Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Natural athletes are naturally good at golf. Agree or disagree?


Note: This thread is 4608 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Are natural athletes natural golfers?

    • No. Look at Charles Barkley.
      20
    • Yes. Look at Tony Romo.
      11


Recommended Posts

Posted

Tony Romo is a +3.3 handicap... He participates in some of the US Open qualifiers.

This is his golf swing.

Charles Barkley is a 36 handicap... He sucks.

This is his golf swing.

There are 50+ professional athletes that have a handicap of 4 or better. There are many that have never tried the game. Now, my question is: are natural athletes natural golfers?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Obviously not.  Some people are good at golf, some are good at other sports.  Some are good at multiple sports ... sometimes golf is one of them (Romo), and sometimes its not (Barkley).

Now I have that "sum, sum, summertime, sum, sum, summertime ..." song in my head thanks to my crappy prose. ;)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I disagree GD.

Nobody's naturally good at golf. :)

Golf is unlike any natural skill we may have ever developed (you know, for survival). Throwing things, running fast, strength, etc. are survival skills. Hitting a little ball into a cup didn't do much to fill anyone's bellies with woolly mammoth. :-D

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would say possibly. I will go with yes for the sake of discussion. The question does not say how good exactly so relatively good...possibly. A natural athlete is good at number of sports and so he/she could be more likely to become decent at golf faster than someone who is not.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Big difference between Romo and Barkley... Barkley isn't known for finesse... I'd say most quarterbacks that can move well in the pocket would make good golfers... hips. Besides, tall guys have shit knees, lol.

Posted

Being athletic doesn't mean golf will come easy but being totally un-athletic pretty much guarantees it won't come easy.

If I had to pick an athletic motion to determine how easily a person would learn golf I would pick throwing (and specifically throwing sidearm).

My cousin throws like most of us using our off hand, absolutely loves golf, and it's a long hard road for him.


Posted

Obviously not.  Some people are good at golf, some are good at other sports.  Some are good at multiple sports ... sometimes golf is one of them (Romo), and sometimes its not (Barkley).

I disagree GD.

Nobody's naturally good at golf. :)

Golf is unlike any natural skill we may have ever developed (you know, for survival). Throwing things, running fast, strength, etc. are survival skills. Hitting a little ball into a cup didn't do much to fill anyone's bellies with woolly mammoth.

Color me confused.

:blink:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I disagree........but it helps.  Anyone with good hand-eye coordination should theoretically learn to play well fast!!

The question should be..............what is athletic?.....for golf?  On one hand, there is Stadler and Lumpy.  Why can't a guy like Dr. J or Sir Charles excel at golf?   Why can't a guy like Shaq make a free throw?  LOL

Early in my golf life, I worked with a former div1 college football player so obviously......many of my golf partners were his buddies...former football players.  With the exception of 1 guy....they were all terrible golfers. lol...... Just because you are athletic doesn't mean squat in golf.....

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted
Nope. Golf takes different talent than what football, basketball, and other physical sports require. Case in point - I was nationally ranked boxer, and was a quick learner in every physical sport (soccer, basketball, tennis, ....). But when it comes to things like golf (and bowling), I just can't seem to quickly adjust to the sports. Now, if golf was played at while running full speed and dodging opponent's right and left hooks, I think I will be good at it in no time. There is something about hitting a helpless, motionless golf ball that makes it difficult for me to get good at. Go figure. :-(

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

agreed....

Just because you are 6'4", weight 245lbs,  and can run a 40yd dash in 4.45 through a brick wall doesn't mean you have the hand-eye coordination to play golf well.  It's a completely different skill set.

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted

I would look at it more like this, if you took 25 everyday people, and then 25 "naturally athletic people" all who have never picked up a golf club, they practiced for a certain amount of time etc. it's almost certain the athletes would be have better results in my opinion.

People who are athletic and excel in a particular sport are often good at other sports, you know, the guy who is good at everything even though he only just started playing 2 weeks ago or something, so I would say it would just translate into golf too.


Posted

Does it give them a predisposition to be good at golf yes, but they can not just pick up a club and be good at golf. There are a rare few cases, and there are a few cases of non-athletes who can do that. So, i wouldn't consider it a inherent thing.

What i think translates more is just the understanding on how to get better. If you've practiced in another sport, you can translate that work ethic. The videos the OP posted are not the first swings those golfers took. They are after hours of practice. Tony Romo works hard at his golf game in the football off season.

I wouldn't say its a natural thing, but i would put them ahead of the curve than your average joe.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would look at it more like this, if you took 25 everyday people, and then 25 "naturally athletic people" all who have never picked up a golf club, they practiced for a certain amount of time etc. it's almost certain the athletes would be have better results in my opinion.

People who are athletic and excel in a particular sport are often good at other sports, you know, the guy who is good at everything even though he only just started playing 2 weeks ago or something, so I would say it would just translate into golf too.

Of course.  Athletics are used to practice.  I.e, they have training know how & discipline on their side.    That is a huge factor in my mind.

Michael Jordan comes to my mind.   He may be good at physical sports like basketball, but when it comes to baseball or golf, he couldn't hack it.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Natural athletes will have an easier time becoming good at golf than non-athletes but I don't think anyone is born naturally good at golf.  Natural athletes have the potential to be better golfers than non-athletes.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm going have to call this an apples to oranges comparison... Golf is very hard for above average tall guys... I'm not talking 6'4"... I'm talking 6'6" and above... there is a reason they aren't professional golfers.

