Jump to content
IGNORED

The Films and Movies Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

Saw the old classic Sci-Fi Them the other night.  James Whitmore, Edmund Gwenn, James Arness and the first screen appearance of Leonard Nimoy.  Great movie.  OK, the ant special effects were very 1950s, but the actors and story were excellent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The Grandmaster Saw this earlier in the year, but it's available on iTunes now and will watch it again tonight. This movie defies categorization. It looks like an action movie, but it's more an

Glengarry Glen Ross trailer done in the style of Wolf of Wall Street

Posted Images

Saw Prisoners during the weekend and would give it an eagle on an easy par 5.  Intense thriller, great performances by Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal with a little twist at the end.  Has some Breaking Bad-esque qualities where you might be asking yourself how far  you would go if you were put in this position.  Not the movie to go see if you want a light hearted date night

Like this movie a lot. I could feel the emotion off the screen. The detective work in the movie felt real. The ending was awesome.

Due to a few things that i can fault it, and wont say because I don't want to spoil the movie. I give it a missed 20 footer for eagle, and a tap in birdie.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I finally saw World War Z off iTunes the other day, and it was horrible. Zombies are pretty "played out" at this point, and the genre didn't get any help when they released this load of steamy poo. The movie was nothing like the book... aside from the fact that zombies were present. I've said many times that WWZ could only work as a television series given the short storied nature of the novel, but of course, it was turned into a vehicle for Brad Pitt instead. Yikes.

I knew the movie would be bad as soon as I learned who Pitt's character was and that it would be featured heavily... in the first few pages of the novel, his character insists that "his own backstory would not cloud the more important story of what happened to the world at large," or something to that effect. Instead, the movie violated this rule right from the beginning, only concerning itself with Pitt's character and his family. From the beginning, those who read the novel are pretty much told to go eat a dick.

Some of what made the novel so good is that the United States knew the zombies were coming -- the virus originates in China -- and yet cannot do anything to stop it despite months of preparation. In the movie, Americans are all surprised when zombies start popping up -- a classic (and now bad) zombie cliche -- and now even more of the originality of the novel has been stripped away and shat on.

The epidemic supposedly begins with one person whose origins are unknown in the novel. The world has its chances to nip it in the bud, but fails over and over again to take the proper action. Even when it reaches a larger scale and nations get involved in putting their heads together to stop it, the bureaucracies cannot agree on how to proceed, and the epidemic just continues to get worse. There were so many brilliant jabs at our own society in the book that the film just decided to flush down the toilet.

I feel like Hollywood just told me I'm too stupid to understand a zombie film with legitimate political implications to it. Thanks.

They ruined a story with promise.

WWZ gets a big fat double, and I'd give it a snowman if that was part of the rules of the thread.

It's movies like this that make me happy we at least live in the golden age of cable television. I never have to go to the movies anymore!

Your review is dead on, unfortunately this is the case with most movies that are adapted from books.  WWZ was an excellent read, highly recommend it even if you saw the lousy movie.  The movie would have been much better presented as a fictional documentary, though it would have probably required 2.5 - 3 hours to get the full effect which is why I agree, it's better suited for a television series.  Pitt added nothing to the movie other than to give women an excuse to go see a zombie movie with their spouse or bf.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Administrator

My wife and I watched We're the Millers last night.  Very funny.

I knew the ball scene was coming (you could tell it was that kind of movie) so I looked away, thankfully.

Also, if by "funny" you mean… this, then yes, it was "funny."

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Watched Simon Pegg's The World's End last night.  That was good too.  I have had a massive head cold since Wednesday, so I have been watching a lot of TV.  I saw Hot Fuzz during the day, which is also excellent.  Great casting in both, and some of the same actors.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

The Adjustment Bureau was a lot better than I thought it would be. Seriously, it was pretty good, considering. And for $0.99 I bought the book (short story really) on which it was based, and enjoyed that too - even though it was nothing like the movie. :-D

I give it a birdie.

