• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
binga7

Do you use a rangefinder?

0   29 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you use a rangefinder?

    • Yes
      32
    • No
      24

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

100 posts in this topic

Went to an elite amateur tournament near my house today and was quite surprised to see that almost 99% of players had bushnell range finders.

I havent played competitive golf for 12 months, so I found this rather a bit different. I was under the impression that the gps was the way to go, since I had purchased one a couple of years back.

Are the rangefinders that much more accurate than a gps. I guess the thing with the rangefinder is that you dont need to map out or download a course.

What are you opinions on the rangefinder and if you use one, do you find it accurate on the course and the range?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I use a Leupold GX-II all the time when playing. Gone are the days when I walk off distances, have to search for yardage markers all over the course, wonder if the flag really is 110 or 120 yards away etc. I use it to find the distance to anything. A creek, a tree, a river, a rock, you name it. I always carry a course guide too and plan my shot when approaching the ball. Once I'm there, I just pick up the rangefinder at shoot the flag or whatever object I need the distance to, pick my club and hit it. Especially useful on courses with few yardage markers. Never tried a GPS, but I'm happy with my rangefinder. Most reviews stated a rangefinder was more accurate, but the GPS may have caught up by now, though it will probably never be as accurate.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Depends what you like. Personally I prefer a range finder to a gps. My Bushnell will bounce off of most anything so I can shoot yardages all over the course.

As for gps, it seems that depends on the unit you have. Some you have to pay to download courses and others like Golf buddy (I think), come with courses already downloaded. So you really have to check and see what kind of deal comes with the gps.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the USGA rule, but I think I remember seeing that, when allowed, line of sight devices are normally all that's allowed.

5. Distance-Measuring Devices (Rule 14-3)

During a stipulated round, the use of any distance measuring device is not permitted unless the Committee has introduced a Local Rule to that effect (see Note to Rule 14-3 and Appendix I; Part B; Section 9).

Even when the Local Rule is in effect, the device must be limited to measuring distance only. Features that would render use of the device contrary to the Local Rule include, but are not limited to:

  • the gauging or measuring of slope;

  • the gauging or measuring of other conditions that might affect play (e.g., wind speed or direction, or other climate-based information such as temperature, humidity, etc.);

  • recommendations that might assist the player in making a stroke or in his play (e.g., club selection, type of shot to be played, green reading or any other advice related matter); or

  • calculating the effective distance between two points based on slope or other conditions affecting shot distance.

    Such non-conforming features render use of the device contrary to the Rules, irrespective of whether or not:

    • the features can be switched off or disengaged; and

    • the features are switched off or disengaged.

      A multi-functional device, such as a smartphone or PDA, may be used as a distance measuring device provided it contains a distance measuring application that meets all of the above limitations (i.e., it must measure distance only).
      In addition, when the distance measuring application is being used, there must be no other features or applications installed on the device that, if used, would be in breach of the
      Rules, whether or not they are actually used.

But to answer your question, I use the Golflogix GPS app on my iPhone. I've found it to be very accurate and I like the data tracking features.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do and in general I believe they speed the game up.  But there are the "fiddlers" that have to use every feature on every shot.  But I don't know that that is slower then looking for markers and stepping off the distance.

I should add the GPS/Laser argument is a Ford/Chevy thing in my opinion.   Both work well,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once my club distances are more consistent I'll think about a ranger finder. Until then I'll be sticking with yardage books, course markers and estimation.

There's nothing worse than a guy who uses GPS to get a distance, verifies it with a range finder but then can't ever hit his targets; it just wastes everyone's time and makes him/her look stupid.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A gps device is nice for blind shots over hills or across doglegs over trees where you don't have line of sight. Range finders need line of sight but seem to be a little more efficient. Smart phones can be battery hogs if you use one for the gps app. If I find work again before the golf season opens then I'll be shopping for a range finder, and I'll have a cheap or free golf app on the phone.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent gotten to the point where i feel the need to have either. I do pretty good with course markers. Once I feel more comfortable with my club yardage ill look at getting a range finder. Any suggestions on something that works well but wont break the bank?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been playing about a year seriously and used niether, although all my frineds use one or the other or both. I started using a gps on my phone, gloflogix, for $20.00 a year, pplus dat acharges. I have a generous data plan, use it mostly for golf. I got it because of a blind shot where I walked to the crest of a hill where I could see the top of the flag. Decieded to go left of the falg, stay away from the club house. Hit the right club, went right where I wanted it. What I didn't see by just finding the top of the flag, was water was to the left. Went in the drink, pin deep!

After about 4 months of using the gps, tracks all kinds of stuff, most of which I don't use, too time consuming. I noticed I wanted to start doing layout type shots. In case where I can't carry the bunker, water etc, so I got a cheap range finder. NO bells or whistles. Basic Bushnell. Used it for about two months, gave it a friends son who plays in tourneys. Upgraded to a Bushnell that does all kind of stuff. Love it! Especially when they have moved stuff around or the gps has the old course data. My GPS has given some really inaccurate data on some less than stellar courses.

I don't use either one every shot. Let's be honest..on a ggod day I carry the ball with my driver 225 - 240, on a bad day, well you know. If I am on a par 5, 580 yds, I know it is my driver, then my 3 wood, then I figure out what distance is left. Only way I use either one is if I am shotting blind (over a hill, dog leg, etc) or I am pretty close to the pin, let's say <200 yds. anything over is pretty straight forward.

I like them both, for different reasons. I would not buy a dedicated GPS, have too crap in my bag now, like the range finder for exactly distances, but really 90% or better, I use eye or course markers, and of course the score card. What I really need is buy something that puts some consistanc in my swing, imporves these old eyes finding the ball. then I will give up both!

Have fun with it, that's my two strokes worth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing about rangefinders is that they dont show you the distance to the front of the green, the pin and the back of the green.  They only show you the distance to where you are shooting the rangefinder to.  With a GPS, it gives you a lot more information.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a Bushnell rangefinder. Not on every shot, but if there are hazards or if I'm in range of the green I use it to know the distances I need to hit or distances I need to avoid. I don't have enough accuracy or consistency to go at the pin, so where it is most useful for me is to know the distances I need to avoid hazards. Nothing worse than hitting a lay up into a hazard! It's a great tool to have.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only thing about rangefinders is that they dont show you the distance to the front of the green, the pin and the back of the green.  They only show you the distance to where you are shooting the rangefinder to.  With a GPS, it gives you a lot more information.

I shoot bunkers, trees, hills, buckets, rakes, ground, you name it. A rangefinder can shoot more than a flag. I'll agree that a GPS gives you a better overview though. That is why I always carry a course guide too. The information there tells me what I need to know once I know the distance to the front of the green, flag or something like that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I use golfshots gps on my iPhone and thats enough for me.  The distances are pretty damn accurate and I like the over head map of the course it gives you.  I don't even bother with that, except to keep score on courses I play regularly though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by binga7

Went to an elite amateur tournament near my house today and was quite surprised to see that almost 99% of players had bushnell range finders.


GPS will give you distance to front, center, and back of green, and other mapped landmarks such as hazards, dogleg corners, etc. They will not tell you the distance to the pin though, like rangefinders do.  Good players need to know the exact yardage to the pin, which is why they prefer rangefinders.



Originally Posted by TitleistWI

The only thing about rangefinders is that they dont show you the distance to the front of the green, the pin and the back of the green.  They only show you the distance to where you are shooting the rangefinder to.

On the contrary, they definitely do give you the distance to the pin - and as I said above, that's their main advantage over rangefinders.

Originally Posted by TitleistWI

With a GPS, it gives you a lot more information.

I agree - it can be difficult to shoot edges of hazards with a rangefinder for example, or anything not in your line of sight. I personally prefer a GPS for that reason. But the exact distance to the pin is often very important for good players, which is why they tend to prefer rangefinders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

On the contrary, they definitely do give you the distance to the pin - and as I said above, that's their main advantage over rangefinders.

