Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What is the correlation between the number of birdies and your handicap.


Note: This thread is 4660 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I play with a group of golfers which range in handicap from single-digit to approximately 25. We had a birdie pool , with the' Lions share 'going to the single-digit and lower handicap golfers on a regular basis..

. Are there any valid statistics which correlates the number of average birdies per round with you handicap ?

. As an example a five handicap golfer may normally post( 2.2 ) birdies per round where a 17 handicap golfer post a( .6 )birdies around.

I'm sure this information is available but to date I have not found it. Would the USGA  be a source for this information.


  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Oh carp, I JUST read an article somewhere about this kind of thing. along the lines of an 18 hdcp hitting a GIR 4 times, a 12 might hit 8, etc... this would correlate with the OPPORTUNITY to make birdie. Personally, I might AVERAGE 2.5 birds a round with a 12. I certainly have the OPPORTUNITY for more- such as easy chips, makeable putts and the like. Some days I might have 4 or 5 and others I get squat. You can pro rate the birdie pool and limit the number any ONE person can take based on Handicaps, or even limit the holes where a birdie takes a skin. The hardest holes would eliminate most high hdcp'rs, so maybe split the pool. top 9 hardest holes is a contest open to everyone, while the easiest 9 are ONLY open to the higher hdcprs. My Dad played in a group with a Birdie Pool, and he never bothered to enter with his 32, since there were at least 3 former Club Champs and one former PGA Teacher in the group (about 30 guys). After awhile they restricted those guys to win only one per outing and it opened up for the others and made it more competitive for the rest of the guys.

Posted

Not sure how reliable this is: http://golfmadesimple.com/howtoimprove10strokes.html, but FWIW it states that a golfer who shoots 85 has an average of 1 birdie a round.

Lots of other criteria on that site as well, for example:

105 golfer: 1 GIR/round

95 golfer: 2 GIRs/round

85 golfer: 6 GIRs/round

Originally Posted by RayG

You can pro rate the birdie pool and limit the number any ONE person can take based on Handicaps, or even limit the holes where a birdie takes a skin. The hardest holes would eliminate most high hdcp'rs, so maybe split the pool. top 9 hardest holes is a contest open to everyone, while the easiest 9 are ONLY open to the higher hdcprs.

If you have handicaps, the easiest thing to do would be to just use whatever stroke adjustments per hole you'd ordinarily make for playing matches or skins, and use net birdies instead of natural birdies.

Bill


Posted

Below are some statistics that are somewhay on point.  Although "average score" does not correlate exactly with one's handicap, one can make an educated guess.  A 75 average might be 2.0-5.0, 79 average 4.0-8.0, 81 average 6.0-10.0, etc ...

One change might be to pay off for "net" birdies or pay off both gross and net but pay more for gross birdies.  Clearly a player with a 20 handicap is primarily going to be subsidizing the single digit's golf costs.

Dr. L.J. Riccio, PhD did an analysis of "average golfers" in 1990. Below is a table which summarizes some of the statistics that Riccio investigated.



The last column indicates the strength of the statistical relationship between score and the statistic. A "Strong" relationship is one that predicts quite well one statistic given the other (i.e. the SCORE given the GIR). A "Weak" relationship does not predict as well.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by skigolf33

I play with a group of golfers which range in handicap from single-digit to approximately 25. We had a birdie pool , with the' Lions share 'going to the single-digit and lower handicap golfers on a regular basis..

. Are there any valid statistics which correlates the number of average birdies per round with you handicap ?

. As an example a five handicap golfer may normally post( 2.2 ) birdies per round where a 17 handicap golfer post a( .6 )birdies around.

I'm sure this information is available but to date I have not found it. Would the USGA  be a source for this information.

I don't know the answer, but just from experience, I'm going to guess that your numbers are high.  Using myself as a baseline:  9 handicap who averages 1 birdie a round, I'm going to take a stab here (don't forget, these are guesses):

handicap avg. birdies/round

tour pro                 4.6

scratch                 2.4

5                          1.8

10                        0.9

15                        0.3

20                        0.1

Again, wild guesses based only on myself and what I've observed.  Thought it'd be fun to put it out there and see what others think.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hell, I'm a 9 handicap and average .8 birdies a round.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted
Originally Posted by bkuehn1952

Below are some statistics that are somewhay on point.  Although "average score" does not correlate exactly with one's handicap, one can make an educated guess.  A 75 average might be 2.0-5.0, 79 average 4.0-8.0, 81 average 6.0-10.0, etc ...

One change might be to pay off for "net" birdies or pay off both gross and net but pay more for gross birdies.  Clearly a player with a 20 handicap is primarily going to be subsidizing the single digit's golf costs.

Dr. L.J. Riccio, PhD did an analysis of "average golfers" in 1990. Below is a table which summarizes some of the statistics that Riccio investigated.

