Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jamo

TaylorMade SLDR Prototype

51 posts in this topic

A picture from TM's Facebook: [QUOTE]We're unwrapping some special prototypes on the PGA Tour and European Tour this week. [/QUOTE]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

TM changes up their look with these, they look more like Mizuno's than TM.

Interesting concept of the slider, seems they are trying to make the adjustment of the face simpler so the booklet isn't required when making a change.  Could get messy hitting the driver off the deck, but I doubt many non-pro's do that very often.

I have to think such a setup will tempt some golfers into adjusting the setting for different holes which I believe would be against the rules, though I doubt many are aware of such rules outside TST.

Next step might be to use another locking method that wouldn't even require a tool and make it even more convenient for golfers to change the setup on the fly.  Maybe that's what TM was referring to with regards to non-conformance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We all wonder what "they" will do next...

It's interesting.

Thanks for the heads up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by newtogolf

Interesting concept of the slider, seems they are trying to make the adjustment of the face simpler so the booklet isn't required when making a change.  Could get messy hitting the driver off the deck, but I doubt many non-pro's do that very often.

I'm fairly certain the slider just changes the CG location, not the face angle.

Originally Posted by newtogolf

I have to think such a setup will tempt some golfers into adjusting the setting for different holes which I believe would be against the rules, though I doubt many are aware of such rules outside TST.

They could just do that now with the hosels… I don't think it will be a problem.

Not much different than this . Or these .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by newtogolf

I have to think such a setup will tempt some golfers into adjusting the setting for different holes which I believe would be against the rules, though I doubt many are aware of such rules outside TST.

Nah ... just like Erik said.  You can see that there is a screw there so they'd still have to break out the tool.

Weird to me ... look like they've abandoned the white/black/orange color scheme and are going blue here.  (Can't really tell what the crowns going to look like though)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by newtogolf

TM changes up their look with these, they look more like Mizuno's than TM.

Agreed, As soon as I saw it, I thought of the MP600 and 630.

Originally Posted by hacker101

WOW another new must have by TM!

Really?! I really hope I'm failing on picking up the sarcasm.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by BostonBrew

Agreed, As soon as I saw it, I thought of the MP600 and 630.

Really?! I really hope I'm failing on picking up the sarcasm.

Total sarcasm!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much different than [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/mizuno_mp-630_fast_track_driver_review]this[/URL]. Or [URL=http://www.golfshopcentral.com/p-49-kick-x-tracker-srt-hybrid.aspx?B=1&A;=94]these[/URL].

Yup, the Mizuno Fast Tracks were the first things that came to mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Nah ... just like Erik said.  You can see that there is a screw there so they'd still have to break out the tool.

Weird to me ... look like they've abandoned the white/black/orange color scheme and are going blue here.  (Can't really tell what the crowns going to look like though)

Crown will be glossy gray. What line of drivers will this be replacing or will they just be adding a new line?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like TM is back to their old tricks: recycling old technology and calling it, "new".  Much like the slot in the Rocketblazes that Wilson used in the '80s.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

I think Taylormade markets to hacks.

You are correct.

I am living proof ... ooh, bright lights, bright lights...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

I think Taylormade markets to hacks.

You are correct.

I am living proof ... ooh, bright lights, bright lights...


Explains your sunglasses...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by newtogolf

Interesting concept of the slider, seems they are trying to make the adjustment of the face simpler so the booklet isn't required when making a change.

Like opening an awning window, you think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting idea. It will be interesting to see if it really works.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mchepp

Interesting idea. It will be interesting to see if it really works.


Mizuno's version of it worked to a certain extent, so I dont see why TM's wouldnt work.  Im sure TM will find a clever way to convince people that their new driver can turn their wicked slice into a nice, little draw.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Nah ... just like Erik said.  You can see that there is a screw there so they'd still have to break out the tool.

Weird to me ... look like they've abandoned the white/black/orange color scheme and are going blue here.  (Can't really tell what the crowns going to look like though)

I agree as long as a tool is required, it's not any different that than the hosel adjustment.  I'd think at some point someone will come up with a method to eliminate the need of a special tool to make the adjustment.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon