Jump to content
IGNORED

Natural athletes are naturally good at golf. Agree or disagree?


tmac20
Note: This thread is 3846 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Are natural athletes natural golfers?

    • No. Look at Charles Barkley.
      20
    • Yes. Look at Tony Romo.
      11


Recommended Posts

Natural athletes make AVERAGE golfers.     I'm a perfect example ... stick and ball sports came easy to me.     Golf came way easier for me than anyone else I know (just wish I started earlier in life).     I'll never be a good golfer because of my obvious lack of putting ability.     I think the obvious answer is ball striking  comes easier for natural athletes --- HOWEVER --- the real question is this ...

is putting easier for natural athletes ??

I think being a natural athlete has far less to do with putting - seems to me as for putting - you either have it or you don't - you can't learn it like you can a golf swing.

What, putting is one of the easiest things to learn, practice, and improve in golf. It's a slow, small, identical movement each time, not sure if srs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Natural athletes make AVERAGE golfers.     I'm a perfect example ... stick and ball sports came easy to me.     Golf came way easier for me than anyone else I know (just wish I started earlier in life).     I'll never be a good golfer because of my obvious lack of putting ability.     I think the obvious answer is ball striking  comes easier for natural athletes --- HOWEVER --- the real question is this ...

is putting easier for natural athletes ??

I think being a natural athlete has far less to do with putting - seems to me as for putting - you either have it or you don't - you can't learn it like you can a golf swing.

Putting has little to do with athletic ability it has to do with eyesight, mental control, green reading ability, properly fit putter and practice.  Most of the putting books talk about how kids are pretty decent putters because they just walk up and hit the ball without getting all mental about it like we do.

You can definitely learn to putt, average golfers typically don't like to take putting lessons or practice putting as much as they do the full swing.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

i would normally say Yes a natural athlete would be better at golf  If he played golf often, than would the average person who played just as often....

But Golf is one of the few sports were it doesnt matter how strong you are or what your weight is...  Other sports i could include here is Billiards and bowling....

Now why is it, almost all hockey players are really good golfers???

As for the Tony Romo vs Charles Barkley comparison, i've seen many videos of Barkley and i would almost put money down that his swing is all fake and he does it for show cuz nobody, not even a noob has that bad of a swing.....

It is what it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just graduated college where I played baseball and previously played since I was three.  I had never picked up a golf club before until 3.5 months ago.  First few weeks of playing i was in the 120's but now I am usually mid-high 80's with an occasional low 80 or a low 90.  Most of my friends think that I have picked golf up so quickly mainly because I already have good hand-eye coordination.

(I mainly think its because I was so used to practicing baseball every day that now I put a ton of time into practicing my golf game and its starting to show)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought someone said that Barkley was pretty good at one point but hit a spectator or something and it caused him to get that hitch which was psychologically based.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Neither Barkley nor Romo are examples of being "naturally" good or bad at golf. Both have spent plenty of time on the golf course.

Take a non-athlete golfing for the first time and see what happens.

The last time I did there was a 60 yard carry over water on the first hole. I never even thought about it being in play but after about 10 tries he finally had to just go around a take a drop. Never got any better for the next 6 holes when we got rained out.

He asked me if I was that bad the first time I played and without really thinking I just said no. I felt bad about that answer later but I still don't know what I should have said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What, putting is one of the easiest things to learn, practice, and improve in golf. It's a slow, small, identical movement each time, not sure if srs.

My point is as a natural athlete, I developed an average swing very quickly - I think if I continue playing at the rate I have the last few years, my ball striking will easily be single digit capable.   Putting is what will keep me from getting there.   I still can't putt my way out of a paper bag.   Putting IMHO has very little to do with being a natural athlete...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just looked up Romo. He's +.3, not +3.3. Awfully good, but not tour level good......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just looked up Romo. He's +.3, not +3.3. Awfully good, but not tour level good......

You're probably right, but according to this website , he was a +3.3 in 2009. Maybe he's 3 strokes worst now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My point is as a natural athlete, I developed an average swing very quickly - I think if I continue playing at the rate I have the last few years, my ball striking will easily be single digit capable.   Putting is what will keep me from getting there.   I still can't putt my way out of a paper bag.   Putting IMHO has very little to do with being a natural athlete...

Not sure what you mean by "can't putt".  If I set up the ball on a flat surface that's 6' from the cup how many times can you sink the putt out of 10?

What efforts have you made to improve your putting and green reading compared to practicing your ball striking.

I get that ball striking has more to do with natural ability but ball striking means a lot of different things to people.  Can you work the ball left to right, right to left.  Can you control the height of the ball and amount of spin?  Hitting a golf ball far might involve athletic ability, the rest is instruction and practice.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

i guess it depends on the sport they played. baseball players and perhaps hockey players may pick up a swing quicker. basketball, i doubt it. if anyone remembers chuck in basketball, he wasnt very graceful. athletics may play a smart part, but i think body control plays a bigger part. i say give chad ocho cinco a club and he'll pick it up quicker than your avg person - considering he had great body control and eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think GOOD tennis and hockey players would be naturally good ball strikers.

Of course, like Erik stated golf has so many more aspects that it is difficult to naturally have the gift for all of them.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Obviously not.  Some people are good at golf, some are good at other sports.  Some are good at multiple sports ... sometimes golf is one of them (Romo), and sometimes its not (Barkley). Now I have that "sum, sum, summertime, sum, sum, summertime ..." song in my head thanks to my crappy prose. ;)

"Let's just sit back and unwind. Summer time!" And no, being an athlete doesn't mean you'll be good at golf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My point is as a natural athlete, I developed an average swing very quickly - I think if I continue playing at the rate I have the last few years, my ball striking will easily be single digit capable.   Putting is what will keep me from getting there.   I still can't putt my way out of a paper bag.   Putting IMHO has very little to do with being a natural athlete...

