Jump to content
IGNORED

A Brief Word on Staying on Topic and Moderation of OT Posts


Note: This thread is 3682 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

From time to time, a small minority of people will complain about a thread going off topic and being "moderated."

Keeping threads fairly strictly on topic is and always has been a goal of this forum. There are a number of reasons for this, but among the top:

  • Threads kept on topic (and with good thread titles) perform better in SEO  (both externally and when using our own search engine on the site). This benefits anyone who wants to search (here or on Google, Bing, etc.) to find information. Someone who searches is more likely to stick around and contribute if they find the information they seek.
  • Better "SEO" also benefits members in other ways: you are more likely to know what a thread is about by looking at the title or reading any post. If you search for "X" and the discussion is three posts about X and then 39 posts about Y, Z, Q, and L, that's not benefitting anyone.
  • It's better for organizing the information on this site. If you want to look up a previous discussion, or quote something from another thread, it makes it easier to find and remember the location of it when the comment came in the discussion in which you expect it - not when a comment about Q was in a discussion on X.
  • It cuts down on the number of personal attacks and stops people from bringing up old stuff. If Person B dislikes Person A because of a discussion from a month ago, it's likely off topic for Person B to mention how stupid they thought Person A behaved in a new thread. We can't completely stop people from liking and disliking others, but this helps keep it to a minimum.

There are other smaller ones, but those are the big ones. Also, we care quite a bit more about keeping things "on-topic" in the golf-related threads (particularly the instructional threads), than we do in other, slightly more fringe-related threads (though given people's sensitivity to politics, racism, etc. we will strive to keep a non-political, non-golf thread from devolving into a political discussion).

While it's easy to understand why this policy of fairly strict tolerance to keeping discussions on topic can be frustrating the first time you encounter it - particularly if you're new to the site - a great many of the members, particularly the long-time members, appreciate that this forum maintains this policy, likely for the advantages listed above.

I've been on other forums. Often many quickly devolve into discussions about something else entirely. Even when I'm not a member, I'll search for a topic, find a thread on a forum with a promising thread title, and find out that by the fifth post everyone's talking about something else entirely. That doesn't make the forum look good.

If you find yourself wanting to discuss an off-topic thing, the simple solution is this: start a new thread with the new topic . You can even "quote" a post in the original thread, copy it from the reply box, and paste it in to the new thread to kick things off. Also, we know we aren't perfect. We strive to be, but we're human in the end. You catch more flies with honey, as they say, but the truth is we don't even need honey - if you feel a topic has been wrongly labeled as "off topic," send a PM to myself or @mvmac and tell us why, logically, it should be allowed.

I have no good way to end this, having said all I think I need to say on this. Executive summary: we are somewhat strict about keeping discussions on-topic, for what we feel are good reasons, and over time the majority of people come to appreciate and welcome it. Many have told us this is the best moderated forum out there (and a good many of those people have had disagreements with myself, Mike, or other long-time forum members).


The end. :-D

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Been a member of many sites from golf to fishin and this one does the best job of staying on topic. I seen a bunch of people get their panties in a wad when they are told their posts are off topic-START A NEW THREAD. Simple solution. Common sense aint so common though these days.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

One of the great things about staying on topic can be seen in the instructional threads. Each thread you can cut and paste the whole thing, archive for later reading and acts as sort of a like a chapter in an instruction book because the thread doesn't veer.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Count me in as a member who appreciates the "on-topic" moderation.

For those who disagree, try reading some other forums sometime when you are actually looking for something specific.

Again, like has been said, there is a very simple solution.  Nothing wrong with starting a new thread.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Overall I think we do a good job on keeping things on topic.  In most golf related threads it's pretty easy to see what the topic is and keep it on topic.

In threads like Bishop getting fired, there are potential tangents to the main topic that relate to the OP but need to be monitored.  For example, social media, political correctness and Bishop's past actions as President of the PGA are all relative to the topics discussion so it becomes a bit more challenging to know what is and what isn't on topic.  I made a post there in response to someone else that I felt was a bit too off topic and labeled it as such but noticed the Off Topic was removed.

I think to avoid there being too many threads that are all inter-related to the same original topic the moderators could be more involved in directing us when to create a new thread if we're strayed too far from the OP.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Thanks for posting @iacas . You brought up a lot of good points. Members appreciate keeping things on topic and it's how we run a well-organized forum.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yea, this thread needed to be made.

And you've been linked to this thread and had something removed, don't take it personally. We've all had off-topic posts removed, myself included. It happens. Cheers. :beer:

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yea, this thread needed to be made. And you've been linked to this thread and had something removed, don't take it personally. We've all had off-topic posts removed, myself included. It happens. Cheers. :beer:

I had an off-topic post removed from THIS thread. :-P But I'm an asshat so it doesn't really count.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this is a very good topic.

I have to say that one thing that peeves me regarding thread titles is when someone starts a thread with a  title like "Never saw this coming" when what they should have called it was "Moving from stiff to regular shafts" or something along those lines.

I hate the idea that people are supposed to be intrigued by a title and have to click on it to find out what it's about. Make it clear what you want to discuss and you'll get more meaningful replies and more people will actually read it.

For the record - I have found the moderation on this site very even handed and fair. In fact, I think the moderators are quite lenient.

Some people probably get away with more than they should and the people complaining almost always are moderated for getting overly personal and moving away from the topic.

I have ruffled feathers more than once and have NEVER been treated unfairly. So moderators...moderate away. :-) And change thread titles, please. :-*

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


I had an off-topic post removed from THIS thread.

That's actually quite impressive! :-D

(Darn, now I'm OT. :doh: )

Chris.:roll:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have to say that one thing that peeves me regarding thread titles is when someone starts a thread with a  title like "Never saw this coming" when what they should have called it was "Moving from stiff to regular shafts" or something along those lines.

I hate the idea that people are supposed to be intrigued by a title and have to click on it to find out what it's about. Make it clear what you want to discuss and you'll get more meaningful replies and more people will actually read it.

I'm with you all the way on this one! I also don't care for the partial sentence lead ins like, "Hey, waddya all think of..." and then you open it and the sentence continues, "...Big Bertha's new lofts." Just tell me what the damn thread's about so I can make an informed decision of whether or not I want to read it.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Shorty said:

I have to say that one thing that peeves me regarding thread titles is when someone starts a thread with a  title like "Never saw this coming" when what they should have called it was "Moving from stiff to regular shafts" or something along those lines.

I hate the idea that people are supposed to be intrigued by a title and have to click on it to find out what it's about. Make it clear what you want to discuss and you'll get more meaningful replies and more people will actually read it.

Here you go:

 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this is a very good topic.  I have to say that one thing that peeves me regarding thread titles is when someone starts a thread with a  title like "Never saw this coming" when what they should have called it was "Moving from stiff to regular shafts" or something along those lines.

If I see a thread title on a brand new thread that's particularly bad, I'll change it, but we don't want to change a title after it's taken off a bit because the thread could get hard to find. I get what you're saying though. It's a balancing act.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3682 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...