Jump to content
IGNORED

Stubbornness or lack of research?: "Drive for Show, Putt for Dough"


Vinsk
Note: This thread is 2962 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Mike Boatright said:

 Take a look at this video this dude has a great swing and could dominate the pga tour with a hybrid of the tee! He hit's his hybrid very straight 340 yards or more.

Don't get me wrong. His skill with a club is very impressive. However, the economic concept of a rational agent implies if he could dominate the PGA tour, he would be already since the financial rewards are far greater than long drive. @Lihu beat me to it.

Pro golf takes both well above average length and accuracy (or at least top notch recovery ability to compensate). Distance is great for scoring, but off line is more costly to scoring than I think you estimate. Tony Finau has above average length for the tour, but is still working his way to the winner's podium on the tour.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
4 hours ago, Lihu said:

This sums it up for me. Approach shots are left out, but I like the idea.

Maybe "Putt for dough, approach to go low, drive to play." ??? :-D

What? C'mon @Lihu.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 hours ago, Lihu said:

If he could dominate the tour, he would be dominating the tour. ;-)

Not necessarily sometimes long drive guys get sponsor money and enjoy life as it is vs the pga tour grind. The money is so good on the pga tour that I would think about it if I were him. Just tee of with irons and hybrids and master 9 irons and sw He could hit it 360 with a normal driver on open par 5' and hit in with a 7 iron.

9 hours ago, natureboy said:

Pro golf takes both well above average length and accuracy (or at least top notch recovery ability to compensate). Distance is great for scoring, but off line is more costly to scoring than I think you estimate. Tony Finau has above average length for the tour, but is still working his way to the winner's podium on the tour.

I agree Finau has very good power and it's big advantage. However doesn't it seem that when you have so much power that invetiably you could be the most accurate player? This dude could tee of wit a 4 hybrid swing easy hit it 312 yards and be 88% fairway kinda guy basically the tour leader. I mean what else can you say from there maybe this guy can't chip,maybe?

Edited by Mike Boatright
Link to comment
Share on other sites


11 hours ago, Lihu said:

This sums it up for me. Approach shots are left out, but I like the idea.

Maybe "Putt for dough, approach to go low, drive to play." ??? :-D

Yep! That could be so true. It's all important. We keep agruing what is more important .... I would submit that it is all important, though the full string is the first step. 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

56 minutes ago, Mike Boatright said:

Not necessarily sometimes long drive guys get sponsor money and enjoy life as it is vs the pga tour grind. The money is so good on the pga tour that I would think about it if I were him. Just tee of with irons and hybrids and master 9 irons and sw He could hit it 360 with a normal driver on open par 5' and hit in with a 7 iron.

Most if not all the tour players can probably blast long drives, and roll a 7i to 200 yards. They're a lot stronger than you seem to think?

They hit really far and put a ton of spin on the ball.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Most if not all the tour players can probably blast long drives, and roll a 7i to 200 yards. They're a lot stronger than you seem to think?

They hit really far and put a ton of spin on the ball.

Some em but not the majority. Players Like Zach Johnson is a good example he is just a good golfer.  DJ no doubt he could hit his 7 iron 220. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, Mike Boatright said:

Some em but not the majority. Players Like Zach Johnson is a good example he is just a good golfer.  DJ no doubt he could hit his 7 iron 220. 

I would say much more than half. Their focus is to play well between 7000-8100 yard courses.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OK, I am new here, so I will ask what the heck is LSW? I tried hovering the cursor on it, and it didn't turn into the little hand, so it's not a link.

I do find Player's comments a little off, since he can still hit it 260-270 at his age! Obviously all parts of the game are important. No better example exists than Ben Hogan wanting to eliminate putting from the game late in his life. He wanted to play "fairways and closest to the pin"! He couldn't imagine a 2 foot putt being as "important" as a 280 yard drive!

But I like Hank Haney's comments on distance. His contention is that golf is a distance game, which it is. Long hitters who can keep it in play have always had an advantage. It's like tall guys in basketball. The operative phrase is, of course, keep it in play. Haney maintained that for every 1mph you could increase your clubhead speed, you'd gain 2 yards. So, if you could increase your clubhead speed by 5mph, you would gain 10 yards. If you hit 40 full shots per round, and hit them all 10 yards longer, that's a gain of 400 yards. So, you're shortening the course by 400 yards, which is significant!

And I also laughed when the powers that be started lengthening courses to deal with the long hitters. Specifically Augusta "Tiger proofing" their course. They didn't seem to realize that no matter how long they stretched it out, the long hitters would still have shorter approach shots than their less powerful brethren.

Distance good! Short bad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, Buckeyebowman said:

OK, I am new here, so I will ask what the heck is LSW? I tried hovering the cursor on it, and it didn't turn into the little hand, so it's not a link.

