• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
inthehole

Nike Equipment holding Tiger back from winning majors?

0  

  1. 1. Is Nike equipment holding Tiger back from winning majors?

    • Yes
      2
    • No
      32

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

55 posts in this topic

Just thinking out loud - do you think the current Nike driver/fairways in even the most competant hands are capable of beating the guys who play equipment that most look at as superior  ?      Not Nike bashing - in fact I now have a VR-s 2h & 3w that I like and am phasing into my bag ... just seems that using Nike equipment (driver/woods mostly) seems to be a disadvantage right out of the gate that even the best might not be able to overcome ... maybe even the Nike ball could be holding them back compared to more established tour balls ??

Am I onto something or way off base at the tour level even considering this arguement ?    Just seems to me it is a possibility that Tiger's equipment may hold him back from winning majors ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Nothing would benefit Nike Golf more than Tiger Woods winning a major (besides Tiger winning 5 more majors). For that reason, I have to believe that he and Nike are doing everything they can to put exactly what Tiger wants in his bag. (My other reason is just what changes do we expect Nike to make? Are Titleist's or Mizuno's or TaylorMade's irons really going to make a differences in Tiger's game? Is a 913D2 really going to make Tiger hit it straighter? Doubt it.) EDIT: Last point. Tiger won 5 times this year. Are his Nike clubs self-aware enough to tell when he's playing in a major and when it's just a Tour event?
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think a good amount of tour input into making Nike clubs come from Tiger, especially the irons. Nike will make Tiger a custom wood or driver to his liking, such as the smaller headed Dymo in 2009. For the Covert woods, he's got Nike to make him a glued version rather than the adjustable neck and it probably won't end there.

Equipment is not Tiger's issue. The stronger field and his diminished mental toughness would contribute to the majors drought.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So who voted yes?

Because Tiger gets to put whatever he wants in his bag, so his equipment ain't what's preventing him from winning lately.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Equipment is not Tiger's issue. The stronger field and his diminished mental toughness would contribute to the majors drought.

That's it... it's the pressure of performing and being consistently in the spot light for any and every move, word, look he does...

The expectation of greatness at all time that he created in the past decades is what he's battling against...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

with that said I do believe that Nike equipment is not as good as others... see Rory, Watney, Casey, Dyson...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Tiger played PING equipment and won 14 Majors thus far? Nike Equipment was good enough to win 5 times on tour last seaon. Are we saying the equipment gets nervous during Majors? I dont know how may times I've read on this forum it's the Indian not the arrow. I have to believe that tour guys talk, and they know more about the equipment than we do. If Nike equipment was in anyway inferior they would not have been able to sign Rory or anyone else for that matter. Bubba could win with Wilson Clubs just like Tiget could win with Cobra etc. But dont take my word Im a Nike Guy with a 23 handicap. LOL
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted no, obviously this is a "fun" thread to throw out there during a lull in the golf season but the reality is if Tiger saw something or hit something better, he'd give it to Nike engineers who would create an exact Nike replica for him to hit just like they did with his putter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 PGAs this year with any eqpt is not the eqpt that does it it's user. He'll get it in 14. His woman situation is under control. His mind is clear now
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted no, obviously this is a "fun" thread to throw out there during a lull in the golf season but the reality is if Tiger saw something or hit something better, he'd give it to Nike engineers who would create an exact Nike replica for him to hit just like they did with his putter.

Or spray paint it the way Phil and Calloway did with the TM SLDR driver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

with that said I do believe that Nike equipment is not as good as others... see Rory, Watney, Casey, Dyson...

You've yet to prove anything here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted no, I feel that the field is so strong now and he is not as young as he was. Plus he must have so much pressure to win and don't forget his injury's to take into consideration.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, it's not holding him back. Tiger has input on clubs and can play whatever he wants.

Rory had other distractions last year, and given time, he has adjusted his Nike equipment and golf ball.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Who really thinks that Nike equipment is inferior to TM, Titleist, Callaway et al?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who really thinks that Nike equipment is inferior to TM, Titleist, Callaway et al?

Not me. Different? Yes. Inferior? Not if your comparing the same level of models.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not me. Different? Yes. Inferior? Not if your comparing the same level of models.

Exactly. If they were inferior, trust me you'd be able to tell...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Ready golf except in match play. Match play is different. 
    • Yep! I have both a FJ jacket and pants in rainwear that I bought years ago. I don't use them very often so they've lasted a long time. But, they're heavy and hot! They were made before GoreTex and other waterproof, breathable fabrics. My advice? Get the absolute best you can afford! They will last you a long time, they will keep you comfortable, they will be light, and they won't impede your swing very much.
    • Thanks for all the responses. I think this boils down to the context of the situation. I had two of the foursome busting chops about hitting out of order on previous holes. Then the first time it was mildly inconvenient for them to wait, the holed out just as i hit the green. Mind you.  This wasnt an "adventure" hole.. I hit the green on stroke 5 because of a flub shot that went about 10 ft. And an errant approach that left me about 10 yards short of the green. In any other case I agree that its perfectly fine to hit when ready, but not if you complain about hitting out of order. I guess to paint the picture, one whipped a club on the 3rd hole due to sculling a shout out of the bunker.. on another hole had one of them walking towards green right in front of my approach.. he nicely moved about 3 yards to the right as i asked him to move. As karma would have it, i hit the shot straight at him and nearly hit him.. these were friends of mine.. so a lesson learned to play golf with different friends..
    • Picked one up and checked it out in a store the other day. First thing I noticed about it was how heavy it was. Reminded me of when I went out for the HS golf team, and the coach had a Driver with a solid steel head on it. He advised us that we were NOT to hit drives with it! It was for warm up only. Being as heavy as it is, I think the main benefit to it might be that it slows your transition from backswing to downswing. There's a whole lot of guys who could use that!
    • OK, this kind of clears things up for me. I thought you might have been trying to take close ups of clubheads impacting golf balls. In that case you'd need something numbering in the several thousands of fps! If all you need is to look at swings I'd say anything the budget allows should suffice. Consider the 960fps system mentioned. If a golf swing takes about I second, at a playback rate of 30fps, that gives you a swing video of 32 seconds in length. Plenty long enough to see the golfer's bodily motions. Considering how small the clubhead will appear when videoing the entire golfer, I don't know that fps is the main consideration. It could be pixel count and the quality of the lenses. This reminds me of my "audiophile" days when cassette tapes were all the rage. I had a BIC deck that could record at 7 1/2 ips (inches per second), and an Audiovox car player that could play back at that speed. The sound quality was amazing! You were putting the same amount of info into twice as much space! There was so much more room!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Just trying
      Just trying
      (33 years old)
    2. Peter_b
      Peter_b
      (45 years old)
    3. SACgolf
      SACgolf
      (51 years old)
    4. Weluvgolf
      Weluvgolf
      (53 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon