Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4209 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Chess is not a sport. It is a game.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would say that portions of the game are intellectually solvable. The game management portion. I think it is spelled out fairly clearly in LSW.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I would say that portions of the game are intellectually solvable. The game management portion. I think it is spelled out fairly clearly in LSW.

Sure, but you still have to swing the club. That's THE most important aspect of golf.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Intellect uses the mind. With that, anyone who uses intelligence (thought and reason) in either a professional , or  amateur manner can be considered an intellectual . I would say that the professionals on this web site are considered intellectuals, more so than the amateurs who are looking for answers.

Since intelligence uses thought and reasoning, it would seem to me to solve any problem, a person would need intelligence.

Pretty sure that's what I think anyways. I guess.

I'd hate to try to swing a golf club with out my intelligence telling my muscles, and bones what to do.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Intellect uses the mind. With that, anyone who uses intelligence (thought and reason) in either a professional, or  amateur manner can be considered an intellectual. I would say that the professionals on this web site are considered intellectuals, more so than the amateurs who are looking for answers.

Since intelligence uses thought and reasoning, it would seem to me to solve any problem, a person would need intelligence.

Pretty sure that's what I think anyways. I guess.

I'd hate to try to swing a golf club with out my intelligence telling my muscles, and bones what to do.

I suppose, but

We all knew what was meant by the title "Golf Is Not Intellectually Solvable".  Even if one didn't the 1st post clearly states the intention of the thread.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

We all knew what was meant by the title "Golf Is Not Intellectually Solvable".  Even if one didn't the 1st post clearly states the intention of the thread.


I agree.

Plus: :-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Golf appeals to intellectual people more than other sports. On its face, it appears to be a game that you can conquer with brain power.

Blame the mystique of Golf: country club culture, wealthy Americans that wanted to pretend that Golf was different than other, brutish sports like boxing or baseball that a gentleman would never engage in.

The focus on mechanics obscures the athleticism of the golf swing.  Especially because so much of the mechanics of the golf swing are dependent on a persons physical ability, in some cases physical abilities that may be extraordinary.


Posted

Blame the mystique of Golf: country club culture, wealthy Americans that wanted to pretend that Golf was different than other, brutish sports like boxing or baseball that a gentleman would never engage in.

The focus on mechanics obscures the athleticism of the golf swing.  Especially because so much of the mechanics of the golf swing are dependent on a persons physical ability, in some cases physical abilities that may be extraordinary.

Never thought of baseball as brutish.  There's quite a lot of science behind baseball but like golf requires athleticism as well.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by iacas

Golf appeals to intellectual people more than other sports. On its face, it appears to be a game that you can conquer with brain power.

Blame the mystique of Golf: country club culture, wealthy Americans that wanted to pretend that Golf was different than other, brutish sports like boxing or baseball that a gentleman would never engage in.

The focus on mechanics obscures the athleticism of the golf swing.  Especially because so much of the mechanics of the golf swing are dependent on a persons physical ability, in some cases physical abilities that may be extraordinary.

On the other hand, I thought golf appealed to the 1% because of the exclusivity and making business deals aspect. The people who wrote the most "intellectual" tomes on golf came from modest backgrounds - Homer Kelley, Mac O'Grady (well, wrote but not so much published), Chris Como, masters candidate and in the eyes of the media, biomechanics man himself said he came from a modest background.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Never thought of baseball as brutish.  There's quite a lot of science behind baseball but like golf requires athleticism as well.

Well, I guess I should put "brutish" in quotes, as its not necessarily something I agree with.  But I still do feel the class-based prejudices play into the perception that golf is different fundamentally from other sports, that it doesn't have the same sort of basic prerequisites to play well as other sports, such as baseball.


  • Moderator
Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by newtogolf

Never thought of baseball as brutish.  There's quite a lot of science behind baseball but like golf requires athleticism as well.

Well, I guess I should put "brutish" in quotes, as its not necessarily something I agree with.  But I still do feel the class-based prejudices play into the perception that golf is different fundamentally from other sports, that it doesn't have the same sort of basic prerequisites to play well as other sports, such as baseball.

Yacht racing, polo, equestrian, skiing to an extent, yes. Golf in the US and UK is affordable to a wider breadth of demographic. But the former, you need a hefty lump sum and or connections to participate. I think it's a misnomer that golf is mostly a 1% activity because all you need is a course, a couple clubs and some balls and these are not major barriers to entry costwise. While the course may be in pretty bad condition, at least you're playing. Most people aren't going to be able to afford an entry level yacht or keep a horse or fly to the Alps.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Blame the mystique of Golf: country club culture, wealthy Americans that wanted to pretend that Golf was different than other, brutish sports like boxing or baseball that a gentleman would never engage in.

I nearly completely disagree.

I think people, such as yourself, see it as intellectually solvable because it's one of the few solitary sports. It's just you and the ball… there is no offense or defense, nobody else to consider. I think people have attempted to "solve" golf intellectually for quite a long time.

The point of the post is that people will rarely or only very very slowly get better at golf the way you've been approaching it: hopping from swing method to swing method, trying "the Moe Norman swing" and then "the Don Trahan swing" and then such-and-such other guy's swing. The golf swing is an athletic move, not an intellectual one. There is no magic bullet, and just because you understand how, why, and what you are supposed to DO, you still have to actually TRAIN your body to DO those things.

Intellect is not a help in the golf swing.

The focus on mechanics obscures the athleticism of the golf swing.  Especially because so much of the mechanics of the golf swing are dependent on a persons physical ability, in some cases physical abilities that may be extraordinary.

I think the opposite is more true: the point of mechanics is to allow a golfer to properly express his athleticism.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I think people, such as yourself, see it as intellectually solvable because it's one of the few solitary sports. It's just you and the ball… there is no offense or defense, nobody else to consider. I think people have attempted to "solve" golf intellectually for quite a long time.

I started a draft that pretty much said this. In golf, the golfer is theoretically capable of accounting for all the possible variables, so if he makes a mistake, it's on him. People try to think their way through a golf shot and forget that there's an athletic component involved. I also think a lot has to do with the emphasis on the mental game and course management, too. People believe they can think their way through this game because that's what they've been taught over the years. There are a lot of field disciplines that are similar to golf (javelin throw comes to mind), yet people don't approach them the same as they do for golf.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4209 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.