LSW is the acronym  for Lowest Score Wins.  Its a book written by the guy who owns the site.

Lowest Score Wins

Driver - Cleveland CG Black 265
Fairway Wood - Adams Tight Lies 16 Degrees
Hybrids - 18 and 20 Degrees Adams Pro
Irons - 4-PW Adams XTD
Wedges - 52 and 56 degree Cleavland CG16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
8 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

OK, I am new here, so I will ask what the heck is LSW? I tried hovering the cursor on it, and it didn't turn into the little hand, so it's not a link.

I do find Player's comments a little off, since he can still hit it 260-270 at his age! Obviously all parts of the game are important. No better example exists than Ben Hogan wanting to eliminate putting from the game late in his life. He wanted to play "fairways and closest to the pin"! He couldn't imagine a 2 foot putt being as "important" as a 280 yard drive!

But I like Hank Haney's comments on distance. His contention is that golf is a distance game, which it is. Long hitters who can keep it in play have always had an advantage. It's like tall guys in basketball. The operative phrase is, of course, keep it in play. Haney maintained that for every 1mph you could increase your clubhead speed, you'd gain 2 yards. So, if you could increase your clubhead speed by 5mph, you would gain 10 yards. If you hit 40 full shots per round, and hit them all 10 yards longer, that's a gain of 400 yards. So, you're shortening the course by 400 yards, which is significant!

And I also laughed when the powers that be started lengthening courses to deal with the long hitters. Specifically Augusta "Tiger proofing" their course. They didn't seem to realize that no matter how long they stretched it out, the long hitters would still have shorter approach shots than their less powerful brethren.

Distance good! Short bad!

 

8 hours ago, baller7345 said:

LSW is the acronym  for Lowest Score Wins.  Its a book written by the guy who owns the site.

Lowest Score Wins

Lowest Score Wins is an excellent book. I highly recommend it. I think it is especially good for players in our handicap range. We have half way decent swings and play OK. But there are gaps in our games that hold us back. Lowest Score Wins teaches us what to focus our practice on and also how to game plan our play to lower our scores. 

Check it out. You will not regret it.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
14 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

OK, I am new here, so I will ask what the heck is LSW? I tried hovering the cursor on it, and it didn't turn into the little hand, so it's not a link.

You hover your cursor over it and it appears in a title tag:

Screen Shot 2016-03-27 at 2.09.27 PM.png

:-)

14 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

He couldn't imagine a 2 foot putt being as "important" as a 280 yard drive!

A two-foot putt is not as important as a 280-yard drive. Yes, they both count as one stroke, but people don't regularly miss two-footers, yet they almost never hit it 280. Read this:

Note, too, that while we agree with distance being important, when people here talk about "the long game" they're just talking about "the full swing." Not distance solely.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Distance is very important... Putting has some Separation Value, but Approach Shots, and Driving are more important...

You obviously don't want to be in the woods off the tee or bring penalty strokes into the equation... But you always want to advance the ball as far as you can SAFELY. Circumstances could require you to be more aggresive in certain situations, but for the most part, advancing safely is key...

Consistent 300-yard drives down the middle or in a safe location,  will gain you more strokes than making 20% of your 15 footers. Because if your not getting a high percentage of GIR/nGIR you won't score, putting is a relatively simple motion anyway.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

And I also laughed when the powers that be started lengthening courses to deal with the long hitters. Specifically Augusta "Tiger proofing" their course. They didn't seem to realize that no matter how long they stretched it out, the long hitters would still have shorter approach shots than their less powerful brethren.

'Tiger-Proofing' was a media hype phrase. Augusta was just trying to catch up to the big distance gains for all the field from ~ 1995-2005 due to club and ball tech. The same average lengthening has been going on with courses in the U.S. Open and PGA Championship rotation..

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 3/27/2016 at 8:38 PM, Mike Boatright said:

Not necessarily sometimes long drive guys get sponsor money and enjoy life as it is vs the pga tour grind. The money is so good on the pga tour that I would think about it if I were him.

Seriously? You're telling me if he could literally 'dominate' on the PGA tour - say win 5 tournaments in a year and take the Fedex bonus that they wouldn't try at least a year of 'the grind' because they are 'all set' with their long drive sponsorship? Have you heard of 'The Fox and the Grapes'? Not to mention the potential endorsement opportunities that would present themselves.

The distance these guys hit is impressive. But even with the accuracy and consistency (very undervalued aspect) of an average PGA player, the average shot dispersion for long drive guy will still be wider than a PGA pro in absolute terms (yards from center of fairway) just from their extra distance. Given that fairways tends to be a certain maximum width, I think that can hurt their scoring more severely than you are accounting for. If the green / around green targets are all huge and they are really good at lag putting and partial wedges it might be eagles and birdies galore.

<why didn't this merge?>

Edited by natureboy

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


7 hours ago, iacas said:

You hover your cursor over it and it appears in a title tag:

Screen Shot 2016-03-27 at 2.09.27 PM.png

:-)

A two-foot putt is not as important as a 280-yard drive. Yes, they both count as one stroke, but people don't regularly miss two-footers, yet they almost never hit it 280.

I understand. That's why I put the word "important" in quotation marks. Maybe I should have used a different phrase like "count as much as". I read that article a long time ago and can't remember exactly how it was worded.

Lowest Score Wins brought up a distant memory and gave me a little chuckle. When I was first showing an interest in the game my Dad and the next door neighbor would let me tag along when they played. I'd pull my Dad's cart and keep the scorecard. The first time out, after the front nine I proudly informed my Dad that he was winning! He had 43 and Mr. Ross had 39! My Dad just grinned his little grin and told me that in golf, the player with the lowest score wins! Oops!

29 minutes ago, natureboy said:

'Tiger-Proofing' was a media hype phrase. Augusta was just trying to catch up to the big distance gains for all the field from ~ 1995-2005 due to club and ball tech. The same average lengthening has been going on with courses in the U.S. Open and PGA Championship rotation..

Well, a lot of hype was certainly generated around Tiger, and with good reason. We went to the WGC Bridgestone in Akron last year, and I watched guys like Dustin Johnson, Rickie Fowler and Bubba hit drives that boggled my mind! I also got to see Nicklaus in his prime and he was certainly long, but a lot of guys are just hitting it stupid distances these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 minutes ago, natureboy said:

Seriously? You're telling me if he could literally 'dominate' on the PGA tour - say win 5 tournaments in a year and take the Fedex bonus that they wouldn't try at least a year of 'the grind' because they are 'all set' with their long drive sponsorship? Have you heard of 'The Fox and the Grapes'? Not to mention the potential endorsement opportunities that would present themselves.

The distance these guys hit is impressive. But even with the accuracy and consistency (very undervalued aspect) of an average PGA player, the average shot dispersion for long drive guy will still be wider than a PGA pro in absolute terms (yards from center of fairway) just from their extra distance. Given that fairways tends to be a certain maximum width, I think that can hurt their scoring more severely than you are accounting for. If the green / around green targets are all huge and they are really good at lag putting and partial wedges it might be eagles and birdies galore.

<why didn't this merge?>

Well maybe he doesn't want to ask him. You apparently not getting it? I think because he can hit hit 295 yards + with a baby hybrid all day then he could be the most consistent player on the pga tour. in terms of fairways and up there in gir. Who knows with a little training maybe he'd just be another Dustin Johnson.

Edited by Mike Boatright
Link to comment
Share on other sites


13 minutes ago, Mike Boatright said:

Well maybe he doesn't want to ask him. You apparently not getting it? I think because he can hit hit 295 yards + with a baby hybrid all day then he could be the most consistent player on the pga tour. in terms of fairways and up there in gir. Who knows with a little training maybe he'd just be another Dustin Johnson.

That's assuming he's as accurate with his hybrid as the average PGA pro with driver. He could hit  a hundred hybrids with a Trackman and easily measure that.

I'm guessing he isn't or he'd be on tour easily doubling his current money. Distance is a bit more important than accuracy for lower scoring, but they both matter. A PGA pro is both much more accurate, consistent, and longer than a scratch player. The average size of the playing field is very relevant to extremely long hitters and scoring.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

@Buckeyebowman  I just wrote that article a day or two ago so I don't know that you read it a while ago. :-)

13 minutes ago, Mike Boatright said:

Well maybe he doesn't want to ask him. You apparently not getting it? I think because he can hit hit 295 yards + with a baby hybrid all day then he could be the most consistent player on the pga tour. in terms of fairways and up there in gir. Who knows with a little training maybe he'd just be another Dustin Johnson.

If he could be would. It's that simple.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2962 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I was pondering a repeatable golf swing beings I am a beginner, and a lot of things have presented themselves in bad ways.  I am mainly speaking irons here.  The thing about golf is the ball is still, but the golfer is also standing over the ball.  Are we saying that each time I hit the ball, my spine angle, lead arm, trail arm, wrists, etc. have to be just about exact to have a repeatable golf swing?  This is already a "funky" position to be in, and a "funky" move to make.  The golf swing is more of a body swing (in my mind).  The ball is small and the sweet spot is small.  I just feel defeated in the fact that I need to bend over the ball the same way every time, same knee bend, same swing arc, and hit a small ball with a small sweet spot.  When I watch club fittings on YouTube, these guys are swinging about the same speed within 1 mph or so. Their Trackman numbers are pretty identical even in 10-20 swings.  I am just trying to make sure that this is the main summary of what needs to be done.  As a beginner, how did you all think through the process to make the swing repeatable?  Much appreciated.
    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...