Jump to content
IGNORED

Free relief from cooling fans around greens?


Note: This thread is 3698 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

If this has been covered somewhere my apologies, but I can't find it.

I was in a tournament a couple of years ago and they had greens cooling fans around most of the greens. The rules sheet they provided said there was no free relief from being obstructed by one of the fans.

Never came into play for my group but back at the clubhouse there was a pretty big argument about it. Evidently somebody had violated that rule (because they didn't read the rules sheet). A few golfers were adamant that there should be free relief and the head pro at the course was just as adamant that there shouldn't be free relief.

What is standard procedure for relief from those fans?

None of the courses I play regularly have them so I don't know.


Assuming the fans are not movable they are Immovable Obstructions and normal free relief is available for lie of ball, stance and intended area of swing. There is no free relief for line of play unless there is a local rule declaring them to be Temporary Immovable Obstructions.

Prohibiting normal free relief is not permitted.


Assuming the fans are not movable they are Immovable Obstructions and normal free relief is available for lie of ball, stance and intended area of swing. There is no free relief for line of play unless there is a local rule declaring them to be Temporary Immovable Obstructions.

Prohibiting normal free relief is not permitted.

It seems like a weird situation.  I wonder why the pro in question was so adamant, since his position seem pretty unreasonable as described.  Even the line of play relief should have been available via local rule, since it seems pretty apparent that the fans were temporary - at least I cannot ever remember playing a course that had permanent fans in place.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Assuming the fans are not movable they are Immovable Obstructions and normal free relief is available for lie of ball, stance and intended area of swing. There is no free relief for line of play unless there is a local rule declaring them to be Temporary Immovable Obstructions.

Prohibiting normal free relief is not permitted.

Thanks. Sounds like the pro is probably right if they are not movable. (?)

It seems like a weird situation.  I wonder why the pro in question was so adamant, since his position seem pretty unreasonable as described.  Even the line of play relief should have been available via local rule, since it seems pretty apparent that the fans were temporary - at least I cannot ever remember playing a course that had permanent fans in place.


I guess it comes down to what is "movable" on line of play. Even though the fans of course could be moved it would take some equipment to do it, they seem "permanently" mounted, and they usually leave them in place from what I remember.

As they were arguing in the clubhouse the pro called somebody to verify his position, and get it right. I have no idea who he called but evidently they agreed with him. BTW he seemed like a really conscientious guy that was trying his best to make the right decision.

Hmmm. So I'm still not 100% certain after two replies from guys that really know the rules. I'll make sure to ask how they want to do it when I go to one of those courses and play by whatever they want to play by.

P.S. I suppose it was the golfer's fault for not reading the rules sheet but most of the golfers there said they would have done the same thing if they hadn't read it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MS256 View Post

Thanks. Sounds like the pro is probably right if they are not movable. (?)


I guess it comes down to what is "movable" on line of play. Even though the fans of course could be moved it would take some equipment to do it, they seem "permanently" mounted, and they usually leave them in place from what I remember.

As they were arguing in the clubhouse the pro called somebody to verify his position, and get it right. I have no idea who he called but evidently they agreed with him. BTW he seemed like a really conscientious guy that was trying his best to make the right decision.

Hmmm. So I'm still not 100% certain after two replies from guys that really know the rules. I'll make sure to ask how they want to do it when I go to one of those courses and play by whatever they want to play by.

P.S. I suppose it was the golfer's fault for not reading the rules sheet but most of the golfers there said they would have done the same thing if they hadn't read it.

I'm curious, did the rule sheet say no relief at all or just no relief from line of play?  They are 2 very different things.  If the former then the pro was wrong since they cannot change Rules of Golf.  If the latter, then assuming no local rule was adopted,  he was correct, but IMO it was a bad decision since the fans easily fit the definition of Temporary Immovable Obstruction from the specimen sample local rule in Appendix I:

Quote:
A temporary immovable obstruction (TIO) is a non-permanent artificial object that is often erected in conjunction with a competition and is fixed or not readily movable.

Therefore they could have made a local rule.  Since apparently they did not then they cannot give line of play relief.  But they also cannot deny the forms of relief provided in the rules for Immovable Obstructions as Rulesman pointed out.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm curious, did the rule sheet say no relief at all or just no relief from line of play?  They are 2 very different things.  If the former then the pro was wrong since they cannot change Rules of Golf.  If the latter, then assuming no local rule was adopted,  he was correct, but IMO it was a bad decision since the fans easily fit the definition of Temporary Immovable Obstruction from the specimen sample local rule in Appendix I:

Therefore they could have made a local rule.  Since apparently they did not then they cannot give line of play relief.  But they also cannot deny the forms of relief provided in the rules for Immovable Obstructions as Rulesman pointed out.


I wasn't very clear about that in my first post but "line of play" was the issue.

Looking at the definition of "temporary immovable object" I'm not sure how I would classify those fans. They are not in conjunction with the tournament or really even in conjunction with everyday play. They are mounted there and when the weather is hot they are turned on. When not used they are still there.


I wasn't very clear about that in my first post but "line of play" was the issue.

Looking at the definition of "temporary immovable object" I'm not sure how I would classify those fans. They are not in conjunction with the tournament or really even in conjunction with everyday play. They are mounted there and when the weather is hot they are turned on. When not used they are still there.

It would seem that they are permanent Immovable Obstructions. Therefore normal free relief under rule 24 for lie of ball, stance and area of intended swing. Relief is not available for line of play.


While it's entirely within the committee's discretion to enforce that condition, I think that it's a poor choice on their part.  Since the local rule is available, and such obstructions are usually fairly close to the greens, it seems to be a bit more reasonable to give relief for line of play.

However, those players arguing the point because they didn't bother to read the hard card are totally out of line.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

While it's entirely within the committee's discretion to enforce that condition, I think that it's a poor choice on their part.  Since the local rule is available, and such obstructions are usually fairly close to the greens, it seems to be a bit more reasonable to give relief for line of play.

However, those players arguing the point because they didn't bother to read the hard card are totally out of line.

The hard card for Carolinas Golf Association events gives greenside cooling fans TIO status, thus imparting line of play relief also. (The reality that the fans are not very temporary causes some heartburn, but since there's no other available mechanism for dealing with them that seems equitable.)

"Age improves with wine."
 
Wishon 919THI 11*
Wishon 925HL 4w
Wishon 335HL 3h & 4h
Wishon 755pc 5i, 6i, 7i, 8i & 9i
Tad Moore 485 PW
Callaway X 54*
Ping G2 Anser C
Callaway SuperSoft
Titleist StaDry
Kangaroo Hillcrest AB

Along a similar line.  My course has large, bright lamps installed at the 18th green, for games finishing late in the day. Here in tropics night falls fast, no twilight.  But if my ball on green and i am putting directly into beam of light, can't see ball well, or cup, could i claim relief from temporary obstruction?  I mean the lamp went on 5 mins ago, and no one else is bothered as their ball not in beam of lamp. Cannot turn lamp off until game over.

I recall pro golfer in SoAfrica stuck a Band-Aid on his putter to prevent sun reflection off putter. His action upheld, i think.


The hard card for Carolinas Golf Association events gives greenside cooling fans TIO status, thus imparting line of play relief also. (The reality that the fans are not very temporary causes some heartburn, but since there's no other available mechanism for dealing with them that seems equitable.)

It is a whole different world with which I have no familiarity.  I've never played on a course that had a cooling fan, temporary OR permanent.  My prior response had mistakenly assumed they were there because of some very unusual situation.  I had no idea they were permanent.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is a whole different world with which I have no familiarity.  I've never played on a course that had a cooling fan, temporary OR permanent.  My prior response had mistakenly assumed they were there because of some very unusual situation.  I had no idea they were permanent.

A green which is surrounded by vegetation or in a depression often suffers from a lack of air movement.  Without the air movement, water on the grass can't evaporate, and it's that evaporation which keeps the grass cool.  So, fans must provide artificial air movement to prevent too much stress on the turf.  They're particularly prevalent with bent grass in southern climates.  You'll won't see as many (or often any) on courses that use warmer-season grasses such as Bermuda.


Along a similar line.  My course has large, bright lamps installed at the 18th green, for games finishing late in the day. Here in tropics night falls fast, no twilight.  But if my ball on green and i am putting directly into beam of light, can't see ball well, or cup, could i claim relief from temporary obstruction?  I mean the lamp went on 5 mins ago, and no one else is bothered as their ball not in beam of lamp. Cannot turn lamp off until game over.

I recall pro golfer in SoAfrica stuck a Band-Aid on his putter to prevent sun reflection off putter. His action upheld, i think.

