Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Who would the media prefer to take over Tiger's mantle?


Note: This thread is 3770 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rory

Jordan

Rickie

Another African American

A homosexual golfer

A ladyboy

A transvestite.

Which one would would profit the media most?

:-D


Posted

The ultimate candidate would be an illegal immigrant, single mother, lesbian with a degree from one of the boutique women's schools like Vassar or Wellesley.

Or Rory.  Speith is too Texan.

Occam's razor


Posted

Any golfer who could win a lot, and more importantly have some what of a bizarre private life. Skeletons in a closet sells by today's media standards.

A pro could win  could win 20 majors, and unless he went through a divorce or two, was caught in a public embarrassment, he would not otherwise be that newsworthy by the majority of today's sports journalists.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There is no one like Tiger ...

Realistically, a more consistent Fowler, McIlroy, Day

and the recently always reliable Spieth.

And some bad boys like Patrick Reed and Bubba Watson.

It takes a village when you have no Tiger.

If you can throw in a consistently good, multi-cultural athlete with an engaging personality, that would be even better.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think the media is falling in love with Spieth a little bit. If he can keep it going, I think you'll see it continue to rise. Too early yet to say he's gonna get the Tiger ratings and love, but he's off to a good start. Winning majors, showing emotion, showing class and consistently being in there on Sunday is a huge part of the recipe. He has all those so far. What made Tiger though isn't just the fact he was a minority, it was that people were looking for the next great one at the time and threw their weight behind him and rightly so. He followed it up and impressed like no other. It's kinda early after the Tiger era to look for a next great one. If Spieth came along 25 years from now the hype would be 10 times higher.

Posted
No one. Definitely not Spieth, Spieth is a great golfer but has NO WHERE near the appeal TW does. Nobody does and nobody will.

Riley


Posted

The ultimate candidate would be an illegal immigrant, single mother, lesbian with a degree from one of the boutique women's schools like Vassar or Wellesley.

Tru Dat


Posted

The media would benefit most from whoever is most controversial and constantly does things to grab media attention.  I'm sure they'd love a gay, transgendered African American who emigrated here illegally, has a bad attitude, criminal tendencies and a drinking/drug problem.  Maybe something like a cross between Madonna and Dennis Rodman in their primes. :-$

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

The ultimate candidate would be an illegal immigrant, single mother, lesbian with a degree from one of the boutique women's schools like Vassar or Wellesley.


Vassar has been co-ed for quite awhile. Since we landed on the moon, IIRC.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Tiger was a prodigy and his relationship with the media started at a very early age.  No one on Tour now has even close to that background story, though Rory probably is the closest of all in terms of the whole background story about how young he was when he started swinging golf clubs.

Jordan is on his media honeymoon but unless he dominates I don't think he'll last because there's nothing to write about.  He'd not intimidating, he's not controversial, he's white and he seems to get along well with everyone, which seem to be the same problems Rory has.

If Reed could get his act together he could become a media favorite because he plays a good "heel".  He dares to wear Tigers colors on Sunday, was a bad boy in college and says dumb things on the course that makes headlines.  He seems to have something to prove and if he gets his game back he could be the "bad guy" who competes with Rory and Jordan.

DJ has some potential, he's got the sordid past, newsworthy wife, famous father in law and he hits the ball a ton which gives him an edge.  I get the impression he isn't well liked on the Tour and doesn't seem to mind as he's more focused on winning than making friends.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Rory

Jordan

Rickie

Another African American

A homosexual golfer

A ladyboy

A transvestite.

Which one would would profit the media most?

i guess i'm not really following you. in the media's case, imo, the tail wags the dog, so if a golfer doesn't continue to be a dominant sportsman, the media will go elsewhere.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scotsclaff

Rory

Jordan

Rickie

Another African American

A homosexual golfer

A ladyboy

A transvestite.

Which one would would profit the media most?

i guess i'm not really following you. in the media's case, imo, the tail wags the dog, so if a golfer doesn't continue to be a dominant sportsman, the media will go elsewhere.

Not if there are other aspects of that person which command media attention.  Woods is nowhere near dominant right now, yet the media follows virtually his every move.  He can be in dead last and missing the cut and the media will still cut away from the tournament leaders to show him shanking a 7-iron into a bunker.  The media covers whatever gets them the most viewership, readership or web clicks.

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

i dont think there is 1 person that could take over Tiger's mantle......

But there are several guys who can keep golf very interesting for a long time..... and who are in the running to win a major or any of the bigger tournaments anytime they play.....

i think these guys will keep it interesting in golf, not cuz they have a feud or anything.... but how the media will make it seem that way

Jason Day

Jordan Speith

Rory

DJ

Rickie

Keegan

and even some of the middle of the road guys who can get hot for a month always keep it interesting.......

It is what it is

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not if there are other aspects of that person which command media attention.  Woods is nowhere near dominant right now, yet the media follows virtually his every move.  He can be in dead last and missing the cut and the media will still cut away from the tournament leaders to show him shanking a 7-iron into a bunker.  The media covers whatever gets them the most viewership, readership or web clicks.

I guess I didn't make myself entirely clear...I didn't mean Tiger per se as he has already established himself as a dominant figure. The OP was looking for someone other than Tiger to replace him. If there isn't a person, its no sweat off of the media's back...they'll find it in another sport if it materializes.


Note: This thread is 3770 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.