Huh? GPS doesn't give you distance to the pin. Laser rangefinders do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Rangefinder here.  I think it really speeds up play.  You've got exact yardage to the pin. No need to pace anything off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a rangefinder, i got it for xmas i find that it is a must need now a days at is much better to use than the GPS it is a lot faster and is point and shoot rather than waiting on the satellite to load up! Love my Bushnell

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No, not exactly...just a general or rough definition of "in the vicinity" will do. Not all of us are 1.5ers. 
    • Which range in the US, the piece doesn't say. Trackman Range is basically setting up multiple radars, 3 for example, so that it can provide numbers for a range of a given length, like 130 yards in the example here and everyone on that range in selected spots basically has radar. Here's the piece that talks about the setup some more plus putting. The new ability to measure putt related data is interesting as well, wonder what it'll add in addition to SAM Puttlab. 
    • Well,  you said for most people,  and I do not have a large sample size to draw from in my own experience in golf so... I draw from my own personal experience.    As a player there was a time when I wanted to change the shape of my swing very badly in a certain way.  I have found that when I tried to do that and hit a ball at the same time it was too much for my brain and I would find contact with the ball over making the change or the change I saw on video would be miniscule if present at all.  I found though that if I removed the ball I was able to make changes.  Now,  obviously this was making an air swing that might not even hit a ball on the ground.  No accuracy,  but that's the point!  Free the brain from having to put clubhead on ball for a minute and focus on something else to harness it a bit!  I removed all intention of a precise strike or clubface control by doing this.  I am talking now seriously make a swing or two look at video...most times exaggerate the move even more...look at video.  Repeat repeat repeat.   Same exact video angle all the time!   This is not a fast process I am just explaining what I was doing.  Backyard was perfect for this feel vs real experimentation feedback loop I was working on.  The only purpose of this was to develop a way I could learn to somewhat repeat what I was looking for.  Stage two would be targeting a tuft of grass and doing it again video.  Stage three would be maybe going out to the range and like you said rehearsing a few and then bringing in the ball and striking it. For me going out and shanking and slicing a bucket of balls working on a change costs money and it's hard to convince myself it's a success regardless of what I see on video.  I've done it several times. So,  before I did the whole air swing thing I hit many buckets and basically it was not effective at anything except maybe excercise and grooving compensations to the point I built myself a nice yip impact block on full swings.  Yes I admit at first I thought I could beat golf by athletic ability alone like every moron high cap that beats balls ingraining moves that need to be eliminated if they are ever to improve.  Without a couple simple workable concepts imo hitting balls is really the worst thing to do for a relatively inexperienced player.  So,  that's my take. For background info on me I played tennis in college and it was sport of focus from maybe sixth grade on and I took proper instruction with one coach for quite a while.  I feel I maximized my potential there.  Often in college I would surf in the morning early (skipping class obviously) and then for the afternoon travel for matches and play my singles and a doubles match.  My coach seriously used to ask me if I surfed that day because he said I played better when I did! I have a lot of experience in teaching athletics of various sorts  including surfing and soccer and I have been told many many times by many people that I have a natural affinity for teaching in a minimalistic simple fashion.  I succeeded in many ways in athletics but for me it was always a personal focus on technique that led to success.  Growing up I could never jump high or run very fast or lift heavy weights,  but I developed a pretty good jump shot in hoops.   I could kick a ball far and score goals in soccer. I am just not one of those naturally athletic fearless types who as a kid could jump their bike real huge or Ollie a skateboard a couple feet into the air or do a tuck flip off a diving board into a pool without thinking a bit how they did it.  I can identify those types and imo there's something happening there most of the rest of us ain't got!  Sure I could flip but it was an extended body flop of sorts lol.  In tennis I got decent,  but it was from good instruction,  good practice, an absolute ton of hours of hard work,  and if I might say so very good technique.  In golf I can't break par so I don't really ever bother people in swing threads unless I can speak from personal experience.  I realize I am not qualified to develop a swing to say a par shooter,  so I don't try to.   I think I might have some thoughts relative to some though.  Sorry for boring those who have read this but I must say I value my time spent on this site highly;  most sites are crud these days filled with Internet warrior liars who don't offer much true Quality.        
    • Yeah, I dunno about any of that. There were almost 150 women playing in this tournament (28*5, right?), no doubt many of them using the restroom during a round, yet only two used a cart to get there. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon