Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2225 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 10/18/2019 at 5:21 PM, AlDena said:

Did I mention the walker also moved in slow motion? 

Whether they're walking or in carts, that's almost always the case when you watch slow groups.

They appear to have no urgency.

I am not perfect by any means, but normally when I put a club in my bag, I take out my next club.  When I get to the ball, I take two practice swings, then hit it . . . and move on.

Well, maybe I am perfect.  😁

I had two guests last year who were extremely slow in everything they did, then they'd hit the ball in the woods/water/whatever.  Fortunately, they were in a cart together, so, once I realized the situation, I just went ahead and played each hole at my pace, then waited at the green for them to hit on and putt out.

By the back, I think they got the idea.  If they think I'm a jerk and don't want to play again, oh well!

When I take guests, and they pay $25 instead of $130, I just hate when our group is the one stinking the place up.

Last month I got 12 on for $79 instead of the $130, then worried for four hours whether they would be the problem golfers.  It seems that some golfers go to the course planning on being -------s.

Incidentally, our GM/Pro has pointed out that when we are cart path only we never have slow groups.

Serious.

Edited by Cartboy

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Cartboy said:

 

Incidentally, our GM/Pro has pointed out that when we are cart path only we never have slow groups.

Serious.

Not unusual at all.

It pretty much forces everyone to a slower pace so the differences are much less apparent.  When nobody can manage their cart use well, everyone is equally slow.

 

Edited by David in FL

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, David in FL said:

Not unusual at all.

It pretty much forces everyone to a slower pace so the differences are much less apparent.  When nobody can manage their cart use well, everyone is equally slow.

 

Also, when the woods are on the other side of the fairway from the cart path, there's less looking for balls.  Plus, it's cart path only because the fairways are sloppy, so there's not a lot of extra walking around.

Go to the ball, hit it, go to your cart.  repeat

Plus, when it's cart path only, the less-abled physically don't play.


Posted

Another thing I do when I'm driving the cart, and when our balls are relatively close, is I'll "split the difference", park the cart halfway in between, and we both walk to our ball.

Sometimes I will stop at the other guy's ball, and walk to mine while he's hitting.  Then he drives to me, and I'll be ready to move on.

I see a whole lot of a guy sitting in cart while the other one hits, then switching and doing it again, when they could be on the way to the next shot.


Posted

IDK: I have seen several threads on the Pace of Play subject and have concluded it is a complex problem.  Having said that I do know of courses that insist on a pace of play that leads to a round of not more than 4 hours 30 minutes.  They do this by monitoring play and if you get behind you'll be ask to pick up and go the next hole and if you refuse you'll be ask to leave and they refund your green fees.  Now, I should add both of these courses are high end resort courses and are very difficult (front tee slopes are like 125 or so).  I would suspect their clients are mostly very good golfers and came to town to specifically play these sorts of courses and escape the snow for a week or so.  I am not sure this policy would work on a municipal course where in general the  green fees are significantly lower and so are the course slopes. 

Butch


Posted
On 11/2/2019 at 6:35 PM, Cartboy said:

Another thing I do when I'm driving the cart, and when our balls are relatively close, is I'll "split the difference", park the cart halfway in between, and we both walk to our ball.

Sometimes I will stop at the other guy's ball, and walk to mine while he's hitting.  Then he drives to me, and I'll be ready to move on.

I see a whole lot of a guy sitting in cart while the other one hits, then switching and doing it again, when they could be on the way to the next shot.

I remember the "play ready golf" initiative a few years ago. I wish they would bring that back. How about the "while we're young"? I play fast and so do the people I play with. We generally can walk 18 holes in three hours if no one is holding us up. Now I know that is not the "norm" but I don't think 4 hours should be the norm either. I don't see course rangers telling groups to skip a hole or refund $. Too much competition for the revenue. I think that the lack of caddie programs has hurt the golf business. I learned all about the game by being a caddie and most of my buddies too. I can't believe that kids wouldn't want a summer job to make a couple bucks. 

My bag:

Taylor Made R7 (x-stiff).
Taylor Made Burner 2 irons (stiff)
Cleveland Wedges (gap and 60)
Odyssey two ball putter (white) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

some responses . . . 

Ours would be considered a high-end resort course, too, and challenging, 132 from the most common tee and 126 from the shortest tee.  Plus, we are in an older-aged resort area.

All that works against pace.

Telling people they have to leave is not on our agenda.  They would have to be drunk, abusive to the beverage cart girl, or something like that.

I do like the idea of spending time with the groups being affected by slow groups, and seeing if we can rebook them at a nice discount.  We carry a tee sheet tablet, and can show them tee times for any day, and book them so they are not behind golfers the next time.

