Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are the pros and cons of using wood and/or hybrid for pitch and run instead of using wedge or short iron?

I think I saw Justin Rose used his driver for pitch and run at the US Open (CMIIW).

Anyone have more success in using wood/hybrid for pitch shot? Does that make sense?

TaylorMade RBZ 9° | TaylorMade Burner SF 2.0 16.5° | Mizuno MP-33 3-PW | Titleist Vokey SM4 56°11 | Cleveland Classic #4


Posted
What are the pros and cons of using wood and/or hybrid for pitch and run instead of using wedge or short iron?

I think I saw Justin Rose used his driver for pitch and run at the US Open (CMIIW).

Anyone have more success in using wood/hybrid for pitch shot? Does that make sense?

The reasons I don't use a hybrid or wood for running shots:

1. the face is much hotter, so distance control is an issue for me

2. the longer shaft makes it more difficult to control distance as well

3. really easy to catch it heavy or thin with such a small stroke

I've yet to come across a scenario where using the hybrid or wood was a better option (for me) than a putter, wedge, or short iron.

  • Upvote 3

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The reasons I don't use a hybrid or wood for running shots:

1. the face is much hotter, so distance control is an issue for me

2. the longer shaft makes it more difficult to control distance as well

3. really easy to catch it heavy or thin with such a small stroke

I've yet to come across a scenario where using the hybrid or wood was a better option (for me) than a putter, wedge, or short iron.

Agree......primarily with #'s 1 and 2 above.  The hot face especially is a big issue, and without a LOT of practice, can screw up your feel for normal chips too.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Also agree. The lowest lofted club I like to chip and run is my 4i if at all possible. At a push I might go with my 3h but generally I try to avoid that if at all possible for the reasons stated.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

Never have like woods/driver for pitch and run for the hotness of the face reasons stated above.  I don't like to use my hybrid for the same reason, though admittedly it's not as hot as my 3w or driver.

But then again, I've never been a huge fan of the pitch and run with a lower lofted club shot generally.  For me it feels like adding an extra variable (controlling run out) with a smaller zone of quality of contact and swing speed at impact that leaves me on the green.  If I hit a stock medium trajectory pitch with my 54˚ or 60˚, there's a relatively very large zone of contact quality and impact swing speed that at least leaves me on the green.  Even if I'm aiming for hop and stop and don't get the cleanest contact and don't get as much spin as I was hoping, I'll just be 15-20 feet past the hole rather than maybe off the green!  Plus I don't then have to worry about weird hops before the green or calculating exactly how much break I'll get while the ball is still hopping, but not yet totally rolling.

With an 8i or 6i I don't feel like I have the safety zone of things working out alright if I connect a little too well or connect with 10% too much swing speed.  I'd much rather have a great shot give me a tap in, a decent shot give me a 10-20 footer for par, and a bad but not terrible shot probably still leave me with a lag putt.  With a 6i playing a runner, I feel like a great shot gives me a tap in, a decent shot gives me a 10-40 footer, and a bad but not terrible shot leaves me almost surely off the green, where lots of the time I'm then realistically looking at double bogey, and at best hoping to get up and down for bogey.

  • Upvote 1

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Depends on the lie but I do it somewhat often. Chipped in for birdie with a hybrid about a dozen times in 2013. I use my putting grip and stroke. But I stopped carrying hybrids about a month ago so I'm done for now.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I never use either a hybrid or a wood for shots around the green but my wife does it pretty much all of the time. I know what you are thinking when I say "my wife" but she's actually very good at it. I always joke that she's the best in the world at it and there's not as much hyperbole there as you would think.

She had a short sided 5 yard shot the last time we played that had to go over a steep rise of dormant rough to a fast green sloping away with about 10 feet of green to work with. Of course she had her 3 hybrid to attempt the shot. :roll: Nobody in their right mind would use that club on that shot. :whistle:

I whispered to my son "watch this, totally impossible". Not to my surprise she ran it over the rise, trickled right down to the hole, and more to my surprise, fell in.

I guess if you are good at it you are good at it and she does that sort of thing all the time. :surrender:


Posted

I tried using a 3 wood once from the fringe............never again, just not enough control for me, so I stick with my irons.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As an alternative to doing this, I've found two other techniques that work better for me than the three wood chip if your ball is resting on the collar of the rough.

1) Purposefully thin a wedge to top the ball by sort of letting the bounce skim on top of the tall grass (Luke Donald explains it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xafCiw4o4c )

2) Something that my teammates introduced me to was the idea of putting with the toe of your putter. If you have a blade style putter with a flat toe, you can turn it sideways and hit a normal putt. The putter doesn't catch in the grass because the "face" is so narrow with more mass directly placed behind it and it can be consistent with a little bit of practice.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2) Something that my teammates introduced me to was the idea of putting with the toe of your putter. If you have a blade style putter with a flat toe, you can turn it sideways and hit a normal putt. The putter doesn't catch in the grass because the "face" is so narrow with more mass directly placed behind it and it can be consistent with a little bit of practice.

Yeah, on the (rare) occasion where the ball is on the fringe but directly up against rough, this is a sneaky little shot. But it's only worth the risk (if you're not careful it will dart at pretty sharp angles from your target, and it's hard to control speed) in that one unique situation. I think I've only used it during a round, maybe, twice ever. Regarding the hybrid idea, I second (actually I think I'm like 5th or 6th to agree at this point) geauxforbroke about it being too risky with a hot faced club. Way too much variation between a good shot and a mishit. With a wedge or short iron the difference is all in the swing length.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I really really love this shot, but I will always use my 5 iron and toe it in. It's a really fun shot, the best is putting a little hook on it.. really cool. Takes practice though, but can help you out of multiple jams


  • Moderator
Posted

What are the pros and cons of using wood and/or hybrid for pitch and run instead of using wedge or short iron?

I think I saw Justin Rose used his driver for pitch and run at the US Open (CMIIW).

Anyone have more success in using wood/hybrid for pitch shot? Does that make sense?

It can work but I think a short iron is easier.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use my three wood for long pitch runs on occasion; usually when I have a lot of green to cover and its uphill. Otherwise I use my 60 degree for basically everything,

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use my three wood for long pitch runs on occasion; usually when I have a lot of green to cover and its uphill. Otherwise I use my 60 degree for basically everything,

3-woods are so big and lethargic to do a pitch and run.. but so many people use them. I've used my hybrid for a cut-draw around a tree, but it still got off the ground about 10 feet. It just seems like a 5 iron, or lower irons, will pinch the ball and keep it low.


Posted

3-woods are so big and lethargic to do a pitch and run.. but so many people use them. I've used my hybrid for a cut-draw around a tree, but it still got off the ground about 10 feet. It just seems like a 5 iron, or lower irons, will pinch the ball and keep it low.

How do you hit a "cut-draw"?

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How do you hit a "cut-draw"?

You have to first tilt the spin axis to the right and then tip it back to the left.

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(4W & 7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You have to first tilt the spin axis to the right and then tip it back to the left.

While the ball is still actually in contact with the clubface, right?

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.