Jump to content
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Jonnydanger81
Note: This thread is 2558 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

It's amazing how this thread just keeps going.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, I agree. It's too bad those people don't get this press to find their maximum potential. I remember back and forth chats with @GHIN0011458 , and feel like people like him and others on this site deserve all the attention that Dan is promoting.

If Dan really cares about golf, he would use his marketing skills to sell the public on those people, and grow the game instead.


I agree but I don't see him doing anything like that, Here is the current OGWR amatuers and Dan actually thinks he can get past these guys??? I know one of the players in the low 800's and he's a flat out stick, has to play at a +5 on a 139 slope, Dan is a joke.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Actually I think we are born with it.

The 12 year old analogy doesn't apply at all to why I can hit the ball as far as I could when I was stronger.

Of course, but that doesn't mean the speed you have today is your max speed. You can build it. Speed comes from strength...look at the difference between a sprinter and a distance runner.

You can be born a fast runner...if you do squats and deadlifts...you'll get faster.

As far as why it doesn't apply to you...the only real way would be for you to get data from a trackman before and after your strength loss. You could have made up for a loss of strength with better technique.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

vs.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Of course, but that doesn't mean the speed you have today is your max speed. You can build it. Speed comes from strength...look at the difference between a sprinter and a distance runner.

You can be born a fast runner...if you do squats and deadlifts...you'll get faster.

As far as why it doesn't apply to you...the only real way would be for you to get data from a trackman before and after your strength loss. You could have made up for a loss of strength with better technique.

I'm not saying that we can't improve our body speed slightly. I am saying we can't improve it very much.

Luke Donald will never hit a ball as far as Rory McIlroy no matter how many weights he lifts.

Greg Maddox could never throw as fast as Sandy Koufax no matter how hard he worked at it (and he was a bigger stronger guy).

You might take a guy that runs a 5 flat 40 and get him down to a 4.8 but he'll never be a 4.3 guy. Another guy might run a 4.4 the first day he walks on a field.

We can of course improve our technique and get the most out of what we've got.

Edit: The guy on the bottom picture you posted can bulk up all he wants and he still won't be a sprinter. He has slow twitch fibers and the sprinter has fast twitch fibers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not saying that we can't improve our body speed slightly. I am saying we can't improve it very much.

Luke Donald will never hit a ball as far as Rory McIlroy no matter how many weights he lifts.

Greg Maddox could never throw as fast as Sandy Koufax no matter how hard he worked at it (and he was a bigger stronger guy).

You might take a guy that runs a 5 flat 40 and get him down to a 4.8 but he'll never be a 4.3 guy. Another guy might run a 4.4 the first day he walks on a field.

We can of course improve our technique and get the most out of what we've got.

Edit: The guy on the bottom picture you posted can bulk up all he wants and he still won't be a sprinter. He has slow twitch fibers and the sprinter has fast twitch fibers.

Agree completely...mostly because it doesn't contradict me. :-D

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
It's amazing how this thread just keeps going.

Trying to figure out what makes golfers good is always going to generate a never ending discussion.

As for me, I keep coming back with pretty much the same points.  Some of the info he is passing out is not good - not all of it, but the gist of it. It bothers me, but I guess it's nothing new, with all the pros out there right now who aren't that great.

Hey, there's about 4 more years of this till it resolves. Dig yourself in, break out the popcorn.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Moderator
So according to a Flightscope rep, his clubs are not flat enough. Let's wait and see after he gets his clubs adjusted how much improvement there is. http://thedanplan.com/flightscope-ready-and-some-d-plane-thoughts/

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So according to a Flightscope rep, his clubs are not flat enough. Let's wait and see after he gets his clubs adjusted how much improvement there is.

http://thedanplan.com/flightscope-ready-and-some-d-plane-thoughts/


I believe it will help to some degree but ultimately his own ability will be the final factor. I have always measured out to standard lie, length, with every clubfitter I have ever seen but this was done in a very basic process and not with a launch monitor, that is something I have always wanted to have done and am more determined to do if I want to get to the next level the equipment does matter.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So according to a Flightscope rep, his clubs are not flat enough. Let's wait and see after he gets his clubs adjusted how much improvement there is. http://thedanplan.com/flightscope-ready-and-some-d-plane-thoughts/

[Quote]That’s the beauty of forged irons: you can play around with lie and loft and always go back if it’s not working.[/Quote] Is this true?