What I would really like is that (after 10 years) we would have a policy that states what we do, or what we can do, so we know what to do.

On days when I open, golfers see me when they pull in because I either greet them at the bag drop or take a cart to them in the parking lot, welcome them, fill them in on our facility, etc.  Then I'm the Starter.  Then they see me on the course.  So, by then they know I'm doing all I can, so if I offer them some sort of replay, they know we're trying.

 

 


Posted
1 hour ago, Cartboy said:

some responses . . . 

Ours would be considered a high-end resort course, too, and challenging, 132 from the most common tee and 126 from the shortest tee.  Plus, we are in an older-aged resort area.

All that works against pace.

Telling people they have to leave is not on our agenda.  They would have to be drunk, abusive to the beverage cart girl, or something like that.

I do like the idea of spending time with the groups being affected by slow groups, and seeing if we can rebook them at a nice discount.  We carry a tee sheet tablet, and can show them tee times for any day, and book them so they are not behind golfers the next time.

What I would really like is that (after 10 years) we would have a policy that states what we do, or what we can do, so we know what to do.

On days when I open, golfers see me when they pull in because I either greet them at the bag drop or take a cart to them in the parking lot, welcome them, fill them in on our facility, etc.  Then I'm the Starter.  Then they see me on the course.  So, by then they know I'm doing all I can, so if I offer them some sort of replay, they know we're trying.

 

 

Cartboy... I've been reading your posts over the last couple of months.  You seem like you really know what you're doing.  And that you like your job. You have claimed ownership of your position.  Great attitude.  You will always do well.

  • Like 1

Posted

Posted by @bkuehn1952 on another thread, this is a perfect example of a course contributing to the POP issue, even if inadvertently.

To be clear, I don’t know this course and there may be no real pace of play issues at all, but it makes for an outstanding example...

The scorecard clearly states that pace of play is important and faster players should be allowed though.  It even lists target POP by individual hole, and cumulatively though the round.  Kudos to them...

...But, the targeted POP is 4:30!  Really?  That’s the target?!  Hole 10, a 400 yard par-4 from the tips has a target of 19 freaking minutes to play it.  Followed by 18 minutes to play a short par-5.  37 freaking minutes to play 2 stinking holes of golf, and again, that’s the target, set by the course.  :doh:   Kill me now.

Come on guys.  If a course won’t step up and set appropriate expectations, and then actively manage to them, the problem will never be solved.

 

85DFEF1C-A9CC-473E-B5EA-D00EE6E9DDA6.jpeg

  • Like 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
50 minutes ago, David in FL said:

The scorecard clearly states that pace of play is important and faster players should be allowed though.  It even lists target POP by individual hole, and cumulatively though the round.  Kudos to them...

...But, the targeted POP is 4:30!  Really?  That’s the target?!  Hole 10, a 400 yard par-4 from the tips has a target of 19 freaking minutes to play it.  Followed by 18 minutes to play a short par-5.  37 freaking minutes to play 2 stinking holes of golf, and again, that’s the target, set by the course.  :doh:   Kill me now.

I'm with you, I like the idea of "time par", and of listing cumulative elapsed time at each tee.  I also like the idea of making the time par pretty aggressive.  Too many people look at the time par as a suggested average, and feel like its OK if they're not too far behind it.

As many here know, I play a fair amount at Talamore, near Pinehurst.  On our last visit, Talamore had installed small GPS units in carts.  Within the GPS display was a line showing your group's position in relation to time par.  If you were more than just a couple of minutes behind, that line would have a bright red background, pretty much impossible to ignore.  All that is fine, but the best part of the system was that the time par was set to about 4:05 for 18 holes, which is really aggressive for a resort setting.  But in talking to the head pro, I learned that playing times had decreased by around 15 or 20  minutes since the GPS units were installed, and he attributed the bulk of the improvement to the aggressive time par, and the unavoidable notice if your group got behind.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
58 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Posted by @bkuehn1952 on another thread, this is a perfect example of a course contributing to the POP issue, even if inadvertently.

To be clear, I don’t know this course and there may be no real pace of play issues at all, but it makes for an outstanding example...

The scorecard clearly states that pace of play is important and faster players should be allowed though.  It even lists target POP by individual hole, and cumulatively though the round.  Kudos to them...

...But, the targeted POP is 4:30!  Really?  That’s the target?!  Hole 10, a 400 yard par-4 from the tips has a target of 19 freaking minutes to play it.  Followed by 18 minutes to play a short par-5.  37 freaking minutes to play 2 stinking holes of golf, and again, that’s the target, set by the course.  :doh:   Kill me now.

Come on guys.  If a course won’t step up and set appropriate expectations, and then actively manage to them, the problem will never be solved.