I'm tempted to watch all of the Fast and the Furious movies today for obvious reasons. But that's over ten hours. Maybe if Paul had starred in a trilogy…

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I really liked The Adjustment Bureau, it didn't get much attention. 5 foot birdie.

RIP F&F; star, but I'm meh about the movies. They're fun, but I wouldn't go out of the way to watch. If they happen to be on or I had free access and nothing else to watch, I'd watch, only seen the Rio one, which wasn't bad.

Recently watched Shaun of the Dead and Silver Linings Playbook. 25 foot birdies for both.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just finished watching The Empire Strikes Back with my 7 yr old, we watched Star Wars A New Hope last week. Needless to say, awesome. I give A New Hope a birdie and The Empire Strikes Back an eagle .

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just finished watching The Empire Strikes Back with my 7 yr old, we watched Star Wars A New Hope last week. Needless to say, awesome. I give A New Hope a birdie and The Empire Strikes Back an eagle .

I assume you've seen Return of the Jedi. Where does that fall on your scale? I've always been of the opinion that it's easily the worst of the first trilogy. It might be the second worst of all 6, ahead of only The Phantom Menace for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I assume you've seen Return of the Jedi. Where does that fall on your scale? I've always been of the opinion that it's easily the worst of the first trilogy. It might be the second worst of all 6, ahead of only The Phantom Menace for me.

I'd rate The Phantom Menace a quadruple bogey. I'd give Jar Jar Binks a quintuple bogey, spit spit spit. Return of the Jedi , a par. Bogey for Ewoks. E cha wa wa!

Someone invent a blocker for anything to do with the upcoming Star Wars movie.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I assume you've seen Return of the Jedi. Where does that fall on your scale? I've always been of the opinion that it's easily the worst of the first trilogy. It might be the second worst of all 6, ahead of only The Phantom Menace for me.

If I had to rank all the Star Wars Movies out of 10 it would be,

9/10 Empires Strikes Back

8/10 Revenge of the Sith

5/10 A New Hope

5/10 Return of the Jedi

3/10 Attack of the Clones

0/10 Phantom Menace

I personally like the darker two of the 6 movies. Phantom Menace was way to kiddish for me. Sitting around with kids yelling for Jar Jar was just horrible. A New Hope and Return of the Jedi are a close, so they tie for 3rd. Attack of the Clones was so so for me. Though seeing Yoda break out the crazy bad-ass Jedi moves at the end was awesome!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I assume you've seen Return of the Jedi. Where does that fall on your scale? I've always been of the opinion that it's easily the worst of the first trilogy. It might be the second worst of all 6, ahead of only The Phantom Menace for me.

I think Return of the Jedi could have been awesome, apparently it was originally titled Revenge of the Jedi and was supposed to be much darker but the smell of money led Lucas (may he rot in hell) to the Commercial Side. You see glimpses of what could have been in the opening seems when Luke chokes the pig-nosed dudes. Anyway, I'll watch it next week with the boy and give my opinion then. Definitely think that ESB was the best of the three. I won't even discuss the "other" three. Edit* I forgot how hot Carrie Fisher was back in the day. Yum yum.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I saw Hunger Games: Catching Fire the other day. Did not want to see it. I was fairly entertained through the whole thing. I give it a really lucky birdie. So close to being a par. You have to see the first one to understand that crap.

--------

Damn it, double post. Oh well I guess if I can't figure out how to delete this post I'll do another review. I wanted to watch a really mindless action flick the other night. I found Immortals on Netflix. The action scenes were bloody + brilliant, very 300-like. EVERYTHING else was pretty bad. Dialogue and acting was MEH. But it lived up to my mindless expectations. The unlimited arrow bow was completely badass and needed to be in the movie more. Overall it deserves a PAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to rank all the Star Wars Movies out of 10 it would be,  9/10 Empires Strikes Back 8/10 Revenge of the Sith 5/10 A New Hope 5/10 Return of the Jedi 3/10 Attack of the Clones 0/10 Phantom Menace I personally like the darker two of the 6 movies. Phantom Menace was way to kiddish for me. Sitting around with kids yelling for Jar Jar was just horrible. A New Hope and Return of the Jedi are a close, so they tie for 3rd. Attack of the Clones was so so for me. Though seeing Yoda break out the crazy bad-ass Jedi moves at the end was awesome!