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is this true?

Yes, forged are easier to bend.

They allow a lot more customization.

The passage here:

reminds me of. . .

http://thesandtrap.com/t/32564/how-do-you-hit-170-yards-with-7-iron

Read a few of the posts for a good laugh. :-D

According to Dan he hits it as fast as the average tour pro, but with a much higher smash factor!

Funny. :-$

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, forged are easier to bend. They allow a lot more customization. The passage here: reminds me of. . . [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/t/32564/how-do-you-hit-170-yards-with-7-iron]http://thesandtrap.com/t/32564/how-do-you-hit-170-yards-with-7-iron[/URL] Read a few of the posts for a good laugh. :-D   According to Dan he hits it as fast as the average tour pro, but with a much higher smash factor! [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/107927/] [/URL] Funny. :-$

Never realized the average swing speed of the shorter clubs is slower than the longer clubs.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, forged are easier to bend.

They allow a lot more customization.

The passage here:

reminds me of. . .

http://thesandtrap.com/t/32564/how-do-you-hit-170-yards-with-7-iron

Read a few of the posts for a good laugh.

According to Dan he hits it as fast as the average tour pro, but with a much higher smash factor!

Funny.


In Dan's defense it may be possible the flight scope like he said will not throw anything out that is not solid evidence, however I find that highly unlikely, Also the guy/salesman with the flight scope is doing a good job hiding the fact he's trying to sell Dan a new set of sticks would be more believable. I'm not doing it but it sure would be funny if someone were to post this info in his blog. Also Dan may be full of crap about his numbers and lies to make his donators feel as if they are supporting something worthwhile. Lastly, is somebody now flying this clown to Europe on their dime again? First Australia now Switzerland? I do however have to give credit where credit is undoubtedly due, he knows how to sell himself pretty good or is it just the law of averages if you shoot an arrow aimlessly at a herd of buffalo your chances of hitting one are better than average.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In Dan's defense it may be possible the flight scope like he said will not throw anything out that is not solid evidence, however I find that highly unlikely, Also the guy/salesman with the flight scope is doing a good job hiding the fact he's trying to sell Dan a new set of sticks would be more believable. I'm not doing it but it sure would be funny if someone were to post this info in his blog. Also Dan may be full of crap about his numbers and lies to make his donators feel as if they are supporting something worthwhile. Lastly, is somebody now flying this clown to Europe on their dime again? First Australia now Switzerland? I do however have to give credit where credit is undoubtedly due, he knows how to sell himself pretty good or is it just the law of averages if you shoot an arrow aimlessly at a herd of buffalo your chances of hitting one are better than average.

If he said his swing speed was 93 with the 7i, it would be a little more believable than his smash factor being 4-5% more efficient than a PGA pro. I still wouldn't buy it.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If he said his swing speed was 93 with the 7i, it would be a little more believable than his smash factor being 4-5% more efficient than a PGA pro. I still wouldn't buy it.