 

85DFEF1C-A9CC-473E-B5EA-D00EE6E9DDA6.jpeg

Look closer..  The time for the front is recommended at 2:07, the back nine is 2:16.  

I'm looking at the score cards from my rounds the last two years and it's amazing how irrelevant pace of play is to most courses.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
On 11/4/2019 at 9:55 AM, Bucki1968 said:

I remember the "play ready golf" initiative a few years ago. I wish they would bring that back. How about the "while we're young"?

They have added "ready golf" to the RULES, after all. I think those ideas are still hanging around. The thing is… people who play "ready golf" can still be freaking slow.

4 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

Look closer..  The time for the front is recommended at 2:07, the back nine is 2:16.

And seven minutes to hit the head and grab a beer at the turn is 4:30.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, iacas said:

They have added "ready golf" to the RULES, after all. I think those ideas are still hanging around. The thing is… people who play "ready golf" can still be freaking slow.

And seven minutes to hit the head and grab a beer at the turn is 4:30.

I was aware.   I just looked at the 64 score cards I have from the last two years and most courses don't help themselves regarding pace of play.   There is only 1 course I've played in the last two years, both public and private that actually monitors pace of play.    Of the 64, only 20 mention a time to complete the round.   13 courses had no mention of pace of play.   The fastest suggested time was 2:06 for 9 holes with 4:45 the slowest for 18. 

Individually I play 18 around 2:15, our foursome plays in about 3:30 (we have one slower player)

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
45 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

I was aware.   I just looked at the 64 score cards I have from the last two years and most courses don't help themselves regarding pace of play.   There is only 1 course I've played in the last two years, both public and private that actually monitors pace of play.    Of the 64, only 20 mention a time to complete the round.   13 courses had no mention of pace of play.   The fastest suggested time was 2:06 for 9 holes with 4:45 the slowest for 18. 

Individually I play 18 around 2:15, our foursome plays in about 3:30 (we have one slower player)

I agree with all of that fully.

Most courses could probably improve the pace of play quite a bit if they had an aggressive policy and a marshal who could push people along the right way.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, David in FL said:

Posted by @bkuehn1952 on another thread, this is a perfect example of a course contributing to the POP issue, even if inadvertently.

To be clear, I don’t know this course and there may be no real pace of play issues at all, but it makes for an outstanding example...

The scorecard clearly states that pace of play is important and faster players should be allowed though.  It even lists target POP by individual hole, and cumulatively though the round.  Kudos to them...

...But, the targeted POP is 4:30!  Really?  That’s the target?!  Hole 10, a 400 yard par-4 from the tips has a target of 19 freaking minutes to play it.  Followed by 18 minutes to play a short par-5.  37 freaking minutes to play 2 stinking holes of golf, and again, that’s the target, set by the course.  :doh:   Kill me now.

Come on guys.  If a course won’t step up and set appropriate expectations, and then actively manage to them, the problem will never be solved.

 

85DFEF1C-A9CC-473E-B5EA-D00EE6E9DDA6.jpeg

This is a really good point. As a single walker and bogey golfer, I can get around 18 holes in about 3:10, and probably less than three if I don’t have to wait on anybody. IMO, a good-paced riding foursome should take no more than 4 hours to play 18 holes.

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Most courses could probably improve the pace of play quite a bit if they had an aggressive policy and a marshal who could push people along the right way.

My experience at courses that do this is that pace of play is never an issue. Usually a respectful reminder from a marshal is all it takes for a slow group to pick up the pace. Seems like only nicer courses are committed to this though, but that's just my experience.

I'm a pretty fast player. When I'm playing solo with no one in front of me, I can easily finish in 2.5 hours or less, even when I'm playing really poorly. In my opinion, many golfers are either not self aware enough to realize how slow they are, or not educated on playing ready golf.

My rounds average about 4-4.5 hours on my home course. This is teeing off between 630-7am so I'm usually in one of the first groups out. This course does close to nothing to encourage / enforce a reasonable pace of play, and unsurprisingly the majority of the reviews are poor due to excessively long rounds.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Slow pace of play isn't going to be fixed anytime soon....why?

There are too many clueless clown golfers who don't care to play golf in under 4 hours or any consideration of other golfers playing.....I've experienced it too often....nuff said.


Posted
12 minutes ago, Mr22putt said:

Slow pace of play isn't going to be fixed anytime soon....why?

There are too many clueless clown golfers who don't care to play golf in under 4 hours or any consideration of other golfers playing.....I've experienced it too often....nuff said.

I wonder if there's a correlation between slow, dawdling drivers and slow golfers???  I get behind them all the time on the road and they rarely let me play through...

  • Upvote 1

Note: This thread is 2225 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.