Posted

Natural athletes make AVERAGE golfers.     I'm a perfect example ... stick and ball sports came easy to me.     Golf came way easier for me than anyone else I know (just wish I started earlier in life).     I'll never be a good golfer because of my obvious lack of putting ability.     I think the obvious answer is ball striking  comes easier for natural athletes --- HOWEVER --- the real question is this ...

is putting easier for natural athletes ??

I think being a natural athlete has far less to do with putting - seems to me as for putting - you either have it or you don't - you can't learn it like you can a golf swing.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Of course.  Athletics are used to practice.  I.e, they have training know how & discipline on their side.    That is a huge factor in my mind.

Michael Jordan comes to my mind.   He may be good at physical sports like basketball, but when it comes to baseball or golf, he couldn't hack it.

Yeh this will happen with some people, but in general, a person who is athletic, and plays sports, is more likely to improve at golf, as opposed to your average person, given the same practice time and techniques etc. IMO


Posted

Yeh this will happen with some people, but in general, a person who is athletic, and plays sports, is more likely to improve at golf, as opposed to your average person, given the same practice time and techniques etc. IMO

Yup, I was agreeing with you on that.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4608 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I mean, if you like GZ, and would drink it more often during a round than water, then keep drinking that. If you walk 18 holes, on a hot summer day, and drink 2 20-oz waters or 4 20-oz GZ. You will benefit more from the 4 20-oz GZ because it's like 99.99% water, lol. Yea, if flavored water makes you drink more water, then that works better.  I would just monitor the salt intake relative to your own health. I am sure some people might have to be careful. GZ is 280 mg salt. So, 4 of those is over 1000 mg. It is over 4 hours. That is like half the daily recommended intake of salt. You are probably losing some of your salt reserves playing golf. Long winded way of saying, it depends on the person.   
    • My first few years playing golf, I'd take a 32 oz Gatorade (probably pre-zero;  almost certainly Gatorade Tiger when that was a thing) with me in my bag, but I'd otherwise take water (in about the volumes I take now).  From your post, it seems like going back to something like that might be a better idea for me -- primarily water (maybe with some fruit or mint leaves thrown in for flavor) and one bottle of sports drink, rather than a diluted sports drink across all I'm drinking?
    • Yesterday evening, I watched The Gentlemen, a Guy Ritchie film from 2019 that I evidently missed on first pass.  It's a par, but it's a par on one of those long par-4s where the par feels like a birdie. It's in a similar vein to some other movies like Lock Stock, Snatch, or Layer Cake (which was Vaughn, not Ritchie).  If you liked those, I think you'll like this.   A friend suggested it a few months ago, and I started it one night and couldn't finish because I was having trouble following.  In retrospect, that was an artifact of trying to watch the movie too late in the day.  I started the movie at the beginning earlier yesterday and got to enjoy the full thing very much, but unlike some other movies, I encourage anyone to watch this when they're awake enough to catch which characters are which.  In my case, watching with subtitles helped me understand what some characters were saying. 
    • Sweat contains about 800 to 1500 mg per liter. For me, about 45 minutes of moderately intense workout had me lose about 3-lbs of water weight. That is about 1-liter. Now, a thing you need consider how much salt you are getting from food. Humans have been perfectly fine eating food with extra salt added. Typically, people would get 500 to 1000 mg of salt just from eating whole foods. Most people eat processed foods, which have more salt. So, we probably are not salt deprived. We are constantly digesting food we eat and taking in that salt. Unless you are fasting, and working out, you probably are slowly getting salt back into your body.  I will say electrolyte powder is probably beneficial for people for intense training or long endurance activities in the perspective of improving fluid retention (helps in recovery) and preventing cramping. I would say, just drinking water is way more important in general. For something like running marathons, absolutely beneficial. For golf, this is a marginal benefit.  In terms of ideal electrolyte ratios, you want to be in the 2:1 to 4:1 sodium to potassium ratio. Though, I have also seen ratios closer to 20:1. This mechanism is vital for nerve impulses, cell volume control, and kidney functions. Potassium is essential for muscle contractions. Magnesium is good for muscles function as well.  Ultima Replenisher: 55mg salt, 250mg potassium, 100mg magnesium.  *Probably good for people who don't eat a lot of whole foods, or foods with a lot salt. Probably one in the same, lol.  LiquidIV: 500mg salt, 370mg potassium, no magnesium.  LMNT: 1000mg salt, 200mg potassium, 60mg magnesium. Skratch: 400mg salt, 50mg potassium, 50mg magnesium.  Transparent Labs: 500mg salt, 250mg potassium, 50mg magnesium. If I had to choose one, I would probably go with Skratch. My diet isn't 100% whole foods, so I get plenty of salt.  Note, if you have kidney issues, I would be wary of adding excessive salt. Salt can be very hard on the kidneys, and you might be negating the benefits of drinking that water. 
    • I ran the nutrients for Ultima Replenisher  by my friend who is nutritionist. She said it was a decent breakdown. So I bought the berry and lemonade packs at Target. Will give a try on the course today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.