Unless the shaft in his 7 iron is somewhere around 43"  Dan can't swing a 7 iron that fast, nowhere near that fast.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
I just think at his level, better fitting clubs aren't going to help as much as a good pro and smart and effective practice and just nitty gritty hard work. As he progresses, his swing might change and he'll need to be fit again. If he were a lower handicap, then, yeah, custom clubs are going help more than practice in the short term. And there is a disconnect between his as of late luxury accommodations, world travel, expensive training and the donate button. At least to me. If he was getting a free ride on good and effective instruction and posted useful stuff for people to learn from, fine. Basically a not trivial portion of his blog consists of products and services he has gotten pro bono, so he is exposed to those with the most aggressive and or opportune marketing, not necessarily the best and or relevant product/service. So if he gets really good or meets his goal, he's gonna tell us to take this vision mental class? It sounds expensive and money better spent elsewhere. But this mental camp, the world travel and his tv spots test driving high performance cars is a turnoff, at least in terms of golf, learning and instruction wise. The blog seems to be veering away from learning swing to marketing opportunity. If you were the professor of the deliberate study he is putting into practice, would you be happy how The Dan Plan is going? He's not exactly helping to support the professor's theory so far.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Never realized the average swing speed of the shorter clubs is slower than the longer clubs.

Always. The club is heavier and shorter. A shorter radius will almost always be swung more slowly.

I just think at his level, better fitting clubs aren't going to help as much as a good pro and smart and effective practice and just nitty gritty hard work.

I could beat Dan using my wife's set of clubs.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Quote:

Originally Posted by nevets88

I just think at his level, better fitting clubs aren't going to help as much as a good pro and smart and effective practice and just nitty gritty hard work.

I could beat Dan using my wife's set of clubs.

How about Preston playing righty? That would be interesting. Don't mean to put you on the spot Preston :-)

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2558 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The International Team is tanking on putts. 
    • Decibels is sound 'pressure' not wave frequency. From that perspective a SGI Iron will have very different pressure wave than a blade even with the same speed and other variables considered equal. Additionally, since your phone will not be in direct path the turbulence difference (which generates the sound 'pressure) will have much lesser variance. In other words you will have convergence at one particular speed. Maybe it's this 90MPH speed with your 6i. But I doubt you will have proportional deviation above or below the speed to give you anything will reliability.  And other speeds? 80, 90? 
    • You could have saved us all some time by realizing I tend to know what I'm talking about when it comes to science and tech. 😛  What? The only way they would imply that it would be "possible" is if you were able to spend six figures (minimum) AND that doesn't include the swing robot that could reach peak speed at the same exact location every time. No, they didn't say it was possible for someone like you to do anything remotely good. Session to session. The PRGR doesn't work the same way - it samples the speed, from behind (inline with the direction of travel) with radar, and takes the highest number it registers. The distance from the PRGR isn't super relevant. You're not reading. Or understanding. No to both. The former is because of the microphones, and the latter is because a clubhead swing more closed versus more open will have a different air flow and thus a different pitch and volume. Clubheads are not symmetrical. You're missing the point. How reflective some of that stuff is could matter. The sounds it generates to background noise could matter. 85 dBs is generally considered ear-injuring volume. You don't "need to find an app" because this will not work at all.
    • But it will change from session to session, from one person’s location to the next, etc. If your goal is to figure out X db = Y mph in swing speed to share with others, that matters.
    • An you still took several minutes to write several posts and talk to sound engineers. I appreciate that you did!  So they basically tell you is possible but you need to be very restrictive. The same thing I found on my research.  Temperature: is not going to change much between swing A and swing B. Distance of max club head: even the PRGR take the fastest speed recorded, not the speed at the ball. But this could be diminish by swinging several times each swing and average the results.  Angles: also PRGR returns less speed swinging on a certain degree.  Clubface orientation: it is also an issue with launch monitors that are not reading the center of the mass of the club. You can have a lot more club speed if your face rotation is higher and your lunch monitor is reading the toe of the club. "Other stuff in the room": are the same from swing A to B, or you can just swing naked! haha  This is the main idea, I have a PRGR and Skytrak. There are plenty of people, more here in Argentina, that can't afford a launch monitor. Also wanted to share the idea and let it be challenged by others. I don't mind been wrong, is part of experimenting.  I did and all the swings were close to 85 dbs, me swinging at 90 m/h. But I don't mind doing a proper test later in the afternoon writing down the results. I need to find and app that also have frequencies in order to test both.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...