Not  allowed.   See Decision 4-1/5  http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Decision-04/#d4-1-5


A green which is surrounded by vegetation or in a depression often suffers from a lack of air movement.  Without the air movement, water on the grass can't evaporate, and it's that evaporation which keeps the grass cool.  So, fans must provide artificial air movement to prevent too much stress on the turf.  They're particularly prevalent with bent grass in southern climates.  You'll won't see as many (or often any) on courses that use warmer-season grasses such as Bermuda.

I had no idea.  Thanks for the explanation.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I had no idea.  Thanks for the explanation.

Me neither!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...

I’ve played several courses in Ohio that have these. All of ones I’ve seen are permanent. They are huge and the post is buried in the ground (I assume in concrete).

Driver: Ping K15 10°, Mitsubishi Diamana Blueboard 63g Stiff
Fairway 4-wood: TaylorMade RocketBallz Tour TP 17.5°, Matrix Ozik TP7HD S shaft

Hybrids: Callaway Diablo Edge 3H-4H, Aldila DVS Stiff
Irons: MIURA PP-9003, Dynamic Gold Superlite S300, Sand Wedge: Scratch 8620 56°
Putter: Nike Method Concept Belly 44"
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B330-S


I’ve played several courses in Ohio that have these. All of ones I’ve seen are permanent. They are huge and the post is buried in the ground (I assume in concrete).

Thanks for posting that.  I didn't even know what they looked like.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They would be the same as a bench or a sand box or a ball washer or a distance stake.

Anyone who says you aren't entitled to relief is crazy.

The confusion may have been a "line of play" issue.

You would have to get relief if it interfered with your stance or swing, not if it was between you and your target.

Immovable Obstructions and Abnormal Ground Conditions (Rules 24-2 and 25-1)

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Note: This thread is 3698 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Kind of reminds me of my first driver - a TM R580 at a whopping 400cc.  Still have one in the stable - and like to hit it on occasion.  Makes me wonder if the Mini-drivers of today are a testing ground to drivers of tomorrow of the powers that be opt to roll back driver head size in conjunction to the ball roll back to limit the overall distance.  I’ve not done a lot of research on shot distances between the mini and regular drivers, but figured there is some.  Will be something to follow as the mini-driver unfolds. 
    • Day 167: did a decent amount of slow rehearsal swings, working on cleaning up some backswing stuff. 
    • I agree with you, at least in regards to myself and playing. I can't really speak much for others. I assume that some people who are playing golf very often can notice more drastic differences. That being said, I do notice some differences here and there and sound and feel definitely have some say in which ball I end up liking. But that seems more psychological than physical. I've only been playing golf regularly for a year now and I'll play almost any ball since I often lose balls. However, since I've been able to get out once a week for a while now, I am down to losing only about 2-3 balls from losing 10-14 per round. Which feels huge for me and so I've begun to narrow down the balls I choose to play with. I've gone through a box of Vice Pro Plus, Vice Pro, Sugar, Titleist DT Trufeel and Kirklands. Bought a bucket of 350 used balls which had a majority of Srixon Soft Feels in there. I decided to give the Soft Feels a try and have really been enjoying them quite a bit. Only yesterday did I hit a Pro V1 for the first time and it felt quite nice. However, that all being said, I have to admit, I've played my best overall with Vice Pro Plus balls. I get the most distance from these balls and am able to hit them quite well. I am not sure on green side spin/grip, I think I'd prefer them to check up a bit more. But I believe one really big factor for me with these balls is that I usually club down when hitting them because I gain so much distance off of them and I also tend to bring my swing speed down which causes me to have a more accurate swing and ball strike. As opposed to trying to whack the snot out of the ball each time, which ends up in a slice 75% of the time. I do love testing out new balls though, sound and feel is always fun to experience.
    • I am in the same boat, I'd love to test a LAB OZ but nobody here has them either and I've never seen one played on any courses I've been on. Nor can I afford/commit to blindly buy something at this price and not know how it works for me. I've been playing a cheapy $60 Wilson Harmonized M1 for a long time and was looking at new putters but the price of a new putter is really off-putting. Thankfully I played in a tournament in November and ended up winning a brand new Taylormade TR B31. Will probably be playing this for a few years until I get to try something like the LAB OZ and once it's been discounted if I like it.
    • Day 92 - 2024-12-31 Feel like crap, but stayed after lessons and hit about 30 to 35 golf balls just focusing on the backswing stuff. I'm going to do some HackMotion measurements soon and go from there. If the backswing stuff is good, I'll begin working on the downswing, with check-ins. If not, I'll spend another week or two.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...