The last column indicates the strength of the statistical relationship between score and the statistic. A "Strong" relationship is one that predicts quite well one statistic given the other (i.e. the SCORE given the GIR). A "Weak" relationship does not predict as well.

This is almost dead on for me. I am around a 10 right now and my average score across all rounds is about 85 and my golf stats say I average exactly .8 birdies per round.


Posted

I had 5 birdies last year and played maybe 12-14 full rounds and a half-dozen 9-hole par-3 rounds with my daughter.

But I've also gone 3 year stretches playing twice as often and had one or no birdies and I don't think I've had more than 2 or 3 birdies in a season previously.  Last year was partially just dumb luck and partially the result of a dozen or so hours of short game practice while waiting for my kid's golf lessons.  Strangely, the extra practice, the extra birdies, the new Nike irons, the hot new Ping G20 3W, the Srixon balls that give me both length and feel -  they didn't seem to get me any closer to my goal of breaking 90 again that I was sure was going to happen again.  I guess the next step is lessons.

In my bag: - Ping G20 driver, 10.5 deg. S flex - Ping G20 3W, 15 deg., S flex - Nickent 4dx 3H, 4H - Nike Slingshot 4-PW - Adams Tom Watson 52 deg. GW - Vokey 58 deg. SW -Ping Half Wack-E putter


Posted

Ooh, ooh, ooh.......I've got this one.  The correlation is, the lower your handicap, the more birdies you average per round!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Way too many variables, some play easier courses, others harder. At my home course, I just started to average more than one par a round, where if I play a shorter course, 2 birdies and 6 pars is not out of reach.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

2012 for me.  Only .9 Birdies per round.

All Holes Front Back Par 3's Par 4's Par 5's
Score 79.4 39.8 39.6 3.4 4.5 5.3
+/- +7.5 +3.8 +3.6 +0.4 +0.5 +0.3
Birdies or better 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.3
Pars 9.5 4.8 4.7 1.2 3.0 1.2
Bogey or worse 7.6 3.8 3.8 1.0 2.6 0.7
Fairways hit 70% (369/525) 68% (195/287) 73% (174/238) 70% (266/378) 70% (103/147)
GIR 44% (294/674) 41% (152/368) 46% (142/306) 42% (63/149) 42% (157/378) 50% (74/147)
Putts 31.1 15.1 16.1 1.8 1.7 1.7
Ups & Downs 44% (68/153) 42% (41/98) 49% (27/55) 34% (13/38) 47% (42/89) 50% (13/26)

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here is my Stats

Eagles 1%

Birdies 10%

Pars     58%

Bogies  25%

Double + 6%

There are rounds that you can get 2 or more birdies but there are also rounds that no birdies and just pars ..

What I Play:
913D3 9.5°Diamana Kai'li 70 Stiff  "C3" | 910F 15°, Diamana Kai'li 80 Stiff "D2" | 910H 19°,  Diamana Kai'li for Titleist 85 Hybrid Stiff | Titleist 714 AP2 4 to P Aerotech Steelfiber i110 S | SM4 Vokey 50.12, 54.14 & SM5 60.11K| 34" Edel Umpqua + 40g Counter Weight
 

Posted
Originally Posted by bkuehn1952

Below are some statistics that are somewhay on point.  Although "average score" does not correlate exactly with one's handicap, one can make an educated guess.  A 75 average might be 2.0-5.0, 79 average 4.0-8.0, 81 average 6.0-10.0, etc ...

One change might be to pay off for "net" birdies or pay off both gross and net but pay more for gross birdies.  Clearly a player with a 20 handicap is primarily going to be subsidizing the single digit's golf costs.

Dr. L.J. Riccio, PhD did an analysis of "average golfers" in 1990. Below is a table which summarizes some of the statistics that Riccio investigated.

The last column indicates the strength of the statistical relationship between score and the statistic. A "Strong" relationship is one that predicts quite well one statistic given the other (i.e. the SCORE given the GIR). A "Weak" relationship does not predict as well.

I'd say this is pretty accurate for me.  Except I average about 4 birdies and not as many pars, and there's no way in hell I hit 81% of my fairways, in the two rounds i've played this year ive hit 11/24 fairways and shot 68 and 74 respectively. (guess that suggests the weak correlation lol)

Age:19

What's in my bag?
Driver- Taylormade TP Burner 2.0 5 wood- Launcher (4-GW)- Jpx Pro 800 SW- X Forged LW- 588 X Wedge- Tp-Z Putter- Unitized Tiempo

 

"Hard work beats talent"-Tim Tebow


Posted

I am a 5 handicap but my average score is probably closer to 9 over. So I am slightly over 1 per round.

First is eagles, birdies, pars, bogies, doubles, and others

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

What is "iron accuracy"?  How is that defined/tracked?

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

I actually made a few more birdies and quite a few more eagles when my scores were much higher than they are now.

I also made MANY more double bogeys and worse and went for everything (no matter how ridiculous the shot was). Laying up wasn't even in my vocabulary


Note: This thread is 4660 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.