People really hate Jar Jar, and I don't disagree, but he wasn't even in the top two worst things about The Phantom Menace for me. The Midi-chlorians thing was dumb and the looooooong-ass pod race was borderline intolerable. The lightsaber battle with Darth Maul was okay though. I would put Attack of the Clones a bit higher, but otherwise my rankings are pretty similar. ------------- Instead of talking more about Star Wars I should probably mention a movie I saw recently. I watched Sleepwalk With Me on Netflix a few days ago. It's a semi-autobiographical movie by comedian Mike Birbiglia. I thought it was pretty good. I give it a birdie.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Watched prisoners and I give it a hole in one. Not a fan of thrillers but boy did this movie have me on the edge of my seat. Were the millers was a surprising burdie
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator
People really hate Jar Jar, and I don't disagree, but he wasn't even in the top two worst things about The Phantom Menace for me. The Midi-chlorians thing was dumb and the looooooong-ass pod race was borderline intolerable. The lightsaber battle with Darth Maul was okay though. I would put Attack of the Clones a bit higher, but otherwise my rankings are pretty similar. ------------- Instead of talking more about Star Wars I should probably mention a movie I saw recently. I watched Sleepwalk With Me on Netflix a few days ago. It's a semi-autobiographical movie by comedian Mike Birbiglia. I thought it was pretty good. I give it a birdie.

Have you seen The People vs George Lucas? Should be on Netflix.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Saw Catching Fire over the weekend. I thought it was pretty great, so I'd give it a birdie. It helps that I read the books back when they came out too though. Plus, who doesn't love a little Jennifer Lawrence :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasfeb21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Or just hit the club that can advance the ball as far as possible while not bringing the penalty strokes into play?
    • I will risk accuracy for distance if it’s still playable and I actually score better that way. If I hit it behind trees and lose balls frequently, maybe a shorter club off the tee is better, but going from a 6 iron to an 8 iron is a big difference. What I remember best from my best round to date was that I felt in control with the driver and could have at it without the fear if a push-slice. I hit fairways, rough and bunkers, but the advantage of being closer is big, even if I find a bunker or the rough. The courses also matters of course. Some people play regularly on courses with few trees and manageable rough. I’ve played on some really narrow courses where a bad shot often is a lost ball. You always have to evaluate the hole and where you are likely to land. On some holes the layout suggests an iron is better, or a wood. On other holes you can go for maximum distance with the driver. It’s easier to use numbers like that with the peofessionals than amateurs, so don’t get too caught up in decimals. Give it a try a few rounds and see what happens, but remember your shot cones and adjust club selections to the hole layouts.
    • In just the past week or so the pool noodles are out of the cups, and rakes are back out.  We've had food and beverage service on the deck all along, with limited indoor seating all along, and we still have limited seating indoors.  We're seeing a lot more two-person carts now as people are being vaccinated, but you can still ride as a single.  We're not planning any shotgun starts for tournaments yet, trying to avoid larger gatherings.  So we're progressing towards normal, not there yet. I think at the local Trump golf club, trolleys aren't allowed, caddies are highly encouraged.  Yet if you go to the home of golf, all the locals use trolleys.  Ah well, we all have our own opinions.
    • Don't worry the toes are in the sandals with the white socks...although sandals with black socks seem to be on the rise and more socially offensive especially in beach climes. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 14ledo81
      14ledo81
      (40 years old)
    2. AussieDan
      AussieDan
      (35 years old)
    3. boggssharp
      boggssharp
      (67 years old)
    4. davisrod29
      davisrod29
      (33 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...