I agree with you, of course putting has less to do with being athletic than ball striking.

Putting is the most robotic stroke in golf I would say, if you can't learn and improve putting, I don't, know what you can improve on.


It sounds like you just don't putt the effort into putting, and practicing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree with you, of course putting has less to do with being athletic than ball striking.

Putting is the most robotic stroke in golf I would say, if you can't learn and improve putting, I don't, know what you can improve on.

It sounds like you just don't putt the effort into putting, and practicing it.

not to derail this thread, but given basic technique is established, seems to me putting is all about reading greens and feel.     I don't think this can be taught - seems to me you clearly either have this ability or you don't.    I don't spend hours practicing putting, but I will spend a goodly amount of time at the course before the round trying to get a feel for the greens.      It's not like I don't give it my best either - on shorter putts, I'll walk around both sides, try to read the greens, go through the whole pre-shot routine I've established, etc.       I am just a ham fisted putter - have no touch/feel - more than once I've had people actually laugh at how bad my putting is compared to the rest of my game... it's to the point where it doesn't even bother me anymore.     Which all leads me back to my suspicion that being a natural athlete has nothing to do with putting...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

not to derail this thread, but given basic technique is established, seems to me putting is all about reading greens and feel.     I don't think this can be taught - seems to me you clearly either have this ability or you don't.    I don't spend hours practicing putting, but I will spend a goodly amount of time at the course before the round trying to get a feel for the greens.      It's not like I don't give it my best either - on shorter putts, I'll walk around both sides, try to read the greens, go through the whole pre-shot routine I've established, etc.       I am just a ham fisted putter - more than once I've had people actually laugh at how bad my putting is compared to the rest of my game... it's to the point where it doesn't even bother me anymore.     Which all leads me back to my suspicion that being a natural athlete has nothing to do with putting...

wrong you can teach both. reading greens can be learned, and you can learn feel as well. most people struggle because their mechanics are bad. it's not you either have it or not.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

wrong you can teach both. reading greens can be learned, and you can learn feel as well. most people struggle because there mechanics are bad. it's not you either have it or not.

well, based on the amount of time I've spent golfing in the 3 years I've been playing (if I fessed up, most wouldn't believe it), if I haven't learned how to read greens and established some remote sense of feel by now, it's not in the cards ... just seems logical to me that some people have an aptitude for it & some just aren't wired for it - especially with regard to feel.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think the poll is a good example. Don't have to look any further than the local courses to see lots of good and bad golfers of varying athletic abilities. In some instances being athletic hinders people. I see lots of young guys trying to muscle the ball around the course with really bad form. It's not that they can't learn but far too many are reluctant to leave their ego in the parking lot.

Dave :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3846 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Makes sense.  Like I said, I wouldn't have been upset at their original offer either, and based on the fine print it seems like they've held up their end of the deal.  
    • If you've only had to adjust retroactively one time in 8 years and have around 5 people each year without handicaps, that's like 40-50 people total so it sounds like you're doing a pretty good job. I think your questions give enough to go off of. This might be a good way to get new people to actually post a few scores during the 6 weeks leading into the first event. Something like "New members will be eligible for tournament money once they have at least 3 posted rounds in GHIN" or something like that. If they can get 3 rounds in prior to their first event, then they're eligible. If not, they'll soon become eligible after an event or two assuming they play a little bit outside of events.
    • This is a loooooong winded narrative so if you don't like long stories, move on. 😉 Our senior club typically gets about 25 new members each year. We lose about 25 members each year for various reasons (moved to FL/AZ, disabled, dead, too expensive). Of the new members, usually 20 have an active GHIN handicap. About 5 each year do not have a GHIN handicap. When they join our club, we give each member a state association membership that includes GHIN handicapping services. We play a series of handicapped tournaments over the summer. When we sign up a new member who does not have a GHIN handicap, we attempt to give them an estimated index until they have sufficient scores posted to have an actual GHIN index.  Our first event typically is around May 15 so, in theory, a new member has about 6 weeks to post a few scores. Posting season in the Mitten starts April 1. Inevitably, several of the unhandicapped individuals seem  to either not play until the first tournament or can't figure out how to enter scores (hey, they are seniors). That situation then leads to my contacting the new member and asking a series of questions: a. Did you ever have a GHIN handicap? If yes, which State and do you recall what it was? b. Do you have an alternate handicap through a non-GHIN handicap service or a league? c. What do you think your average score was last year (for 9 or 18) d. What was your best score last year? Where did you play and which tee was used? e. What do you consider a very good score for yourself? Based on their responses I attempt to give them an index that makes them competitive in the first couple events BUT does not allow them to win their flight in the first couple events. We don't want the new members to finish last and at the same time, we don't want someone with a "20" playing handicap to win the third flight with a net 57. In the event some new member did shoot a net 57, we also advise everyone that we can and will adjust handicaps retroactively when it is clear to us that a member's handicap does not accurately reflect their potential. We don't like to adjust things retroactively and in the 8 years I have chaired the Handicap Committee, we have only done it once. So here are the questions to the mob: Any ideas how to do this better? Any questions one might ask an unhandicapped individual to better estimate their index/handicap? Would it be reasonable to have a new player play once (or more?) without being eligible to place in the money?
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Awesome! I got that a while back with my start word! Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...