping G400+ 10.5 degrees regular flex Hybrids-Ping I25 17 & 20 degrees stiff flex Irons-Ping I3 O-size 4 through lob wedge regular flex Putter-Nike Oz 6


Note: This thread is 5415 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.